Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question

The essay "Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question" was written by Thomas Carlyle about the acceptability of using black slaves and indentured servants. It was first anonymously published as an article in Fraser's Magazine for Town and Country of London in December, 1849,^[1] and was reprinted as a pamphlet four years later with the title Occasional Discourse on the Nigger Question.^[2] The essay was the spark of a debate between Carlyle and John Stuart Mill.^[3]

It was in this essay that Carlyle first introduced the phrase "the dismal science" to characterize the field of economics.^[4]

Origins

The article began as a devil's advocate work with the aim of challenging what Carlyle perceived to be a hypocritical philanthropic movement for the emancipation of West Indian slaves. Although the slave trade had been abolished in the British colonies by 1807, and in the British Empire by 1833, Cuba and Brazil continued to use slaves for economic advantage after 1838. In its original publication, Carlyle presented it as a speech "delivered by we know not whom" written down by an unreliable reporter by the name of "Phelin M'Quirk" (the fictitious "Absconded Reporter"). The manuscript was supposedly sold to the publisher by M'Quirk's landlady in lieu of unpaid rent - she found it lying in his room after he ran off.

In its 1849 publication, a fictitious speaker makes various controversial points rangin from insults about the appearance and intelligence of black Africans to radical alternative solutions to the slavery problem. These are probably opinions that Carlyle has gathered from the British under-class and upper-class, plantation owners, such as his friend John Stirling, and some of the remaining pro-slavery elite he met in London, all fused into one. It brings the contemporary reader into the feelings and controversies of the time. The present day reader might find some of the facts and figures incredible. The speaker suggests that the conditions on most slave ships are not nearly as awful as the worst reported, and that many countries aside from Britain are involved in the slave trade, so that trying to stop it would be impossible. Additionally, rather than simply setting slaves free into a world of which they have little understanding, slave owners should be obliged to look after their slaves like a member of their family, by caring for them into old age.

Throughout the delivery of the speech to the public, M'Quirk reports that members of the audience got up and left in disgust, suggesting how Carlyle expected the essay would be received. Just as he had expected, the work met with widespread disapproval, and in the minds of many people, Carlyle's reputation was forever tarnished. Carlyle's closest friends criticized him for his stand but, rather than back down, he grew contrary and isolated. In later publications, the M'Quirk framework was entirely omitted, and Carlyle expressed the opinions as if they were his own.

Debate with John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill's reply, in the next issue of Fraser's Magazine under the title "The Negro question", was also published anonymously.^[5]

Notes

References

• The Carlyle-Mill "Negro Question" Debate.
• Christianson, Aileen (1980). "On the Writing of the Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question", Carlyle Newsletter, Vol. II, pp. 13–19.
• Neff, Emery (1924). Carlyle and Mill. New York: Columbia University Press.

External links

Wikisource has original text related to this article: Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question

• The Dismal Science? Thomas Carlyle v John Stuart Mill
• Carlyle and the Racist Origins of the Idea that Economics was "the Dismal Science"
• The Secret History of the Dismal Science. Part I. Economics, Religion and Race in the 19th Century
• http://www.manchester2002-uk.com/history/victorian/Victorian1.html