Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States

Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States

Argued March 11, 1953
Decided May 24, 1953
Full case name Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States
Citations

345 U.S. 594 (more)

73 S.Ct. 872
Prior history Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Holding
A publisher selling only combined insertions appearing in both its morning and evening papers does not violate the Sherman Act
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Clark, joined by Vinson, Reed, Frankfurter, Jackson
Dissent Burton, joined by Black, Douglas, Minton

Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 (1953), is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 5–4 decision it held that a tie-in sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, because there was no market dominance in the tying product.[1]

See also

References

  1. Turner, Donald F. (1958). "The Validity of Tying Arrangements under the Antitrust Laws". Harvard Law Review. 72 (1): 50–75. JSTOR 1338363.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 1/30/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.