The Hooded Men 1971
The Hooded men are 14 men who were subjected to torture in Northern Ireland by the British army and the Royal Ulster Constabulary in 1971.
The Irish Government, on behalf of the men who had been subject to the five techniques, took the case to the European Commission of Human Rights (Ireland v. United Kingdom, 1976 Y.B. Eur. Conv. on Hum. Rts. 512, 748, 788-94 [Eur. Comm’n of Hum. Rts.]).
The Commission stated: ...unanimously considered the combined use of the five methods to amount to torture, on the grounds that (1) the intensity of the stress caused by techniques creating sensory deprivation "directly affects the personality physically and mentally"; and (2) "the systematic application of the techniques for the purpose of inducing a person to give information shows a clear resemblance to those methods of systematic torture which have been known over the ages...a modern system of torture falling into the same category as those systems applied in previous times as a means of obtaining information and confessions. - European Court of Human Rights
The Commission's findings were appealed.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) trial Ireland v. the United Kingdom (Case No. 5310/71) in 1978 ruled: 167. Although the five techniques, as applied in combination, undoubtedly amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment, although their object was the extraction of confessions, the naming of others and/or information and although they were used systematically, they did not occasion suffering of the particular intensity and cruelty implied by the word torture as so understood...168. The Court concludes that recourse to the five techniques amounted to a practice of inhuman and degrading treatment, which practice was in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights Article 3. On 8 February 1977, in proceedings before the ECHR, and in line with the findings of the Parker Report and UK Government policy, Sam Silkin, both Attorney General for England and Wales and for Northern Ireland, stated:
The Government of the United Kingdom have considered the question of the use of the "five techniques" with very great care and with particular regard to Article 3 (art. 3) of the Convention. They now give this unqualified undertaking, that the 'five techniques' will not in any circumstances be reintroduced as an aid to interrogation.
Although there was much frustration at the 1978 ruling of "inhuman and degrading treatment," the case of "the Hooded Men" seemed resigned to history.
In 2011 Lurgan historian Jim McIlmurray brought the men together for the first time in 40 years to mark the 40th anniversary of internment and the hooded treatment. http://thepensivequill.am/2016/06/british-thwarting-hooded-men-torture.html
It was a day of very mixed emotions. There was much laughter and many tears, and an underlying emotion that is hard to describe, best put it into words by saying that there was a current of emotion that could only be felt and shared by those 10 men who had endured so much and managed to survive.
Unexpectedly in early 2013, declassified documents were uncovered that revealed the existence of the interrogation centre at Ballykelly. This information had not been mentioned in any of the inquiries, and proved the British Government had deliberately hid these documents from the inquiries and the European Court of Human Rights.
The British government had, in fact, lied to the European Court of Human Rights regarding multiple aspects of the case: (1) the severity of the methods used on the men; (2) the long term physical and psychological consequences of the methods; (3) where the interrogations took place; and (4) who gave the political authority and clearance for it.
In June 2013, a meeting was arranged in Lurgan between the Hooded Men and the legal firm of Kevin Winters and Company to explore reopening the case.
The staff appointed to work on the case, Solicitor Darragh Mackin and Katie Dowling, demonstrated spirit and determination, which is still ongoing. It was during this meeting that I was asked to become the coordinator between the men and the solicitors, working closely with both groups.
An RTÉ documentary entitled, "The Torture Files," reported on a letter from the UK Home Secretary Merlyn Rees in 1977 to the then British Prime Minister James Callaghan. It confirmed that a policy of "torture" had, in fact, been authorized by the British Government's ministers, specifically the Secretary for Defense Peter Carrington, in 1971, contrary to the information shared with the Irish government and the ECHR.
The letter states: "It is my view (confirmed by Brian Faulkner before his death) that the decision to use methods of torture in Northern Ireland in 1971/72 was taken by ministers - in particular Lord Carrington, then secretary of state for defence".
Following the revelations in June 2014, The Hooded men, their solicitor and case coordinator Jim McIlmurray & Darragh Mackin called on the Irish government to bring the case back to the ECHR on the ground of the newly uncovered vital evidence intentionally withheld by the British government during the original ECHR proceedings.
On 2 December 2014 the Irish government announced that upon review of the newly uncovered evidence and receipt of requests from the Hooded Men, it had decided to officially ask the ECHR to revise its 1978 judgment.
The case is currently awaiting a European Courts decision. Prominent Human rights lawyer Amal Clooney is leading the case.
Four of the original hooded men have since died, Sean McKenna, Michael Montgomery, Pat Shivers and Gerry McKerr.
On Wednesday the 16th of November 2016 a historic first meeting took place in Dublin between the Irish government and the surviving Hooded men represented by KRW LAW. http://www.portadowntimes.co.uk/news/irish-government-meet-with-hooded-men-1-7683334
http://www.irishnews.com/news/2015/03/20/news/-formidable-hooded-man-mckerr-dies-at-71-118674/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11594961/Amal-Clooney-to-accuse-late-Prime-Minister-Ted-Heath-of-complicity-in-torture-of-detainees.html[1]
References
- https://www.justsecurity.org/17881/revisiting-torture-implications-overturning-ireland-v-united-kingdom-case/
- http://lawofwar.org/Ireland_v_United_Kingdom.htm
- https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2014/11/ukireland-landmark-hooded-men-torture-case-should-be-re-opened/