Taser safety issues

Tasers and other high-voltage stun devices can cause cardiac arrhythmia in healthy and susceptible subjects, leading to heart attack or death in minutes by ventricular fibrillation, which leads to cardiac arrest and—if not treated immediately—to sudden death. An increased risk of death is directly related to the duration of high voltage exposure.

Although the medical conditions or use of illegal drugs among some of the casualties may have been the cause of death, the electric shock of the Taser can significantly heighten such risk for subjects in an at-risk category, especially electric shocks to the chest area.[1] In some cases however, death occurred after Taser use coupled with the use of force alone, with no evidence of underlying medical condition and no use of drugs.[2][3]

Risk of fire injury

Tasers, like other electric devices, have been found to ignite flammable materials. For this reason Tasers come with express instructions not to use them where flammable liquids or fumes may be present, such as filling stations and methamphetamine labs.

An evaluative study carried out in 2001 by the British Home Office investigated the potential for Tasers to ignite CS spray. Seven trials were conducted, in which CS gas containing methyl isobutyl ketone (a solvent in all CS sprays used by the United Kingdom police) was sprayed over mannequins wearing street clothing. The Tasers were then fired at the mannequins. In two of the seven trials, "the flames produced were severe and engulfed the top half of the mannequin, including the head". This poses a particular problem for law enforcement, as some police departments approve the use of CS before the use of a Taser.[4]

However, in the United States, a water or oil based pepper spray is more common than CS. This allows for the possibility of a Taser being used after an individual has been subjected to pepper spray without the concern for a fire.[5]

Training

Military

A February 2005 memorandum from the Aberdeen Proving Ground, a United States Army weapons test site, discouraged shocking soldiers with Tasers in training, contrary to Taser International's recommendations. The Army's occupational health sciences director affirmed the Taser's effectiveness, but warned that "Seizures and ventricular fibrillation can be induced by the electric current." and that "the practice of using these weapons on U.S. Army military and civilian forces in training is not recommended, given the potential risks."[6]

Police

On 5 July 2005 Michael Todd, then Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, England, let himself be shot in the back with a Taser, to demonstrate his confidence that Tasers can be used safely. This was captured on video, and the video was released to the BBC on 17 May 2007. He was wearing a shirt and no jacket. When tased, he fell forward onto his chest on the ground, and (he said afterwards) "I couldn't move, it hurt like hell," he said after recovering. "I wouldn't want to do that again."[7][8][9]

Although tests on police and military volunteers have shown Tasers to function appropriately on a healthy, calm individual in a relaxed and controlled environment,[10] the real-life target of a Taser is, if not mentally or physically unsound, in a state of high stress and in the midst of a confrontation. According to the UK’s Defence Scientific Advisory Council’s subcommittee on the Medical Implications of Less-lethal Weapons (DoMILL), "The possibility that other factors such as illicit drug intoxication, alcohol abuse, pre-existing heart disease, and cardioactive therapeutic drugs may modify the threshold for generation of cardiac arrhythmias cannot be excluded.” In addition, Taser experiments “do not take into account real life use of Tasers by law enforcement agencies, such as repeated or prolonged shocks and the use of restraints".[11][12][13][14][15]

Police officers in at least five US states have filed lawsuits against Taser International claiming they suffered serious injuries after being shocked with the device during training classes.[16]

Medical literature reports that one police officer suffered spine fractures after being shocked by a Taser during a demonstration.[17]

Use as a torture device

The United Nations Committee against Torture reports that the use of Tasers can be a form of torture, due to the acute pain they cause, and warns against the possibility of death in some cases.[18] The use of stun belts has been condemned by Amnesty International as torture, not only for the physical pain the devices cause, but also for their heightened abuse potential. Amnesty International has reported several alleged cases of excessive electroshock gun use that possibly amount to torture.[19] They have also raised extensive concerns about the use of other electro-shock devices by American police and in American prisons, as they can be (and according to Amnesty International, sometimes are) used to inflict cruel pain on individuals.[20]

Tasers may also not leave the telltale markings that a conventional beating might. The American Civil Liberties Union has also raised concerns about their use, as has the British human rights organization Resist Cardiac Arrest.

Increased use of force

Critics claim that risk-averse police officers resort to using Taser in situations in which they otherwise would have used more conventional, less violent alternatives, such as trying to reason with a cornered suspect.[21]

Comparison to alternatives

Supporters claim that electroshock weapons such as Tasers are more effective than other means including pepper-spray (an eye/breathing inflammatory agent), batons or other conventional ways of inflicting pain, even handguns, at bringing a subject down to the ground with minimum physical exertion.[22]

Supporters claim that electroshock guns are a safer alternative to devices such as firearms. Taser International now uses the term, "less lethal" instead of "non-lethal," which does not mean the weapon cannot cause death, but that it is not intended to be fatal, and in most cases is not.[23] Non-lethal weapons are defined as "weapons that are explicitly designed and primarily employed so as to incapacitate personnel or material, while minimizing fatalities, permanent injury to personnel, and undesired damage to property and the environment."

"Non-lethal" designation

While they are not technically considered lethal, some authorities and non-governmental organizations question both the degree of safety presented by the weapon and the ethical implications of using a weapon that some, such as sections of Amnesty International, allege is inhumane. As a consequence, Amnesty International Canada and other civil liberties organizations have argued that a moratorium should be placed on Taser use until research can determine a way for them to be safely used.[10] Amnesty International has documented over 500 deaths that occurred after the use of Tasers. Amnesty International. Police sources question whether the Taser was the actual cause of death in those cases, as many of the deaths occurred in people with serious medical conditions and/or severe drug intoxication, often to the point of excited delirium.

Validity of "excited delirium" term

Critics of taser use, however, argue that "excited delirium" is not a valid medical term[10] and is not listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, although the term is actually recognized by the National Association of Medical Examiners and the American College of Emergency Physicians.[24] Tasers are often used as an alternative to attempting to verbally get a potentially armed, or otherwise dangerous suspect to comply, striking the suspect with a baton or shooting them with firearms. The term "less-lethal" is being used more frequently when referring to weapons such as tasers because many experts feel that no device meant to subdue a person can be completely safe. The less-lethal category also includes devices such as pepper spray, tear gas, riot guns and batons, all of which have been reported as contributing or causative factors in deaths. One problem when comparing the Taser to other forms of force is that no precise statistics are kept in the U.S. on policing related deaths or the use of excessive force. In 2001, the New York Times reported that the U.S. government is unable or unwilling to collect statistics showing the precise number of suspects killed by the police or the prevalence of the use of excessive force.[25]

Manufacturer's risk acknowledgments

Breathing

Taser International has stated in a training bulletin that repeated blasts of a taser can "impair breathing and respiration". Also, on Taser's website[22] it is stated that, for a subject in a state described as "excited delirium", repeated or prolonged stuns with the Taser can contribute to "significant and potentially fatal health risks".[16] (The term "excited delirium" is not recognized by the American Medical Association or American Psychological Association.[24] but was recently recognized by the American College of Emergency Physicians). In such a state, physical restraint by the police coupled with the exertion by the subject are considered likely to result in death or more injuries. Critics alleged that electroshock devices can damage delicate electrical equipment such as pacemakers, but tests conducted by the Cleveland Clinic found that Tasers did not interfere with pacemakers and implantable defibrillators.[26][27]

Cardiac arrests, lawsuits and effectiveness

On September 30, 2009, the manufacturer Taser International issued a warning and new targeting guidelines to law enforcement agencies to aim shots below the chest center of mass as "avoiding chest shots with ECDs avoids the controversy about whether ECDs do or do not affect the human heart"[28] Calgary Police Service indicated in a news interview that the rationale for the warning was "new medical research that is coming out is showing that the closer probe to heart distances have a likelihood, or a possibility, that they may affect the rhythm of the heart".[29]

Taser "recommended officers avoid tasing suspects in the chest area, citing the potential for cardiac arrests, lawsuits and effectiveness of the device". Central Texas Constable Richard McCain, whose deputy used a Taser weapon against an unarmed 72-year-old woman (resulting in a $40,000 lawsuit settlement), describes Taser's directive as "not really practical".[30]

Deaths and injuries related to Taser use

While their intended purpose is to avoid the use of lethal force (firearms), 180 deaths were reported to have been associated with tasers in the US by 2006.[31] It is unclear in each case whether the Taser was the cause of death, but several legislators in the U.S. have filed bills clamping down on them and requesting more studies on their effects.[32] A study led by William Bozeman of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center of nearly 1,000 persons subjected to Taser use concluded that 99.7% of the subjects had suffered no injuries, or minor ones such as scrapes and bruises, while three persons suffered injuries severe enough to need hospital admission, and two died. Bozeman's study found that "...paired anterior probe impacts potentially capable of producing a transcardiac discharge vector." occurred in 21.9% of all deployments.[33] Multiple studies have since concluded that CEW use directly impacts cardiac and brain function, and can lead to cardiac arrest as well as dangerously elevated heart rate.[34][35]

The head of the U.S. southern regional office of Amnesty International, Jared Feuer, claimed that 277 people in the United States have died after being shocked by a Taser between June 2001 and October 2007, which has already been documented. He also claimed that about 80% of those on whom a Taser was used by U.S. police were unarmed. "Tasers interfere with a basic equation, which is that force must always be proportional to the threat", Feuer said. "They are being used in a situation where a firearm or even a baton would never be justified."[36] A spokesperson for Taser International asserted that if a person dies from a "tasering" it is instantaneous and not days later.[37] Taser International announced that it is "transmitting over 60 legal demand letters requiring correction of... false and misleading headlines."[38]

The Guardian newspaper was running a database, The Counted, in 2015, tracking US killings by police and other law enforcement agencies that year. As of 6 November 2015, 47 deaths of the 965 killed were classified as taser events.[39]

Chronology

Several incidents have received publicity.

2003
2004

A 2004 CBS News report described 70 deaths believed to be caused by the Taser, including 10 in August 2004 alone.[41] At that time Amnesty International reported the number at 150 since June 2001.[42]

2005
2006
2007

In October and November 2007, four individuals died after being tasered in Canada, leading to calls for review of its use. The highest-profile of these cases was that of Robert Dziekański, a non-English speaking man from Poland who died in less than two minutes after being tasered by Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) at the Vancouver International Airport, October 14, 2007.[50][51] The tasering was captured on home video and was broadcast nationally.[52] This was followed by three further death-after-Tasering incidents in Montreal, Halifax, Nova Scotia, and Chilliwack, British Columbia, leading Amnesty International to demand Taser use end in Canada, as it had records of 16 other such deaths in the country.[53]

On Sunday 18 November 2007 in Jacksonville, Florida, Christian Allen, 21, was pulled over by police because his car radio was too loud. After a struggle he and a passenger escaped on foot, an officer gave chase, caught Allen and tasered him at least three times. Allen died later in custody.[54]

On December 12, 2007, in response to the death of Robert Dziekański, Canadian Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day requested that the federal Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP (CPC) prepare recommendations for immediate implementation. The CPC report recommended to "immediately restrict the use of the conducted energy weapon (CEW)" by reclassifying it as an "impact weapon."[55] The commission released its report on 18 June 2008; recommendations include restricting use to experienced officers (5 years or more), providing medical attention to those who have been shocked, improving previous documentation of specific deployment of the weapon, among other things.[56][57][58]

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

Analysis

Between June 2001 and June 2007, there were at least 245 cases of deaths of subjects after having been shocked using Tasers.[105] Of these cases:

In 2015, the Washington Post reported that in the 11-month period from January to November 2015, 48 people died in the United States in incidents in which police used Tasers, according to police, court and autopsy records.[108]

A study published by the American Journal of Cardiology found that California police departments that introduced Tasers experienced significant increases in the numbers of in-custody sudden deaths and firearm deaths in the first full year following deployment. The rates declined to predeployment levels in subsequent years. No significant change in the number of officer injuries was found.[109]

A study by the Potomac Institute concluded; "Based on the available evidence, and on accepted criteria for defining product risk vs. efficacy, we believe that when stun technology is appropriately applied, it is relatively safe and clearly effective. The only known field data that are available suggest that the odds are, at worst, one in one thousand that a stun device would contribute to (and this does not imply “cause”) death. This figure is likely not different than the odds of death when stun devices are not used, but when other multiple force measures are. A more defensible figure is one in one hundred thousand."[110]

After hearing many witnesses and briefs the report[111] by the Canadian House of Commons, Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security makes 17 recommendations as a result the death due to the repetitive tasering of a Polish immigrant at the Vancouver International airport.

An investigation by the Canadian Press and Canadian Broadcasting Corporation found that one-third of those shot by a Taser by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police received injuries that required medical attention as a result. The news agencies used Freedom of Information requests to obtain the Taser-use forms filled out by RCMP officers from 2002 to 2007.[57]

The study[112] done by Pierre Savard, Ing., PhD., Ecole Polythechnique de Montreal, et al., for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), indicated that the threshold of energy needed to induce deadly ventricular fibrillation decreased dramatically with each successive burst of pulses. The threshold for women may be less.[113]

Although the Taser[114] is a programmable device, the controlling software does not limit: a) the number of the bursts of pulses and the time between bursts while the trigger is held down continuously, or b) the number of times the shock cycles can be repeated. Thus the design does not adequately reduce the likelihood that the victim's heart enters into a deadly ventricular fibrillation.

According to a study presented at the Heart Rhythm Society's 2007 Scientific Sessions, Tasers may present risks to subjects with implanted pacemakers.[115] However, a study conducted by the Cleveland Clinic in 2007 on a single animal determined that a standard five-second Taser X26 application "does not affect the short-term functional integrity of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators.... The long-term effects were not assessed."[27]

A study conducted by electrical engineer James Ruggieri and published January 2006 in the Journal of the National Academy of Forensic Engineers measured a Taser's output as 39 times more powerful than specified. The study concluded that the discharge is sufficient to trigger ventricular fibrillation, a 50 percent risk according to electric safety standards. Ruggieri said that electricity breaks down skin tissue, decreasing its resistance and increasing current through the body.[6]

A 2007 study published in The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology questioned the apparent contradiction created by the claim that the Taser X26 does not stimulate the heart muscle, while clearly causing skeletal muscle contraction and stimulation. They estimated the average current pulse of the X26 at 1 ampere. They concluded that it is primarily proximity (or lack thereof) of the heart to the electrodes that prevents stimulation of the heart, along with the short duration of the pulse, which allows the heart to return to near its baseline state prior to the next pulse, due to the larger time constant for the heart muscle vs skeletal muscles. They estimated a 0.4% chance of heart muscle stimulation among the general population with optimum (or worst case) electrode placement, which would normally resolve itself with the resumption of a normal heart beat.[116]

In 2006, the US National Institute of Justice began a two-year study into Taser-related deaths in custody.[117]

A Chicago study suggests that use of the Taser can interfere with heart function. A team of scientists and doctors at the Cook County hospital trauma center stunned 6 pigs with two 40-second Taser discharges across the chest. Every animal was left with heart rhythm problems and two of the subjects died of cardiac arrest. One of the subjects died three minutes after being shot indicating, according to researcher Bob Walker, that "after the Taser shock ends, there can still be effects that can be evoked and you can still see cardiac effects."[118][119]

Other medical issues

San Francisco cardiologist and electrophysiologist Zian Tseng told the Braidwood Inquiry that a healthy individual could die from a Taser discharge, depending on electrode placement on the chest and pulse timing. He said that the risk of serious injury or death is increased by the number of activations, adrenaline or drugs in the bloodstream, and a susceptible medical history. After Tseng began researching Tasers three years ago, Taser International contacted him, asking him to reconsider his media statements and offering funding.[120]

Taser darts penetrate the skin, and therefore may pose a hazard for transmitting diseases via blood. U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements and the bloodborne pathogen protocols should be followed when removing a Taser probe.[121] The removal process may also be addressed in an exposure control plan (ECP) in order to increase Taser probe removal safety.[121]

One issue often raised with the use of the Taser are the effects of Metabolic acidosis. This is a temporary condition where the body produces lactic acid within the muscles in the same way as strenuous physical exercise.[122][123]

Other legal issues and court cases

According to Taser International, tasers are intended “to incapacitate dangerous, combative, or high-risk subjects who pose a risk to law enforcement/correctional officers, innocent citizens, or themselves”.[124]

Tasers are illegal or subject to legal restrictions on their availability and use in many jurisdictions.

Police officers in at least five US states have filed lawsuits against Taser International claiming they suffered serious injuries after being shocked with the device during training classes.[16]

Summit County, Ohio Medical Examiner Lisa J. Kohler cited Taser use as a cause of death in three cases, Mark D. McCullaugh, Dennis S. Hyde, and Richard Holcomb. Taser International sued, and on May 2, 2008, visiting judge Ted Schneiderman ordered the Medical Examiner to remove all references to "Taser" in the reports and change the cause of death in McCullaugh's case from "Homicide" to "Undetermined."[125]

On June 9, 2008 Taser International lost its first Product-Liability Suit.[126]

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP - 18 June 2008 report

The Commissioner for Public Complaints made several recommendations regarding the use of tasers by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) including:[127][128][129]

Compliance Strategy Group Independent Review of the RCMP – June 2008

Compliance Strategy Group (John Kiedrowski, Principal Consultant, Michael Petrunik and Ronald-Frans Melchers, Associate Consultants) conducted An Independent Review of the Adoption and Use of Conducted Energy Weapons by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police[130] that was completed in June 2008, but only released under access to information and privacy around September 12, 2008. The report is available from the RCMP under access to information, but is censored (e.g., no recommendations). The report as released by the RCMP may be found on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation website www.cbc.ca. The Report reviews how the RCMP made the decisions to introduce the conducted energy weapons, training, policies and procedures, and accountability. The report is approximately 150 pages and provides an excellent analysis on how a police force adopted the Taser. The authors of the report argued that the police did not do their due diligences, is concerned about training and the issues of accountability. The report also pointed out that the police in Canada have misclassified the Taser as a prohibited weapon whereas under the criminal code it is referred to as a prohibited firearm, and refers to excited delirium as "folk knowledge".

Probe removal safety issues

  1. Taser probes (also known as Taser darts) qualify as a "sharp" according to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) definition of "Sharps".[131] This is important because the proper removal and treatment of a sharp is an OSHA issue in the US.[131]
  2. If an individual receives a "needlestick" during the Taser dart removal, or if an individual is exposed to bloodborne diseases during the removal, the incident is called an "exposure incident".[132] The individual subject to the exposure incident may have or have not contracted bloodborne diseases while removing the Taser dart or while having the Taser dart removed. Extensive testing is the next step in the process. This can be an expensive and stressful event. Possible bloodborne diseases that may be contracted include HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and other bloodborne pathogens".[132] Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is also a bloodborne pathogen.[133]
  3. Current methods of removal: OSHA does not give clear guidance as to how to remove the probes, the guidelines only state that the removal must be done safely. Current methods of Taser Darts include removing the probes by hand, removing the probe with pliers or similar tools, or using the D.A.R.T. Pro and X-TRACTOR TIP Removal System made by Global Pathogen Solutions. When handling contaminated sharps OSHA guidelines should always be followed.
    Special precautions should be taken when a Taser dart is being removed from sensitive areas.[134]
  4. Disposal issues: Proper disposal of the contaminated darts includes placing the probes into a puncture resistant, leak-proof container.[131]
  5. OSHA requirements and the Bloodborne Pathogen Protocols should be followed when removing a Taser probe.[135]

The removal process may also be addressed in an Exposure Control Plan in order to increase Taser probe removal safety.[135]

See also

References

  1. USA Amnesty International's concerns about Taser use, Statement to the U.S. Justice Department inquiry into deaths in custody Accessed on December 2, 2007
  2. "Robert Dziekanski Taser Death A Homicide: Coroner (VIDEO)". The Huffington Post. April 8, 2013. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  3. "Tased in the Chest for 23 Seconds, Dead for 8 Minutes, Now Facing a Lifetime of Recovery".
  4. Safety flaw in police's new gun December 9, 2001
  5. water and oil based pepper spray patent Sep 18, 2007
  6. 1 2 "Study raises concerns over Tasers' safety", Arizona Republic, February 13, 2006
  7. 5 July 2005
  8. Top cop tastes a TASER May 17, 2007
  9. BBC News Player - Police chief shot with TASER May 18, 2007
  10. 1 2 3 "In depth: Tasers". CBC News. Archived from the original on November 3, 2007. Retrieved November 12, 2007.
  11. Amnesty International’s continuing concerns about Taser use (in the USA) 2006
  12. Amnesty International 2004 report USA: Excessive and lethal force? Amnesty International's concerns about deaths and ill-treatment involving police use of tasers
  13. Amnesty International 2006 report USA: Amnesty International's continuing concerns about taser use
  14. Amnesty International 2006 report Canada: Inappropriate and excessive use of tasers
  15. Amnesty International Statement to the U.S. Justice Department inquiry into deaths in custody 27 September 2007
  16. 1 2 3 Steven DiJoseph (November 21, 2005). "Arizona Sheriff Announces Test of Alternative to Taser Stun Gun" (reprint).
  17. Police Officer Suffers Spine Fractures at Taser Demonstration September 4, 2007
  18. Committee against Torture Concludes Thirty-Ninth Session, press release, United Nations Office at Geneva, November 23, 2007. Accessed 26 November 2007. Archived February 21, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.
  19. USA - Amnesty International 2003 Archived October 19, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
  20. Amnesty International’s continuing concerns about taser use 2006 Archived September 26, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
  21. The Taser Effect: Two years after HPD armed itself with the stun guns, questions linger over how and how often the weapon is being used, January 14, 2007
  22. 1 2 "Smart Weapons, Body Cameras, Data Solutions - TASER". taser.com. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  23. Police stun-gun may be lethal, firm admits October 3, 2005
  24. 1 2 "A knee in the neck of excited delirium". cmaj.ca. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  25. Butterfield, Fox (2001-04-29). "When the Police Shoot, Who's Counting?". The New York Times. Retrieved December 22, 2007.
  26. Cleveland Clinic Study Demonstrates TASER X26 Does Not Affect Short-Term Function of Implantable Pacemakers and Defibrillators May 16, 2007
  27. 1 2 Lakkireddy D, Khasnis A, Antenacci J, et al. (2007). "Do electrical stun guns (TASER-X26) affect the functional integrity of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators?". Europace. 9 (7): 551–6. doi:10.1093/europace/eum058. PMID 17491105.
  28. TASER Law Enforcement Warnings
  29. "Taser maker issues new guidelines". CTVNews. October 7, 2009. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  30. FOX. "FOX 7 Austin - News Weather Sports". KTBC. Retrieved January 15, 2016.
  31. Parker Waichman Alonso LLP, Associated Press, June 14, 2006. Justice Department to review TASER deaths. Retrieved December 3, 2007.
  32. KHAMPHA BOUAPHANH, AP file, Houston & Texas News. Retrieved December 3, 2007.
  33. Bozeman, William P.; Teacher, Eric; Winslow, James E. (December 1, 2012). "Transcardiac Conducted Electrical Weapon (TASER) Probe Deployments: Incidence and Outcomes". The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 43 (6): 970–975. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.03.022. ISSN 0736-4679.
  34. "Taser shock disrupts brain function, has implications for police interrogations". Science Daily. February 8, 2016. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  35. "Study: TASER Shocks May Cause Fatal Heart Attacks". Prison Legal News. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  36. William Dunham, Reuters, October 8, 2006. retrieved December 7, 2007.
  37. Mark W. Kroll, Why do certain anti-police groups blame TASER for injuries or death, last updated November 6, 2007. Retrieved December 8, 2007. Archived here, on December 23, 2007. Archived June 8, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
  38. Prime Newswire issued November 16, 2007
  39. "The Counted: People killed by police in the US". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 November 2015.
  40. Goldman, Abigail (November 23, 2008). "Cops raise Taser safety claims". Las Vegas Sun. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  41. "TASER Danger?". CBS News. October 12, 2004.
  42. 1 2 "Man dies after police jolt him with stun gun - CNN.com". CNN. November 18, 2007. Retrieved May 24, 2010.
  43. Terror police 'shot' man in coma, BBC News, November 15, 2007
  44. Taser shocks ruled cause of death, by Robert Anglen, The Arizona Republic, July 30, 2005. Accessed November 25, 2007.
  45. Dana Treen. "State rules Taser death homicide". jacksonville.com. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  46. http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/article.cfm?ID=26890
  47. N.S. orders Taser review after inmate's death
  48. http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iQp9AiPFhnRBQzgeSh2Yn4ZNvJBQ
  49. "Montreal family wants public inquiry after coroner says Taser use avoidable". CBC News. August 29, 2008. Retrieved June 25, 2012.
  50. "Witness blames RCMP, Vancouver airport for death of Tasered man". CBC News. October 18, 2007. Archived from the original on December 11, 2007.
  51. "Details emerge in airport death". CTVNews. November 25, 2007. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  52. "Taser video shows RCMP shocked immigrant within 25 seconds of their arrival". CBC News. November 15, 2007. Archived from the original on December 19, 2007.
  53. AFP: Fourth Taser gun death in Canada: police
  54. 1 2 Officer Uses Taser During Struggle; Man Dies
  55. "RCMP watchdog releases report on Taser use". CTV News. December 12, 2007. Retrieved December 12, 2007.
  56. Rookie Mounties should be barred from using Tasers: watchdog, CBC News, June 18, 2008
  57. 1 2 One-third of people shot by Taser need medical attention: probe, CBC News, June 17, 2008
  58. RCMP fire Tasers multiple times despite health hazards: probe, CBC News, June 11, 2008
  59. "Man dies after cop hits him with Taser 9 times". CNN.com. July 22, 2008. Retrieved January 15, 2009.
  60. "Chicago man dies after Taser hit by Ohio police - Employees, Chicago". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on April 29, 2008.
  61. "Taser held responsible in Salinas death", The (Monterey County) Herald, June 7, 2008
  62. Man dies after being Tasered, CTV.ca, July 22, 2008
  63. "Statesville suspect dies after Taser hits". The Charlotte Observer. July 29, 2008.
  64. Statement from the New York City Police Department New York Times, September 2008.
  65. "Judge rules for Taser in cause-of-death decisions". azcentral.com web. May 2, 2008. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  66. http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/article.cfm?ID=20777 Martinsville Bulletin, October 2009
  67. http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/05/28/michigan.taser.death/ CNN, May 2009
  68. "Autistic man Tazed on Tybee, family says". savannahnow.com. May 23, 2010. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  69. "Man dies after being shocked by Taser in jail". Contra Costa Times. Dublin, CA. Associated Press. August 18, 2010.
  70. Melzer, Eartha Jane (August 23, 2010). "Man dies after Taser shots from Washtenaw County police". The Michigan Messenger.
  71. Simons, Abby (September 18, 2010). "Man hit with Taser in police scuffle dies". The Star Tribune.
  72. "Oklahoma City man dies after police use Taser to subdue him during domestic dispute". The Oklahoman. September 17, 2010.
  73. "man dead after police taser". Sydney, Australia. ABC Australia. October 5, 2010.
  74. "mali man dies after french police use taser". BBC News. November 30, 2010.
  75. "Boynton Beach police officer charged with tasing fellow officer". The Palm Beach Post News. May 6, 2011.
  76. "Suspect dies in BSO custody; relatives question reason". Palm Beach Post. June 6, 2011.
  77. "Taser gun used on man aged 82 during arrest in Northolt". BBC News. July 11, 2011.
  78. "Teen struck by Ohio campus officer's stun gun dies". Associated Press. August 6, 2011.
  79. "PWC police investigate Taser death". WTOP News. August 7, 2011.
  80. "Barrow Taser arrest man dies". BBC News. August 17, 2011.
  81. Carter, Helen (August 24, 2011). "Man dies after Taser arrest near Bolton". London: The Guardian.
  82. "Fresno man dies after being tasered by a sheriff's deputy". ABC Local. September 13, 2011.
  83. "FHP Trooper on Tasing handcuffed woman Danielle Maudsley: I needed to stop her". 10News. Feb 17, 2012.
  84. "Chief: Tasers justified". Times Union (Albany). 1 November 2011.
  85. Laville, Sandra (November 24, 2011). "Met police Tasered man carrying toy gun on train". The Guardian. London. Retrieved November 25, 2011.
  86. "Heart attack kills TPD officer while visiting mother". KVOA News 4 Tucson.
  87. "San Bernardino Man Dies After Police Tase Him". LAist. November 16, 2011.
  88. "N.C. probes death of bicyclist tased by police". CBS. November 23, 2011.
  89. "In cuffs, man Tasered and seriously injured on Honeymoon Island". Tampa Bay Times. March 18, 2012.
  90. "Man Tased on Honeymoon Island Dies". News Talk Florida. March 19, 2012.
  91. "Suspect dies after Sydney police fire Taser". The Sydney Morning Herald. March 18, 2012.
  92. "Ombudsman to scrutinise Taser death probe". The Sydney Morning Herald. March 20, 2012.
  93. Miles, Kathelene (April 16, 2012). "Sledge Hammer, Porn Star, Dies After Being Tasered By Police". The Huffington Post. Retrieved April 18, 2012.
  94. Winston, Richard; Matt Stevens (April 17, 2012). "Autopsy pending for porn actor Sledge Hammer after fatal LAPD clash". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 18, 2012.
  95. "Caught On Camera: Woman Goes Into Cardiac Arrest During Traffic Stop". cbslocal.com. November 19, 2012.
  96. "Man dies after police use Taser in Greater Manchester". BBC News. July 11, 2013.
  97. "Israel Hernandez Dies After Being Tasered By Miami Beach Police For Graffiti". Huffington Post. August 7, 2013.
  98. "Police Taser Killed Miami Beach Teen Israel Hernandez, Confirms Medical Examiner (updated)". Huffington Post. July 3, 2014.
  99. "Man Tasered by Edmonton police dies in hospital". CBC News. October 31, 2013.
  100. "Teen critical from stun gun; FBI investigates case". Associated Press. September 16, 2014.
  101. Harley, Nicola (November 6, 2014). "Suspected murderer killed as he 'ate' body parts". The Daily Telegraph. London.
  102. "Man dies in police Taser shooting in Newcastle-under-Lyme". BBC. December 22, 2014.
  103. Jackman, Tom (April 11, 2015). "Fairfax jail inmate in Taser death was shackled". The Washington Post.
  104. County police getting Tasers May 23, 2007
  105. Death by Excited Delirium: Diagnosis or Coverup? February 26, 2007
  106. Another Taser Death - In Clearwater April 07, 2006
  107. http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2015/11/26/improper-techniques-increased-risks/
  108. Lee, B.; Vittinghoff, E; Whiteman, D; Park, M; Lau, LL; Tseng, ZH (2009). "Relation of Taser (Electrical Stun Gun) Deployment to Increase in In-Custody Sudden Deaths". The American Journal of Cardiology. 103 (6): 877–80. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.046. PMID 19268749.
  109. "Potomac Institute for Policy Studies" (pdf). potomacinstitute.org. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  110. STUDY OF THE CONDUCTIVE ENERGY WEAPON–TASER June, 2008
  111. Analysis of the Quality and Safety of the Taser X26 devices tested for Radio-Canada / Canadian Broadcasting Corporation by National Technical Systems,Test Report 41196‐08.SRC December 2, 2008
  112. The Electric Shock Questions - Effects and Symptoms 2005
  113. TASER X26E Operating Manual
  114. Study Shows Tasers Pose Potential Risks for Pacemaker Patients: Weapons May Cause Arrhythmias in Patients With Cardiac Devices May 11, 2007
  115. Ideker, R. E.; Dosdall, D. J. (2007). "Can the Direct Cardiac Effects of the Electric Pulses Generated by the TASER X26 Cause Immediate or Delayed Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Normal Adults?". The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 28 (3): 195–201. doi:10.1097/PAF.0b013e31803179a9. PMID 17721165.
  116. Justice Department looks into deaths of people subdued by stun guns July 13, 2006
  117. "Chicago study calls Taser's safety claims into question", CBC News, January 30, 2008
  118. Dennis AJ, Valentino DJ, Walter RJ, et al. (2007). "Acute effects of TASER X26 discharges in a swine model". J Trauma. 63 (3): 581–90. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3180683c16. PMID 18073604.
  119. "Stun guns not risk free, inquiry told", CBC News, May 12, 2008
  120. 1 2 OHSA. "Bloodborne pathogens. - 1910.1030". Occupational Safety and Health Administration. p. 1910.1030. Retrieved January 15, 2016.
  121. http://www.ecdlaw.info/outlines/06-10-08%20TRS%20Metabolic%20Acidosis.pdf
  122. https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/features/taser_death/taser-death-tasered-to-deaths-by-tasers-2.html
  123. "About Us, Company - TASER". taser.com. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  124. Autopsy findings must be changed, judge rules. Akron Beacon Journal
  125. "Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million". bloomberg.com. June 7, 2008. Retrieved August 2, 2015.
  126. Rookie Mounties should be barred from using Tasers: watchdog
  127. One-third of people shot by Taser need medical attention: probe
  128. RCMP fire Tasers multiple times despite health hazards: probe
  129. RCMP website
  130. 1 2 3 OSHA. "OSHA Fact Sheet Protecting Yourself When Handling Contaminated Sharps" (pdf). OSHA. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  131. 1 2 OSHA. "OSHA Fact Sheet: Bloodborne Pathogen Exposure Incidents" (PDF). OSHA. Retrieved May 9, 2012.
  132. Center For Disease Control. "Causes of MRSA Infections". Center for Disease Control. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  133. James A. Cronin. "Conducted Energy Devices: Development of Standards for Consistency and Guidance The Creation of National CED Policy and Training Guidelines" (PDF). Department of Justice. p. 24.
  134. 1 2 "Occupational Safety and Health Administration". Occupational Safety and Health Administration. p. 1910 1030.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.