In forma pauperis

In forma pauperis (/ɪn ˈfɔːrmə ˈpɔːpərᵻs/; IFP or i.f.p.) is a Latin legal term meaning "in the character or manner of a pauper".[1]

United Kingdom

IFP was abolished in the UK in 1949.[2]

United States

In the United States, the IFP designation is given by both state and federal courts to someone who is without the funds to pursue the normal costs of a lawsuit or a criminal defense.[1] The status is usually granted by a judge without a hearing, and it entitles the person to a waiver of normal costs, and sometimes in criminal cases the appointment of counsel. While court-imposed costs such as filing fees are waived, the litigant is still responsible for other costs incurred in bringing the action such as deposition and witness fees. However, in federal court, a pauper can obtain free service of process through the United States Marshal's Service.[3]

Approximately two-thirds of writ of certiorari petitions to the Supreme Court are filed in forma pauperis.[4][5] Most of those petitioners are prisoners.[4] Statistically, petitions that appear on the Supreme Court's in forma pauperis docket are substantially less likely to be granted review than others on the docket.[6]

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), is a landmark case in United States Supreme Court history where in forma pauperis was invoked.[7] In forma pauperis is usually granted in connection to pro se petitioners, but the two concepts are separate and distinct.

Notes

  1. 1 2 Henry Campbell Black. (1979). Black's Law Dictionary (5th ed.). West Publishing. p. 701. ISBN 0-8299-2041-2.
  2. ↑ "The implications for access to justice of the Government's proposals to reform legal aid".
  3. ↑ Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 4(c)(3)
  4. 1 2 Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (2006). The Psychology of the Supreme Court. USA: Oxford University Press. p. 60. ISBN 0-19-530604-X.
  5. ↑ Stephens, Otis H.; Scheb, John M. (2002). American Constitutional Law. Thomson Wadsworth. ISBN 0-534-54570-X.
  6. ↑ Thompson, David C.; Wachtell, Melanie F. (2009). "An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Certiorari Petition Procedures". George Mason University Law Review. 16 (2): 237, 241. SSRN 1377522Freely accessible.
  7. ↑ Lewis, Anthony (1964). Gideon's Trumpet. U.S.: Random House. ISBN 0-679-72312-9.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/26/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.