Sir John Wrottesley, 8th Baronet

Sir John Wrottesley, 8th Baronet (22 December 1744 – 23 April 1787), of Wrottesley Hall in Staffordshire, was a British army officer and Member of Parliament.

Background and early life

Wrottesley was the eldest son of the Reverend Sir Richard Wrottesley, 7th Baronet, Dean of Worcester, and Mary, the daughter of John Leveson-Gower, 1st Earl Gower.^[1] This grandfather was head of the most powerful Whig political dynasty in Staffordshire, based at Trentham Hall: the Leveson Gowers controlled a number of seats in the unreformed House of Commons. In 1754, Gower died and was succeeded by Wrottesley's uncle, Granville Leveson-Gower.

Wrottesley determined on an army career, being commissioned as ensign in the 2nd Foot Guards in 1761 and transferring as Captain in the 85th Foot the following year. From 1766-1767, he was equerry to the Duke of York.

Wrottesley's political connections were strengthened when his uncle, Gower, joined the Cabinet as Lord President of the Council in 1767, and again two years later when his sister married the Prime Minister, the Duke of Grafton. However, Gower and Grafton belonged to different, often competing, factions of the shifting coalition that constituted the Whig party.

Political career

Wrottesley was nominated for Parliament at the general election of 22 March 1768 by Earl Gower as member for Newcastle-under-Lyme. The borough was regarded as belonging the Gower Leveson family, who owned much of the property and allowed the tenants to get into serious arrears,^[2] as well as providing lavish hospitality during elections. However, the borough had a large electorate and had recently been made a little less comfortable by the emergence of a malcontent group of electors, who invited Robert Clive to challenge the controlling interest. The challenge came to nothing and Wrottesley was returned unopposed, alongside Alexander Forrester, a key member of the Bedfordite faction of conservative Whigs, placed in the seat at the request of the Duke himself.^[3] The Gowers were now closely allied with the Duke of Bedford's faction and this was to determine most of Wrottesley's parliamentary career.

Only a month after the election, a vacancy occurred in Staffordshire, when one member, George Harry Grey, succeeded his father as Earl of Stamford. Grey had been a Gower nominee in this county constituency, where, by informal agreement, the Gowers nominated one member, while leaving the other seat for one of the local landed gentry.^[4] Wrottesley resigned his seat a couple of months later and was slotted into the vacancy by Gower, becoming MP for Staffordshire on 5 July 1768. He represented the county for the remainder of his life, always being returned unopposed.

At first Wrottesley almost invariably voted with the government.^[5] Such consistency could be achieved only by a complete political volte face, as the administration itself changed in 1770. For his first two years in Parliament, Wrottesley, the Gowers and the rest of the Bedfordites were involved in the Whig administration of Wrottesley's own brother-in-law, Grafton, a friend and supporter of William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham. The Chathamites favoured an aggressive, anti-French colonial policy, and Wrottesley had made his military career in pursuit of their objectives. Faced with tensions in North America, however, the Chathamites tended to sympathise with the colonists. The Bedfordite Whigs increasingly took the opposite stance. Under he Tory administration of Frederick North, Lord North, from 1770 onwards, the Bedfordites entered into coalition with the Tories. Wrottesley and the rest of the Gower clients thus changed sides, supporting a hard line against the Americans that led to the American Revolutionary War. Gower took over leadership of the faction when Bedford died in 1771. Wrottesley was still a member of the Army and in 1770 had been promoted to Lieutenant Colonel. When hostilities broke out in 1775, he rejoined his regiment, retaining his seat in Parliament.

Wrottesley served for three years in the war, returning to England in 1778. By this time, France had formally intervened in the war on the side of the Americans. Wrottesley made his first parliamentary speech after his return on 26 November 1778, during the debate on the Address, which followed the Speech from the throne at the opening of Parliament.

"(Wrottesley) asked if the House was called upon for unanimity against France? If it was for a war with America, he could not give his approbation to it. All that could be done, he said, had been done. If 50,000 Russians were sent, they could do nothing. He thought New York, Rhode Island, and Halifax should be garrisoned, and the rest of the army brought away."

In a speech in December he elaborated his position, saying that the British forces were too widely distributed and the lines of communication too stretched for any offensive action. He was not for immediate withdrawal but it was too late for any offensive action. For a year he went no further in his criticisms and supported the government in most votes. However, in a speech on 6 December 1779 he adopted a much more critical stance. Claiming he was no party man, he nevertheless told ministers:

"A change of measures was now become absolutely necessary. America was lost by their incapacity and misconduct, their obstinacy and their blindness."

Wrottesley's evolution closely followed that of the Bedfordites in general. At the end of 1779, Gower led the entire faction out of the alliance with North, bringing the end of the government and the war within sight. However, Wrottesley continued to support the government in general, voting against opposition moves to control the expenses of the royal household, but he criticised the government's policy in Ireland, warning that it risked making the same mistakes as in America.

On 12 December 1781 Wrottesley voted against a motion from Sir James Lowther, 5th Baronet to end the war, declaring himself against the total withdrawal implied by the motion. However, on 22 Feb. 1782 Henry Seymour Conway, a veteran of both the War of the Austrian Succession and Seven Years' War put forward a motion against the war. Wrottesley voted for it but it was defeated by the smallest possible margin: 194 votes to 193. Five days later Conway moved a similar motion, again with Wrottesley's support, which was carried by 234 to 215. On 15 March Wrottesley also voted for the motion of no confidence in North’s administration put forward by Sir John Rous, which finally brought down the government.

The fall of North brought in a government dominated by the Rockingham Whigs, who had consistently opposed the American Revolutionary War. However, the unexpected death of Rockingham in July left Lord Shelburne trying to hold together an unsteady coalition to bring the war to an end. Wrottesley voted for Shelburne's preliminary moves toward peace on 18 February 1783 - part of a rallying of independent members that allowed negotiations to proceed. Thereafter, Wrottesley seems to have taken a backward step from the front line of politics. He abstained from voting on key measures proposed by the Fox-North Coalition that superseded Shelburne's ministry. He gave general support to William Pitt the Younger when he emerged as Prime Minister at the end of 1783.

Wrottesley's military career progressed just as well while he was in the House of Commons as when he was in the field. He was promoted to Colonel in 1779 and Major-General in 1782, and was appointed Colonel of the 45th Foot in 1784. He died in 1787, at the age of only 42.

Family

Sir John succeeded to the baronetcy on his father's death on 20 July 1769. He married the Hon. Frances Courtenay, daughter of The Viscount Courtenay, in 1770, and they had ten children, including his heir, John, who succeeded him as 9th Baronet and was later raised to the peerage as Baron Wrottesley.

Notes

References

• John Burke, A General and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerage and Baronetage of the British Empire (London: Henry Colburn & Richard Bentley, 1832)
• Leigh Rayment's list of baronets
• Lewis Namier & John Brooke, The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1754-1790 (London: HMSO, 1964)
• Lundy, Darryl. "www.thepeerage.com". The Peerage.