Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc

Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc
Court Court of Appeal
Decided 18 December 1998
Citation(s) [2000] QB 263, [1999] 3 WLR 17, [1998] EG 189, (2000) 32 HLR 234, [1998] EWCA Civ 1960, [1999] 4 All ER 235
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Henry LJ, Chadwick LJ, Clarke LJ
Keywords
Mortgage

Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc [2000] QB 263 is an English land law case, concerning mortgage.

Facts

The Ropaigealachs did not receive the letter from Barclays, with a final demand for payment, warning the property would be sold, because they were having it renovated and were away. They heard of the sale through a neighbour.

Judgment

Clarke LJ held there would be no declaration that Barclays could not take possession without a court order because the legislation could not be otherwise construed.[1]

It does however strike me as very curious that mortgagors should only have protection in the case where the mortgagee chooses to take legal proceedings and not in the case where he chooses simply to enter the property.

But he was persuaded it was not possible to infer that Parliament intended to cover such a case.

See also

Notes

  1. [2000] QB 263, 283

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/18/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.