# Octonion

In mathematics, the **octonions** are a normed division algebra over the real numbers, usually represented by the capital letter O, using boldface **O** or blackboard bold . There are three lower-dimensional normed division algebras over the reals: the real numbers **R** themselves, the complex numbers **C**, and the quaternions **H**. The octonions have eight dimensions; twice the number of dimensions of the quaternions, of which they are an extension. They are noncommutative and nonassociative, but satisfy a weaker form of associativity, namely they are alternative.

Octonions are not as well known as the quaternions and complex numbers, which are much more widely studied and used. Despite this, they have some interesting properties and are related to a number of exceptional structures in mathematics, among them the exceptional Lie groups. Additionally, octonions have applications in fields such as string theory, special relativity, and quantum logic.

The octonions were discovered in 1843 by John T. Graves, inspired by his friend W. R. Hamilton's discovery of quaternions. Graves called his discovery **octaves**, and mentioned them in a letter to Hamilton dated 16 December 1843, but his first publication of his result in (Graves 1845) was slightly later than Arthur Cayley's article on them. The octonions were discovered independently by Cayley^{[1]} and are sometimes referred to as **Cayley numbers** or the **Cayley algebra**. Hamilton described the early history of Graves' discovery. Hamilton invented the word *associative* so that he could say that octonions were not associative.^{[2]}

## Definition

The octonions can be thought of as octets (or 8-tuples) of real numbers. Every octonion is a real linear combination of the **unit octonions**:

where *e*_{0} is the scalar or real element; it may be identified with the real number 1. That is, every octonion *x* can be written in the form

with real coefficients {*x*_{i}}.

Addition and subtraction of octonions is done by adding and subtracting corresponding terms and hence their coefficients, like quaternions. Multiplication is more complex. Multiplication is distributive over addition, so the product of two octonions can be calculated by summing the product of all the terms, again like quaternions. The product of each term can be given by multiplication of the coefficients and a multiplication table of the unit octonions, like this one: (This table is due to Arthur Cayley (1845) and John T. Graves (1843).)^{[3]}

× | e_{0} |
e_{1} |
e_{2} |
e_{3} |
e_{4} |
e_{5} |
e_{6} |
e_{7} |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

e_{0} |
e_{0} |
e_{1} |
e_{2} |
e_{3} |
e_{4} |
e_{5} |
e_{6} |
e_{7} |

e_{1} |
e_{1} |
−e_{0} |
e_{3} |
−e_{2} |
e_{5} |
−e_{4} |
−e_{7} |
e_{6} |

e_{2} |
e_{2} |
−e_{3} |
−e_{0} |
e_{1} |
e_{6} |
e_{7} |
−e_{4} |
−e_{5} |

e_{3} |
e_{3} |
e_{2} |
−e_{1} |
−e_{0} |
e_{7} |
−e_{6} |
e_{5} |
−e_{4} |

e_{4} |
e_{4} |
−e_{5} |
−e_{6} |
−e_{7} |
−e_{0} |
e_{1} |
e_{2} |
e_{3} |

e_{5} |
e_{5} |
e_{4} |
−e_{7} |
e_{6} |
−e_{1} |
−e_{0} |
−e_{3} |
e_{2} |

e_{6} |
e_{6} |
e_{7} |
e_{4} |
−e_{5} |
−e_{2} |
e_{3} |
−e_{0} |
−e_{1} |

e_{7} |
e_{7} |
−e_{6} |
e_{5} |
e_{4} |
−e_{3} |
−e_{2} |
e_{1} |
−e_{0} |

Most off-diagonal elements of the table are antisymmetric, making it almost a skew-symmetric matrix except for the elements on the main diagonal, as well as the row and column for which *e*_{0} is an operand.

The table can be summarized by the relations:^{[4]}

where is a completely antisymmetric tensor with value +1 when *ijk* = 123, 145, 176, 246, 257, 347, 365, and:

with *e*_{0} the scalar element, and *i*, *j*, *k* = 1 ... 7.

The above definition though is not unique, but is only one of 480 possible definitions for octonion multiplication with *e*_{0} = 1. The others can be obtained by permuting and changing the signs of the non-scalar basis elements. The 480 different algebras are isomorphic, and there is rarely a need to consider which particular multiplication rule is used. Each of these 480 definitions is invariant up to signs under some 7-cycle of the points (1234567), and for each 7-cycle there are four definitions, differing by signs and reversal of order. A common choice is to use the definition invariant under the 7-cycle (1234567) with *e*_{1}*e*_{2} = *e*_{4} as it is particularly easy to remember the multiplication. A variation of this sometimes used is to label the elements of the basis by the elements ∞, 0, 1, 2, ..., 6, of the projective line over the finite field of order 7. The multiplication is then given by *e*_{∞} = 1 and *e*_{1}*e*_{2} = *e*_{4}, and all expressions obtained from this by adding a constant (mod 7) to all subscripts: in other words using the 7 triples (124) (235) (346) (450) (561) (602) (013). These are the nonzero codewords of the quadratic residue code of length 7 over the field of 2 elements. There is a symmetry of order 7 given by adding a constant mod 7 to all subscripts, and also a symmetry of order 3 given by multiplying all subscripts by one of the quadratic residues 1, 2, 4 mod 7.^{[5]}^{[6]}

The multiplication table for a geometric algebra of signature (−−−−) can be given in terms of the following 7 quaternionic triples (omitting the identity element): (I,j,k), (i,J,k), (i,j,K), (I,J,K), (∗I,i,m), (∗J,j,m), (∗K,k,m) in which the lowercase items are vectors (mathematics and physics) and the uppercase ones are bivectors and ∗ = mijk (which is in fact the Hodge dual operator). If the ∗ is forced to be equal to the identity then the multiplication ceases to be associative, but the ∗ may be removed from the multiplication table resulting in an octonion multiplication table.

Note that in keeping ∗ = mijk associative and thus not reducing the 4-dimensional geometric algebra to an octonion one, the whole multiplication table can be derived from the equation for ∗. Consider the gamma matrices. The formula defining the fifth gamma matrix shows that it is the ∗ of a four-dimensional geometric algebra of the gamma matrices.

### Cayley–Dickson construction

A more systematic way of defining the octonions is via the Cayley–Dickson construction. Just as quaternions can be defined as pairs of complex numbers, the octonions can be defined as pairs of quaternions. Addition is defined pairwise. The product of two pairs of quaternions (*a*, *b*) and (*c*, *d*) is defined by

where denotes the conjugate of the quaternion *z*. This definition is equivalent to the one given above when the eight unit octonions are identified with the pairs

- (1,0), (
*i*,0), (*j*,0), (*k*,0), (0,1), (0,*i*), (0,*j*), (0,*k*)

### Fano plane mnemonic

A convenient mnemonic for remembering the products of unit octonions is given by the diagram at the right, which represents the multiplication table of Cayley and Graves.^{[3]}^{[8]} This diagram with seven points and seven lines (the circle through 1, 2, and 3 is considered a line) is called the Fano plane. The lines are oriented. The seven points correspond to the seven standard basis elements of Im(**O**) (see definition below). Each pair of distinct points lies on a unique line and each line runs through exactly three points.

Let (*a*, *b*, *c*) be an ordered triple of points lying on a given line with the order specified by the direction of the arrow. Then multiplication is given by

*ab*=*c*and*ba*= −*c*

together with cyclic permutations. These rules together with

- 1 is the multiplicative identity,
*e*_{i}^{2}= −1 for each point in the diagram

completely defines the multiplicative structure of the octonions. Each of the seven lines generates a subalgebra of **O** isomorphic to the quaternions **H**.

### Conjugate, norm, and inverse

The *conjugate* of an octonion

is given by

Conjugation is an involution of **O** and satisfies *(xy)*^{∗} = *y*^{∗} *x*^{∗} (note the change in order).

The *real part* of *x* is given by

and the *imaginary part* by

The set of all purely imaginary octonions span a 7 dimension subspace of **O**, denoted Im(**O**).

Conjugation of octonions satisfies the equation

The product of an octonion with its conjugate, *x*^{∗} *x* = *x* *x*^{∗}, is always a nonnegative real number:

Using this the norm of an octonion can be defined, as

This norm agrees with the standard Euclidean norm on **R**^{8}.

The existence of a norm on **O** implies the existence of inverses for every nonzero element of **O**. The inverse of *x* ≠ 0 is given by

It satisfies *x* *x*^{−1} = *x*^{−1} *x* = 1.

## Properties

Octonionic multiplication is neither commutative:

- if are distinct and non-zero,

nor associative:

- if are distinct, non-zero or if .

The octonions do satisfy a weaker form of associativity: they are alternative. This means that the subalgebra generated by any two elements is associative. Actually, one can show that the subalgebra generated by any two elements of **O** is isomorphic to **R**, **C**, or **H**, all of which are associative. Because of their non-associativity, octonions do not have matrix representations, unlike quaternions.

The octonions do retain one important property shared by **R**, **C**, and **H**: the norm on **O** satisfies

This equation means that the octonions form a composition algebra. The higher-dimensional algebras defined by the Cayley–Dickson construction (e.g. the sedenions) all fail to satisfy this property. They all have zero divisors.

Wider number systems exist which have a multiplicative modulus (e.g. 16-dimensional conic sedenions). Their modulus is defined differently from their norm, and they also contain zero divisors.

As shown by Hurwitz, the only normed division algebras over the reals are **R**, **C**, **H**, and **O**. These four algebras also form the only alternative, finite-dimensional division algebras over the reals (up to isomorphism).

Not being associative, the nonzero elements of **O** do not form a group. They do, however, form a loop, indeed a Moufang loop.

### Commutator and cross product

The commutator of two octonions *x* and *y* is given by

This is antisymmetric and imaginary. If it is considered only as a product on the imaginary subspace Im(**O**) it defines a product on that space, the seven-dimensional cross product, given by

Like the cross product in three dimensions this is a vector orthogonal to *x* and *y* with magnitude

But like the octonion product it is not uniquely defined. Instead there are many different cross products, each one dependent on the choice of octonion product.^{[9]}

### Automorphisms

An automorphism, *A*, of the octonions is an invertible linear transformation of **O** which satisfies

The set of all automorphisms of **O** forms a group called *G*_{2}.^{[10]} The group *G*_{2} is a simply connected, compact, real Lie group of dimension 14. This group is the smallest of the exceptional Lie groups and is isomorphic to the subgroup of Spin(7) that preserves any chosen particular vector in its 8-dimensional real spinor representation. The group Spin(7) is in turn a subgroup of the group of isotopies described below.

*See also*: PSL(2,7) – the automorphism group of the Fano plane.

### Isotopies

An isotopy of an algebra is a triple of bijective linear maps *a*, *b*, *c* such that if *xy* = *z* then *a*(*x*)*b*(*y*) = *c*(*z*). For *a* = *b* = *c* this is the same as an automorphism. The isotopy group of an algebra is the group of all isotopies, which contains the group of automorphisms as a subgroup.

The isotopy group of the octonions is the group Spin_{8}(**R**), with *a*, *b*, and *c* acting as the three 8-dimensional representations.^{[11]} The subgroup of elements where *c* fixes the identity is the subgroup Spin_{7}(**R**), and the subgroup where *a*, *b*, and *c* all fix the identity is the automorphism group *G*_{2}.

## Integral octonions

There are several natural ways to choose an integral form of the octonions. The simplest is just to take the octonions whose coordinates are integers. This gives a nonassociative algebra over the integers called the Gravesian octonions. However it is not a maximal order (in the sense of ring theory); there are exactly 7 maximal orders containing it. These 7 maximal orders are all equivalent under automorphisms. The phrase "integral octonions" usually refers to a fixed choice of one of these seven orders.

These maximal orders were constructed by Kirmse (1925), Dickson and Bruck as follows. Label the 8 basis vectors by the points of the projective plane over the field with 7 elements. First form the "Kirmse integers" : these consist of octonions whose coordinates are integers or half integers, and that are half integers (that is, halves of odd integers) on one of the 16 sets

- ∅ (∞124) (∞235) (∞346) (∞450) (∞561) (∞602) (∞013) (∞0123456) (0356) (1460) (2501) (3612) (4023) (5134) (6245)

of the extended quadratic residue code of length 8 over the field of 2 elements, given by ∅, (∞124) and its images under adding a constant mod 7, and the complements of these 8 sets. Then switch infinity and any one other coordinate; this operation creates a bijection of the Kirmse integers onto a different set, which is a maximal order. There are 7 ways to do this, giving 7 maximal orders, which are all equivalent under cyclic permutations of the 7 coordinates 0123456. (Kirmse incorrectly claimed that the Kirmse integers also form a maximal order, so he thought there were 8 maximal orders rather than 7, but as Coxeter (1946) pointed out they are not closed under multiplication; this mistake occurs in several published papers.)

The Kirmse integers and the 7 maximal orders are all isometric to the E_{8} lattice rescaled by a factor of 1/√2. In particular there are 240 elements of minimum nonzero norm 1 in each of these orders, forming a Moufang loop of order 240.

The integral octonions have a "division with remainder" property: given integral octonions *a* and *b* ≠ 0, we can find *q* and *r* with *a* = *qb* + *r*, where the remainder *r* has norm less than that of *b*.

In the integral octonions, all left ideals and right ideals are 2-sided ideals, and the only 2-sided ideals are the principal ideals *nO* where *n* is a non-negative integer.

The integral octonions have a version of factorization into primes, though it is not straightforward to state because the octonions are not associative so the product of octonions depends on the order in which one does the products. The irreducible integral octonions are exactly those of prime norm, and every integral octonion can be written as a product of irreducible octonions. More precisely an integral octonion of norm *mn* can be written as a product of integral octonions of norms *m* and *n*.

The automorphism group of the integral octonions is the group *G*_{2}(**F**_{2}) of order 12096, which has a simple subgroup of index 2 isomorphic to the unitary group ^{2}*A*_{2}(3^{2}). The isotopy group of the integral octonions is the perfect double cover of the group of rotations of the E_{8} lattice.

## See also

## Notes

- ↑ Cayley, Arthur (1845), "On Jacobi's elliptic functions, in reply to the Rev..; and on quaternions",
*Philosophical Magazine*,**26**: 208–211, doi:10.1080/14786444508645107. Appendix reprinted in*The Collected Mathematical Papers*, Johnson Reprint Co., New York, 1963, p. 127 - ↑ Hamilton (1848), "Note, by Sir W. R. Hamilton, respecting the researches of John T. Graves, Esq.",
*Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy*,**21**: 338–341 - 1 2 G Gentili, C Stoppato, DC Struppa and F Vlacci (2009), "Recent developments for regular functions of a hypercomplex variable", in Irene Sabadini; M Shapiro; F Sommen,
*Hypercomplex analysis*(Conference on quaternionic and Clifford analysis; proceedings ed.), Birkhäuser, p. 168, ISBN 978-3-7643-9892-7 - ↑ Lev Vasilʹevitch Sabinin; Larissa Sbitneva; I. P. Shestakov (2006), "§17.2 Octonion algebra and its regular bimodule representation",
*Non-associative algebra and its applications*, CRC Press, p. 235, ISBN 0-8247-2669-3 - ↑ Rafał Abłamowicz; Pertti Lounesto; Josep M. Parra (1996), "§ Four ocotonionic basis numberings",
*Clifford algebras with numeric and symbolic computations*, Birkhäuser, p. 202, ISBN 0-8176-3907-1 - ↑ Jörg Schray; Corinne A. Manogue (1996), "Octonionic representations of Clifford algebras and triality",
*Foundations of Physics*, Springer,**26**(Number 1/January): 17–70, doi:10.1007/BF02058887. Available as ArXive preprint Figure 1 is located here. - 1 2 (Baez 2002, p. 6)
- ↑ Tevian Dray & Corinne A Manogue (2004), "Chapter 29: Using octonions to describe fundamental particles", in Pertti Lounesto & Rafał Abłamowicz,
*Clifford algebras: applications to mathematics, physics, and engineering*, Birkhäuser, p. 452, ISBN 0-8176-3525-4 Figure 29.1: Representation of multiplication table on projective plane. - ↑ (Baez 2002, pp. 37–38)
- ↑ (Conway & Smith 2003, Chapter 8.6)
- ↑ (Conway & Smith 2003, Chapter 8)

## References

- Baez, John C. (2002). "The Octonions".
*Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society*.**39**(2): 145–205. arXiv:math/0105155v4. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-01-00934-X. ISSN 0273-0979. MR 1886087. - Baez, John C. (2005). "Errata for
*The Octonions*" (PDF).*Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society*.**42**(2): 213–213. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-05-01052-9. - Conway, John Horton; Smith, Derek A. (2003),
*On Quaternions and Octonions: Their Geometry, Arithmetic, and Symmetry*, A. K. Peters, Ltd., ISBN 1-56881-134-9, Zbl 1098.17001. (Review). - Coxeter, H. S. M. (1946), "Integral Cayley numbers.",
*Duke Math. J.*,**13**: 561–578, doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-46-01347-6, MR 0019111 - Dixon, Geoffrey M. (1994),
*Division Algebras: Octonions, Quaternions, Complex Numbers and the Algebraic Design of Physics*, Kluvwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 0-7923-2890-6 - Freudenthal, Hans (1985) [1951], "Oktaven, Ausnahmegruppen und Oktavengeometrie",
*Geom. Dedicata*,**19**(1): 7–63, doi:10.1007/BF00233101, MR 0797151 - Graves (1845), "On a Connection between the General Theory of Normal Couples and the Theory of Complete Quadratic Functions of Two Variables",
*Philos. Mag.*,**26**: 315–320, doi:10.1080/14786444508645136 - Kirmse (1924), "Über die Darstellbarkeit natürlicher ganzer Zahlen als Summen von acht Quadraten und über ein mit diesem Problem zusammenhängendes nichtkommutatives und nichtassoziatives Zahlensystem",
*Ber. Verh. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig. Math. Phys. Kl.*,**76**: 63–82 - Salzmann, Helmut; Betten, Dieter; Grundhöfer, Theo; Hähl, Hermann; Löwen, Rainer; Stroppel, Markus (1995),
*Compact Projective Planes, With an Introduction to Octonion Geometry*, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 3-11-011480-1, ISSN 0938-6572 - van der Blij, F. (1961), "History of the octaves.",
*Simon Stevin*,**34**: 106–125, MR 0130283

## External links

- Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001), "Cayley numbers",
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics*, Springer, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4 - Octonions and the Fano Plane Mnemonic (video demonstration)
- Wilson, R. A. (2008),
*Octonions*(PDF), Pure Mathematics Seminar notes