Lindh v. Murphy

Lindh v. Murphy

Argued April 14, 1997
Decided June 23, 1997
Full case name Aaron Lindh v. Murphy, Warden
Citations

521 U.S. 320 (more)

Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Souter, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer
Dissent Rehnquist, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
Laws applied
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996

Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996's amendments to Title 28, Section 2254 of the United States Code applies to cases filed after the Act's effective date.[1] The amendments "do not apply to pending noncapital cases such as Lindh's."[1]

In his dissent, Chief Justice William Rehnquist argues that "in light of the whole of our retroactivity jurisprudence," pending cases should be subject to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996's amendments.[1]

References

  1. 1 2 3 Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 (1997)

External links


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.