National human rights institution

A National human rights institution (NHRI) is an independent institution bestowed with the responsibility to broadly protect, monitor and promote human rights in a given country. The growth of such bodies has been encouraged by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) which has provided advisory and support services, and facilitated access for NHRIs to the UN treaty bodies and other committees.^[1] There are over 100 such institutions, about two-thirds assessed by peer review as compliant with the United Nations standards set out in the Paris Principles. Compliance with the Principles is the basis for accreditation at the UN, which, uniquely for NHRIs, is not conducted directly by a UN body but by a sub-committee of the International Coordinating Committee of National Human Rights Institutions (ICC). The secretariat to the review process (for initial accreditation, and reaccreditation every five years) is provided by the National Institutions and Regional Mechanisms Section of the OHCHR.^[2]

NHRIs can be grouped together in two broad categories: human rights commissions and ombudsmen. While most ombudsman agencies have their powers vested in a single person, human rights commissions are multi-member committees, often representative of various social groups and political tendencies. They are sometimes set up to deal with specific issues such as discrimination, although some are bodies with very broad responsibilities. Specialised national institutions exist in many countries to protect the rights of a particular vulnerable group such as ethnic and linguistic minorities, indigenous peoples, children, refugees persons with disabilities or women.

However, in general terms national human rights institution have an explicit and specific human rights mandate and a broader mandate, which could include research, documentation and training and education in human rights issues, than the classical ombudsman model which tends to work on handling complaints about administrative deficiencies. While all human rights violations are maladministration, only a small proportion of the workload of an ombudsman deals with violations of human rights standards.^[3]

In most countries, a constitution, a human rights act or institution-specific legislation will provide for the establishment of a national human rights institution. The degree of independence of these institutions depends upon national law, and best practice requires a constitutional or statutory basis rather than (for example) a presidential decree.

Nations human rights institutions are also referred to by the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action^[4] and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities^[5]

Functions of NHRIs

Special commissions have been established in many countries to ensure that laws and regulations concerning the protection of human rights are effectively applied. Commissions tend to be composed of members from diverse backgrounds, often with a particular interest, expertise or experience in the field of human rights.

Human rights commissions are concerned primarily with the protection of those within the jurisdiction of the state against discrimination or mistreatment, and with the protection of civil liberties and other human rights. Some commissions concern themselves with alleged violations of any rights recognized in the constitution and/or in international human rights instruments.

One of the most important functions vested in many human rights commissions is to receive and investigate complaints from individuals (and occasionally, from groups) alleging human rights abuses committed in violation of existing national law. While there are considerable differences in the procedures followed by various human rights commissions in the investigation and resolution of complaints, many rely on conciliation or arbitration. It is not unusual for a human rights commission to be granted authority to impose a legally binding outcome on parties to a complaint. If no special tribunal has been established, the commission may be able to transfer unresolved complaints to the normal courts for a final determination.

NHRIs are usually able to deal with any human rights issue directly involving a public authority. In relation to non-state entities, some national human rights institutions have at least one of the following functions:

• addressing grievances or disputes involving certain kinds of company (for instance state-owned enterprises, private companies providing public services, or companies that operate at the federal level)
• addressing only certain types of human rights issue (for instance non-discrimination or labour rights)
• addressing complaints or disputes raising any human rights issue and involving any company.^[6]

The degree to which the recommendations or rulings produced by a human rights institution can be enforced varies based on the human rights climate surrounding the institution.

Another important function of a human rights commission is systematically to review a government's human rights policy in order to detect shortcomings in human rights observance and to suggest ways of improving. This often includes human rights proofing of draft legislation, or policies.

Human rights commissions may also monitor the state's compliance with its own and with international human rights laws and if necessary, recommend changes. The realization of human rights cannot be achieved solely through legislation and administrative arrangements; therefore, commissions are often entrusted with the important responsibility of improving community awareness of human rights.

According to the Paris Principles, the 'National human rights institutions' are obliged to make "preparation of reports on the national situation with regard to human rights in general, and on more specific matters;" and this is mostly done in annual status reports.^[7]

Promoting and educating about human rights may involve informing the public about the commission's own functions and purposes; provoking discussion about various important questions in the field of human rights; organizing seminars; holding counselling services and meetings; as well as producing and disseminating human rights publications.

Not all of the following NHRIs are accredited through the ICC.

Regional groupings of NHRIs

• International Ombudsman Institute
• Network of African National Human Rights Institutions (NANHRI)
• Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions (APF)
• European Group of National Human Rights Institutions
• Network of National Institutions in the Americas

Sub-national human rights institutions

Australia

Anti-Discrimination Board of New South Wales

Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission

Equal Opportunity Commission (South Australia)

Equal Opportunity Commission (Western Australia)

Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland

Office of Anti-Discrimination Commissioner (Tasmania)

Human Rights Commission (Australian Capital Territory)

Northern Territory Anti-Discrimination Commission

Canada

Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission

British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal

Ontario Human Rights Commission

United Kingdom

The three UK bodies (Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Scotland) are listed above as they are each recognised as NHRIs.

Spain

Catalonia: Síndic de Greuges (Ombudsman)

South Korea

Provincial and Metropolis level

Provincial Human Rights Promotion Commission (South Chungcheong Province)

Provincial Human Rights Promotion Commission (Gangwon Province)

Seoul Human Rights Commission

Human Rights Ombudsman (Gwangju)

Citizen Council for Human Rights Promotion is advisory council for the Ombudsman

Ulsan Human Rights Commission

Education

Human Rights Commission for Students, Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education

Human Rights Advocate for Students (Gyeonggi Province)

Human Rights Commission for Students, Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education

Human Rights Advocate for Students (Seoul)

Notes

See also

• Human rights
• List of human rights articles by country
• International human rights instruments
• Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action
• European Court of Human Rights
• Inter-American Court of Human Rights
• African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights
• Human Rights Commissions
• Greek National Commission for Human Rights

Further reading

• OHCHR (2010) National Human Rights institutions - History, Principles, Roles and Responsibilities(Professional Training Series No.4)
• OHCHR (2009) Survey on National Human Rights Institutions
• Anna-Elina Pohjolainen. (2006).The Evolution of National Human Rights Institutions. The Danish Institute for Human Rights.
• Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative. (2006). Human Rights Commissions: A Citizen’s Handbook, IInd Edition Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative
• International Council on Human Rights Policy. (2005) Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions International Council on Human Rights Policy/Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Morten Kjærum. (2003). National Human Rights Institutions - Implementing Human Rights The Danish Institute for Human Rights
• Donnelly, Jack. (2003). Universal Human Rights in Theory & Practice. 2nd ed. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
• Birgit Lindsnaes, Lone Lindholt, Kristine Yigen (eds.). (2001) National Human Rights Institutions, Articles and working papers, Input to the discussions of the establishment and development of the functions of national human rights institutions The Danish Institute for Human Rights.
• Shute, Stephen & Hurley, Susan (eds.) (1993). On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures. New York: BasicBooks.
• Ignatieff, Michael. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

External links

• International Coordinating Committee (ICC) of National Human Rights Institutions - Official website for the ICC
• UNHCHR Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948
• National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) Profiles (ACCESS Facility)