Lucius Licinius Lucullus (praetor 104 BC)

Lucius Licinius Lucullus (born c.144 BC)^[1] was a politician of the Roman Republic, and a member of the distinguished family of the Licinii Luculli, being the son of Lucius Licinius Lucullus (Consul 151 BC). He did not, however, achieve the political success of his father and failed to hold the Consulship, reaching only the position of Praetor in 104 BC. During his Praetorship he first successfully put down a minor slave revolt in Campania before being sent to take command in Sicily during the Second Servile War.^[2] He was later relieved of his command and prosecuted for embezzlement upon his recall to Rome. Being convicted, he was banished from the city and lived the remainder of his life in exile. He is the father of the more famous Lucius Licinius Lucullus, conqueror of Mithridates in the Third Mithridatic War.

Family

The Licinii Luculli were a branch of the ancient and aristocratic Plebeian gens Licinia. The first recorded Lucullus is an L. Licinius Lucullus who held the junior magistracy of Curule Aedile in 202 BC,^[3] and his descendants were to play a relatively obscure part in history until Lucullus' father became the first member of the family to be elected to the Consulship in 151 BC, thereby officially ennobling his family. While Consul the elder Lucullus was sent to continue the war against the Celtiberians in Hispania,^[4] however, his predecessor made peace and ended the war before his arrival, thereby depriving him of the opportunity for obtaining booty, through which he had hoped to make his family fortune. He therefore proceeded to make war on the neighbouring Vaccaei tribe, without any pretext or authorisation from the Senate, and with the sole aim of plundering their towns and lands for his own enrichment.^[5] Upon his return to Rome the elder Lucullus had succeeded in making himself and his family wealthy, and therefore influential, and was never prosecuted for his illegal conduct.

His son, also Lucius Licinius Lucullus, was born around 144 BC ^[6] and, sometime around 119 BC,^[7] married Caecilia Metella, the daughter of Lucius Caecilius Metellus Calvus. She was also the sister of Metellus Numidicus (Consul 109 BC) and Metellus Dalmaticus (Consul 119 BC), two of the leading optimates of their day.^[8] This political marriage brought the Luculli the support and influence of the powerful Caecilii Metelli family which would help their own rise to prominence. From this marriage Lucullus had two sons, Lucius and Marcus, born around 118/117 BC and 116 BC.^[9] However, despite being politically beneficial the match was an unhappy one, with Metella engaging in numerous scandalous affairs which led to an eventual divorce. Plutarch simply refers to her as 'a bad woman.'^[10]

The Vettian Slave Revolt

Lucullus was elected as one of the Praetors for 104 BC, probably Praetor Peregrinus,^[11] the magistrate responsible for hearing appeals and judicial cases outside the city of Rome in Italy. During his Praetorship a young Roman knight (Eques), Titus Minucius Vettius, led a slave revolt around the city of Capua in Campania.^[12]

Vettius had fallen in love with a beautiful young slave girl and, promising to pay her owner the huge sum of seven Attic talents, had been permitted to take her. However, when the time within which it had been agreed that payment would be made expired, Vettius was unable to fulfil his promise. A further extension of his credit was agreed but, when this again ran out, Vettius panicked. Kidnapping and murdering all his creditors, as well as the girl's owner, he then armed his slaves and declared himself the 'King of Campania,' proclaiming that all slaves who deserted their masters to join him would be free. Soon an army of seven-hundred escaped slaves were terrorising the Campanian countryside, killing all those who refused to join them.^[13]

When news reached Rome of the revolt, the Senate appointed Lucullus, then Praetor, 'to apprehend the fugitives.'^[14] Diodorus records that upon his arrival at Capua, Lucullus had four thousand infantry and four hundred cavalry under his command and that Vettius had a force of about three thousand five hundred.^[15] Upon learning of Lucullus' approach, Vettius and his men had taken up position on a nearby hill which they had hastily fortified, and there waited. When Lucullus' first assault against the rebels was repulsed, given their advantage of the higher ground, and so Lucullus tried a different strategy. Making contact with Apollonius, Vettius' general, Lucullus promised him that he would receive no punishment for his part in the rebellion if he were to now to co-operate with Rome and turn all he could against Vettius. Apollonius, fearing for his life, accepted the offer and, with the rebels now fighting amongst themselves, Lucullus was able to easily defeat them and put an end to the revolt. Vettius himself, seeing that all was lost, committed suicide before he was captured. All the rebels who were taken prisoner were them executed, save Apollonius who, true to his word, Lucullus pardoned and set free.^[16]

The Second Sicilian Slave Revolt

For main article see Second Servile War

In 104 BC, while Lucullus was suppressing the revolt of Vettius, a second more serious slave rebellion had broken out on Sicily.

Outbreak of the Revolt

In that year the Consul Gaius Marius had decreed that any Italian citizen being held in slavery was to be released immediately and that henceforth it was to be illegal for an Italian to be a slave. This was in response to the Italian Allies refusing to supply levies to fight the invading Germanic Cimbri unless such a decree was issued and the practise of selling Italian citizens into slavery for non-payment of debts outlawed.^[17][18]

As a consequence of this, the Governor of Sicily, Publius Licinius Nerva, set up a tribunal and began the process of interviewing slaves claiming to be Italians and determining whether in fact they were telling the truth or not. By presenting themselves at the tribunal in this way, in a few days eight hundred Italians had obtained their freedom. However, the wealthy Sicilian landowners, most of whom depended on a large slave workforce to farm their extensive estates, soon became agitated and demanded that the Governor desist from his work immediately.^[19] Giving in to pressure, Nerva closed the tribunals. Slaves waiting to present themselves were outraged at being denied their freedom and soon slaves began to rise up against their masters, landowners were murdered in their villas and the escaped slaves began to gather, rapidly growing in numbers until rebel slave armies were roaming the Sicilian countryside looting and pillaging as they went. Nerva, after defeating one band of rebels, found others springing up wherever he turned and, with only a small militia at his disposal, quickly lost control of the situation. An Italian slave named Salvius then emerged calling himself King of Sicily and the rebels began to unite behind him. In Rome, the crisis meant that the city could no longer depend on the essential Sicilian grain supply, and so swift action was needed.^[20]

Having just successfully put down one slave rebellion, the Senate turned again to Lucullus to take over from his hapless relative, Nerva. At the head of a new Roman and Allied army numbering around seventeen thousand according to Diodorus, Lucullus landed in Sicily in 103 BC.^[21]

The Battle of Scirthaea

Salvius, now calling himself Tryphon, planned to respond to Lucullus' arrival by withdrawing into his fortress of Triocala and there hold out against the Roman siege. However, his general Athenion prevailed upon him not to hide behind the walls of Triocala and instead face the Romans in open battle. Marching to meet Lucullus, the rebels encamped at Scirthaea, twelve miles distant from the Roman camp and, the next day the two sides prepared for battle. According to Diodorus Tryphon's host numbered forty-thousand strong against Lucullus' fourteen thousand.^[22]

After much skirmishing the main battle began as the two armies closed the gap separating them from their enemies and clashed together. At first it seemed as if the rebels were driving the Romans back, with Athenion and his cavalry inflicting heavy losses upon Lucullus. However, just as it seemed that the slaves might be victorious, Athenion was wounded and cut down from his horse, forced to feign death in order to save himself. The rebels, believing their brave general to be dead, lost heart and fled. Tryphon, seeing his army vanishing before him, turned and joined them in flight back to his refuge in Triocala. Later that night, under cover of darkness, the wounded Athenion also escaped. With thousands of slaves cut down in the rout, Diodorus estimates that, as night fell, around twenty-thousand rebels lay dead, half of Tryphon's army destroyed and Lucullus victorious.^[23]

The Siege of Triocala

From his defeat at Scirthaea, Tryphon, along with the remnants of his army, shut himself behind the gates of Triocala and prepared to resist the inevitable siege. Lucullus, however, was slow to follow up his victory at Scirthaea and it was not until nine days after the battle that he finally arrived outside the walls of the rebel stronghold and placed it under siege. Several times Lucullus attempted to take the city by assault, however all were repulsed with heavy losses for the Romans and seemed to merely embolden the defenders. Lucullus therefore settled for a long siege to starve the enemy out.^[24]

By the end of 103 BC Lucullus remained outside the walls of Triocala, frustratingly unable to take the city and end the rebellion. In Rome, seeing his failure to take Triocala as evidence of some indolence or incompetence, the Senate did not prorogue his command in Sicily and instead appointed Gaius Servilius to take his place when his term expired in 102 BC.

Enraged at what he saw as a betrayal by the Senate, Lucullus, when he heard that his replacement had crossed the straits and landed in Sicily, ordered his army to burn their camp and destroy all their supplies and siege equipment before withdrawing from Triocala and disbanding completely.^[25] He did this so that Servilius would not benefit from any of what he had achieved while in Sicily. Lucullus also assumed that, as he was ensuring the failure of his successor, such an outcome would prove his own innocence from any alleged incompetence. Servilius did indeed fail in his attempt to defeat the rebels and was himself defeated by Athenion, who had first murdered then succeeded his former master. It was Servilius' replacement, Manius Aquillius who finally put an end to the revolt in 100 BC.^[26]

Prosecution and Banishment

Upon returning to Rome in 102 BC Lucullus was almost immediately put in trial for the abuse of his command in Sicily. He was accused of seeking to prolong the war merely as a pretext to plunder the province for his own profit just as his father had done during his command in Spain. The destruction of his camp and equipment, as well as the illegal disbanding of his army, also supported the charge that he had abused his position and the public resources entrusted to him.^[27] To avenge the disgrace done by Lucullus to the Servilii through his treatment of Gaius Servilius, it was a Servilius, known as Servilius the Augur, who prosecuted him for embezzlement.^[28]

Lucullus turned to his powerful brother-in-law, Metellus Numidicus, for support against his accusers, but Numidicus refused to speak for him.^[29][30] This may have been because the Servilii too had family connections with the Metelli - Servilius Vatia being married to the daughter of Metellus Macedonicus, Numidicus' uncle - and so they were unable to favour either side in the trial.

Lucullus was found guilty and banished from the city in 102 BC.^[31] He spent the remainder of his life in exile, possibly in Heraclea,^[32] and died at an unknown date.

When his two sons, Lucius and Marcus Lucullus reached their majority, they immediately sought revenge by impeaching their father's accuser, Servilius the Augur, whom they charged with misusing public funds. However, despite the best efforts of the brothers, the trial descended into violence and Servilius was acquitted.^[33]

References

External links

• Appian, Roman History, 'The Wars in Spain'
• Sources for Three Roman Slave Revolts
• Plutarch's 'Life of Lucullus'