Irish Rebellion of 1641

Irish Rebellion of 1641
Part of the Eleven Years' War
Date23 October 1641 – May 1642
(7 months)
Result Founding of the Irish Catholic Confederation and beginning of the Confederate War
Irish Catholics  Kingdom of England
Kingdom of Ireland
Scottish Covenanters
Protestant colonists
Commanders and leaders
Felim O'Neill,
Rory O'Moore,
Donough MacCarty,
Connor Maguire and others
William St Leger,
James Butler,
Charles Coote,
Robert Monro (Covenanters)
? ?
Casualties and losses
? ?

The Irish Rebellion of 1641 (Irish: Éirí Amach 1641) began as an attempted coup d'état by Irish Catholic gentry, who tried to seize control of the English administration in Ireland to force concessions for Catholics. The coup failed and the rebellion developed into an ethnic conflict between native Irish Catholics on one side, and English and Scottish Protestant settlers on the other. This began a conflict known as the Irish Confederate Wars.

The rising was sparked by Catholic fears of an impending invasion of Ireland by anti-Catholic forces of the English Long Parliament and the Scottish Covenanters, who were defying the authority of King Charles I (king of England, Scotland, and Ireland). In turn, the rebels' suspected association with Charles helped start the English Civil War. The English and Scottish Parliaments refused to raise an army to put down the rebellion unless it was under their command rather than the King's.

The Irish rebellion broke out in October 1641 and was followed by several months of violent chaos before the Irish Catholic upper classes and clergy formed the Catholic Confederation in the summer of 1642. The Confederation became a de facto government of most of Ireland, free from the control of the English administration and loosely aligned with the Royalist side in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms. The subsequent Irish Confederate Wars continued in Ireland until the 1650s, when Oliver Cromwell's New Model Army decisively defeated the Irish Catholics and Royalists, and re-conquered the country.


The roots of the 1641 rebellion lay in the failure of the English State in Ireland to assimilate the native Irish elite in the wake of the Elizabethan conquest and plantation of the country. The pre-Elizabethan Irish population is usually divided into the "Old (or Gaelic) Irish", and the Old English, or descendants of medieval Norman settlers. These groups were historically antagonistic, with English settled areas such as the Pale around Dublin, south Wexford, and other walled towns being fortified against the rural Gaelic clans.[1]

By the seventeenth century, the cultural divide between these groups, especially at elite social levels, was declining. Many English lords not only spoke the Irish language, but extensively patronised Irish poetry and music, and have been described as Hiberniores Hibernis ipsis ("More Irish than the Irish themselves"). Intermarriage was also common. Moreover, in the wake of the Elizabethan conquest, the native population became defined by their shared religion, Roman Catholicism, in distinction to the new Church of England and Church of Scotland of settlers, and the officially Protestant (Church of Ireland) English administration in Ireland. During the decades between the end of the Elizabethan wars of re-conquest in 1603 and the outbreak of rebellion in 1641, the political position of the wealthier landed Irish Catholics was increasingly threatened by the English government of Ireland.[2]


The 16th and early 17th century English conquest of Ireland was marked by large scale confiscation and colonisation of land, known as the "Plantations", notably in Ulster and Munster. These were mass dispossessions of Irish landowners who had rebelled against the crown, and sometimes their workers, and the granting of their land to colonists from England and Scotland. The terms of the Plantation, particularly in Ulster, were very harsh on the native population, who were forbidden from owning or renting land in planted areas and also from working there on land owned by settlers. The main effect of this was the dispossession of formerly powerful Irish clan leaders, such as the O'Neills and the O'Donnells, who fled the country in the Flight of the Earls in 1607. Other Catholic lords, such as the Magennis clan in County Down, sold much of their land to new settlers by the 1630s.

Many of the exiles (notably Owen Roe O'Neill) found service as mercenaries in the Catholic armies of Spain and France. They formed a small émigré Irish community, militantly hostile to the English-run and Protestant state in Ireland, but restrained by the generally good relations between England and Spain and France after 1604. In Ireland itself, though the resentment caused by the plantations was one of the principal causes for the outbreak and spread of the rebellion. In 1641 60% of land still belonged to Catholics.[3]


Most of the Irish Catholic upper classes were not ideologically opposed to the sovereignty of Charles I over Ireland, but wanted to be full subjects of the triple monarchy (England, Scotland, and Ireland) and maintain their pre-eminent position in Irish society. This was prevented by two factors, firstly their religious dissidence, and secondly the threat posed to them by the extension of the Plantations. The failed Gunpowder Plot of 1605 curtailed the rights of wealthy Irish Catholics, who had not been involved in the plot.

Anglicanism was the only approved form of worship of the Three Kingdoms. Non-attendance at Protestant church services was punishable by recusant fines and the public practice of unapproved faiths by arrest. Catholics could not hold senior offices of state, or serve above a certain rank in the army. The Irish privy council was dominated by English Protestants. The constituencies of the Irish House of Commons were increased, giving Protestants a majority of 108–102 in it, from the session of 1613. The Irish House of Lords still had a considerable Catholic majority that enabled it to block most, but not all, unwelcome draft legislation.

Moreover, the Irish Parliament's legislation had to be approved by the English Parliament under a 15th-century ordinance known as Poynings' Law. The Protestant (and therefore settler) dominated administration took opportunities to confiscate more land from longstanding landowners.[4]

In response, the Irish Catholic upper classes sought what were called The Graces, and appealed directly to the King, first James I and then Charles I, for full rights as subjects and toleration of their religion. On several occasions, the Monarchs appeared to have reached an agreement with them, granting their demands in return for raising taxes. Irish Catholics were disappointed when, on paying the increased levies after 1630, Charles postponed the implementation of their last two demands until mid-1641.[5] In the late 1630s Thomas Wentworth, the Lord Deputy of Ireland, proposed a new round of plantations,[6] though these had not been implemented by 1641.

On the pretext of checking of land titles to raise revenue, Wentworth confiscated and was going to plant lands in Roscommon and Sligo and was planning further plantations in Galway and Kilkenny directed mainly at the "Old English" families.[7] In the judgement of historian Padraig Lenihan, 'It is likely that he [Wentworth] would have eventually encountered armed resistance from Catholic landowners' if he had pursued these policies further.[8] However, the actual rebellion followed the destabilisation of English and Scottish politics and the weakened position of the king in 1640. Wentworth was executed in London in May 1641.


In 1638 to 1640 Scotland rose in a revolt known as the Bishops' Wars against Charles I's attempt to impose Church of England prayers there, believing them to be too close to Catholicism. The King's attempts to put down the rebellion failed when the English Long Parliament, which had similar religious concerns to the Scots, refused to vote for new taxes to pay for raising an army. Charles therefore started negotiations with Irish Catholic gentry to recruit an Irish army to put down the rebellion in Scotland, in return for the concession of Irish Catholics' longstanding requests for religious toleration and land security. This army was slowly mobilised at Carrickfergus opposite the Scottish coast but was then disbanded in mid-1641. To the Scots and the English Parliaments, this appeared to confirm that Charles was a tyrant, who wanted to impose Catholicism on his kingdoms, and to govern again without reference to his Parliaments as he had done in 1628–1640. During the early part of 1641, some Scots and Parliamentarians even proposed invading Ireland and subduing organised Catholicism there, to ensure that no royalist Irish Catholic army would land in England or Scotland.[9]

Frightened by this, and wanting to seize the opportunity, a small group of Irish Catholic landowners conceived a plan to take Dublin Castle and to control other important towns around the country in a quick coup in the name of the King, both to forestall a possible invasion and to force him to concede the Catholics' demands. Also, Charles' failure to defeat the Scots and the pressure he and his ministers were under from the "Short" and "Long" English parliaments in 1640–41, together with the English Parliament condemning Thomas Wentworth, the former Lord Deputy of Ireland, to death made the king appear weak and made it seem much more likely that a rebellion would be successful.


Unfavourable economic conditions also contributed to the outbreak of the rebellion. This decline may have been a consequence of the Little Ice Age event of the mid 17th Century. The Irish economy had hit a recession and the harvest of 1641 was poor. Interest rates in the 1630s had been as high as 30% per annum. The leaders of the rebellion like Phelim O'Neill and Rory O'Moore were heavily in debt and risked losing their lands to creditors. What was more, the Irish peasantry were hard hit by the bad harvest and were faced with rising rents. This aggravated their desire to remove the settlers and contributed to the widespread attacks on them at the start of the rebellion.[10][11]


Sir Felim O'Neill.

The planners of the rebellion were a small group of Irish landowners, mainly Gaelic Irish and from the heavily planted province of Ulster. Hugh Oge MacMahon and Conor Maguire were to seize Dublin Castle, while Phelim O'Neill and Rory O'Moore were to take Derry and other northern towns. The rebellion was to be executed on 23 October 1641. Their plan was to use surprise rather than force to take their objectives without bloodshed, and then issue their demands, in expectation of support from the rest of the country.[12] The plan for a fairly bloodless seizure of power was foiled when the authorities in Dublin heard of the plot from an informer (a Protestant convert named Owen O'Connolly) and arrested Maguire and MacMahon.[nb 1]

O'Neill meanwhile successfully took several forts in the north of the country, claiming to be acting in the King's name and issuing the Proclamation of Dungannon. At Newry on 4 November he published a Royal Commission from King Charles that gave him wide powers. Though a forgery, the Commission persuaded many of the landed gentry in the rest of Ireland to support him.[14] Fairly quickly, events spiralled out of the control of the men who had instigated them. The English authorities in Dublin over-reacted to the rebellion, which they characterised as 'a most disloyal and detestable conspiracy intended by some evil affected Irish Papists' which they claimed was aimed at 'a general massacre of all English and Protestant inhabitants'.[15] Their response was to send troops under commanders Charles Coote and William St Leger (themselves Protestant settlers) to rebel held areas in counties Wicklow and Cork respectively. Their expeditions were characterised by what modern historian Padraig Lenihan has called, 'excessive and indiscriminate brutality' against the general Catholic population there[16] and helped to provoke the general Catholic population into joining the rebellion.

Meanwhile, in Ulster, the breakdown of state authority prompted widespread attacks by the native Irish population on the English Protestant settlers.[17] Initially, Scottish settlers were not attacked by the rebels but as the rebellion went on, they too became targets.[18] Phelim O'Neill and the other insurgent leaders initially tried to stop the attacks on the settlers, but were unable to control the local peasantry. A contemporary — though hostile — Catholic source tells us that O'Neill "strove to contain the raskall multitude from those frequent savage actions of stripping and killing which were after perpetrated and gave their enterprise an odious character as well in the opinion of their countrymen as of strangers" but that "the floodgate of rapine, once being laid open, the meaner sort of people was not to be contained".[19]

Communal uprisings spread to the rest of the country. Munster was the last region to witness such disturbances; the rebellion in Munster was largely a product of the severe martial law William St Leger imposed upon the province. Many Irish Catholic lords who had lost lands or feared dispossession joined the rebellion and participated in the attacks on the settlers. At this stage, such attacks usually involved the beating and robbing rather than the killing of Protestants. Historian Nicholas Canny writes, 'most insurgents seemed anxious for a resolution of their immediate economic difficulties by seizing the property of any of the settlers. These popular attacks did not usually result in loss of life, nor was it the purpose of the insurgents to kill their victims. They nevertheless were gruesome affairs because they involved face to face confrontations between people who had long known each other. A typical attack involved a group of Irish descending upon a Protestant family and demanding, at knife point, that they surrender their moveable goods. Killings usually only occurred where Protestants resisted'.[20]

The motivations for the popular rebellion were complex. Among them were a desire to reverse the plantations; rebels in Ulster were reported as saying, 'the land was theirs and lost by their fathers.[21] Another motivating factor was a sharp antagonism towards the English language and culture which had been imposed on the country. For example, rebels in County Cavan forbade the use of the English language and decreed that the original Irish language place names should replace English ones.[21] A third factor was religious antagonism. The rebels consciously identified themselves as Catholics and justified the rising as a defensive measure against the Protestant threat to 'extirpate the Catholic religion'. Rebels in Cavan stated "we rise for our religion. They hang our priests in England".[22] Historian Brian MacCuarta writes, "Longstanding animosities against the [Protestant] clergy were based on the imposition of the state church since its inception thirty years previously. Ulster Irish ferocity against everything Protestant were fuelled by the wealth of the church in Ulster, exceptional in contemporary Ireland".[23] There were also cases of purely religious violence, where native Irish Protestants were attacked and Catholic settlers joined the rebellion.[24]

Ulster massacres

The number of planters killed in the early months of the uprising is the subject of debate.[25] Early English Parliamentarian pamphlets claimed that over 200,000 settlers had lost their lives.[26] In fact, recent research has suggested that the number is far more modest, in the region of 4,000 or so killed, though many thousands were expelled from their homes.[27] It is estimated that up to 12,000 Protestants may have lost their lives in total, the majority dying of cold or disease after being expelled from their homes in the depths of winter.[28][29]

The general pattern around the country was that the attacks intensified the longer the rebellion went on. At first, there were beatings and robbing of local settlers, then house burnings and expulsions and finally killings, most of them concentrated in Ulster. Historian Nicholas Canny suggests that the violence escalated after a failed rebel assault on Lisnagarvey in November 1641, after which the settlers killed several hundred captured insurgents. Canny writes, 'the bloody mindedness of the settlers in taking revenge when they gained the upper hand in battle seems to have made such a deep impression on the insurgents that, as one deponent put it, "the slaughter of the English" could be dated from this encounter'.[30] In one incident after this battle, the planters in Portadown were taken captive and then killed on the bridge in the town (see the Portadown Massacre). In nearby Kilmore parish, English and Scottish men, women, and children were burned to death in the cottage in which they were imprisoned.[31] In County Armagh, recent research has shown that about 1,250 Protestants were killed in the early months of the rebellion, or about a quarter of the planter population there.[32] In County Tyrone, modern research has identified three blackspots for the killing of settlers, with the worst being near Kinard, "where most of the British families planted... were ultimately murdered".[33] The Shrule massacre in early 1642 involved the deaths of dozens of Protestants travelling under safe conduct, where all the local officials and escort were Catholics.

Modern historians have argued that the killings of 1641 had a powerful psychological impact on the Protestant settlers.[34][35] Dr. Mary O'Dowd, 'To look at the long-term consequences of the Plantation, it's very difficult to do that without also taking into consideration the long-term implications of the 1641 rebellion: because the massacres of 1641, in the winter of 1641, really were very traumatic for the Protestant settler community in Ulster, and they left long-term scars within that community.[36]

Contemporary Protestant accounts depict the outbreak of the rebellion as a complete surprise; one stated that it was 'conceived among us and yet we never felt it kick in the womb, nor struggle in the birth'.[37] After the rebellion, many Protestants in Ireland took the attitude that the native Irish could not be trusted to remain quiescent again. The Protestant narrative of the rebellion as a preconceived plot to massacre them was constructed in the Depositions, a collection of accounts by victims assembled between 1642 and 1655 and now housed in Trinity College Dublin and articulated in a book published by John Temple in 1642, entitled The Irish Rebellion.[38]

Some settlers massacred Catholics, particularly in 1642–43 when a Scottish Covenanter army landed in Ulster. William Lecky, the 19th century historian of the rebellion, concluded that, "it is far from clear on which side the balance of cruelty rests".[39]

Among the more prominent incidents was the killing of Irish prisoners at Kilwarlin woods near Newry and the subsequent massacre of Catholic prisoners and civilians in the town itself. Trevor Royle quotes James Turner who in his memoirs reported that after a skirmish in Kilwarlin woods, Irish prisoners were given "bad quarter, being shot dead",[40] but two other eyewitness accounts of the skirmish, (a letter by Roger Pike and the dispatches of Major-General Robert Monro, the Protestant commander), do not mention the killing of prisoners.[41] Turner records in his memoirs that the following day English soldiers entered Newry and captured its castle; after the capitulation Catholic soldiers and local merchants were lined up on the banks of the river and "butchered to death ... without any legal process".[40]

On Rathlin Island Covenanter Campbell soldiers of the Argyll's Foot were encouraged by their commanding officer Sir Duncan Campbell of Auchinbreck to kill the local Catholic MacDonalds, near relatives of their arch Clan enemy in the Scottish Highlands Clan MacDonald; this they did with ruthless efficiency, throwing scores of MacDonald women over cliffs to their deaths on rocks below.[42] The number of victims of this massacre has been put as low as 100 and as high as 3,000.

The widespread killing of civilians was brought under control to some degree in 1642, when Owen Roe O'Neill arrived in Ulster to command the Irish Catholic forces and hanged several rebels for attacks on civilians. Thereafter, the war, though still brutal, was fought in line with the code of conduct that both O'Neill and the Scottish commander Robert Monro had learned as professional soldiers in continental Europe.[43]

In the long term, the killings committed by both sides in 1641 intensified the sectarian animosity that originated in the plantations. The effects of this can still be seen, particularly in Northern Ireland, today. The bitterness created by the plantations and the massacres of 1641 proved extremely long lasting. Ulster Protestants commemorated the anniversary of the rebellion on every 23 October for over two hundred years after the event. According to Pádraig Lenihan, 'This anniversary helped affirm communal solidarity and emphasise the need for unrelenting vigilance; [they perceived that] the masses of Irish Catholics surrounding them were and always would be, unregenerate and cruel enemies'[44] Images of the massacres involving Protestant deaths in 1641 are still represented on the banners of the Orange Order. If the upper estimate of 12,000 deaths is accurate, this would represent less than 10% of the British settler population in Ireland, though in Ulster the ratio of deaths to the settler population would have been somewhat higher, namely around 30%.[45]

English and Scottish intervention

From 1641 to early 1642, the fighting in Ireland was characterised by small bands, raised by local lords or among local people, attacking civilians of opposing ethnic and religious groups. At first, many of the Irish Catholic upper classes in Munster and Connacht were reluctant to join the rebellion, especially the "Old English" community. However, within six months almost all of them had joined the rebellion. Closer to Dublin the gentry of Meath and Kildare were organised by 1 November. There were three main reasons for this:

On 4 November Phelim O'Neill produced a forged royal proclamation at Newry and asserted that he was acting in King Charles's name. On the same day the English parliament voted money and supplies for an army of up to 8,000 men to crush the rebellion.[47]

By early 1642, there were four main concentrations of rebel forces; in Ulster under Phelim O'Neill, in the Pale around Dublin led by Viscount Gormanstown, in the south east, led by the Butler family – in particular Lord Mountgarret and in the south west, led by Donagh MacCarthy, Viscount Muskerry. In areas where British settlers were concentrated, around Cork, Dublin, Carrickfergus and Derry, they raised their own militia in self-defence and managed to hold off the rebel forces.[48]

The Catholic gentry near Dublin, known as the "Lords of the Pale", issued their Remonstrance to the king on 17 March 1642 at Trim, County Meath. On 22 March the Catholic hierarchy met at Kells, County Meath and almost unanimously agreed that the rebellion was a just war.

Charles I sent a large army to Dublin to subdue them. This "English Army for Ireland" numbered over 20,000 by mid-1642. The Scottish parliament also sent an army to Ulster to defend their compatriots there. In February 1642 the royalist army led by Ormonde based in Dublin advanced to Naas and in March they raised the siege of Drogheda. In April they supplied garrisons in the midlands and won the Battle of Kilrush on their return to Dublin.

A quick defeat of the rebels in Ireland was prevented by the outbreak of the English Civil War in mid to late 1642. Among other issues, the English Parliament did not trust Charles with command of the army raised to send to Ireland, fearing that it would afterwards be used against them. At the same time James Tuchet, 3rd Earl of Castlehaven was sent by King Charles to liaise with the Confederates during 1642.

Because of the Civil War in England, English troops were withdrawn from Ireland in late 1642 and a military stalemate ensued.[49] After the inconclusive Battle of Edgehill in October 1642, royalists considered that the army sent to Ireland earlier in 1642 would have ended the conflict within days or months, had it been available in England when needed.

Founding of the Confederation

Main article: Confederate Ireland

The war in England gave the Irish Catholics breathing space to create the Irish Catholic Confederation, which would run the Irish Catholic war effort.

On 10 May 1642, Ireland's Catholic clergy held a synod at Kilkenny. Present were the Archbishops of Armagh, Cashel and Tuam, 11 bishops or their representatives, and other dignitaries.[50] They drafted the Confederate Oath of Association and called on all Catholics in Ireland to take it. Those who took the oath swore allegiance to Charles I and vowed to obey all orders and decrees made by the "Supreme Council of the Confederate Catholics". The rebels henceforth became known as Confederates. The synod re-affirmed that the rebellion was a "just war".[51] It called for the creation of a council (made up of clergy and nobility) for each province, which would be overseen by a national council for the whole island. It vowed to punish misdeeds by Confederate soldiers and to excommunicate any Catholic who fought against the Confederation. The synod sent agents to France, Spain and Italy to gain support, gather funds and weapons, and recruit Irishmen serving in foreign armies.[52] Lord Mountgarret was appointed president of the Confederate Council, and a General Assembly was fixed for October that year.[53]

By the summer of 1642, the Irish Catholics controlled more than two-thirds of Ireland and the rebellion had become more of a conventional war between the Irish and the British-controlled enclaves in Ulster, Dublin and Cork.

The Confederate General Assembly was held in Kilkenny on 24 October 1642, where it set up a provisional government.[54] Present were 14 Lords Temporal and 11 Lords Spiritual from the Parliament of Ireland, along with 226 commoners.[55] The Assembly elected a Supreme Council of 24.[54] The Supreme Council would have power over all military generals, military officers and civil magistrates.[56] Its first act was to name the generals who were to command Confederate forces: Owen Roe O'Neill was to command the Ulster forces, Thomas Preston the Leinster forces, Garret Barry the Munster forces and John Burke the Connacht forces.[56] A National Treasury, a mint for making coins, and a press for printing proclamations were set up in Kilkenny.[57]

The Confederation eventually sided with the Royalists in return for the promise of self-government and full rights for Catholics after the war. They were finally defeated by the English Parliament's New Model Army from 1649 through to 1653 and land ownership in Ireland passed largely to Protestant settlers.[58]

See also


  1. After the Restoration, the Parliament of Ireland passed an act making 23 October a day of Thanksgiving.[13]


  1. Colm Lennon, Sixteenth Century Ireland, The Incomplete Conquest pp 67-68
  2. "The Gaelic Irish and Old English were increasingly seen by outsiders and increasingly defined themselves, as undifferentiatedly Irish." Padraig Lenihan, Confederate Catholics at War, pp 4-6.
  3. Lenihan, Consolidating Conquest, p58
  4. Padraig Lenihan, Consolidating Conquest, p56-57
  5. Act of Limitation; Act of Relinquishment
  6. Padraig Lenihan, Confederate Catholics at War, p.10, 'Wentworth saw plantation as the major instrument of cultural and religious change'
  7. Confederate Catholics at War p.11
  8. Confederate Catholics at War, p.12
  9. Lenihan, Confederate Catholics at War, p22-23
  10. John Kenyon, Jane Ohlmeyer, eds. The Civil Wars, A Military History of England, Scotland and Ireland, 1638–1660, pp 29-30. One of his [Phelim O'Neill's] creditors, Mr Fullerton of Loughal... was one of the first to be murdered in the rebellion".
  11. See also, Nicholas Canny, Making Ireland British, pp 473-474
  12. "But when they engaged in their insurrection on 22 October 1641, unquestionably they weren’t intending on the destruction of the entire Plantation that had been brought into place. We don’t know precisely what they intended: they presumably intended to seize the positions of strength, the military fortification of the province; having done that to, from this position of strength, to engage in some negotiation with the Crown with a view to bettering their condition in some way. But they, I think it is correct to say, that they weren’t intent on destroying the Plantation." (Nicholas Canny, "The Plantation of Ireland: 1641 rebellion" BBC lecture. Accessed 12 February 2008.)
  13. "1662 (14 & 15 Chas. 2 sess. 4) c. 23". Statutes Passed in the Parliaments Held in Ireland: 1310-1662. George Grierson, printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty. 1794. pp. 610–2. Retrieved 12 September 2014.
  14. Timeline of events in 1641–55 published online by the Library of Trinity College Dublin
  15. Richard Bellings, History of the Confederation and War in Ireland (c. 1670), in Gilbert, J. T., History of the Affairs of Ireland, Irish Archaeological and Celtic society, Dublin, 1879. pg. 9 & 18
  16. Lenihan, Confederate Catholics at War, p. 23
  17. "But on the 23rd and the 24th and 25th of October 1641, the popular attacks which are relatively spontaneous, are clearly focused upon the tenants who had moved in and become beneficiaries of the Plantation; and that these actions, as well as the words which are articulated in justifying those actions – targeted attacks upon those who had moved in and benefited from the Plantation – these indicate that there was a popular sentiment of dispossession which was articulated in action as well as in words when the opportunity provided itself, when the political order was challenged by the actions which Phelim O'Neill and his associates engaged upon." (Nicholas Canny "The Plantation of Ireland: 1641 rebellion" BBC lecture. Accessed 12 February 2008.
  18. Canny, Making Ireland British, p. 486
  19. Richard Bellings, "History of the Confederation and War in Ireland" (c. 1670), in Gilbert, J. T., History of the Affairs of Ireland, Irish Archaeological and Celtic society, Dublin, 1879. pp. 14-15
  20. Nicholas Canny, Making Ireland British, p. 476
  21. 1 2 Age of Atrocity, p.154
  22. Age of Atrocity, p. 153
  23. Age of Atrocity, p. 155
  24. Canny, Making Ireland British, p. 177; Age of Atrocity, p. 154
  25. Staff Massacres and myths, University of Cambridge, Information provided by, 21 October 2007
  26. Royle, Trevor (2004), Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms 1638–1660, London: Abacus, ISBN 0-349-11564-8 p.139
  27. "William Petty's figure of 37,000 Protestants massacred... is far too high, perhaps by a factor of ten, certainly more recent research suggests that a much more realistic figure is roughly 4,000 deaths." Ohlmeyer, Jane; Kenyon, John. The Civil Wars, p. 278.
  28. "Modern historians estimate the number massacred in Ireland in 1641 at between 2,000 and 12,000." Marshal, John (2006). John Locke, Toleration and Early Enlightenment Culture Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-65114-X, Page 58, footnote 10.
  29. Staff. "The Plantation of Ulster: 1641 rebellion", BBC Paragraph 3. Accessed 17 February 2008.
  30. Canny, Making Ireland British, p. 485.
  31. A deposition made by one William Clarke to the effect that "about 100 Protestants (including women and children) from the nearby parish of Loughal, who were already prisoners" were killed at the bridge in Portadown in November 1641. Nicholas Canny, Making Ireland British, p. 485.
  32. Ohlmeyer and Kenyon, The Civil Wars, p. 74
  33. Lenihan, Confederate Catholics at War, p.31
  34. Staff Massacres and myths, University of Cambridge, Information provided by, 21 October 2007. John Morrill wrote: "The 1641 massacres have played a key role in creating and sustaining a collective Protestant and British identity in Ulster."
  35. Dr. Raymond Gillespie of the National University of Ireland, Maynoth, "I think in some ways it's what happens after the Plantation which is much more important for the enduring legacy. It's the fears of the Irish which are created in 1641, the fear of massacre, the fear of attack, that somehow or other accommodations which had been made before were no longer possible after that because the Irish were quite simply, as John Temple put it in his history of the rebellion ‘untrustworthy’. And that book was repeatedly reprinted – I think the last time it was reprinted was 1912, so that this message (the message not of the Plantation but the message of the rebellion) is the one that persists and the one which is used continuously right through the 19th century – that the Catholics are untrustworthy; that we can’t do business with them; we shouldn’t be involved with them; they are part of a large conspiracy to do us down" (Raymond Gillespie Plantation of Ulster: Long term consequences, BBC. Accessed 13 February 2008).
  36. Mary O'Dowd. The Plantation of Ulster: Long term consequences BBC. Accessed 12 February 2008
  37. Ohlmeyer, Kenyon, The Civil Wars, p.29
  38. Noonan, Kathleen M. "Martyrs in Flames": Sir John Temple and the conception of the Irish in English martyrologies*. Albion, June 2004. On the website of
  39. Patrick J. Corish, A New History of Ireland, Volume 3: Early Modern Ireland 1534–1691 By T. W. Moody, F. X. Martin, F. J. Byrne in , p292
  40. 1 2 Royle, Trevor (2004), Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms 1638–1660, London: Abacus, ISBN 0-349-11564-8 p.142
  41. Ulster Archaeological Society, (1860). Ulster Journal of Archaeology Volume 8, London: Russell J Smith, Ireland: Hodges & Smith. p. 78-80
  42. Royle, Trevor (2004), Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms 1638–1660, London: Abacus, ISBN 0-349-11564-8 p.143
  43. Pádraig Lenihan, (2001) Confederate Catholics at War, 1641–49, Cork University Press, ISBN 1-85918-244-5. p. 211, 212
  44. Pádraig Lenihan, 1690, Battle of the Boyne. Tempus (2003) ISBN 0-7524-2597-8 pp.257–258
  45. Mary O'Dowd. 1641 rebellion BBC. Accessed 8 March 2008
  46. Lenihan, Confederate Catholics at War, p24-26
  48. Kenyon, Ohlmeyer, p73-74
  49. Kenyon, Ohlmeyer, p77
  50. Meehan, Charles Patrick. The Confederation of Kilkenny. 1846. p.27
  51. Meehan, p.29
  52. Meehan, p.30
  53. Meehan, p.31
  54. 1 2 Meehan, p.43
  55. Meehan, p.41
  56. 1 2 Meehan, p.44
  57. Meehan, p.45
  58. Canny 562–566


Depositions of witnesses

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/23/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.