Nepalese royal massacre

Nepalese Royal Massacre

The Narayanhity Royal Palace, former home of the Royal Family. Following the abdication of the king and the founding of a republic, the building and its grounds have been turned into a museum.
Location Narayanhity Royal Palace, Kathmandu, Nepal
Date 1 June 2001
(19 Jestha 2058 B.S.)
Around 21:00 (UTC+05:45)
Target The Nepalese Royal Family
King Birendra of Nepal
Attack type
Fratricide, patricide,
sororicide, regicide,
matricide, avunculicide,
mass murder, murder-suicide, massacre
Weapons
Deaths 10 (including the perpetrator)
Non-fatal injuries
5

The Nepalese Royal Massacre occurred on 1 June 2001, at a house in the grounds of the Narayanhity Royal Palace, the residence of the Nepalese monarchy. Ten members of the family were killed during a party or monthly reunion dinner of the royal family in the house. The dead included King Birendra of Nepal and Queen Aishwarya.

Later, Prince Dipendra became de jure King of Nepal upon his father's death when in coma and died in hospital three days after the massacre without recovering from the coma.

Birendra's brother Gyanendra became king after the massacre and the death of King Dipendra.[1]

Overview of events

According to reports, at the dinner, Crown Prince Dipendra had been drinking heavily, had smoked large quantities of hashish and "misbehaved" with a guest which resulted in his father King Birendra telling Dipendra, who was his oldest son, to leave the party. So, Dipendra was escorted to his room by his brother Prince Nirajan and cousin Prince Paras.[2]

About an hour later, Dipendra returned to the party armed with an H&K MP5, a Franchi SPAS-12 and an M16. He fired a single shot into the ceiling before pointing the gun to his father, King Birendra. When his uncle Dhirendra tried to dissuade Dipendra from doing so, he shot his uncle in the chest at point-blank range.[2] This was the beginning of the massacre. During the attack, Dipendra darted in and out of the hall several times, firing shots at each return. Although King Birendra managed to stay alive at the first attack, he sustained some injuries. Excerpts from the official probe report, prepared by a two-member committee in Kathmandu, states that King Birendra made an abortive last-minute attempt to shoot at Dipendra as the latter fired indiscriminately at the royals. Dipendra had thrown the 9mm caliber MP5 automatic submachine gun into the billiards room, when he returned for a second time. The king managed to take hold of it, however, his sister Princess Shova Shahi snatched the weapon from him and pulled out the magazine of the gun assuming it to be the only weapon Dipendra had. While this continued, Prince Paras suffered slight injuries and managed to save at least three royals, including two children, by pulling a sofa over them.[2] The above version of the story is reportedly the one that Shova Shahi told the official committee. Corroborating Shova Shahi's version, Prince Paras is quoted as having said, "She [Shova] must have thought that it was the only weapon Dai (Dipendra) had but I saw that he had much more weapons."[3]

As the story later told, the Queen Aishwarya, who came into the room when the first shots were fired, escaped the room looking for help.[4] She was accompanied in her pursuit by her younger son, Prince Nirajan. Unfortunately, they confronted and were assaulted, fatally, in the garden by the Crown Prince Dipendra. Both of them were shot multiple times. Dipendra then proceeded to a small bridge over a stream running through the palace gardens, where he shot himself six times in the back and once in the left hand, which left him critically injured.[2]

One of the major pressures the king was facing was with India. In 1989, India imposed an economic blockade on Nepal. The reason was the expiring of the Trade and Transit Treaty. After the blockade, India had asked King Birendra to renew the agreement between two sister Hindu nations which the King was resisting.[5]

Later, Lamteri, a junior army staff at Narayanhiti Palace, claimed that he had seen Dipendra in an inebriated state in his private room before the royal family was massacred.[1]

Victims

Killed

Wounded

Aftermath

Dipendra was proclaimed king while in a coma, but he died on 4 June 2001, after a three-day reign.[8] Gyanendra was appointed regent for the three days, then ascended the throne himself after Dipendra died.

While Dipendra lived, Gyanendra maintained that the deaths were the result of an "accidental discharge of an automatic weapon". However, he later said that he made this claim due to "legal and constitutional hurdles", since under the constitution, and by tradition, Dipendra could not have been charged with murder had he survived.[9] A full investigation took place, and Crown Prince Dipendra was found to be responsible for the killing.

A two-man committee comprising Keshav Prasad Upadhaya, the Supreme Court Chief Justice, and Taranath Ranabhat, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, carried out the week-long investigation into the massacre.[10] The investigation concluded, after interviewing more than a hundred people including eyewitnesses and palace officials, guards and staff, that Dipendra had carried out the massacre.[11] A large number of critics and Nepalese, both inside Nepal and abroad, disputed the official report because many facts and evidence reported by the investigation team seemed contradictory in many aspects. A close aide of Dipendra when he was prince said of Dipendra, "He can give up the throne for the sake of his love, but he can never do this kind of thing."[12]

Rumours regarding cause of massacre

The widely circulated rumour is that Prince Dipendra was angry over a marriage dispute.[13] Dipendra's choice of bride was Devyani Rana, daughter of Pashupati SJB Rana, a member of the Rana clan, which the Shah dynasty have a historic animosity against. The Rana clan had served as the hereditary prime ministers of Nepal, with the title Maharaja, until 1951, and the two clans have a long history of inter-marriages.[14] It is also speculated that the reason for the marriage dispute over Dipendra's choice of wife was that the royal family had a position that the crown prince should not marry someone having relatives in India, as Devyani did.[15] Also, the fact that Devyani Rana's mother, Usharaje Scindia was of Gwalior royal lineage, wasn't considered impressive by the Nepal royal family.[16] Prince Dipendra also courted Supriya Shah, who was the granddaughter of Queen Mother Ratna's own sister. Queen Aishwarya, though initially against the relationship due to family ties and the view that Supriya would be incompetent as a queen, as to which expressions by the Queen were heard by an aide,[15] nevertheless favored Supriya over Devyani Rana, since if Supriya became Queen, the Shah dynasty would not have to share its power with the Ranas, entailing formation of an unwanted political alliance.[16]

Ceremonial response

On 11 June 2001, a Hindu katto ceremony was held to exorcise or banish the spirit of the dead King from Nepal. A brahmin Durga Prasad Sapkota, dressed as Birendra to symbolise the late King, rode an elephant out of Kathmandu and into symbolic exile, taking many of the actual belongings of the King with him.[17]

Conspiracy theories

Many Nepalese people are skeptical of the official report that the then Crown Prince Dipendra carried out the murder.[18] King Birendra and his son Dipendra were very popular and well respected by the Nepalese population. Subsequently, Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda, the chairman of the Nepalese Maoist Party, in a public gathering claimed that the massacre was planned by the Indian intelligence agency RAW or the American CIA.[19] Promoters of these ideas allege Gyanendra had a hand in the massacre so that he could assume the throne himself. His ascension to the throne would only be possible if both of his nephews Dipendra and Nirajan were eliminated. Moreover, Gyanendra and especially his son Prince Paras were grossly unpopular with the public. On the day of the massacre he was in Pokhara whilst other royals were attending a dinner function. His wife Komal, Paras and daughter Prerana were in the room at the royal palace during the massacre. While the entire families of Birendra and Dipendra were wiped out, nobody in Gyanendra's family died: his son escaped with slight injuries,[20] and his wife sustained a life-threatening bullet wound but survived.[21]

Despite the fact that two survivors have publicly confirmed that Dipendra did the shooting, as was documented in a BBC documentary,[4] the chain of events is disputed by some Nepalese. After the monarchy was abolished through a populist uprising there have been several claims refuting the official report, among them is a book published in Nepal named Raktakunda recounting the massacre.[22] It looks at the incident through the eyes of one of the surviving witnesses, Queen Mother Ratna's personal maid, identified in the book as Shanta. The book, which the author says is a "historical novel", posits that two men masked as Crown Prince Dipendra fired the shots that led to the massacre. Shanta's husband, Trilochan Acharya, also a royal palace employee, was killed along with 10 royal family members, including the entire family of King Birendra. In addition to details of the royal massacre, Shanta alleged many other cover-ups by the royal family, including a claim that the previous king King Mahendra committed suicide.

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 "Dipendra was innocent: witness". The Indian Express. 24 Jul 2008.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Rahul Bedi; Alex Spillius (8 June 2001). "Massacre witness blames Crown Prince". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 28 May 2008.
  3. "rediff.com: King Birendra tried to shoot Dipendra". rediff.com. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  4. 1 2 "Nepal survivors blame prince". BBC News. 7 June 2001. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  5. Ayoob, Mohammed. "India in South Asia: The quest for regional predominance." World Policy Journal 7.1 (1989): 107-133.
  6. Dkagencies
  7. "Dipendra kicked his father after he shot him - Nepali Times". nepalitimes.com. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  8. "Nepal mourns slain king". BBC News. 2 June 2001. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  9. "Nepal journalists charged with treason". BBC News. 27 June 2001. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  10. "Nepal massacre inquiry begins, at long last". CNN. 8 June 2001. Archived from the original on 11 December 2008.
  11. "Prince blamed for Nepal massacre". BBC News. 14 June 2001. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  12. "Prince Shot the whole family dead for a girl". BBC News. 2 June 2001. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  13. "Five thousand at Nepalese Royal wedding". BBC News. 23 February 2007. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  14. "Intermarriage on two Royal Clans". BBC News. 23 February 2007. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  15. 1 2 "Dipendra's troubled childhood - Nepali Times". nepalitimes.com. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  16. 1 2 "Princess Of 'Doom' - Jun 18,2001". outlookindia.com. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  17. ABC News. "Nepal Banishes Soul of Dead King". ABC News. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  18. "Nepalese diaspora fears for future". BBC News. 4 June 2001.
  19. "Apathy, date quirk make Nepal forget royal massacre". The Times of India. 1 Jun 2011.
  20. "Nepal's errant crown prince". BBC News. 5 June 2001. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  21. "Nepal queen leaves hospital". BBC News. 27 June 2001. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
  22. "Nepali Times" (PDF).

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/25/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.