Allied war crimes during World War II

Allied war crimes include both alleged and legally proven violations of the laws of war by the Allies during World War II against either civilians or military personnel of the Axis powers.

At the end of World War II, many trials of Axis war criminals took place, most famously the Nuremberg Trials and Tokyo Trials. However, in Europe, these tribunals were set up under the authority of the London Charter, which only considered allegations of war crimes committed by persons who acted in the interests of the European Axis nations.

There were a number of war crimes involving Allied personnel that were investigated by the Allied powers and that led in some instances to courts-martial. Some incidents alleged by historians to have been crimes under the law of war in operation at the time were, for a variety of reasons, not investigated by the Allied powers during the war, or they were investigated and a decision was taken not to prosecute.


The Western Allies claim that their militaries were directed to observe the Hague Conventions and Geneva Conventions and believed to be conducting a just war fought for defensive reasons. Violations of the conventions did occur, however, including the forcible return of Soviet citizens who had been collaborating with Axis forces to the USSR at the end of the war. The military of the Soviet Union also frequently committed war crimes, which are today known to have been at the direction of its government. These crimes included waging wars of aggression, mass murder and genocide of prisoners of war, and repressing the population of conquered countries.[1]

Antony Beevor describes the Soviet rape of German women during the occupation of Germany as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has estimated that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania, and Silesia alone. He asserts that Russian, Belorussian, and Ukrainian women and girls liberated from slave labor in Germany were also violated.[2]

It has been suggested by some historians, including Jörg Friedrich, that the aerial bombardment of civilian areas and cultural targets in enemy territory, including the German cities of Cologne, Hamburg, and Dresden, the Abbey in Monte Cassino in Italy during the Battle of Monte Cassino,[3] the Japanese cities of Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka, and especially the use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, by the Western Allies, which resulted in total destruction of many cities and buildings and the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians, be considered as war crimes.[4][5][6] However, no positive or specific customary international humanitarian law with respect to aerial warfare existed prior to and during World War II[7] which means that at the time, strategic bombings were not officially war crimes. Because of this, no Japanese and German officers were prosecuted at the post-World War II Allied war crime trials for the aerial raids on Shanghai, Chongqing, Warsaw, Rotterdam, and British cities during the Blitz.[8]



C.P. Stacey, the Canadian official campaign historian, reports that on 14 April 1945 rumours had been spread that the popular commanding officer of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders of Canada had been killed by a civilian sniper. This rumoured action resulted in the Highlanders setting fire to civilian property within the town of Friesoythe in an act of reprisal.[9] Stacey later wrote that the Canadian troops first removed German civilians from their property before setting the houses on fire; he commented that he was "glad to say that [he] never heard of another such case".[10] It was later found that in fact German soldiers had killed the Argyll's commander, Lieutenant Colonel Frederick E. Wigle.[11]

United States

Photo allegedly showing execution of Waffen-SS troops in a coal yard in the area of the Dachau concentration camp during its liberation. April 29, 1945 (US Army photograph)[Note 1]



Following the Operation Dragoon landings in southern France and the collapse of the German military occupation in August 1944, large numbers of Germans could not escape from France and surrendered to the French Forces of the Interior. The Resistance executed a few of the Wehrmacht and most of the Gestapo or SS prisoners.[30]

The Maquis also executed 17 German prisoners of war at Saint-Julien-de-Crempse (in the Dordogne region), on 10 September 1944, 14 of whom have since been positively identified. The murders were revenge killings for German murders of 17 local inhabitants of the village of St. Julien on 3 August 1944, which were themselves reprisal killings in response to Resistance activity in the St. Julien region, which was home to an active Maquis cell.[31]

Moroccan Goumiers

See also: Marocchinate

French Moroccan troops of the French Expeditionary Corps, known as Goumiers, committed mass crimes in Italy during and after the Battle of Monte Cassino[32] and in Germany.[33] According to Italian sources, more than 12,000 civilians, above all young and old women, children, were kidnapped, raped, or killed by Goumiers.[34] This is featured in the Italian film La Ciociara (Two Women) with Sophia Loren.

Anthony Clayton in his book 'France, Soldiers, and Africa' (Brassey's Defence Publishers, 1988) devotes several pages to the criminal activities of the Goumiers, which he partially ascribes to the record of what was considered normal practices in their homeland.


Armed conflict Perpetrator
World War II in YugoslaviaYugoslav Partisans
Incident Type of crimePersons
Bleiburg tragedy War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. The victims were Yugoslav collaborationist troops (ethnic Croats, Serbs, and Slovenes). They were executed without trial in an act of vengeance for the genocide committed by the pro-Axis collaborationist regimes (in particular the Ustaše) installed by the Nazis during the German occupation of Yugoslavia.[35]
Foibe massacres War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Following Italy's 1943 armistice with the Allied powers, and again after the end of the German occupation of Istria in 1945, Yugoslav resistance forces executed an unknown number (ranging from several hundreds to some thousands) of ethnic Italians accused of collaboration, regardless of their personal responsibility.[36][37]
Vojvodina massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. 1944–1945 killings of ethnic Germans and Hungarians in Bačka, and Serb prisoners of war.[38]
Kočevski Rog massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[39]
Macelj massacre Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[40]
Tezno trench Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[41]
Barbara Pit Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[42]
Prevalje mass grave Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[43]

Soviet Union

The Soviet Union had not signed the Geneva Convention of 1929 that protected, and stated how prisoners of war should be treated. This cast doubt on whether the Soviet treatment of Axis prisoners was therefore a war crime, although prisoners "were [not] treated even remotely in accordance with the Geneva Convention",[44] resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands.[45] However, the Nuremberg Tribunal rejected this as a general argument. The tribunal held that the Hague Conventions (which the 1929 Geneva Convention did not replace but only augmented, and unlike the 1929 convention, were ones that the Russian Empire had ratified) and other customary laws of war, regarding the treatment of prisoners of war, were binding on all nations in a conflict whether they were signatories to the specific treaty or not.[46][47][48]

Acts of mass rape and other war crimes were committed by Soviet troops during the occupation of East Prussia (Danzig),[49][50][51][52] parts of Pomerania and Silesia, during the Battle of Berlin,[53] and during the Battle of Budapest.

Late in the war, Yugoslavia's communist partisans complained about the rapes and looting committed by the Soviet Army while traversing their country. Milovan Djilas later recalled Joseph Stalin's response,

Does Djilas, who is himself a writer, not know what human suffering and the human heart are? Can't he understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometers through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle?[54]

Soviet war correspondent Natalya Gesse observed the Red Army in 1945: "The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty. It was an army of rapists". Polish women as well as Russian, Belorussian and Ukrainian slave laborers were also mass raped by the Red Army. The Soviet war correspondent Vasily Grossman described: "Liberated Soviet girls quite often complain that our soldiers rape them".[55]

United Kingdom

On 4 May 1940, in response to Germany's intensive unrestricted submarine warfare, during the Battle of the Atlantic and its invasion of Denmark and Norway, the Royal Navy conducted its own unrestricted submarine campaign. The Admiralty announced that all vessels in the Skagerrak, were to be sunk on sight without warning. This was contrary to the terms of the Second London Naval Treaty.[56][57]

In July 1941, the submarine HMS Torbay (under the command of Anthony Miers) was based in the Mediterranean where it sank several German ships. On two occasions, once off the coast of Alexandria, Egypt, and the other off the coast of Crete, the crew attacked and killed dozens of shipwrecked German sailors and troops. None of the shipwrecked survivors posed a major threat to Torbay's crew. Miers made no attempt to hide his actions, and reported them in his official logs. He received a strongly worded reprimand from his superiors following the first incident. Mier's actions violated the Hague Convention of 1907, which banned the killing of shipwreck survivors under any circumstances.[58][59]

During Operation Overlord, British line of communication troops conducted small-scale looting in Bayeux and Caen in France, following their liberation, in violation of the Hague Conventions.[60] Looting, rape, and prisoner execution was committed by British soldiers in a smaller scale than other armies throughout the war.[61] On 23 May 1945, British troops in Schleswig-Holstein were alleged to have plundered Glücksburg castle, stealing jewelry, and desecrating 38 coffins from the castle's mausoleum.[62]

The "London Cage", a MI19 prisoner of war facility in the UK during and immediately after the war, was subject to allegations of torture.[63] The Bad Nenndorf interrogation centre in occupied Germany, managed by the Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre, was the subject of an official inquiry in 1947, which found that there was "mental and physical torture during the interrogations" and that "personal property of the prisoners were stolen".[64]

The Italian statistics record eight rapes and nineteen attempted rape by British soldiers in Italy between September 1943 and December 1945. Various sources, including the Special Investigation Branch as well as evidences from Belgian reporters, said that rape and sexual harassment by British troops occurred frequently following the invasion of Sicily in 1943.[65] In Germany, although far from the scale of those committed by the Red Army, rapes of local women were also committed by British and Canadian troops. Even elderly women were targeted. Though the Royal Military Police tended to turn a blind eye towards abuse of German prisoners and civilians, rape was a major issue for them. Some officers, however, treated the behaviour of their men with leniency. Many rapes were committed under the effects of alcohol or post-traumatic stress, but there were cases of premeditated attacks, like the assault on three German women in the town of Neustadt am Rübenberge or the attempted gang-rape of two local girls at gunpoint in the village of Oyle, near Nienburg, which ended in the death of one of the women when, whether intentionally or not, one of the soldiers discharged his gun, hitting her in the neck.[66] There were also reports of "sexual assault and indecency" committed by British soldiers against children in Belgium and the Netherlands, when a number of men were convicted of these crimes while fraternizing with Dutch and Belgian families during the winter of 1944-45.[66]

Asia and the Pacific War

Allied soldiers in Pacific and Asian theatres sometimes killed Japanese soldiers who were attempting to surrender or after they had surrendered. A social historian of the Pacific War, John W. Dower, states that "by the final years of the war against Japan, a truly vicious cycle had developed in which the Japanese reluctance to surrender had meshed horrifically with Allied disinterest in taking prisoners".[67] Dower suggests that most Japanese personnel were told that they would be "killed or tortured" if they fell into Allied hands and, as a consequence, most of those faced with defeat on the battlefield fought to the death or committed suicide.[68] In addition, it was held to be shamefully disgraceful for a Japanese soldier to surrender, leading many to commit suicide or to fight to the death regardless of any beliefs concerning their possible treatment as POWs. In fact, the Japanese Field Service Code said that surrender was not permissible.[69]

And while it was "not official policy" for Allied personnel to take no prisoners, "over wide reaches of the Asian battleground it was everyday practice".[70]

On 4 March 1943, during the Battle of the Bismarck Sea, General George Kenney ordered Allied patrol boats and aircraft to attack Japanese rescue vessels, as well as the survivors from the sunken vessels on life rafts and swimming or floating in the sea. This was later justified on the grounds that rescued servicemen would have been rapidly landed at their military destination and promptly returned to active service.[71] These orders violated the Hague Convention of 1907, which banned the killing of shipwreck survivors under any circumstances.[72]

United Kingdom

During the Burma Campaign, there are recorded instances of British troops removing gold teeth from dead Japanese troops and displaying Japanese skulls as trophies.[73]

During the Allied occupation of Japan, Australian, British, Indian and New Zealand troops in Japan as part of the British Commonwealth Occupation Force (BCOF) committed 62 recorded rapes. The commander of the BCOF's official reports state that members of the BCOF were convicted of committing 57 rapes in the period May 1946 to December 1947 and a further 23 between January 1948 and September 1951. No official statistics on the incidence of serious crimes during the BCOF's first three months in Japan (February to April 1946) are available.[74] Australian historian Robin Gerster contends that while the official statistics underestimate the level of serious crime among BCOF members, Japanese police often did not pass reports they received on to the BCOF and that the serious crimes which were reported were properly investigated by BCOF military police. The penalties given to members of the BCOF convicted of serious crimes were "not severe", however, and those imposed on Australians were often mitigated or quashed by Australian courts.[75]


R. J. Rummel states that there is little information regarding the general treatment of Japanese prisoners taken by Chinese Nationalist forces during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–45).[76] However, Chinese civilians and conscripts, as well as Japanese civilians, were maltreated by Chinese soldiers. Rummel claims that Chinese peasants "often had no less to fear from their own soldiers than they did from the Japanese".[77] He also wrote that, in some intakes of Nationalist conscripts, 90% died from disease, starvation or violence, before they had even commenced training.[78] In "The Birth of Communist China", C.P. Fitzgerald describes China under the rule of KMT thus: “the Chinese people groaned under a regime fascist in every quality except efficiency.”[79]

Examples of war crimes committed by Chinese forces include:


According to historian Mark Johnston, "the killing of unarmed Japanese was common" and Australian command tried to put pressure on troops to actually take prisoners, but the troops proved reluctant.[82] When prisoners were indeed taken "it often proved difficult to prevent them from killing captured Japanese before they could be interrogated".[83] According to Johnston, as a consequence of this type of behavior, "Some Japanese soldiers were almost certainly deterred from surrendering to Australians".[83]

Major General Paul Cullen indicated that the killing of Japanese prisoners in the Kokoda Track Campaign was not uncommon. In one instance he recalled during the battle at Gorari that "the leading platoon captured five or seven Japanese and moved on to the next battle. The next platoon came along and bayoneted these Japanese."[84] He also stated that he found the killings understandable but that it had left him feeling guilty.

United States

American soldiers in the Pacific often deliberately killed Japanese soldiers who had surrendered. According to Richard Aldrich, who has published a study of the diaries kept by United States and Australian soldiers, they sometimes massacred prisoners of war.[85] Dower states that in "many instances ... Japanese who did become prisoners were killed on the spot or en route to prison compounds".[70] According to Aldrich it was common practice for U.S. troops not to take prisoners.[86] This analysis is supported by British historian Niall Ferguson,[87] who also says that, in 1943, "a secret [U.S.] intelligence report noted that only the promise of ice cream and three days leave would ... induce American troops not to kill surrendering Japanese".[87]

Ferguson states such practices played a role in the ratio of Japanese prisoners to dead being 1:100 in late 1944. That same year, efforts were taken by Allied high commanders to suppress "take no prisoners" attitudes,[87] among their own personnel (as these were affecting intelligence gathering) and to encourage Japanese soldiers to surrender. Ferguson adds that measures by Allied commanders to improve the ratio of Japanese prisoners to Japanese dead, resulted in it reaching 1:7, by mid-1945. Nevertheless, taking no prisoners was still standard practice among US troops at the Battle of Okinawa, in April–June 1945.[87]

Ulrich Straus, a US Japanologist, suggests that frontline troops intensely hated Japanese military personnel and were "not easily persuaded" to take or protect prisoners, as they believed that Allied personnel who surrendered, got "no mercy" from the Japanese.[88] Allied soldiers believed that Japanese soldiers were inclined to feign surrender in order to make surprise attacks.[88] Therefore, according to Straus, "Senior officers opposed the taking of prisoners on the grounds that it needlessly exposed American troops to risks ..."[88] When prisoners nevertheless were taken at Guadalcanal, interrogator Army Captain Burden noted that many times these were shot during transport because "it was too much bother to take him in".[89]

Ferguson suggests that "it was not only the fear of disciplinary action or of dishonor that deterred German and Japanese soldiers from surrendering. More important for most soldiers was the perception that prisoners would be killed by the enemy anyway, and so one might as well fight on".[87]

US historian James J. Weingartner attributes the very low number of Japanese in US POW compounds to two important factors, a Japanese reluctance to surrender and a widespread American "conviction that the Japanese were "animals" or "subhuman'" and unworthy of the normal treatment accorded to POWs.[90] The latter reason is supported by Ferguson, who says that "Allied troops often saw the Japanese in the same way that Germans regarded Russians—as Untermenschen".[87]

Mutilation of Japanese war dead

U.S. Navy Lieutenant (j.g.) E.V. McPherson with a Japanese skull on board USS PT-341

Some Allied soldiers collected Japanese body parts. The incidence of this by American personnel occurred on "a scale large enough to concern the Allied military authorities throughout the conflict and was widely reported and commented on in the American and Japanese wartime press".[91]

The collection of Japanese body parts began quite early in the war, prompting a September 1942 order for disciplinary action against such souvenir taking.[91] Harrison concludes that, since this was the first real opportunity to take such items (the Battle of Guadalcanal), "[c]learly, the collection of body parts on a scale large enough to concern the military authorities had started as soon as the first living or dead Japanese bodies were encountered".[91]

When Japanese remains were repatriated from the Mariana Islands after the war, roughly 60 percent were missing their skulls.[91]

In a 13 June 1944 memorandum, the US Army Judge Advocate General, (JAG) Major General Myron C. Cramer, asserted that "such atrocious and brutal policies", were both "repugnant to the sensibilities of all civilized people"[90] and also violations of the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armies in the Field, which stated that: "After each engagement, the occupant of the field of battle shall take measures to search for the wounded and dead, and to protect them against pillage and maltreatment."[92] Cramer recommended the distribution to all commanders of a directive ordering them to prohibit the misuse of enemy body parts.[90]

These practices were in addition also in violation of the unwritten customary rules of land warfare and could lead to the death penalty.[90] The US Navy JAG mirrored that opinion one week later, and also added that "the atrocious conduct of which some US personnel were guilty could lead to retaliation by the Japanese which would be justified under international law".[90]


US soldiers raped Okinawan women during the Battle of Okinawa in 1945.[93]

Okinawan historian and former director of the Okinawa Prefectural Historical Archives Oshiro Masayasu writes based on several years of research:

Soon after the US Marines landed, all the women of a village on Motobu Peninsula fell into the hands of US soldiers. At the time, there were only women, children and old people in the village, as all the young men had been mobilized for the war. Soon after landing, the Marines "mopped up" the entire village, but found no signs of Japanese forces. Taking advantage of the situation, they started "hunting for women" in broad daylight and those who were hiding in the village or nearby air raid shelters were dragged out one after another.[94]

There were also 1,336 reported rapes during the first 10 days of the occupation of Kanagawa prefecture after the Japanese surrender.[93]

According to interviews carried out by the New York Times and published by them in 2000, multiple elderly people from an Okinawan village confessed that after the United States had won the Battle of Okinawa three armed marines kept coming to the village every week to force the villagers to gather all the local women, who were then carried off into the hills and raped. The article goes deeper into the matter and claims that the villagers' tale - true or not - is part of a 'dark, long-kept secret' the unraveling of which 'refocused attention on what historians say is one of the most widely ignored crimes of the war': "the widespread rape of Okinawan women by American servicemen".[95] Although Japanese reports of rape were largely ignored at the time, academic estimates have been that as many as 10,000 Okinawan women may have been raped. It has been claimed that the rape was so prevalent that most Okinawans over age 65 around the year 2000 either knew or had heard of a woman who was raped in the aftermath of the war. Military officials denied the mass rapings, and all surviving veterans refused the New York Times' request for an interview.[96]

Professor of East Asian Studies and expert on Okinawa Steve Rabson said: "I have read many accounts of such rapes in Okinawan newspapers and books, but few people know about them or are willing to talk about them". Books, diaries, articles and other documents refer to rapes by American soldiers of various races and backgrounds. Samuel Saxton, a retired captain, explained that the American veterans and witnesses may have believed: "It would be unfair for the public to get the impression that we were all a bunch of rapists after we worked so hard to serve our country". Masaie Ishihara, a sociology professor, supports this: "There is a lot of historical amnesia out there, many people don't want to acknowledge what really happened".[96]

An explanation given for why the US military has no record of any rapes is that few - if any - Okinawan women reported abuse, mostly out of fear and embarrassment. Those who did report them are believed by historians to have been ignored by the US military police. A large scale effort to determine the extent of such crimes has also never been called for. Over five decades after the war has ended the women who were believed to have been raped still refused to give a public statement, with friends, local historians and university professors who had spoken with the women instead saying they preferred not to discuss it publicly. According to a Nago, Okinawan police spokesman: "Victimized women feel too ashamed to make it public".[96]

In his book "Tennozan: The Battle of Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb", George Feifer noted that by 1946 there had been fewer than 10 reported cases of rape in Okinawa. He explains that it was: "partly because of shame and disgrace, partly because Americans were victors and occupiers". Feifer claimed: "In all there were probably thousands of incidents, but the victims' silence kept rape another dirty secret of the campaign."[97] Many people wondered why it never came to light after the inevitable American-Japanese babies the many women must have had. In interviews, historians and Okinawan elders said that some Okinawan women who were raped did give birth to biracial children, but that many of them were immediately killed or left behind out of shame, disgust or fearful trauma. More often, however, rape victims underwent crude abortions with the help of village midwives.[96]

However, American professor of Japanese Studies Michael S. Molasky argues that Okinawan civilians "were often surprised at the comparatively humane treatment they received from the American enemy."[98][99] According to Islands of Discontent: Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power by the American Mark Selden, the Americans "did not pursue a policy of torture, rape, and murder of civilians as Japanese military officials had warned."[100]

Comparative death rates of POWs

According to James D. Morrow, "Death rates of POWs held is one measure of adherence to the standards of the treaties because substandard treatment leads to death of prisoners". The "democratic states generally provide good treatment of POWs".[101]

Held by Axis powers

Held by the Allies

Novelist James Bacque claims an analysis of records supports a German POW death rate of over 25%,[106] although his figures have been disputed by academics, who describe Bacque's figures as "simply impossible".[107] A panel of historians concluded that Bacque is a Canadian novelist with no previous historical research or writing experience,[108] and his writing is "seriously — nay, spectacularly — flawed in its most fundamental aspects.".[109]

Summary table

 Soviet Union  United States
and  United Kingdom
Taiwan China Western Allies Nazi Germany Germany Empire of Japan Japan
Held by  Soviet Union 14.70–35.80% 10.00%
 United Kingdom 0.03%
 United States 0.15% varying
 France 2.58%
East European 32.90%
Nazi Germany Germany 57.50% 4.00%
Empire of Japan Japan included in Western Allies (27%) not documented 27.00%


Holocaust denial literature

The focus on supposed Allied atrocities during the war has been a theme in Holocaust denial literature, particularly in countries where outright denial of the Holocaust is illegal.[110] According to historian Deborah Lipstadt, the concept of "comparable Allied wrongs", such as the post-war expulsions and Allied war crimes, is at the center of, and a continuously repeated theme of, contemporary Holocaust denial; phenomenon she calls "immoral equivalencies".[111]

Japanese neo-nationalists

Japanese neo-nationalists argue that Allied war crimes and the shortcomings of the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal were equivalent to the war crimes committed by Japanese forces during the war. American historian John W. Dower has written that this position is "a kind of historiographic cancellation of immorality—as if the transgressions of others exonerate one's own crimes".[112] While right-wing forces in Japan have tried to push for their perspective on war-time history, they have been unsuccessful due to opposition from both within and outside Japan.[113]

See also


  1. The caption for the photograph in the US National Archives reads, "SC208765, Soldiers of the 42nd Infantry Division, US Seventh Army, order SS men to come forward when one of their number tried to escape from the Dachau, Germany, concentration camp after it was captured by US forces. Men on the ground in background feign death by falling as the guards fired a volley at the fleeing SS men. (157th Regt. 4/29/45)." (Moody 2003)
    Lt. Colonel Felix L. Sparks disputed this and thought that it "represented the initial step in the cover-up of the execution of German guards". (Moody 2003)
  • Moody, W. (2003), Hell's Folly, Trafford Publishing, p. 128 (footnote), retrieved September 6, 2010 


  1. Davies, Norman (2005). "War crimes". The Oxford Companion to World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 983–984. ISBN 978-0-19-280670-3.
  2. Antony Beevor (1 May 2002), "'They raped every German female from eight to 80'",, The Guardian
  3. Kershaw, Alex, "Monte Cassino, Ten Armies in Hell", World War II Magazine, September/October 2013, p. 73
  4. Harding, Luke (22 October 2003). "Germany's forgotten victims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  5. Bloxham, David "Dresden as a War Crime", in Addison, Paul & Crang, Jeremy A. (eds.). Firestorm: The Bombing of Dresden. Pimlico, 2006. ISBN 1-84413-928-X. Chapter 9 p. 180
  6. Davies, Norman (2005). "War crimes". The Oxford Companion to World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 983–984. ISBN 978-0-19-280670-3.
  7. Javier Guisández Gómez (30 June 1998). "The Law of Air Warfare". International Review of the Red Cross (323): 347–363. Archived from the original on 25 April 2013.
  8. Terror from the Sky: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II. Berghahn Books. 2010. p. 167. ISBN 1-8454-5844-3.
  9. Stacey (1960), p. 558
  10. Stacey (1982), pp. 163–164
  11. Stacey (1960), pp. 558
  12. Giovanni Bartolone, Le altre stragi: Le stragi alleate e tedesche nella Sicilia del 1943–1944
  13. George Duncan, Massacres and Atrocities of World War II in the Axis Countries
  14. Weingartner, James J. A Peculiar Crusadee: Willis M. Everett and the Malmedy massacre, NYU Press, 2000, p. 118. ISBN 0-8147-9366-5
  15. Weingartner, James J. (1989). "Massacre at Biscari: Patton and an American War Crime". The Historian. 52: 24–39. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.1989.tb00772.x.
  16. Lundeberg, Philip K. (1994). "Operation Teardrop Revisited". In Runyan, Timothy J.; Copes, Jan M. To Die Gallantly : The Battle of the Atlantic. Boulder: Westview Press. pp. 221–6. ISBN 0-8133-8815-5.
  17. Blair, Clay (1998). Hitler's U-Boat War. The Hunted, 1942–1945. Modern Library. New York: Random House. p. 687. ISBN 0-679-64033-9.
  18. Albert Panebianco (ed). Dachau its liberation 57th Infantry Association, Felix L. Sparks, Secretary 15 June 1989. (backup site)
  19. Sparks, Felix L. "Dachau And It's Liberation". Retrieved 23 December 2013.
  20. Perez, R.H. (2002). "Dachau Concentration Camp - Liberation". Retrieved 20 December 2013.
  21. Buechner, Howard (1986). Dachau: The Hour of the Avenger. New York: Thunderbird Press. p. 97. ISBN 0913159042.
  22. "The Horror of D-Day: A New Openness to Discussing Allied War Crimes in WWII", Der Spiegel, May 4, 2010, (part 1), accessed 8 July 2010
  23. Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.186
  24. Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.189
  25. Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.190
  26. David Wilson (27 March 2007). "The secret war". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 22 November 2008.
  27. Lilly, Robert J. (2007). Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe During World War II. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0-230-50647-X.
  28. Morrow, John H. (October 2008). "Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe during World War II By J. Robert Lilly". The Journal of Military History. 72 (4): 1324. doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0151.
  29. Schofield, Hugh (5 June 2009). "Revisionists challenge D-Day story". BBC News. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  30. Beevor, Antony, D-Day, Viking, 2009 p 447
  31. After the Battle Magazine, Issue 143
  32. Archived 15 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine. Italian women win cash for wartime rapes
  33. Volker Koop: Besetzt: französische Besatzungspolitik in Deutschland, Berlin 2005
  34. "1952: Il caso delle "marocchinate" al Parlamento". Archived from the original on 6 January 2009. Retrieved 22 November 2008.
  35. Yalta and the Bleiburg Tragedy Archived 16 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine.
  36. A Tragedy Revealed by Door Arrigo Petacco, Konrad Eisenbichler
  37. Slovene-Italian Relations 1880-1956 Report 2000
  38. Janjetović, Zoran (2006). "Proterivanje nemačkog i mađarskog življa iz Vojvodine na kraju drugog svetskog rata". Hereticus (in Serbian). 1.
  39. Slovenia 1945: Memories of Death and Survival after World War II by John Corsellis & Marcus Ferrar. Pages 87, 204 & 250.
  40. "Macelj - gora zločina!". Večernji list (in Croatian). 2012-05-16. Retrieved 2012-06-01.
  41. "Tezno je najveća masovna grobnica Hrvata". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 11 September 2007. Archived from the original on 27 May 2010. Retrieved 2010-05-15.
  42. "Stratišta: "U iskapanju Hude jame Hrvati nam moraju pomoći, tamo su oni ubijali svoje"". Slobodna Dalmacija (in Croatian). 2009-11-07. Retrieved 2012-06-01.
  43. Mass grave of 700 people found in Slovenia, The Daily Telegraph
  44. Study: Soviet Prisoners-of-War (POWs), 1941–42 website of Gendercide Watch
  45. Matthew White, Source List and Detailed Death Tolls for the Twentieth Century Hemoclysm: Stalin
  46. POWs and the laws of war: World War II legacy 2003 Educational Broadcasting Corporation
  47. Jennifer K. Elsea (Legislative Attorney American Law Division) Federation of American Scientists CRS Report for Congress Lawfulness of Interrogation Techniques under the Geneva Conventions (PDF) 8 September 2004. Page 24 first paragraph see also footnotes 93 and 87
  48. German High Command Trial 30 December 1947 – 28 October 1948, PartVIII Archived 2 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine.
  49. James, Mark (2005). "Remembering Rape: Divided Social Memory and the Red Army in Hungary 1944–1945". Past & Present. 188 (1): 133–161. doi:10.1093/pastj/gti020.
  50. Hitchcock, William I. (2003). "German Midnight: The Division of Europe, 1945". The Struggle for Europe: The Turbulent History of a Divided Continent 1945–2002. ISBN 0-385-49798-9.
  51. De Zayas, Alfred-Maurice (1994). A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944–1950. ISBN 0-312-12159-8.
  52. Walter, Elizabeth B. (1997). Barefoot in the Rubble. ISBN 0-9657793-0-0.
  53. Beevor, Antony (1 May 2002). "'They raped every German female from eight to 80'". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
  54. Milovan Djilas, Conversations with Stalin, p. 95.
  55. Beevor, Antony (1 May 2002). "They raped every German female from eight to 80". The Guardian. London.
  56. Innes McCartney (15 July 2013). British Submarines 1939-45. Osprey Publishing. p. 21. ISBN 1-8460-3007-2.
  57. Nachman Ben-Yehuda (15 July 2013). Atrocity, Deviance, and Submarine Warfare: Norms and Practices during the World Wars. University of Michigan Press. p. 133. ISBN 0-4721-1889-7.
  58. HMS Torbay (N79) Archived 23 September 2014 at the Wayback Machine.
  59. Michael L. Hadley (March 17, 1995). Count Not the Dead: The Popular Image of the German Submarine. McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 135. ISBN 0-7735-1282-9.
  60. Flint, p. 354
  61. Kershaw, Robert (1990). It Never Snows In September. Ian Allan Publishing. ISBN 0-7110-2167-8.
  62. Castle looted by British troops AAP, 23 August 1947
  63. Cobain, Ian (2005-11-12). "The secrets of the London Cage". The Guardian. Retrieved 2009-07-17.
  64. Lt Col R.G.W. Stephens (2000). Oliver Hoare (ed.), ed. Camp 020: MI5 and the Nazi Spies. Public Records Office. p. 7. ISBN 1-903365-08-2.
  65. Emsley, Clive (2013) Soldier, Sailor, Beggarman, Thief: Crime and the British Armed Services since 1914. Oxford University Press, USA, p. 128-129; ISBN 0199653712
  66. 1 2 Longden, Sean (2004) To the victor the spoils: D-Day to VE Day, the reality behind the heroism. Arris Books, p. 195.ISBN 1844370380
  67. John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War (Pantheon: New York. ISBN 0-394-75172-8), p.35.
  68. John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy, p.68.
  69. Ulrich Strauss, 2003, The Anguish of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II
  70. 1 2 John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy, p.69.
  71. "Anniversary talks—Battle of the Bismarck Sea, 2–4 March 1943". Australian War Memorial. 3 March 2003. Retrieved August 1, 2015.
  72. Convention For The Adaptation To Maritime War Of The Principles Of The Geneva Convention, Article 16
  73. T. R. Moreman "The jungle, the Japanese and the British Commonwealth armies at war, 1941-45", p. 205
  74. Gerster 2008, pp. 112–3.
  75. Gerster 2008, p. .
  76. 1 2 Rummel 1991, p. 112
  77. 1 2 Rummel 1991, p. 113
  78. Rudolph J. Rummel, 1991, China's Bloody Century: Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900 (ISBN 0-88738-417-X) Transaction Publishers, p.115.
  79. C.P. Fitzgerald, The Birth of Communist China, Penguin Books, 1964, p.106. (ISBN 0-14-020694-9 / ISBN 978-0-14-020694-4)
  80. Tom Mintier, "Photos document brutality in Shanghai" CNN, 23 September 1996. Retrieved: 25 August 2007.
  81. 中村粲 『大東亜戦争への道』展々社,1990年
  82. Mark Johnston, Fighting the enemy: Australian soldiers and their adversaries in World War II pp. 80–81
  83. 1 2 Mark Johnston, Fighting the enemy: Australian soldiers and their adversaries in World War II p. 81
  84. Kevin Baker, Paul Cullen, citizen and soldier: the life and times of Major-General Paul Cullen AC, CBE, DSC and Bar, ED, FCA p. 146
  85. Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese PoWs'" (Daily Telegraph (UK), June 8, 2005), accessed 26/05/2007. (Adrich is a Professor of History at Nottingham University.)
  86. Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese PoWs'" (Daily Telegraph (UK), June 8, 2005), accessed 26/05/2007
  87. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ferguson, Niall (2004). "Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards a Political Economy of Military Defeat". War in History. 11 (2): 148–92. doi:10.1191/0968344504wh291oa.
  88. 1 2 3 Ulrich Straus, The Anguish Of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II (excerpts) Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003 ISBN 978-0-295-98336-3, p.116
  89. Ulrich Straus, The Anguish Of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II (excerpts) Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003 ISBN 978-0-295-98336-3, p.117
  90. 1 2 3 4 5 Weingartner, J. J. (1992). "Trophies of War: US Troops and the Mutilation of Japanese War Dead, 1941–1945". Pacific Historical Review. 61 (1): 53–67. JSTOR 3640788.
  91. 1 2 3 4 Harrison, Simon (2006). "Skull trophies of the Pacific War: Transgressive objects of remembrance". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 12 (4): 817–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00365.x.
  92. Cited in Weingartner, 1992.
  93. 1 2 Schrijvers, Peter (2002). The GI War Against Japan. New York City: New York University Press. p. 212. ISBN 0-8147-9816-0.
  94. Tanaka, Toshiyuki. Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During World War II, Routledge, 2003, p.111. ISBN 0-203-30275-3
  95. Sims, Calvin (1 June 2000). "3 Dead Marines and a Secret of Wartime Okinawa". New York Times. Nago, Japan. Retrieved 6 April 2015. Still, the villagers' tale of a dark, long-kept secret has refocused attention on what historians say is one of the most widely ignored crimes of the war, the widespread rape of Okinawan women by American servicemen.
  96. 1 2 3 4 Sims, Calvin (1 June 2000). "3 Dead Marines and a Secret of Wartime Okinawa". New York Times. Nago, Japan. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  97. Feifer, George (1992). Tennozan: The Battle of Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb. Michigan: Ticknor & Fields. ISBN 9780395599242.
  98. Molasky, Michael S. (1999). The American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa: Literature and Memory. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-415-19194-4.
  99. Molasky, Michael S.; Rabson, Steve (2000). Southern Exposure: Modern Japanese Literature from Okinawa. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-8248-2300-9.
  100. Sheehan, Susan D; Elizabeth, Laura; Selden, Hein Mark. "Islands of Discontent: Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power": 18.
  101. 1 2 James D. Morrow. The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties, Center for Political Studies at The University of Michigan
  102. Yuki Tanaka, 1996,Hidden Horrors (Westview Press) (ISBN 0-8133-2718-0) pp. 2–3.
  103. Gavan Daws, "Prisoners of the Japanese: POWs of World War II in the Pacific", p.297
  104. "Donald L. Miller "D-Days in the Pacific", p317"
  105. James D. Morrow The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties, Center for Political Studies at The University of Michigan, p. 22
  106. James Bacque, Other Losses revised edition 1999, Little Brown and Company, Boston, New York, Toronto, London ISBN 1-55168-191-9
  107. Power Kills Chapter 13. Available on line at:
  108. Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 20
  109. Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 21
  110. Stephen E. Atkins, "Holocaust denial as an international movement", ABC-CLIO, 2009, pg. 105
  111. Debrah Lipstadt, "Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory", Bt Bound, 1999, pg. 41
  112. Dower, John W, (2002). ""An Aptitude for Being Unloved: War and Memory in Japan". In Bartov, Omer; et al. Crimes of War: Guilt and Denial in the Twentieth Century. New York: The New Press. p. 226. ISBN 1-56584-654-0.
  113. Sharalyn Orbaugh, "Japanese fiction of the Allied occupation" p.179


  • Addison (editor), Paul; Crang (editor), Jeremy A (2006). Firestorm: The Bombing of Dresden. Pimlico. ISBN 1-84413-928-X. 
  • Bischoff, Gunter; Ambrose, Stephen (1992), "Introduction", in Bischoff, Gunter; Ambrose, Stephen, Eisenhower and the German POWs, New York: Louisiana State University Press, ISBN 0-8071-1758-7 
  • Flint, Edwards R (2009). The development of British civil affairs and its employment in the British Sector of Allied military operations during the Battle of Normandy, June to August 1944. Cranfield, Bedford: Cranfield University; Cranfield Defence and Security School, Department of Applied Science, Security and Resilience, Security and Resilience Group. 
  • Gómez, Javier Guisández (1998). "30 June 1998 International Review of the Red Cross no 323, p.347-363: The Law of Air Warfare" (PDF). International Review of the Red Cross. 
  • Gerster, Robin (2008), Travels in Atomic Sunshine. Australia and the Occupation of Japan, Melbourne: Scribe, ISBN 978-1-921215-34-6 
  • Overy, Richard (2006). "The Post-War Debate". Firestorm: The Bombing of Dresden (PDF). 
  • Stacey, Colonel Charles Perry; Bond, Major C.C.J. (1960). Official History of the Canadian Army in the Second World War: Volume III. The Victory Campaign: The operations in North-West Europe 1944–1945. The Queen's Printer and Controller of Stationery Ottawa. 
  • Stacey, Colonel Charles Perry (1982). A date with history: Memoirs of a Canadian historian. Deneau. ISBN 978-0-88879-086-6. 
  • USAF Historical Division, Research Studies Institute Air University. "Historical Analysis of the 14–15 Bombing of Dresden" (PDF). Air Force Historical Studies Office. 

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/1/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.