John Small (cricketer)

For other people with the same name, see John Small.
John Small
Personal information
Full name John Small
Born (1737-04-19)19 April 1737
Empshott, Hampshire, England
Died 31 December 1826(1826-12-31) (aged 89)
Petersfield, Hampshire, England
Nickname Old Small
Batting style Right-handed
Bowling style Unknown
Role Batsman
Domestic team information
c.1756 to 1798 Hampshire
Career statistics
Source: Haygarth, S&B vol. 1, 31 July 2009

John Small (19 April 1737, Empshott, Hampshire – 31 December 1826, Petersfield, Hampshire) was an English professional cricketer who played in important matches from c.1756 to 1798, one of the longest careers on record.[fc 1] He is generally regarded as the greatest batsman of the 18th century and was the first to master the use of the modern straight bat which was introduced in the 1760s. He scored the earliest known century in important cricket and was acclaimed as the greatest player of the famous Hambledon Club. In 1997, he was named by The Times as one of its 100 Greatest Cricketers of All Time. He is the first person known to have been described in literature in terms that attest him to have been a superstar. He was a very influential player who was involved in the creation of two significant permanent additions to the Laws of Cricket: the maximum width of the bat and the introduction of the middle stump.

Cricket career

Small was a playing member of Hambledon during its years of greatness and it was largely because of him that Hambledon was such a famous club.[1] He was definitely playing for Hambledon in 1764 and his name is found in the club's scorecards right up to 1798 when he was over 60.[2] Knowledge of the early years of his career are sketchy due to the lack of detailed records before scorecards became common from 1772, but it is believed he began playing in top-class cricket during the 1750s and may well have taken part in the earliest known Hambledon matches, a tri-series against Dartford in 1756.[3][4][5]


The earliest definite mention of Small dates from the 1764 season when Hambledon played three important matches against Chertsey (i.e., effectively a Hampshire v Surrey series).[6] The Hambledon team in the first match is believed to have been: Richard Nyren (captain), John Small, Peter Stewart, William Hogsflesh, William Barber, John Bayton, Osmond, John Woolgar, Edward Woolgar, Thomas Ridge and Squire Thomas Land (aka Lamb).[7] Hambledon at this time was sometimes referred to as "Squire Land's Club".[3]

In August 1768, Small scored more than 140 runs for Hambledon against Kent at Broadhalfpenny Down. This was a feat almost unheard of at that time but it is not quite clear from the original source if it was in one innings or his match total.[8] Only a week later, playing for Hambledon against Sussex at Broadhalfpenny Down, Small scored "about four-score notches ... and was not out when the game was finished", Hambledon winning by 7 wickets.[9]

On 31 July and 1 August 1769, Hambledon played Caterham at Guildford Bason and won by 4 wickets. A contemporary report in the Reading Mercury states that "the utmost activity and skill in the game was displayed by each individual through the whole course of this match, but particularly the batting of Messrs Small and John Bayton on the Hambledon side".[10]

Small was involved in one of the most controversial incidents in early cricket history when Hambledon played Chertsey at Laleham Burway on 23 & 24 September 1771. Hambledon won the match by 1 wicket.[11][12] It was in this game that Chertsey's Thomas White used a bat that was as wide as the wicket, possibly in an attempt to force an issue about the width of the new straight bats that had recently replaced the old curved sticks.[13] Whether that was White's intention is unclear but his action ensured that a new rule was passed which limited the width to 4.25 inches. This rule supported a written motion presented by Hambledon bowler Thomas Brett that was counter-signed by club captain Richard Nyren and senior batsman Small. The original of Brett's memorandum, bearing Small's signature, is maintained by Marylebone Cricket Club in its museum at Lord's.[14]


The production of match scorecards became common from the 1772 season and three 1772 cards have survived. Small played in all three matches and was easily the season's highest runscorer with 213 in his six innings. The only other player to exceed 100 was William Yalden who made 136, also in six innings. In the first match of the season, Small scored 78 for Hampshire against All-England out of a team total of 146. In the second innings, he scored 34 out of 79 and his team won by 53 runs, an illustration of his enormous value to Hampshire.[15] His innings of 78 was the highest individual score definitely recorded to that time. Although higher scores such as Richard Newland's 88 in 1745 and Small's own 140-plus in 1768 have been mentioned in the sources, it is not clear if those were definitely made in one innings or if they were match totals. Small's 78 is therefore the startpoint of the progressive world record for the highest individual innings in senior cricket.

Small's 1772 aggregate of 213 runs from six innings would give him an average of 35.50 if all his innings were completed (i.e., the scorecards in 1772 do not confirm the not out batsmen). This may seem low by modern standards but it has to be remembered that prevailing pitch conditions were such that "the scoring potential of the 18th century batsman was only about 30% of the 20th or 21st century batsman".[16] 18th century pitches were fully exposed to the elements, underwent rudimentary preparation and were not flat: Lumpy Stevens in particular was a master at selecting one in which there was a distinctive brow or ridge that would enable him to bowl "shooters".[16]

Small has been recorded in a number of single wicket matches but he seems to have been less successful in this form of cricket than in the eleven-a-side version. He did have one single wicket innings that was of enormous significance in the evolution of the sport because it led directly to the introduction of the third (middle) stump to what had always been a two-stump wicket. The match in question took place at the Artillery Ground on 22 & 23 May 1775 between Five of Kent (with Lumpy Stevens) and Five of Hambledon (with Thomas White).[17] Kent batted first and made 37 to which Hambledon replied with 92, including 75 by Small, that being his highest known score in a single wicket match. In their second innings, Kent scored 102, leaving Hambledon a target of 48 to win. Small batted last of the Hambledon Five and needed 14 more to win when he went in. He duly scored the runs and Hambledon won by 1 wicket but a great controversy arose afterwards because, three times in the course of his second innings, Small was beaten by Lumpy only for the ball to pass through the two-stump wicket each time without hitting the stumps or the bail.[13] As a result of Lumpy's protests, the middle stump was introduced, although it was some years before its use became universal.[18]

Although he probably scored a century in 1768, Small's most famous feat was in fact to score the earliest known century in an important match when he made 136* for Hampshire against Surrey at Broadhalfpenny Down on 13 July 1775.[19]

Style and technique

Along with other greats of the Hambledon era such as Billy Beldham and Tom Walker, Small did much to lay the foundations of what can now be recognised as modern batting technique. He was noted for his sound defence but he was also a fluent strokemaker who used his wrists particularly well.[2] John Nyren described him as the "best short runner of his day" and believed him to be "the first who turned the short run to account".[20][21]

Small rarely if ever bowled but he was "an admirable fieldsman, always playing middle wicket" and "as active as a hare".[20]

It is sometimes said that Small invented the straight bat, replacing the old curved bat in the 1760s after bowlers started pitching the ball instead of skimming or trundling it.[22] It is more accurate to say that he was the first batsman to master the use of the straight bat and that he subsequently manufactured them in his workshop.[3]

Family and personal life

John Small's tombstone in the churchyard at St Peter’s Church, Petersfield.

Nyren says that Small was "a remarkably well-made and well-knit man of a handsome countenance and honest expression".[20]

He was married and had at least five children including three daughters who died in childhood (see photograph of the family's tombstone). His wife Ann (born c.1739) died on 22 November 1802, aged 63. His two sons, Jack and Eli, also played senior cricket. Mrs Ann Small was a vociferous supporter of the Hambledon team and was a regular attendee at its matches, often travelling with the team to away games too.[23]

Outside cricket, Small's profession was originally a cobbler but he later expanded his business to include the manufacture of cricket bats and balls.[22]

Small was musical and could play both the fiddle and the double bass. One of his greatest admirers was the cricket patron John Sackville, 3rd Duke of Dorset, who, when learning of Small's musical skills, sent him "a handsome violin".[20] Small returned the favour by sending the Duke a present of two newly made cricket bats and balls.[20]


Like so many of his contemporaries, Small's fame is based largely on the testimony paid to him by John Nyren in The Cricketers of My Time. Small received high praise indeed for Nyren wrote that "(Small) shines among them (i.e., the Hambledon players) in all the lustre of a star of the first magnitude" (i.e., a superstar).[20]

His legacy is well summarised by a contemporary verse about him which, it is believed, he displayed on a sign outside his workshop in Petersfield:

Here lives John Small,
Makes bat and ball,
Pitches a wicket, plays at cricket
With any man in England.[2][3]

In 1997, in an article in The Times, former Wisden Cricketers' Almanack editor John Woodcock named Small in his 100 Greatest Cricketers of All Time.[24]


  1. Note that surviving match records to 1825 are incomplete and any statistical compilation of a player's career in that period is based on known data. Match scorecards were not always created, or have been lost, and the matches themselves were not always recorded in the press or other media. Scorecard data was not comprehensive: e.g., bowling analyses lacked balls bowled and runs conceded; bowlers were not credited with wickets when the batsman was caught or stumped; in many matches, the means of dismissal were omitted.


  1. Leach, John (2008). "From Lads to Lord's – Profile of John Small". Stumpsite. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 31 July 2009.
  2. 1 2 3 Haygarth, p. 242.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Mote, p. 97.
  4. Leach, John (2008). "Classification of cricket matches from 1697 to 1825". Stumpsite. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2009.
  5. "List of matches played in 1756". CricketArchive. Retrieved 1 August 2009.
  6. Leach, John (2008). "From Lads to Lord's – 1764". Stumpsite. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 31 July 2009.
  7. Mote, p. 164.
  8. Waghorn, Cricket Scores, p. 66.
  9. McCann, p. 73.
  10. Waghorn, Dawn of Cricket, p. 33.
  11. Buckley, p. 56.
  12. Waghorn, Cricket Scores, p. 76.
  13. 1 2 Nyren, p. 156.
  14. Leach, John (2008). "The Monster Bat Controversy". Stumpsite. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  15. Ashley-Cooper, p. 177.
  16. 1 2 Leach, John (2008). "From Lads to Lord's – Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics". Stumpsite. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  17. Haygarth, p. 21-22.
  18. Haygarth, p. 21.
  19. Haygarth, p. 25.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nyren, pp. 57-58.
  21. Note that the term "short run" refers to what would now be called a "quick single".
  22. 1 2 Mote, pp. 96-97.
  23. Mote, p. 95.
  24. "Woodcock's Hundred". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 31 July 2009.


External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/11/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.