Torino scale

The Torino Scale is a method for categorizing the impact hazard associated with near-Earth objects (NEOs) such as asteroids and comets. It is intended as a communication tool for astronomers and the public to assess the seriousness of collision predictions, by combining probability statistics and known kinetic damage potentials into a single threat value. The Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale is a similar, but more complex scale.

Overview

Torino Scale. The scale in metres is the approximate diameter of an asteroid with a typical collision velocity.

The Torino Scale uses an integer scale from 0 to 10. A 0 indicates an object has a negligibly small chance of collision with the Earth, compared with the usual "background noise" of collision events, or is too small to penetrate Earth's atmosphere intact. A 10 indicates that a collision is certain, and the impacting object is large enough to precipitate a global disaster.

An object is assigned a 0 to 10 value based on its collision probability and the kinetic energy (expressed in megatons of TNT) of the possible collision.

The Torino Scale is defined only for potential impacts less than 100 years in the future.

"For an object with multiple potential collisions on a set of dates, a Torino Scale value should be determined for each date. It may be convenient to summarize such an object by the greatest Torino Scale value within the set."[1]

History and naming

The Torino Scale was created by Professor Richard P. Binzel in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The first version, called "A Near-Earth Object Hazard Index", was presented at a United Nations conference in 1995 and was published by Binzel in the subsequent conference proceedings (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, volume 822, 1997.)

A revised version of the "Hazard Index" was presented at a June 1999 international conference on NEOs held in Torino (Turin), Italy. The conference participants voted to adopt the revised version, where the bestowed name "Torino Scale" recognizes the spirit of international cooperation displayed at that conference toward research efforts to understand the hazards posed by NEOs. ("Torino Scale" is the proper usage, not "Turin Scale.")[1]

Due to exaggerated press coverage of Level 1 asteroids, a rewording of the Torino Scale was published in 2005, adding more details and renaming the categories: in particular, Level 1 was changed from "Events meriting careful monitoring" to "Normal".

The Torino Scale has served as the model for the Rio Scale which quantifies the validity and societal impact of SETI data.[2]

Current Torino Scale

The Torino Scale also uses a color code scale: white, green, yellow, orange, red. Each color code has an overall meaning:[3]

NO HAZARD (white)
0.The likelihood of a collision is zero, or is so low as to be effectively zero. Also applies to small objects such as meteors and bodies that burn up in the atmosphere as well as infrequent meteorite falls that rarely cause damage.
NORMAL (green)
1.A routine discovery in which a pass near Earth is predicted that poses no unusual level of danger. Current calculations show the chance of collision is extremely unlikely with no cause for public attention or public concern. New telescopic observations very likely will lead to reassignment to Level 0.
MERITING ATTENTION BY ASTRONOMERS (yellow)
2.A discovery, which may become routine with expanded searches, of an object making a somewhat close but not highly unusual pass near Earth. While meriting attention by astronomers, there is no cause for public attention or public concern as an actual collision is very unlikely. New telescopic observations very likely will lead to reassignment to Level 0.
3.A close encounter, meriting attention by astronomers. Current calculations give a 1% or greater chance of collision capable of localized destruction. Most likely, new telescopic observations will lead to reassignment to Level 0. Attention by public and by public officials is merited if the encounter is less than a decade away.
4.A close encounter, meriting attention by astronomers. Current calculations give a 1% or greater chance of collision capable of regional devastation. Most likely, new telescopic observations will lead to reassignment to Level 0. Attention by public and by public officials is merited if the encounter is less than a decade away.
THREATENING (orange)
5.A close encounter posing a serious, but still uncertain threat of regional devastation. Critical attention by astronomers is needed to determine conclusively whether a collision will occur. If the encounter is less than a decade away, governmental contingency planning may be warranted.
6.A close encounter by a large object posing a serious but still uncertain threat of a global catastrophe. Critical attention by astronomers is needed to determine conclusively whether a collision will occur. If the encounter is less than three decades away, governmental contingency planning may be warranted.
7.A very close encounter by a large object, which if occurring this century, poses an unprecedented but still uncertain threat of a global catastrophe. For such a threat in this century, international contingency planning is warranted, especially to determine urgently and conclusively whether a collision will occur.
CERTAIN COLLISIONS (red)
8.A collision is certain, capable of causing localized destruction for an impact over land or possibly a tsunami if close offshore. Such events occur on average between once per 50 years and once per several thousand years.
9.A collision is certain, capable of causing unprecedented regional devastation for a land impact or the threat of a major tsunami for an ocean impact. Such events occur on average between once per 10,000 years and once per 100,000 years.
10.A collision is certain, capable of causing global climatic catastrophe that may threaten the future of civilization as we know it, whether impacting land or ocean. Such events occur on average once per 100,000 years, or less often.

No object has ever been rated above level 4; Currently all objects are rated level 0 (see below).

Actual impacts and impact energy comparisons

The Chicxulub impact, believed by many to be a significant factor in the extinction of the dinosaurs, has been estimated at 100 million (108) megatons, or Torino Scale 10. The impact which created the Barringer Crater, and the Tunguska event in 1908 are both estimated to be in the 310 megaton range,[4] corresponding to Torino Scale 8. The 2013 Chelyabinsk meteor had a total kinetic energy prior to impact of about 0.5 megatons, corresponding to Torino Scale 0. Between 2000 and 2013, 26 asteroid impacts with energy of 1-600 kiloton were detected.[5]

The biggest hydrogen bomb ever exploded, the Tsar Bomba, was around 50 megatons. The 1883 eruption of Krakatoa was the equivalent of roughly 200 megatons.

The comet C/2013 A1, which passed close to Mars in 2014, was originally estimated to have a potential impact energy of 5 million to 24 billion Mt, and in March 2013 was estimated to have an impact probability of ~1:1250, corresponding to the Martian analogue of Torino Scale 6.[6] The impact probability was reduced to ~1:120000 in April 2013, corresponding to Torino Scale 1 or 2.[7]

Objects with non-zero Torino ratings

Currently non-zero

Downgraded to zero

This is a partial list of near-Earth asteroids that have been listed with a Torino Scale rating of 1+ and been lowered to 0 or been removed from the Sentry Risk Table altogether. Most objects that reach a Torino Scale of 1 have a short observation arc of less than 2 weeks and are quickly removed as the observation arc gets longer and more accurate.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/torino.cfm Torino Impact Scale (NASA Ames)
  2. "The Rio Scale". International Academy of Astronautics. Retrieved 2016-08-29.
  3. "The Torino Impact Hazard Scale". NASA/JPL Near-Earth Object Program Office. 13 Apr 2005. Retrieved 2011-11-05.
  4. "Sandia supercomputers offer new explanation of Tunguska disaster". Sandia National Laboratories. December 17, 2007. Retrieved 2008-01-29. The asteroid that caused the extensive damage was much smaller than we had thought,” says Sandia principal investigator Mark Boslough of the impact that occurred June 30, 1908.
  5. http://sentinelmission.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/B612_PR_042214.pdf
  6. Elenin, Leonid (3 March 2013). "Close approach to Mars. Up-to-date analysis". SpaceObs.org blog (ISON-NM). Retrieved 2013-03-03.
  7. "News - Comet to Make Close Flyby of Red Planet in October 2014". NASA/JPL.
  8. "Current Impact Risks (2002 CU11)". Near-Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on March 21, 2002.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 "NEOs Removed from Impact Risks Tables". Near Earth Object Program. NASA.
  10. "Current Impact Risks (2003 EE16)". Near-Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on April 2, 2003.
  11. 1 2 "2003 MH4 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on July 8, 2003.
  12. "Asteroid 2003 QQ47's Potential Earth Impact in 2014 Ruled Out". NASA/JPL Near-Earth Object Program Office. September 3, 2003. Retrieved 2011-11-06.
  13. 1 2 "Major News about Minor Objects (2003 YT1)". hohmanntransfer. 2003-12-27.
  14. "Major News about Minor Objects (2004 DV24)". hohmanntransfer. 2004-03-01.
  15. "Major News about Minor Objects (2004 FU4)". hohmanntransfer. 2004-03-27.
  16. 1 2 Don Yeomans; Steve Chesley & Paul Chodas (December 23, 2004). "Near-Earth Asteroid 2004 MN4 Reaches Highest Score To Date On Hazard Scale". NASA/JPL Near-Earth Object Program Office.
  17. David Morrison (March 1, 2006). "Asteroid 2004 VD17 classed as Torino Scale 2". Asteroid and Comet Impact Hazards (NASA). Retrieved 2011-11-06.
  18. 1 2 "1997 XR2 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on February 7, 2006.
  19. "2006 SU49 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on September 28, 2006.
  20. "2006 XG1 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on January 7, 2007.
  21. 1 2 "2007 CA19 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on February 16, 2007.
  22. 1 2 "2007 LQ19 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on July 14, 2007.
  23. "2008 AF4 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on January 15, 2008.
  24. "2009 KK Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on June 4, 2009.
  25. "2009 WM1 Earth Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on November 24, 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-26.
  26. "Observations of small Solar-System bodies (2009 YG)". hohmanntransfer. 2009-12-28.
  27. "2005 YU55 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on January 25, 2010. Retrieved 2010-02-25.
  28. Elizabeth K. Gardner (October 31, 2011). "Large asteroid to pass by Earth Nov. 8, but what if it didn't?". Purdue University. Retrieved 2011-11-07.
  29. 1 2 "2010 JU39 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on May 22, 2010.
  30. "2010 XC25 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on December 16, 2010.
  31. 1 2 "2011 BM45 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on February 16, 2011. Retrieved 2011-02-25.
  32. "2011 SM68 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on September 30, 2011. Retrieved 2011-09-29.
  33. "Observations of small Solar-System bodies (2011 UL21)". hohmanntransfer. 2011-10-27.
  34. 1 2 "2011 UW158 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on November 6, 2011.
  35. "Observations of small Solar-System bodies (2012 CA21)". hohmanntransfer. 2012-02-21.
  36. "Observations of small Solar-System bodies (2012 MU2)". hohmanntransfer. 2012-06-23.
  37. "2011 AG5 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Retrieved 2011-02-07.
  38. "Observations of small Solar-System bodies (2013 TV135)". hohmanntransfer. 2013-11-02.
  39. "2013 TV135 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. JPL. Retrieved 2013-11-03.
  40. archive is/Wx0I3
  41. "2014 DA Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on February 24, 2014.
  42. "2007 VK184 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on March 20, 2014. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
  43. 1 2 3 "2015 NK13 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on July 22, 2015.
  44. "MPEC 2015-N44 : 2015 NK13". Minor Planet Electronic Circular. MPC. Retrieved 2015-07-22.
  45. 1 2 "2015 PU228 Impact Table". NEODyS. Archived from the original on August 24, 2015. Retrieved 2015-08-24.
  46. "2015 PU228 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Archived from the original on August 28, 2015. Retrieved 2015-08-24.
  47. "MPEC 2015-P73 : 2015 PU228". Minor Planet Electronic Circular. MPC. Retrieved 2015-08-24.
  48. 1 2 3 "2016 WJ1 Impact Risk". Near Earth Object Program. NASA. Retrieved 2016-11-25. (archive.is)
  49. "MPEC 2016-W38 : 2016 WJ1". Minor Planet Electronic Circular. MPC. Retrieved 2016-11-25.

 This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/5/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.