Exaptation (a replacement for the teleologically-loaded term "pre-adaptation"[1]) and the related term co-option describe a shift in the function of a trait during evolution. For example, a trait can evolve because it served one particular function, but subsequently it may come to serve another. Exaptations are common in both anatomy and behaviour. Bird feathers are a classic example: initially they may have evolved for temperature regulation, but later were adapted for flight. Interest in exaptation relates to both the process and products of evolution: the process that creates complex traits and the products (functions, anatomical structures, biochemicals, etc.) that may be imperfectly developed.[2][3]

History and definitions

Charles Darwin

The idea that the function of a trait might shift during its evolutionary history originated with Charles Darwin (Darwin 1859). For many years the phenomenon was labeled "preadaptation", but since this term suggests Teleology in biology, appearing to conflict with natural selection, it has been replaced by the term exaptation.

The idea had been explored by several scholars[lower-alpha 1] when in 1982 Stephen Jay Gould and Elisabeth Vrba introduced the term "exaptation". However, this definition had two categories with different implications for the role of adaptation.

(1) A character, previously shaped by natural selection for a particular function (an adaptation), is coopted for a new use—cooptation. (2) A character whose origin cannot be ascribed to the direct action of natural selection (a nonaptation), is coopted for a current use—cooptation. (Gould and Vrba 1982, Table 1)

The definitions are silent as to whether exaptations had been shaped by natural selection after cooption, although Gould and Vrba cite examples (e.g., feathers) of traits shaped after cooption. Note that the selection pressure upon a trait is likely to change if it is (especially, primarily or solely) used for a new purpose, potentially initiating a different evolutionary trajectory.

To avoid these ambiguities, Buss, et al. (1998) suggested the term "co-opted adaptation", which is limited to traits that evolved after cooption. However, the commonly used terms of "exaptation" and "cooption" are ambiguous in this regard.


In some circumstances, the "pre-" in preadaptation can be interpreted as applying, for non-teleological reasons, prior to the adaptation itself, creating a meaning for the term that is distinct from exaptation.[6][7] For example, future environments (say, hotter or drier ones), may resemble those already encountered by a population at one of its current spatial or temporal margins.[6] This is not actual foresight, but rather the luck of having adapted to a climate which later becomes more prominent. Cryptic genetic variation may have the most strongly deleterious mutations purged from it, leaving an increased chance of useful adaptations,[7][8] but this represents selection acting on current genomes with consequences for the future, rather than foresight.

Function may not always come before form: developed structures could change or alter the primary functions they were intended for due to some structural or historical cause.[9]


Bird feathers of various colors

There are many examples of exaptations. A classic example is how feathers, which initially evolved for heat regulation, were co-opted for display, and later co-opted for use in bird flight. Another example is the lungs of many basal fish, which evolved into the lungs of terrestrial vertebrates but also underwent exaptation to become the gas bladder, a buoyancy control organ, in derived fish.[10]

A behavioural example pertains to subdominant wolves licking the mouths of alpha wolves as a sign of submissiveness. (Similarly, dogs, which are wolves who through a long process were domesticated, lick the faces of their human owners.) This trait can be explained as an exaptation of wolf pups licking the faces of adults to encourage them to regurgitate food.[11]

Arthropods provide the earliest identifiable fossils of land animals, from about 419 million years ago in the Late Silurian, and terrestrial tracks from about 450 million years ago appear to have been made by arthropods.[12] Arthropods were well pre-adapted to colonize land, because their existing jointed exoskeletons provided support against gravity and mechanical components that could interact to provide levers, columns and other means of locomotion that did not depend on submergence in water.[13]

Metabolism can be considered an important part of exaptation. As one of the oldest biological systems and being central to life on the Earth, studies have shown that metabolism may be able to use exaptation in order to be fit given some new set of conditions or environment.[14] Studies have shown that up to 44 carbon sources are viable for metabolism to successfully take place and that any one adaptation in these specific metabolic systems is due to multiple exaptations. Taking this perspective, exaptations are important in the origination of adaptations in general. A recent example comes from Richard Lenski's E. coli long-term evolution experiment, in which aerobic growth on citrate arose in one of twelve populations after 31,000 generations of evolution.[15] Genomic analysis by Blount and colleagues showed that this novel trait was due to a gene duplication that caused oxic expression of a citrate transporter gene that is normally only expressed under anoxic conditions, thus exapting it for aerobic use.[16] Metabolic systems have the potential to innovate without adaptive origins.

Gould and Brosius took the concept of exaptation to the genetic level. It is possible to look at a retroposon, originally thought to be simply junk DNA, and deduce that it may have gotten a new function to be termed as an exaptation.[17][18][19] Given an emergency situation in the past, an organism may have used junk DNA for a useful purpose in order to evolve and be able to survive. This may have occurred with mammalian ancestors when confronted with a large mass extinction about 250 million years ago and a substantial increase in the level of oxygen in the Earth’s atmosphere. More than 100 loci have been found to be conserved only among mammalian genomes and are thought to have essential roles in the generation of features such as the placenta, diaphragm, mammary glands, neocortex, and auditory ossicles. It is believed that as a result of exaptation, or making previously “useless” DNA into one that could be used in order to increase survival chance, mammals were able to generate new brain structures as well as behavior to better survive the mass extinction and adapt to a new life.

Adaptation and exaptation cycle

It was speculated by Gould and Vrba[20] in one of the first papers written about exaptation, that when an exaptation arises, it may not be perfectly suited for its new role and may therefore develop new adaptations to promote its use in a better manner. In other words, the beginning of developing a particular trait starts out with a primary adaptation toward a fit or specific role, followed by a primary exaptation (a new role is derived using the existing feature but may not be perfect for it), which in turn leads to the development of a secondary adaptation (the feature is improved by natural selection for better performance), promoting further development of an exaptation, and so forth.

Once again, feathers are an important example in that they may have first been adapted for thermoregulation and with time became able to catch insects and therefore serve as a new feature for another benefit. Large contour feathers with specific arrangements arose as an adaptation for catching insects more successfully, which eventually led to the flight seeing as the large feathers served better for that purpose.


Evolution of complex traits

One of the challenges to Darwin's theory of evolution was explaining how complex structures could evolve gradually,[21] given that their incipient forms may have been inadequate to serve any function. As George Jackson Mivart (a critic of Darwin) pointed out, 5 percent of a bird wing would not be functional. The incipient form of complex traits would not have survived long enough to evolve to a useful form.

As Darwin elaborated in the last edition of The Origin of Species,[22] many complex traits evolved from earlier traits that had served different functions. By trapping air, primitive wings would have enabled birds to efficiently regulate their temperature, in part, by lifting up their feathers when too warm. Individual animals with more of this functionality would more successfully survive and reproduce, resulting in the proliferation and intensification of the trait.

Eventually, feathers became sufficiently large to enable some individuals to glide. These individuals would in turn more successfully survive and reproduce, resulting in the spread of this trait because it served a second and still more beneficial function: that of locomotion. Hence, the evolution of bird wings can be explained by a shifting in function from the regulation of temperature to flight.

Jury-rigged design

Darwin explained how the traits of living organisms are well-designed for their environment, but he also recognized that many traits are imperfectly designed. They appear to have been made from available material, that is, jury-rigged.[lower-alpha 2] Understanding exaptations may suggest hypotheses regarding subtleties in the adaptation. For instance, that feathers evolved initially for thermal regulation may help to explain some of their features unrelated to flight (Buss et al., 1998). However, this is readily explained by the fact that they serve a dual purpose.

Some of the chemical pathways for physical pain and pain from social exclusion overlap.[23] The physical pain system may have been co-opted to motivate social animals to respond to threats to their inclusion in the group.

See also


  1. See Jacob (1977)[4] and Mayr (1982)[5] for references.
  2. Jacob (1977)[4] sees much of evolution as "tinkering," that is, working with available traits. "Tinkering" includes (but is not limited to) shifts in function.


  1. Gould, S. J.; Vrba, E. S. (1982). "Exaptation - a missing term in the science of form". Paleobiology. 8 (1): 4–15. JSTOR 2400563.
  2. Bock, W.J. (1959). "Preadaptation and multiple evolutionary pathways". Evolution. 13 (2): 194–211. doi:10.2307/2405873. JSTOR 2405873.
  3. Hayden, Eric J.; Ferrada, Evandro; Wagner, Andreas (2 June 2011). "Cryptic genetic variation promotes rapid evolutionary adaptation in an RNA enzyme". Nature. 474 (7349): 92–95. doi:10.1038/nature10083. PMID 21637259.
  4. 1 2 Jacob, F. (1977). "Evolution and tinkering". Science. 196 (4295): 1161–6. doi:10.1126/science.860134. PMID 860134.
  5. Mayr, Ernst (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-36445-7.
  6. 1 2 Eshel,I. Matessi, C. (1998). "Canalization, genetic assimilation and preadaptation: A quantitative genetic model". Genetics. 4: 2119–2133.
  7. 1 2 Masel, Joanna (March 2006). "Cryptic Genetic Variation Is Enriched for Potential Adaptations". Genetics. Genetics Society of America. 172 (3): 1985–1991. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.051649. PMC 1456269Freely accessible. PMID 16387877.
  8. Rajon, E.; Masel, J. (2011). "Evolution of molecular error rates and the consequences for evolvability". PNAS. 108 (3): 1082–1087. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012918108. PMC 3024668Freely accessible. PMID 21199946.
  9. Exaptation in Human Evolution: How to Test Adaptive vs Exaptive Evolutionary Hypotheses
  10. Colleen Farmer (1997). "Did Lungs and the Intracardiac Shunt Evolve to Oxygenate the Heart in Vertebrates?". Paleobiology. Paleontological Society. 23 (3): 358–372. JSTOR 2401109.
  11. "accessed May 16, 2008". Wolf.org. Retrieved 2013-12-17.
  12. Pisani, D., Laura L Poling, L.L., Lyons-Weiler M., and Hedges, S.B. (2004). "The colonization of land by animals: molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropods". BMC Biology. 2: 1. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-2-1. PMC 333434Freely accessible. PMID 14731304.
  13. Cowen, R. History of Life (3rd ed.). Blackwell Science. p. 126. ISBN 0-632-04444-6.
  14. A Latent Capacity for Evolutionary Innovation through Exaptation in Metabolic Systems
  15. Blount, Zachary D.; Borland, Christina Z.; Lenski, Richard E. (2008). "Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (23): 7899–7906. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803151105. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 2430337Freely accessible. PMID 18524956.
  16. Blount, Zachary D.; Barrick, Jeffrey E.; Davidson, Carla J.; Lenski, Richard E. "Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population". Nature. 489 (7417): 513–518. doi:10.1038/nature11514. PMC 3461117Freely accessible. PMID 22992527.
  17. Brosius, Jürgen (1991). "Retroposons--seeds of evolution". Science. 251 (4995): 753. doi:10.1126/science.1990437. PMID 1990437.
  18. Brosius, Jürgen; Gould, Stephen Jay (1992). "On "genomenclature": a comprehensive (and respectful) taxonomy for pseudogenes and other "junk DNA"". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 89 (22): 10706–10. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.22.10706. PMC 50410Freely accessible. PMID 1279691.
  19. Okada, Norihiro (14 July 2010). "Emergence of mammals by emergency: exaptation". Genes To Cells. 15 (8): 801–812. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01429.x. Retrieved 13 December 2014.
  20. Exaptation - A Missing Term in the Science of Form
  21. The development of complex structures (i.e., evolution of novelties) occur either by intensification of an existing function or by a switch in functions.
  22. Darwin 1872
  23. MacDonald and Leary, 2005


External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/8/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.