Nathaniel P. Banks

Nathaniel P. Banks

Portrait by Brady-Handy studio, c. 1860-1875
21st Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives
In office
February 2, 1856  March 4, 1857
President Franklin Pierce
Preceded by Linn Boyd
Succeeded by James Lawrence Orr
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 5th district
In office
March 4, 1889  March 3, 1891
Preceded by Edward D. Hayden
Succeeded by Sherman Hoar
In office
March 4, 1875  March 3, 1879
Preceded by Daniel W. Gooch
Succeeded by Selwyn Z. Bowman
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 6th district
In office
December 4, 1865  March 3, 1873
Preceded by Daniel W. Gooch
Succeeded by Benjamin Butler
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 7th district
In office
March 4, 1853  December 24, 1857
Preceded by John Z. Goodrich
Succeeded by Daniel W. Gooch
24th Governor of Massachusetts
In office
January 7, 1858  January 3, 1861
Lieutenant Eliphalet Trask
Preceded by Henry Gardner
Succeeded by John Albion Andrew
Personal details
Born Nathaniel Prentice Banks
(1816-01-30)January 30, 1816
Waltham, Massachusetts
Died September 1, 1894(1894-09-01) (aged 78)
Waltham, Massachusetts
Political party Democratic
Liberal Republican
Spouse(s) Mary Theodosia Palmer
Profession Politician, military officer, U.S. marshal
Military service
Allegiance United States of America
Service/branch United States Army
Union Army
Years of service 1861–1865
Rank Major General
Commands Army of the Shenandoah
V Corps
Army of the Gulf
Battles/wars American Civil War

Nathaniel Prentice (or Prentiss)[1] Banks (January 30, 1816 – September 1, 1894) was an American politician from Massachusetts and a Union general during the American Civil War.

A millworker by background, Banks was prominent in local debating societies, and his oratorical skills were noted by the Democratic Party. But his abolitionist views fitted him better for the nascent Republican Party, through which he became Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and Governor of Massachusetts in the 1850s. Always a political chameleon (for which he was criticized by contemporaries), Banks was the first professional politician (with no outside business or legal interests) to serve as Massachusetts Governor.[2]

At the outbreak of the Civil War, President Lincoln appointed Banks as one of the first 'political' major generals, over the heads of West Point regulars, who initially resented him, but came to acknowledge his influence on the administration of the war. After suffering a series of inglorious setbacks in the Shenandoah River Valley at the hands of Stonewall Jackson, Banks replaced Benjamin Butler at New Orleans as commander of the Department of the Gulf, charged with administration of Louisiana and gaining control of Mississippi River. But he failed to reinforce Grant at Vicksburg, and badly handled the Siege of Port Hudson, taking its surrender after Vicksburg had fallen. He then launched the Red River Campaign, a failed attempt to occupy eastern Texas that prompted his recall. Banks was also instrumental in early Reconstruction efforts in Louisiana, intended by Lincoln as a model for later such activities.

After the war, Banks returned to the Massachusetts political scene, serving in Congress, where he supported Manifest Destiny, influenced the Alaska Purchase legislation, and supported women's suffrage. In his later years he adopted more liberal progressive causes, and served as a United States marshal for Massachusetts before suffering a decline in his mental faculties.

Early life

Nathaniel Startle Prentice Banks was born at Waltham, Massachusetts, the first child of Nathaniel P. Banks, Sr., and Rebecca Greenwood Banks, on January 30, 1816. His father worked in the textile mill of the Boston Manufacturing Company, eventually becoming a foreman.[3] Banks went to local schools until the age of fourteen, at which point the family's financial demands compelled him to take a job in the mill. He started as a bobbin boy, responsible for replacing bobbins full of thread with empty ones,[4] working in the mills of both Waltham and Lowell.[5] Because of this role he became known as Bobbin Boy Banks, a nickname he carried throughout his life.[6] He was at one time apprenticed as a mechanic alongside Elias Howe, a cousin.[7]

Recognizing the value of education, Banks continued to read, sometimes walking to Boston on his days off to visit the Atheneum Library. He attended company-sponsored lectures by luminaries of the day including Daniel Webster and other orators. He formed a debate club with other mill workers to improve their oratorical skills, and took up acting. He became involved in the local temperance movement; speaking at its events brought him to the attention of Democratic Party leaders, who asked him to speak at campaign events during the 1840 elections. He honed his oratorical and political skills by emulating Robert Rantoul, Jr., a Democratic Congressman who also had humble beginnings.[8] His personal good looks, voice, and flair for presentation were all assets that he used to gain advantage in the political sphere, and he deliberately sought to present himself with a more aristocratic bearing than was suggested by his humble beginnings.[9]

Banks's success as a speaker convinced him to quit the mill. He first worked as an editor for two short-lived political newspapers; after they failed he ran for a seat in the state legislature in 1844, but lost. He then applied to Rantoul, who had been appointed Collector of the Port of Boston, for a job.[10] The job, which he held until political changes forced him out in 1849,[11] gave him sufficient security that he was able to marry Mary Theodosia Palmer, an ex-factory employee he had been courting for some time.[12] Banks again ran unsuccessfully for the state legislature in 1847.[13]

Antebellum political career

Banks in 1852, portrait by Southworth and Hawes

In 1848, Banks was victorious in another run for the state legislature, successfully organizing elements in Waltham whose votes were not easily controlled by the Whig-controlled Boston Manufacturing Company (which could effectively compel votes for Whigs because there was no secret ballot).[14] He was at first moderate in opposition to the expansion of slavery, but recognizing the potency of the burgeoning abolitionist movement, he became more strongly attached to that cause as a vehicle for political advancement.[15] This brought Banks, along with fellow Democrats Rantoul and George S. Boutwell to form a coalition with the Free Soil Party that successfully gained control of the legislature and governor's chair. The deals negotiated after the coalition win in the 1850 election put Boutwell in the governor's chair and made Banks the Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives. Although Banks did not like the radical Free Soiler Charles Sumner (personally or for his strongly abolitionist politics), he supported the coalition agreement that resulted in Sumner's election to the United States Senate, despite opposition from conservative Democrats. His role as house speaker and his effectiveness in conducting business raised his status significantly,[16] as did side work he did doing publicity work for the state Board of Education.[17]


In 1852, Banks sought the Democratic nomination for a seat in the United States Congress. While it was at first granted, his refusal to disavow abolitionist positions meant support was withdrawn by party conservatives. He ended up winning a narrow victory anyway, with Free Soil support.[18] In 1853, he presided over the state Constitutional Convention of 1853. This convention produced a series of proposals for constitutional reform, including a new constitution, all of which were rejected by voters. The failure, which was led by Whigs and conservative anti-abolitionist Democrats, spelled the end of the Democratic-Free Soil coalition.[19]

In Congress, Banks sat on the Committee of Military Affairs. He bucked the Democratic party line by voting against the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which overturned the 1820 Missouri Compromise, using his parliamentary skills in an effort to keep the bill from coming to a vote.[20] Supported by his constituents, he then publicly endorsed the abolitionist cause.[21] His opposition came despite long stated support for Manifest destiny, which the bill's proponents claimed it furthered.[22] In 1854 he formally joined the Know Nothing cause, was renominated for Congress by the Democrats and Free Soilers, and won an easy victory in the Know Nothing landslide.[23] Banks was, along with Wilson and Governor Henry J. Gardner, one of the leaders of the movement, although none of the three strongly supported the movement's nativist core.[24]

In 1855, Banks agreed to chair the convention of a new Republican Party convention, whose platform was intended to bring together antislavery interests from the Democrats, Whigs, Free Soilers, and Know Nothings. When Know Nothing Governor Henry Gardner refused to join in the fusion, Banks carefully kept his options open, passively supporting the Republican effort but also avoiding criticism of Gardner in his speeches. Gardner was reelected.[25] During the summer of 1855, Banks was invited to speak at an antislavery rally in Portland, Maine, his first major speaking opportunity outside Massachusetts. In the speech, Banks expressed his opinion that the Union did not necessarily need to be preserved, say that under certain conditions it would be appropriate to "let [the Union] slide". Future political opponents would repeatedly use these words against him, accusing him of "disunionism".[26]

At the opening of the Thirty-Fourth Congress in December 1855, representatives from several parties opposed to slavery's spread gradually united in supporting Banks for speaker. After the longest and one of the most bitter speakership contests on record, lasting from December 3, 1855 to February 2, 1856, Banks was chosen on the 133rd ballot.[27] This victory was lauded at the time as the "first Republican victory" and "first Northern victory", and greatly raised Banks' profile.[28] He gave antislavery men important posts in Congress for the first time, and cooperated with investigations of both the Kansas conflict and the caning of Charles Sumner on the floor of the Senate. Because of his fairness in dealing with the numerous factions, as well his parliamentary ability, Banks was lauded by others in the body, including former Speaker Howell Cobb, who called him "in all respects the best presiding officer [I] had ever seen."[29]

Banks played a key role in 1856 in bringing forward John C. Frémont as a moderate Republican presidential nominee. Because of his success as speaker, Banks was considered a possible presidential contender, and his name was put in nomination by supporters (knowing that he supported Frémont) at the Know Nothing convention, held one week before the Republicans met. Banks then refused the Know Nothing nomination, which went instead to former President Millard Fillmore. Banks was active on the stump in support of Frémont, who lost the election to James Buchanan; Banks easily won reelection to his own seat. Democrats, however, regained control of the House of Representatives, depriving him of the speakership.[30]

Governor of Massachusetts

In 1857 Banks ran for Governor of Massachusetts against the incumbent Henry Gardner. His nomination by the Republicans was contentious, with opposition coming primarily from radical antislavery interests opposed to his comparatively moderate stand on the issue. After a contentious campaign Banks won a comfortable victory.[31] One key action Banks took in support of the antislavery movement was the dismissal of Judge Edward G. Loring.[32] Loring had ruled in 1854 that Anthony Burns, a fugitive slave, be returned to slavery under the terms of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.[33] Under the pressure of a public petition campaign spearheaded by William Lloyd Garrison, the legislature passed two Bills of Address, in 1855 and 1856, calling for Judge Loring to be removed from his state office, but in both cases Governor Gardner declined to remove Loring. Banks signed a third such bill in 1858.[32] He was rewarded with significant antislavery support, easily winning reelection in 1858.[34]

John Albion Andrew (portrait by Darius Cobb) succeeded Banks as governor.

Banks's 1859 reelection was influenced by two significant issues. One was a state constitutional amendment requiring newly naturalized citizens to wait two years before becoming eligible to vote. Promoted by the state's Know Nothings, it was passed by referendum in May of that year. Banks, catering to Known Nothing supporters, supported its passage, although Republicans elsewhere opposed such measures, because they were seeking immigrant votes.[35] (The amendment was repealed in 1862-63.)[36] The other issue was John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry, which more radical Republicans (notably John Albion Andrew) expressed sympathy for. Not yet ready for armed conflict, the state voted for the more moderate Banks.[35] After the election, Banks vetoed a series of bills, over provisions removing a restriction limiting state militia participation to whites. This incensed the radical abolitionist forces in the legislature, but they were unable to override his vetoes in either that legislative session, or of similar bills passed in the next.[37]

Banks made a serious attempt to gain the Republican presidential nomination in 1860, but dislike of him by the radicals in the state party harmed him. His failure to secure a majority in the state delegation prompted him to skip the national convention,[38] where he received first-ballot votes as a nominee for Vice President.[39] His attempt to promote Henry L. Dawes, another moderate Republican, as his successor in the governor's chair also failed: the party nominated the radical John Andrew, who went on to win the general election.[40] Banks's farewell speech, given with civil war looming, was an appeal for moderation and union.[41]

In the summer of 1860, Banks accepted an offer to become a resident director of the Illinois Central Railroad, which had previously employed his mentor Robert Rantoul.[42] Banks moved to Chicago after leaving office, and was engaged primarily in the promotion and sale of the railroad's extensive lands.[43] He continued to speak out in Illinois against the breakup of the Union.[41]

Civil War

Main article: American Civil War
The champions of the Union, lithograph by Currier & Ives, 1861. Banks is among the frontmost standing figures, just left of the central seated figure.

As the Civil War became imminent in early 1861, President Abraham Lincoln considered Banks for a cabinet post,[44] despite a negative recommendation from Governor Andrew, who considered Banks to be unsuitable for any office.[45] Lincoln rejected Banks in part because he had accepted the railroad job,[46] but chose him as one of the first major generals of volunteers, appointing him on May 16, 1861.[47] He was initially resented by trained and experienced commanders,[48] but Banks, given his national prominence as a leading Republican, brought political benefits to the administration, including the ability to attract recruits and money for the Union cause, despite his lack of field experience.[49]

First command

Banks first commanded a military district in eastern Maryland, which notably included Baltimore, a hotbed of secessionist sentiment and a vital rail link. Banks for the most part stayed out of civil affairs, allowing political expression of secessionism to continue, while maintaining important rail connections between the north and Washington, DC.[50] He did, however arrest the police chief and commissioners of the city of Baltimore, and replaced the police force with one that had more carefully vetted pro-Union sympathies.[51] In August 1861, Banks was assigned to the western district of Maryland. There he was responsible for the arrest of legislators sympathetic to the Confederate cause (as was John Adams Dix, who succeeded Banks in the eastern district) in advance of legislative elections. This, combined with the release of local soldiers in his army to vote, ensured that the Maryland legislature remained pro-Union.[52] Banks's actions had a chilling effect on Confederate sentiment in Maryland, which, although a slave state, remained loyal through the war.[51]

Shenandoah Valley Campaign

In February 1862 Banks was ordered by Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan to secure the lower Shenandoah Valley, moving most of his forces east of the Blue Ridge Mountains in anticipation of assisting in McLellan's Peninsula Campaign. After Stonewall Jackson was turned back at the March 23 First Battle of Kernstown, Banks was instead ordered to pursue Jackson up the valley, to prevent Jackson from reinforcing the defenses of Richmond. When Banks's men reached the southern Valley at the end of a difficult supply line, the president recalled them to Strasburg, at the northern end.[53] Jackson then marched rapidly down the adjacent Luray Valley, and encountered some Banks' forces in the May 23 Battle of Front Royal. This prompted Banks to withdraw to Winchester, where Jackson again attacked on May 25. The Union forces were poorly arrayed in defense, and retreated in disorder across the Potomac River and back into Maryland.[54] An attempt to capture Jackson's forces in a pincer movement (with forces led by John Frémont and Irvin McDowell) failed, and Jackson was able to reinforce Richmond. Banks was criticized in the campaign for mishandling his troops and performing inadequate reconnaissance,[55] while his political allies sought to pin the blame for the debacle on the War Department.[56]

Northern Virginia Campaign

Banks in his military uniform, c. 1861 (portrait by Mathew Brady)

In June 1862, the Union forces were reorganized under Maj. Gen. John Pope, with Banks heading one of three divisions. Pope was a West Pointer with little confidence in Banks's abilities as a leader. By early August this force was in Culpeper County. Pope gave Banks an ambiguous series of orders, directing him south of Culpeper to determine enemy strength, hold a fortified defensive position, and to engage the enemy. Banks again placed his troops poorly, and compounded the error by not performing the reconnaissance needed to determine the enemy's strength, particularly in the area of Cedar Mountain, the local high ground, which was held by Confederate forces, a division of Jackson's army led by A.P. Hill. These forces clashed in the August 9 Battle of Cedar Mountain, in which Banks attacked to gain an early advantage, but a Confederate counterattack led by Hill repulsed Banks' corps and won the day. Banks failed to commit his reserves after nearly flanking the Confederate right, which might have given him the victory.[57] Although Banks thought the battle one of the "best fought", an officer in his corps described it as "about as great a piece of folly as I have ever witnessed on the part of an incompetent general."[58] The arrival at the end of the day of Union reinforcements under Pope, as well as the rest of Jackson's men, resulted in a two-day stand-off there, with the Confederates finally withdrawing from Cedar Mountain on August 11. Stonewall Jackson observed that Banks's men fought well, and Lincoln also expressed confidence in his leadership.[59] Banks suffered a minor injury during the battle, and was recalled to oversee the forces defending Washington.[60][61]

Army of the Gulf

Main article: Army of the Gulf

In November 1862, President Lincoln gave Banks command of the Army of the Gulf, and asked him to organize a force of thirty thousand new recruits, drawn from New York and New England. As a former governor of Massachusetts, he was politically connected to the governors of these states, and the recruitment effort was successful.[62] In December he sailed from New York with a large force of raw recruits to replace Maj. Gen. Benjamin Butler at New Orleans, Louisiana, as commander of the Department of the Gulf.[63]

According to historian John D. Winters, Butler disliked Banks and his portrayed success as a general drawn from "civil life".[64] Nevertheless, Butler, "swallowing his bitter pill with a show of good grace," welcomed Banks to New Orleans and briefed him on civil and military affairs of importance. Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy, doubted the wisdom of replacing Butler (also a political general, and later a Massachusetts governor) with Banks. According to Winters, "Welles's opinion of the military abilities of both men was very low, but he did not question Butler's skill as a 'police magistrate' in charge of civil affairs. Banks, he thought, did not have 'the energy, power or ability of Butler.' He did have 'some ready qualities for civil administration,' but was less reckless and unscrupulous' and probably would not be able to hold a tight enough rein on the people" once placed under Union control."[64] Banks had to contend not just with Southern opposition to the occupation of New Orleans, but also to politically hostile Radical Republicans both in the city and in Washington, who criticized his moderate approach to administration.[65]

Banks issued orders to his men prohibiting pillage, but the undisciplined troops had chosen to disobey them, particularly when near a prosperous plantation. A soldier of the New York 114th wrote: "The men soon learned the pernicious habit of slyly leaving their places in the ranks when opposite a planter's house. ... Oftentimes a soldier can be found with such an enormous development of the organ of destructiveness that the most severe punishment cannot deter him from indulging in the breaking of mirrors, pianos, and the most costly furniture. Men of such reckless disposition are frequently guilty of the most horrible desecrations."[66]

Banks's wife joined him in New Orleans, and held lavish dinner parties for the benefit of Union soldiers and their families. On April 12, 1864, she played the role of the "Goddess of Liberty" surrounded by all of the states of the reunited country. She did not then know of her husband's loss at the Battle of Mansfield three days earlier. By July 4, 1864, however, occupied New Orleans had recovered from the Red River Campaign to hold another mammoth concert extolling the Union.[67]

Siege of Port Hudson

Main article: Siege of Port Hudson

Part of Banks's orders included instructions to ascend the Mississippi River to join forces with Ulysses S. Grant, in order to gain control of the waterway, which was under Confederate control between Vicksburg, Mississippi and Port Hudson, Louisiana. Grant was moving against Vicksburg, and Banks was under orders to secure Port Hudson before joining Grant at Vicksburg. He did not move immediately, because the garrison at Port Hudson was reported to be large,[68] his new recruits were ill-equipped and insufficiently trained for action, and he was overwhelmed by the bureaucratic demands of administering the occupied portions of Louisiana.[69] He did send forces to reoccupy Baton Rouge, and sent a small expedition that briefly occupied Galveston, Texas but was evicted in the Battle of Galveston (January 1, 1863).[70]

In 1862, several Union gunboats had successfully passed onto the river between Vicksburg and Port Hudson, interfering with Confederate supply and troop movements. In March 1863, after they had been captured or destroyed, naval commander David Farragut sought to run the river past Port Hudson in a bid to regain control over that area, and convinced Banks to make a diversionary land attack on the Confederate stronghold. Banks marched with 12,000 men from Baton Rouge on March 13, but was unable to reach the enemy position due to inaccurate maps. He then compounded the failure to engage the enemy with miscommunications with Farragut.[71][72] The naval commander successfully navigated two gunboats past Port Hudson, taking fire en route, without support. Banks ended up retreating back to Baton Rouge, his troops plundering all along the way. The episode was a further blow to Banks's reputation as a military commander, leaving many with the false impression he had not wanted to support Farragut.[71]

1860s map showing the Siege of Port Hudson

Under political pressure to show progress, Banks embarked on operations to secure a route that bypassed Port Hudson via the Red River in late March.[73] He was eventually able to reach Alexandria, Louisiana, but stiff resistance from the smaller forces of Confederate General Richard Taylor meant he did not get there until early May. His army seized thousands of bales of cotton, and Banks claimed to have interrupted supplies to Confederate forces further east. During these operations Admiral Farragut turned command of the naval forces assisting Banks to David Porter, with whom Banks had a difficult and prickly relationship.[74]

Following a request from Grant for assistance against Vicksburg, Banks finally laid siege to Port Hudson in May 1863.[75] Two attempts to carry the works by storm, as with Grant at Vicksburg, were dismal failures. The first, made against the entrenched enemy on May 27, failed because of inadequate reconnaissance and because Banks failed to ensure the attacks along the line were coordinated.[76][77] After a bloody repulse, Banks continued the siege, and launched a second assault on June 14. It was also badly coordinated, and the repulse was equally bloody: each of the two attacks resulted in more than 1,800 Union casualties.[76] The Confederate garrison under General Franklin Gardner surrendered on July 9, 1863, after receiving word that Vicksburg had fallen.[78] This brought the entire Mississippi River under Union control. Port Hudson was the first time African American soldiers were used in a major Civil War battle.[79][80]

In the autumn of 1863, Lincoln and Chief of Staff Henry Halleck informed Banks that plans should be made for operations against the coast of Texas, chiefly for the purpose of preventing the French in Mexico from aiding the Confederates or occupying Texas, and to interdict Confederate supplies from Texas heading east.[81] The second objective he attempted to achieve at first by again sending a force against Galveston, which was badly beaten in the Second Battle of Sabine Pass on September 8.[82] An expedition sent to Brownsville secured possession of the region near the mouth of the Rio Grande and the Texas outer islands in November.[83]

Red River Campaign

Confederate General Richard Taylor opposed Banks in Louisiana.
Main article: Red River Campaign

As part of operations against Texas, Halleck also promoted to Banks the Red River Campaign, an overland approach to taking resource-rich but well-defended parts of northern Texas. Banks and General Grant both considered the Red River Campaign a strategic distraction, with an eastward thrust to capture Mobile, Alabama preferred.[84] Political forces prevailed, and Halleck drafted a plan for operations on the Red River.[85]

The campaign lasted from March to May 1864, and was a major failure. Banks's army was routed at the Battle of Mansfield (April 8) by General Taylor and retreated 20 miles (32 km) to make a stand the next day at the Battle of Pleasant Hill. Despite winning a tactical victory at Pleasant Hill, Banks continued the retreat to Alexandria, his force rejoining part of David Porter's Federal Inland Fleet. That naval force had joined the Red River Campaign to support the army[86] and to take on cotton as a lucrative prize of war. Banks was accused of allowing "hordes" of private cotton speculators to accompany, the expedition, but only a few did, and most of the cotton seized was taken by the army or navy. Banks did little, however, to prevent unauthorized agents from working the area.[87] A cooperating land force launched from Little Rock, Arkansas was turned back in the Camden Expedition.[88]

Part of Porter's large fleet became trapped above the falls at Alexandria by low water, engineered by Confederate action.[89] Banks and others approved a plan proposed by Joseph Bailey to build wing dams as a means to raise what little water was left in the channel. In ten days, 10,000 troops built two dams, and managed to rescue Porter's fleet, allowing all to retreat to the Mississippi River.[90] After the campaign, General William T. Sherman famously said of the Red River campaign that it was "One damn blunder from beginning to end",[91] and Banks earned the dislike and loss of respect of his officers and rank and file for his mishandling of the campaign.[92] On hearing of Banks' retreat in late April, Grant wired Chief of Staff Halleck asking for Banks to be removed from command.[93] The Confederates held the Red River for the remainder of the war.[94]

Louisiana Reconstruction

Banks undertook a number of steps intended to facilitate the Reconstruction plans of President Lincoln in Louisiana. When Banks arrived in New Orleans, the atmosphere was somewhat hostile to the Union owing to some of Butler's actions. Banks moderated some of Butler's policies, freeing civilians that Butler had detained and reopening churches whose ministers refused to support the Union. He recruited large numbers of blacks for the military, and instituted formal works and education programs to organize the many slaves who had wandered from their plantations, believing they had been freed. Because Banks believed the plantation owners would need to play a role in Reconstruction, the work program was not particularly friendly to the blacks, requiring them to sign year-long work contracts, and subjecting vagrant blacks to involuntary public work.[95] The education program was effectively shut down after Southerners regained control of the city in 1865.[96]

General Edward Canby succeeded Banks in Louisiana.

In August 1863, President Lincoln ordered Banks to oversee the creation of a new state constitution, and in December granted him wide-ranging authority to create a new civilian government.[97][98] However, because voter enrollment was low, Banks cancelled planned Congressional elections, and worked with civilian authorities to increase enrollment rates. After a February 1864 election organized by Banks, a Unionist government was elected in Louisiana, and Banks optimistically reported to Lincoln that Louisiana would "become in two years, under a wise and strong government, one of the most loyal and prosperous States the world has ever seen."[99] A constitutional convention held from April to July 1864 drafted a new constitution that provided for the emancipation of slaves.[100] Banks was a significant influence on the convention, insisting that provisions be included for black education and at least partial suffrage.[101]

By the time the convention ended, Banks's Red River Campaign had come to its ignominious end and Banks was superseded in military (but not political) matters by Major General Edward Canby. President Lincoln ordered Banks to oversee elections held under the new constitution in September, and then ordered him to return to Washington to lobby Congress for acceptance of Louisiana's constitution and elected Congressmen.[102] Radical Republicans in Congress railed against his political efforts in Louisiana,[103] and refused to seat Louisiana's two Congressmen in early 1865. After six months, Banks returned to Louisiana to resume his military command under Canby. However, he was politically trapped between the civilian government and Canby, and resigned from the army in May 1865 after only one month in New Orleans. He returned to Massachusetts in September 1865.[104] Secretary of War Halleck in early 1865 ordered William Farrar Smith and James T. Brady to investigate breaches of Army regulations during the occupation of New Orleans. The commissioners' report, which was not published, found that the occupational administration was riddled by "oppression, peculation, and graft".[105]

Military recognition of Banks's service in the war included election in 1867 as a captain of the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Massachusetts. He was re-elected for a second one-year term in 1875. In 1892 he was elected as a Veteran First Class Companion of the Massachusetts Commandery of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States, a military society for officers who had served the Union during the Civil War.

Postbellum career

Postbellum portrait by Mathew Brady or Levin C. Handy

On his return to Massachusetts, Banks immediately ran for Congress, for a seat vacated by the resignation of Radical Republican Daniel W. Gooch. The Massachusetts Republican Party, dominated by radicals, opposed his run, but he prevailed easily at the state convention and in the general election, partially wooing radical voters by proclaiming support for Negro suffrage.[106] He served from 1865 to 1873, during which time he chaired the Foreign Affairs Committee.[107] Despite his nominally moderate politics, he was forced to vote with the radicals on many issues, rather than being seen as a supporter of President Johnson's policies.[108] He was active in supporting the reconstruction work he had done in Louisiana, trying to get its Congressional delegation seated in 1865. He was opposed in this by a powerful faction in Louisiana, who argued he had essentially set up a puppet regime, and also alienated Radical Republicans by accepting a bill on the matter that omitted a requirement that states not be readmitted until they had given their black citizenry voting rights.[109] Despite his position as chair of an important committee, Banks was snubbed by President Grant, who worked around him whenever possible.[110]

During this period in Congress, Banks was one of the strongest early advocates of Manifest Destiny. He introduced legislation promoting offers to annex all of British North America (effectively today's Canada), which drew neither domestic interest, nor that of the Canadians.[111] This and other proposals he made died in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Charles Sumner.[112] They served to make him unpopular in Britain and Canada, but played well to his heavily Irish-American constituency.[113] Banks also played a significant role in securing passage of the Alaska Purchase funding bill, enacted in 1868.[114] Banks' financial records strongly suggest he received a large gratuity from the Russian minister after the Alaska legislation passed.[115] Questions were raised not long after the bill's passage, with a House investigation of the matter effectively whitewashing the affair. Biographer Fred Harrington is of the opinion that Banks would have supported the legislation regardless of the payment he is alleged to have received.[116] Banks also supported unsuccessful efforts to acquire some Caribbean islands, including the Danish West Indies and the Dominican Republic,[117] and spoke out in support of Cuban independence.[118]

In 1872, Banks joined the Liberal-Republican revolt in support of Horace Greeley. He had to some degree had to buck a party trend away from labor reform, a subject that was close to many of his working-class constituents, but not the wealthy businessmen who were coming to dominate the Republican Party.[119] While Banks was campaigning across the North for Greeley, the radical Daniel Gooch successfully gathered enough support to defeat him for reelection; it was his first defeat at the hands of Massachusetts voters. After his loss, Banks invested in an unsuccessful start-up Kentucky railroad headed by John Frémont, hoping its income would substitute for the political loss.[120]

Seeking a revival of his political fortunes, Banks ran successfully for Massachusetts Senate in 1873, supported by a coalition of Liberal Republicans, Democrats, and Labor Reform groups. The latter groups he wooed in particular, adopting support for shorter workdays. In that term, he help draft and secure passage of a bill restricting hours of women and children to ten hours per day.[121] In 1874, Banks was elected to Congress again, supported by a similar coalition in defeating Gooch.[122] He served two terms (1875–1879), losing in the 1878 nominating process after formally rejoining the Republican fold. He was accused in that campaign of changing his positions too often to be considered reliable.[123] After his defeat, President Rutherford B. Hayes appointed him as United States marshal for Massachusetts as a patronage reward for his service. He held the post from 1879 until 1888, but exercised poor oversight over his subordinates, and consequently became embroiled in legal action over the recovery of unpaid fees.[124]

In 1888, Banks once again won a seat in Congress. He played little role, because his mental health was failing.[125] After one term he was not renominated, and retired to Waltham.[126] His health continued to deteriorate, and he was briefly sent to McLean Hospital shortly before his death in Waltham on September 1, 1894.[127] His death made nationwide headlines; he is buried in Waltham's Grove Hill Cemetery.[126]

Legacy and honors

Fort Banks in Winthrop, Massachusetts, built in the late 1890s, was named for him.[128] A statue of him stands in Waltham's Central Square,[129] and Banks Street in New Orleans is named after him, as is Banks Court in Chicago's Gold Coast neighborhood.[130] His Waltham home from 1855 to his death is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.[131]

See also


  1. Many short biographical summaries spell his middle name "Prentiss." He is known to have spelled it "Prentice".
  2. Hogarty, p. 29
  3. Hollandsworth, p. 3
  4. Hollandsworth, p. 4
  5. Harrington, p. 3
  6. Reef, p. 327
  7. Rosenberg, p. 41
  8. Hollandsworth, pp. 5–8
  9. Harrington, p. 4
  10. Hollandsworth, pp. 8–9
  11. Harrington, p. 8
  12. Banks, R.H., pp. 9–25
  13. Hollandsworth, p. 10
  14. Hollandsworth, pp. 10–11
  15. Hollandsworth, p. 12
  16. Hollandsworth, pp. 13–14
  17. Harrington, p. 10
  18. Hollandsworth, pp. 15–16
  19. Hollandsworth, pp. 16–17
  20. Harrington, pp. 18-21
  21. Hollandsworth, pp. 20–21
  22. Harrington, p. 19
  23. Hollandsworth, pp. 22–23
  24. Harrington, pp. 23-25
  25. Hollandsworth, p. 24
  26. Harrington, pp. 26
  27. Hollandsworth, pp. 25–27
  28. Harrington, p. 31
  29. Hollandsworth, p. 28
  30. Hollandsworth, pp. 30–33
  31. Hollandsworth, pp. 34–35
  32. 1 2 Voss-Hubbard (1995), pp. 173–174
  33. Von Frank, p. 1
  34. Harrington, p. 46
  35. 1 2 Hollandsworth, pp. 37-38
  36. Baum, p. 48
  37. Harrington, pp. 47-48
  38. Hollandsworth, pp. 40-41
  39. Harrington, p. 48
  40. Pearson, pp. 1:119–120,123-128
  41. 1 2 Harrington, p. 52
  42. Harrington, p. 50
  43. Hollandsworth, p. 44
  44. Hollandsworth, p. 43
  45. Baum, p. 57
  46. Harrington, pp. 52-53
  47. Work, pp. 10–11
  48. Harrington, p. 55
  49. Hollandsworth, pp. 44-45
  50. Hollandsworth, pp. 46-48
  51. 1 2 Harris, pp. 66-80
  52. Work, pp. 160-161
  53. Work, pp. 58-59
  54. Work, pp. 60-61
  55. Work, pp. 61-63
  56. Harrington, p. 79
  57. Work, pp. 66-69
  58. Work, p. 69
  59. Harrington, p. 84
  60. Hollandsworth, p. 81
  61. Harrington, p. 85
  62. Hollandsworth, pp. 83-85
  63. Hollandsworth, pp. 84-86
  64. 1 2 Winters, p. 146
  65. Harrington, pp. 94-103
  66. Winters, p. 236
  67. Winters, p. 390
  68. Work, p. 99
  69. Patterson, pp. 76-77
  70. Dupree, pp. 25-30
  71. 1 2 Work, p. 100
  72. Dupree, pp. 32–33
  73. Dupree, pp. 41–44
  74. Dupree, pp. 42–44
  75. Dupree, p. 45
  76. 1 2 Work, p. 104
  77. Dupree, pp. 44–47
  78. Dupree, p. 48
  79. Patterson, p. 84
  80. Hewitt, pp. 174-178
  81. Dupree, pp. 49-51
  82. Dupree, pp. 55-61
  83. Dupree, pp. 70-74
  84. Johnson, pp. 1-36
  85. Work, p. 123
  86. Work, pp. 123-128
  87. Harrington, pp. 160-162
  88. Work, pp. 123-124
  89. Robertson, pp. 4
  90. Work, p. 128
  91. Robertson, p. 168
  92. Work, p. 127
  93. Joiner, p. 160
  94. Otto, p. 21
  95. Dawson, pp. 11–14
  96. Harrington, pp. 108-110
  97. Dawson, p. 16
  98. Tunnell, p. 30
  99. Dawson, pp. 16–18
  100. Dawson, p. 18
  101. Tunnell, p. 79
  102. Dawson, p. 19
  103. Harrington, pp. 163-165
  104. Dawson, pp. 19–23
  105. Capers, pp. 117-119
  106. Harrington, pp. 169-170
  107. Harrington, p. 175
  108. Harrington, p. 171
  109. Richards, pp. 219-221
  110. Baum, p. 169
  111. Harrington, pp. 175-178
  112. Harrington, p. 180
  113. Harrington, p. 181
  114. Harrington, pp. 182-183
  115. Banks, R.H., pp. 1312–17
  116. Harrington, p. 183
  117. Harrington, pp. 188-190
  118. Harrington, p. 191
  119. Harrington, pp. 198-201
  120. Harrington, p. 203
  121. Harrington, pp. 204-205
  122. Harrington, p. 205
  123. Harrington, pp. 206-207
  124. Hollandsworth, pp. 248–249
  125. Hollandsworth, pp. 249–250
  126. 1 2 Hollandsworth, pp. 252–253
  127. Hollandsworth, pp. 251–252
  128. Plaque on site provided by Winthrop Historical Commission. Photographed 19-Oct-2009
  129. Hollandsworth, p. 254
  131. "MACRIS inventory record and NRHP nomination for Gale-Banks House". Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Retrieved 2014-04-26.


United States Congress. "BANKS, Nathaniel Prentice (id: B000116)". Biographical Directory of the United States Congress. 

Further reading

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nathaniel Prentice Banks.
Wikisource has the text of a 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article about Nathaniel P. Banks.
Military offices
Preceded by
Robert Patterson
Commander of the Department of the Shenandoah
25 July 1861–18 March 1862
Succeeded by
Command reorganized as V Corps
Preceded by
Himself as Commander of Department of the Shenandoah
Commander of V Corps
March 18, 1862–4 April 1862
Succeeded by
Command reorganized as Department of the Shenandoah
Preceded by
Himself as commander of V Corps
Commander of the Department of the Shenandoah
4 April 1862–26 June 1862
Succeeded by
Command reorganized as II Corps Army of Virginia
Preceded by
Himself as Commander of Department of the Shenandoah
Commander of II Corps Army of Virginia
26 June 1862–12 September 1862
Succeeded by
Alpheus S. Williams
Preceded by
Benjamin Butler
Commander of the Department of the Gulf
December 15, 1862 – September 23, 1864
Succeeded by
Stephen A. Hurlbut
Political offices
Preceded by
John Z. Goodrich
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 7th congressional district

March 4, 1853 – December 24, 1857
Succeeded by
Daniel W. Gooch
Preceded by
Linn Boyd
Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives
February 2, 1856 – March 4, 1857
Succeeded by
James L. Orr
Preceded by
Henry J. Gardner
Governor of Massachusetts
January 7, 1858 – January 3, 1861
Succeeded by
John A. Andrew
Preceded by
Daniel W. Gooch
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 6th congressional district

December 4, 1865 – March 3, 1873
Succeeded by
Benjamin Butler
Preceded by
Daniel W. Gooch
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 5th congressional district

March 4, 1875 – March 3, 1879
Succeeded by
Selwyn Z. Bowman
Preceded by
Edward D. Hayden
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 5th congressional district

March 4, 1889 – March 3, 1891
Succeeded by
Sherman Hoar
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/8/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.