Hydrophiinae

"Sea snakes" redirects here. For the rock band, see Sea Snakes. For sea snakes in mythology and cryptozoology, see Sea serpent.
Hydrophiinae
Pelamis platura
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Squamata
Suborder: Serpentes
Family: Elapidae
Subfamily: Hydrophiinae
Smith, 1926
range of sea snakes shown in lime green

The Hydrophiinae, also known as coral reef snakes or sea snakes, are a subfamily of venomous elapid snakes that inhabit marine environments for most or all of their lives. Most are extensively adapted to a fully aquatic life and are unable to move on land, except for the genus Laticauda, which has limited land movement. They are found in warm coastal waters from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific and are closely related to venomous terrestrial snakes in Australia.[1]

All have paddle-like tails and many have laterally compressed bodies that give them an eel-like appearance. Unlike fish, they do not have gills and must surface regularly to breathe. Along with whales, they are among the most completely aquatic of all air-breathing vertebrates.[2] Among this group are species with some of the most potent venoms of all snakes. Some have gentle dispositions and bite only when provoked, but others are much more aggressive. Currently, 17 genera are described as sea snakes, comprising 62 species.[3][4]

Description

The majority of adult Hydrophiinae species grow to between 120 and 150 cm (3.9 and 4.9 ft) in length,[5] with the largest, Hydrophis spiralis, reaching a maximum of 3 m (9.8 ft).[6] Their eyes are relatively small with a round pupil[7] and most have nostrils located dorsally.[8] The skulls do not differ significantly from those of terrestrial elapids, although the dentition is relatively primitive with short fangs and (with the exception of Emydocephalus) as many as 18 smaller teeth behind them on the maxilla.[2]

Yellow-lipped sea krait, Laticauda colubrina

Most Hydrophiinae are completely aquatic and have adapted to their environments in many ways, the most characteristic of which is a paddle-like tail that has improved their swimming ability.[9] To a varying degree, the bodies of many species are laterally compressed, especially in the pelagic species. This has often caused the ventral scales to become reduced in size, even difficult to distinguish from the adjoining scales. Their lack of ventral scales means they have become virtually helpless on land, but as they live out their entire lifecycles at sea, they have no need to leave the water.[5][8]

The only genus that has retained the enlarged ventral scales is the sea kraits, Laticauda, with only five species. These snakes are considered to be more primitive, as they still spend much of their time on land, where their ventral scales afford them the necessary grip.[5][8] Laticauda species are also the only sea snakes with internasal scales, i.e., their nostrils are not located dorsally.[9]

Since it is easier for a snake's tongue to fulfill its olfactory function under water, its action is short compared to that of terrestrial snake species. Only the forked tips protrude from the mouth through a divided notch in the middle of the rostral scale.[2] The nostrils have valves consisting of a specialized spongy tissue to exclude water, and the windpipe can be drawn up to where the short nasal passage opens into the roof of the mouth. This is an important adaptation for an animal that must surface to breathe, but may have its head partially submerged when doing so. The lung has become very large and extends almost the entire length of the body, although the rear portion is thought to have developed to aid buoyancy rather than to exchange gases. The extended lung possibly also serves to store air for dives.[5][8]

Most species of the Hydrophiinae are able to respire through the top of their skin. This is unusual for reptiles, because their skin is thick and scaly, but experiments with the black-and-yellow sea snake, Pelamis platura (a pelagic species), have shown this species can satisfy about 25% of its oxygen requirements in this manner, which allows for prolonged dives.[10]

Blue-lipped sea krait, Laticauda laticaudata

Like other land animals that have adapted to life in a marine environment, sea snakes ingest considerably more salt than their terrestrial relatives through their diets, and when seawater is inadvertently swallowed. This meant they had to evolve a more effective means of regulating the salt concentration of their blood. In sea snakes, the posterior sublingual glands, located under and around the tongue sheath, evolved to allow them to expel salt with their tongue action.[2][8]

Scalation among sea snakes is highly variable. As opposed to terrestrial snake species that have imbricate scales to protect against abrasion, the scales of most pelagic sea snakes do not overlap. Reef-dwelling species, such as Aipysurus, do have imbricate scales to protect against the sharp coral. The scales themselves may be smooth, keeled, spiny, or granular, the latter often looking like warts. Pelamis has body scales that are "peg-like", while those on its tail are juxtaposed hexagonal plates.[8]

Sensory abilities

Vision, chemoreception (tongue-flicking) and hearing are important senses for terrestrial snakes but these stimuli become distorted in water.[11][12] The poor visibility, chemical dilution and limitation of ground-borne vibrations underwater suggest that sea snakes and sea kraits may have unique sensory abilities to compensate for the relative lack of other sensory cues.[13]

Very little is known about sea snake vision. A study of retinal photoreceptors of spine-bellied, Lapemis curtus, and horned, Acalyptophis peronii, sea snakes found three classes of visual pigments all from cone cells.[14] Despite the absence of rod cells in sea snake eyes, Simeos et al. found genes from rod-cells (rh1) were still being expressed[15] suggesting that in sea snakes some cones may be transmuted rods. However, behavioural observations indicate that vision has a limited role for catching prey and mate selection, but sound (i.e. vibration) and chemoreception may be important.[16][17] One study identified small sensory organs on the head of Lapemis curtus[18] similar to the mechanoreceptors in alligators and aquatic snake Acrochodus that are used to sense the movement of fish prey.[19] Westhoff et al. recorded auditory brain responses to vibration underwater in Lapemis curtus,[20] which are sensitive enough to detect movement in prey but were not as sensitive as fish lateral line systems. Similarly, vision appears to be of limited importance for finding mates. Shine experimented with applying skin secretions (pheromones) to snake-like objects to see if male turtle-headed sea snakes, Emydocephalus annulatus, are attracted to female pheromones. Shine found that although vision may be useful over short distances (<1 m), pheromones are more important once the male comes in physical contact with an object.[21]

The olive sea snake, Aipysurus laevis, has been found to have photoreceptors in the skin of its tail, allowing it to detect light and presumably ensuring it is completely hidden, including its tail, inside coral holes during the day. While other species have not been tested, Aipysurus laevis possibly is not unique among sea snakes in this respect.[22]

Other unique senses, such as electro-magnetic reception and pressure detection,[23] have been proposed for sea snakes, but scientific studies have yet to be performed to test these senses.[13]

Distribution and habitat

The Hydrophiinae are mostly confined to the warm tropical waters of the Indian Ocean and the western Pacific Ocean,[5] with a few species found well out into Oceania.[24] The geographic range of one species, Pelamis platurus, is wider than that of any other reptile species, except for a few species of sea turtles.[2] It extends from the east coast of Africa, from Djibouti in the north to Cape Town in the south,[25] across the Indian Ocean, the Pacific, south as far as the northern coast of New Zealand,[24][26] all the way to the western coast of the Americas, where it occurs from northern Peru in the south (including the Galápagos Islands) to the Gulf of California in the north. Isolated specimens have been found as far north as San Clemente in the United States.[10]

Sea snakes do not occur in the Atlantic Ocean.[8] It is thought that Pelamis would be found there were it not for the cold currents off Namibia and western South Africa that keep it from crossing into the eastern South Atlantic, or south of 5° latitude along the South American west coast. Sea snakes do not occur in the Red Sea, believed to be due to its increased salinity, so no danger exists of them crossing through the Suez Canal. A lack of salinity is also thought to be the reason why Pelamis has not crossed into the Caribbean via the Panama Canal.[2]

Despite their marine adaptations, most sea snakes prefer shallow waters near land, around islands, and especially somewhat sheltered waters, as well as near estuaries.[5][9] They may swim up rivers and have been reported as far as 160 km (99 mi) from the sea.[9] Others, such as P. platurus, are pelagic and are found in drift lines, slicks of floating debris brought together by surface currents.[27] Some sea snakes inhabit mangrove swamps and similar brackishwater habitats, and two landlocked freshwater forms are found: Hydrophis semperi occurs in Lake Taal in the Philippines, and Laticauda crockeri in Lake Te Nggano on Rennell Island in the Solomon Islands.[8]

Behavior

Sea snakes are generally reluctant to bite,[5][6] and are usually considered to be mild-tempered, although variation is seen among species and individuals.[24] Some species, such as P. platurus, which feed by simply gulping down their prey, are more likely to bite when provoked because they seem to use their venom more for defense. Others, such as Laticauda, use their venom for prey immobilization; these snakes are often handled without concern by local fishermen, who unravel and toss them back into the water barehanded when the snakes become entangled in fishing nets.[5][8] Species reported as much more aggressive include Aipysurus laevis, Astrotia stokesii, Enhydrina schistosa, Enhydrina zweifeli, and Hydrophis ornatus.[9]

Olive sea snake, Aipysurus laevis

On land, their movements become very erratic. They crawl awkwardly in these situations and can become quite aggressive, striking wildly at anything that moves, although they are unable to coil and strike in the manner of terrestrial snakes.[6][7]

Sea snakes appear to be active both day and night. In the morning, and sometimes late in the afternoon, they can be seen at the surface basking in the sunlight, and they dive when disturbed.[5] They have been reported swimming at depths over 90 m (300 ft), and can remain submerged for as long as a few hours, possibly depending on temperature and degree of activity.[6][24]

Sea snakes have been sighted in huge numbers. For example, in 1932, a steamer in the Strait of Malacca, off the coast of Malaysia, reported sighting "millions" of Astrotia stokesii, a relative of Pelamis; these reportedly formed a line of snakes 3 m (9.8 ft) wide and 100 km (62 mi) long.[27] The cause of this phenomenon is unknown, although it likely has to do with reproduction.[2] They can sometimes be seen swimming in schools of several dozen, and many dead specimens have been found on beaches after typhoons.[7]

Feeding

They feed on small fish and occasionally young octopodes.

Reproduction

Except for a single genus, all Hydrophiinae species are ovoviviparous; the young are born alive in the water where they live their entire lives.[8] In some species, the young are quite large: up to half as long as the mother.[6] The one exception is the genus Laticauda, which is oviparous; its five species all lay their eggs on land.[8]

Venom

Like their relatives in the Elapidae family, the majority of the Hydrophiinae species are highly venomous; however, when bites occur, venom injection is rare, so envenomation symptoms usually seem nonexistent or trivial.[9] For example, P. platurus has a venom more potent than any terrestrial snake species in Costa Rica based on LD50, but despite its abundance in the waters off its western coast, few human fatalities have been reported.[10] Nevertheless, all sea snakes should be handled with great caution.[9]

Bites in which envenomation does occur are usually painless and may not even be noticed when contact is made. Teeth may remain in the wound. Usually, little or no swelling occurs, and rarely are any nearby lymph nodes affected. The most important symptoms are rhabdomyolysis (rapid breakdown of skeletal muscle tissue) and paralysis. Early symptoms include headache, a thick-feeling tongue, thirst, sweating, and vomiting. Symptoms that can occur 30 minutes to several hours after the bite include generalized aching, stiffness, and tenderness of muscles all over the body. Passive stretching of the muscles is also painful, and trismus, which is similar to tetanus, is common. This is followed later on by symptoms typical of other elapid envenomations: a progressive flaccid paralysis, starting with ptosis and paralysis of voluntary muscles. Paralysis of muscles involved in swallowing and respiration can be fatal.[28]

Taxonomy

Cladogram
Elapidae

Cobra


Hydrophiinae
sea kraits

Laticauda




Notechis


sea snakes


Emydocephalus



Aipysurus





Hydrelaps



Hydrophis







Cladogram showing the basic evolutionary relationships among sea snakes, sea kraits and other venomous terrestrial snakes. Sea kraits are more closely related to the Asiatic elapids such as cobras, in contrast sea snakes form a monophyletic group that are more closely related to Australian elapids.

Sea snakes were at first regarded as a unified and separate family, the Hydrophiidae, that later came to comprise two subfamilies: the Hydrophiinae, or true/aquatic sea snakes (now 16 genera with 57 species), and the more primitive Laticaudinae, or sea kraits (one genus, Laticauda, with five species). Eventually, as it became clear just how closely related the sea snakes are to the elapids, the taxonomic situation became less well-defined. Some taxonomists responded by moving the sea snakes to the Elapidae, thereby creating the subfamilies Elapinae, Hydrophiinae, and Laticaudinae, although the latter may be omitted if Laticauda is included in the Hydrophiinae. No one has yet been able to convincingly work out the phylogenetic relationships between the various elapid subgroups, and the situation is still unclear. Therefore, others opted to either continue to work with the older traditional arrangements, if only for practical reasons, or to lump all of the genera together in the Elapidae, with no taxonomic subdivisions, to reflect the work that remains to be done.[3][4][7][8]

Genus[3][4] Taxon authority[3] Species[3] Subsp.*[3] Common name[4] Geographic range[4]
Acalyptophis Boulenger, 1895 1 0 spiny-headed sea snake or horned sea snake Gulf of Thailand, South China Sea, the Strait of Taiwan, and the coasts of Guangdong, Indonesia, the Philippines, New Guinea, New Caledonia, Australia (Northern Territory, Queensland, Western Australia)
Aipysurus Lacépède, 1804 7 1 olive sea snakes Timor Sea, South China Sea, Gulf of Thailand, and coasts of Australia (Northern Territory, Queensland, West Australia), New Caledonia, Loyalty Islands, southern New Guinea, Indonesia, western Malaysia and Vietnam
Astrotia Fischer, 1855 1 0 Stokes' sea snake coastal areas from west India and Sri Lanka through Gulf of Thailand to South China Sea, west Malaysia, Indonesia, east to New Guinea, north and east coasts of Australia, the Philippines
Emydocephalus Krefft, 1869 2 0 turtlehead sea snakes the coasts of Timor (Indonesian Sea), New Caledonia, Australia (Northern Territory, Queensland, West Australia), and in the Southeast Asian sea along the coasts of China, Taiwan, Japan, and the Ryukyu Islands
Enhydrina (Enhydrina schistosa & Enhydrina zweifeli) Gray, 1849 2 0 beaked sea snakes in the Persian Gulf (Oman, United Arab Emirates, etc.), south to the Seychelles and Madagascar,

Southeast Asia (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam), Australia (Northern Territory, Queensland), New Guinea and Papua New Guinea

Ephalophis M.A. Smith, 1931 1 0 Grey's mudsnake northwestern Australia
Hydrelaps Boulenger, 1896 1 0 Port Darwin mudsnake northern Australia, southern New Guinea
Hydrophis Latreille in Sonnini & Latreille, 1801 34 3 sea snakes Indo-Australian and Southeast Asian waters.[29]
Kerilia Gray, 1849 1 0 Jerdon's sea snake Southeast Asian waters[29]
Kolpophis M.A. Smith, 1926 1 0 bighead sea snake Indian Ocean[29]
Lapemis Gray, 1835 2 0 spine-bellied sea snake, Shaw's sea snake Persian Gulf to Indian Ocean, South China Sea, Indo-Australian Archipelago and the western Pacific[29]
Laticauda Laurenti, 1768 8 0 sea kraits Southeast Asian and Indo-Australian waters
Parahydrophis Burger & Natsuno, 1974 1 0 northern mangrove sea snake northern Australia, southern New Guinea
Parapistocalamus Roux, 1934 1 0 Hediger's snake Bougainville Island, Solomons
Pelamis Daudin, 1803 1 0 yellow-bellied sea snake Indian and Pacific Oceans
Praescutata Wall, 1921 1 0 from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, the South China Sea, and northeast to the coastal region of Fujian and Strait of Taiwan
Thalassophis P. Schmidt, 1852 1 0 anomalous sea snake South China Sea (Malaysia, Gulf of Thailand), Indian Ocean (Sumatra, Java, Borneo)

*) Not including the nominate subspecies

Molecular studies

Molecular data studies suggest all three monotypic semiaquatic genera (Ephalophis, Parahydrophis and Hydrelaps) are early diverging lineages.[30] The Aipysurus group is monophyletic: the egg-eating specialists form separate, early-diverging lineages. The Hydrophiini last shared a common ancestor about 6 million years ago ago with the majority of extant lineages diversified over the last 3.5 million years ago. The Hydrophis group shared a last common ancestor about 1.5-3 million years ago.

Captivity

At best, Hydrophiinae make difficult captives. Ditmars (1933) described them as nervous and delicate captives that usually refuse to eat, preferring only to hide in the darkest corner of the tank.[7] Over 50 years later, Mehrtens (1987) wrote, although they were rarely displayed in Western zoological parks, some species were regularly on display in Japanese aquariums. Available food supply limits the number of species that can be kept in captivity, since some have diets that are too specialized. Also, some species appear intolerant of handling, or even being removed from the water. Regarding their requirements in captivity, the Laticauda species need to be able to exit the water somewhere at about 29 °C, along with a submerged shelter. Species that have done relatively well in captivity include the ringed sea snake, Hydrophis cyanocinctus, which feeds on fish and eels in particular. Pelamis platurus has done especially well in captivity, accepting small fish, including goldfish. However, care has to be taken to house them in round or oval tanks, or in rectangular tanks with corners that are well-rounded, to prevent the snakes from damaging their snouts by swimming into the sides.[8]

Conservation status

Most sea snakes are not on the CITES protection lists,[9][31] however, one species, Laticauda crockeri, is classified as vulnerable, another, Aipysurus fuscus, classified as endangered, and two, Aipysurus foliosquama and Aipysurus apraefrontalis, are classified as critically endangered according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.[32]

See also

References

  1. Hutchings, Pat (2008). The Great Barrier Reef: Biology, Environment and Management. Csiro Publishing. p. 345. ISBN 9780643099975. Sea snakes are true reptiles closely related to Australian venomous terrestrial snakes. Indeed, both groups are included in a single subfamily, Hydrophiinae, by most modern herpetologists.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Parker HW, Grandison AGC. 1977. Snakes a natural history. Second Edition. British Museum (Natural History) and Cornell University Press. 108 pp. 16 plates. LCCCN 76-54625. ISBN 0-8014-1095-9 (cloth), ISBN 0-8014-9164-9 (paper).
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Elapidae". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved 7 August 2007.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Elapidae at the New Reptile Database. Accessed 12 August 2007.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Stidworthy J. 1974. Snakes of the World. Grosset & Dunlap Inc. 160 pp. ISBN 0-448-11856-4.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Fichter GS. 1982. Poisonous Snakes. A First Book. Franklin Watts. 66 pp. ISBN 0-531-04349-5.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Ditmars RL. 1933. Reptiles of the World. Revised Edition. The MacMillan Company. 329 pp. 89 plates.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Mehrtens JM. 1987. Living Snakes of the World in Color. New York: Sterling Publishers. 480 pp. ISBN 0-8069-6460-X.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sea snakes at Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed 7 August 2007.
  10. 1 2 3 Campbell JA, Lamar WW. 2004. The Venomous Reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca and London. 870 pp. 1500 plates. ISBN 0-8014-4141-2.
  11. Shine, R.; Phillips, B.; Waye, H.; LeMaster, M.; Mason, R. T. (2003-05-14). "Chemosensory cues allow courting male garter snakes to assess body length and body condition of potential mates". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 54 (2): 162–166. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0620-5. ISSN 0340-5443.
  12. Young, Bruce A. (2003-09-01). "Snake bioacoustics: toward a richer understanding of the behavioral ecology of snakes". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 78 (3): 303–325. doi:10.1086/377052. ISSN 0033-5770. PMID 14528622.
  13. 1 2 Sensory Evolution on the Threshold: Adaptations in Secondarily Aquatic Vertebrates (1 ed.). University of California Press. 2008-02-04. ISBN 9780520252783.
  14. Hart, Nathan S.; Coimbra, João Paulo; Collin, Shaun P.; Westhoff, Guido (2012-04-15). "Photoreceptor types, visual pigments, and topographic specializations in the retinas of hydrophiid sea snakes". The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 520 (6): 1246–1261. doi:10.1002/cne.22784. ISSN 1096-9861. PMID 22020556.
  15. Simões, Bruno F.; Sampaio, Filipa L.; Loew, Ellis R.; Sanders, Kate L.; Fisher, Robert N.; Hart, Nathan S.; Hunt, David M.; Partridge, Julian C.; Gower, David J. (2016-01-27). "Multiple rod–cone and cone–rod photoreceptor transmutations in snakes: evidence from visual opsin gene expression". Proc. R. Soc. B. 283 (1823): 20152624. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2624. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 4795032Freely accessible. PMID 26817768.
  16. Heatwole, H; Cogger, H (1993). Fauna of Australia (PDF). Canberra, Australia: AGPS. p. 16.
  17. Heatwole, Harold (1999-01-01). Sea Snakes. UNSW Press. ISBN 9780868407760.
  18. "Scale Sensillae of the File Snake (Serpentes: Acrochordidae) and Some Other Aquatic and Burrowing Snakes". ResearchGate. doi:10.1163/156854297X00111. Retrieved 2016-04-02.
  19. Soares, Daphne (2002-05-16). "Neurology: An ancient sensory organ in crocodilians". Nature. 417 (6886): 241–242. doi:10.1038/417241a. ISSN 0028-0836.
  20. Westhoff, Guido; Fry, Bryan G.; Bleckmann, Horst (2005-01-01). "Sea snakes (Lapemis curtus) are sensitive to low-amplitude water motions". Zoology (Jena, Germany). 108 (3): 195–200. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2005.07.001. ISSN 0944-2006. PMID 16351967.
  21. Shine, R. (2005-01-13). "All at sea: aquatic life modifies mate-recognition modalities in sea snakes (Emydocephalus annulatus, Hydrophiidae)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 57 (6): 591–598. doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0897-z. ISSN 0340-5443.
  22. Zimmerman K, Heatwole H. 1990. Cutaneous Photoreception: A New Sensory Mechanism for Reptiles. Copeia, vol. 1990, no. 3 (September 19), pp. 860-862
  23. Liu, Y.-L.; Lillywhite, H. B.; Tu, M.-C. (2010-07-03). "Sea snakes anticipate tropical cyclone". Marine Biology. 157 (11): 2369–2373. doi:10.1007/s00227-010-1501-x. ISSN 0025-3162.
  24. 1 2 3 4 U.S. Navy. 1991. Poisonous Snakes of the World. US Govt. New York: Dover Publications Inc. 203 pp. ISBN 0-486-26629-X.
  25. Spawls S, Branch B. 1995. The Dangerous Snakes of Africa. Ralph Curtis Books. Dubai: Oriental Press. 192 pp. ISBN 0-88359-029-8.
  26. Slaughter RJ, Beasley DM, Lambie BS, Schep LJ (2009). "New Zealand's venomous creatures". N. Z. Med. J. 122 (1290): 83–97. PMID 19319171.
  27. 1 2 The sea snakes are coming at NewScientist. Accessed 13 January 2009.
  28. Warrell DA. 2004. Snakebites in Central and South America: Epidemiology, Clinical Features, and Clinical Management. In Campbell JA, Lamar WW. 2004. The Venomous Reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca and London. 870 pp. 1500 plates. ISBN 0-8014-4141-2.
  29. 1 2 3 4 The Hydrophiidae at Cyberlizard's home pages. Accessed 12 August 2007.
  30. Sanders KL, Lee MS, Mumpuni, Bertozzi T, Rasmussen AR (2012) Multilocus phylogeny and recent rapid radiation of the viviparous sea snakes (Elapidae: Hydrophiinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol pii: S1055-7903(12)00378-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.09.021
  31. Serpentes at CITES. Accessed 11 August 2007.
  32. . Accessed 14 May 2011.

Further reading

  • Graham JB, Lowell WR, Rubinoff I, Motta J. 1987. Surface and subsurface swimming of the sea snake Pelamis Platurus. J. exp. Biol. 127, 27-44. PDF at the [Journal of Experimental Biology]. Accessed 7 August 2007.
  • Rasmussen AR. 1997. Systematics of sea snakes; a critical review. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 70, 15-30.
  • Smith MA. 1926. Monograph of the sea snakes (Hydrophiidae). British Museum of Natural History, London.
  • Voris HK. 1977. A phylogeny of the sea snakes (Hydrophiidae). Fieldiana Zool. 70, 79-169.
  • Whitaker R. 1978. Common Indian Snakes: A Field Guide. Macmillan India Limited.
Wikispecies has information related to: Hydrophiinae

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/27/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.