Paul v NALGO

Paul v NALGO
Court	High Court
Citation(s)	[1987] IRLR 413
Keywords
Trade union, governance

Paul v NALGO [1987] IRLR 413 is a UK labour law case, concerning the governance of trade unions in the United Kingdom.

Facts

P and F, members of NALGO, claimed the union’s publications against the Tories were unlawful under TUA 1913 s 3(3)(f) providing funds could not be used to persuade people to not vote for a candidate – unless there had been a political objects clause, under what is now TULRCA 1992 s 72(1)(f).

Judgment

Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson VC held the literature was unlawful under the TUA 1913 s 3(3)(f) as its main purpose was to persuade people to not vote Tory, and so was unlawful.

Sources on trade unions

European Convention on Human Rights art 11

ILO Freedom of Association Convention (1948) C87

ASLEF v United Kingdom [2007] ECHR 184

Lee v Showmen’s Guild of Great Britain [1952] 2 QB 359

Edwards v Halliwell [1950] 2 All ER 1064

Hodgson v NALGOA [1972] 1 WLR 130

TULRCA 1992 ss 46-61

Ecclestone v National Union of Journalists [1999] IRLR 166

Breen v Amalgamated Engineering Union [1971] 2 QB 175

AB v CD [2001] IRLR 808

TULRCA 1992 ss 71-96

Paul v NALGO [1987] IRLR 413

Roebuck v NUM (Yorkshire Area) No 2 [1978] ICR 676

Esterman v NALGO [1974] ICR 625

Cheall v APEX [1983] 2 AC 180

TULRCA 1992 ss 62-65

see UK labour and trade unions

UK labour law

Notes

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/16/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.