Money had and received
An action for money had and received to the plaintiff's use is the name for a common law claim derived from the form of action known as indebitatus assumpsit. The action enabled one person to recover money which has been received by another: for example, where a plaintiff paid money to the defendant while labouring under a mistake of fact or where there was a total failure of consideration. The action was a personal action only available in respect of money, rather than other benefits. Where the benefit received by the defendant was services or goods, the appropriate action was a quantum meruit or a quantum valebat, respectively.
The action for money had and received formed a part of the law of quasi-contract. Although the forms of action were abolished in the mid-19th century, reference continues to be made to the action in modern pleading.[1] The terminology of "quasi-contract" has been replaced by the more modern terminology of unjust enrichment in most common law jurisdictions.
Case law
- Bingham v. Cabot 3 U.S. 19 (Dall.) (1795)
- Kershaw v Kirkpatrick [1878] UKPC 4
- Sinclair v Brougham [1914] AC 398
- Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 1468
- Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548
- The Mikhail Lermontov [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep 579
- Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] UKHL 12
- Phillip Collins Ltd v Davis [2000] 3 All ER 808
See also
Notes
- ↑ Cf. Graham Virgo, The Principles of the Law of Restitution (3rd ed, 2015).