List of people nominated to U.S. Supreme Court in last year of presidency

This article is part of the series on the
United States Supreme Court
The Court
Decisions Procedure History Court Building
Current membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Anthony Kennedy Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan Vacant Retired Associate Justices John Paul Stevens Sandra Day O'Connor David Souter
All members
List of all members by court by seat by time in office by education Succession Timeline List of Chief Justices List of Associate Justices Specialty lists All nominations Unsuccessful nominations Nominations late in presidency Court demographics Justices who served in Congress Ideological leanings of justices
Court functionaries
Clerks Reporter of Decisions Supreme Court Police
Other countries Law Portal

Vacancies on the Supreme Court of the United States rarely arise during the last year of a presidency.^[1][2][3] Following is a list of those people who were nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court during the last year of a president's last term. This list does not include presidents who never had an opportunity to serve what would have been their last year, due to assassination or the like.

Political scientist Michael Nelson wrote in 2012 that the U.S. Senate is less likely to approve Supreme Court nominations that are submitted during the final year of a presidency.^[4] This type of situation received considerable public attention in 2016 with the death of Justice Antonin Scalia and the resulting Merrick Garland Supreme Court nomination.^[5]

Law professors Jason Mazzone and Robin Kar published a study in 2016 in which they wrote that a detailed analysis of Senate history does not support a deliberate inter-presidential transfer of nominating power from one president to the next. In their view, an actual vacancy ought to be viewed differently from a vacancy that is announced in advance but never actually vacated ("NV"); an elected president who makes a nomination ought to be viewed differently from a president-by-succession ("S"); and, a nomination made post-election-of-successor ("PE") should be distinguished from a nomination made earlier.^[6][7] Accordingly, the list below indicates these things in the notes column, although these distinctions have been questioned by scholars such as Edward Whelan.^[8]

Possible results

There are several possible results of a Supreme Court nomination:

• "confirmed"—for nominees who were confirmed and accepted confirmation.
• "rejected"—for nominees who lost their confirmation vote.
• "declined"—for nominees who declined nomination. This includes nominees who were confirmed by the Senate but declined to serve.
• "pending"—for nominees pending before the current session of the Senate.
• "withdrawn"—for nominations withdrawn by the President prior to a confirmation vote.
• "no action"—for cases in which the Senate session ended without the nomination being brought to the floor for consideration.
• "postponed"—for nominations about which a vote was taken to defer consideration of the nominee, but no confirmation vote took place. In this case, the "date of result" is the date of the vote to postpone. The Senate need not vote to postpone or table a matter "indefinitely", in order for a resolution to have that effect.^[9]

Nominees

See also

• List of Presidents of the United States by judicial appointments
• List of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
• List of nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States
• Unsuccessful nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States

References

1. ↑ "Do presidents stop nominating judges in final year?", Politifact (February 14, 2016).
2. ↑ Kiely, Eugene. "Cruz, Rubio Twist Court 'Precedent'", FactCheck.org (February 17, 2016).
3. 1 2 3 4 Kessler, Glenn. "Does the Senate have a constitutional responsibility to consider a Supreme Court nomination?", Washington Post (March 16, 2016).
4. ↑ Nelson, Michael. "2013 and Beyond: Barack Obama and the Perils of Second Term Presidents" in Elections of 2012, p. 33 (SAGE Publications, 2013): "During the final year of the second term, the Senate takes an especially jaundiced view of the president's judicial nominations. Historically, the rejection rate for final year nominations to the United States Supreme Court has been 48 percent, compared with 14 percent for nominations made earlier in the term. When the opposition party controls the Senate, the final year rejection rate rises to 75 percent."
5. 1 2 Shear, Michael (March 16, 2016). "Obama Chooses Merrick Garland for Supreme Court". New York Times. 
6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Kar, Robin and Mazzone, Jason. "The Garland Affair: What History and the Constitution Really Say About President Obama's Powers to Appoint a Replacement for Justice Scalia", NYU Law Review (On-Line Features, 2016) via SSRN.
7. ↑ "Law Profs Kar and Mazzone Respond", Bench Memos, National Review (June 9, 2016).
8. ↑ Whelan, Edward. "Law Profs Kar/Mazzone on Senate Duty on Supreme Court Vacancies --- Part 3", Bench Memos, National Review (June 7, 2016).
9. ↑ Beth, Richard (2009). Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789-2009. DIANE Publishing. pp. 5ff. ISBN 978-1-4379-1994-3. 
10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "Supreme Court Nominations". Official website of the United States Senate. Retrieved February 3, 2006. 

External links

• Hogue, Henry. "Supreme Court Nominations Not Confirmed, 1789—August 2010", Congressional Research Service (August 20, 2010).