Fujitsu's Application

Fujitsu's Application^[1] is a 6 March 1997 judgment by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. The judges' decision was to confirm the refusal of a patent by the United Kingdom Patent Office and by Justice Laddie in the High Court. Lord Justice Aldous heard the appeal before the Court of Appeal.

Facts

Fujitsu's claimed invention was a new tool for modelling crystal structures on a computer. A scientist wishing to investigate what would result if he made a new material consisting of a combination of two existing compounds would enter data representing those compounds and how they should be joined into the computer. The computer then automatically generated and displayed the new structure using the data supplied. Previously, the same effect could only have been achieved by assembling plastic models by hand - a time-consuming task.

Discussion

• UK courts should look to the decisions of the European Patent Office for guidance in interpreting the exclusions.
• A "technical contribution" is needed to make a potentially excluded thing patentable, proclaiming that this was a concept at the heart of patent law and referring to the European Patent Office's decision in T 208/84, VICOM.
• There is a difficulty inherent in determining what is and is not "technical", such that each case should be decided on its own facts.
• The substance of an invention should be used to assess whether or not a thing is patentable, not the form in which it is claimed. Thus a non-patentable method cannot be patented under the guise of an apparatus.

Judgment

The claimed invention was certainly a useful tool. However, as claimed, the invention was nothing more than a conventional computer which automatically displayed a crystal structure shown pictorally in a form that would in the past have been produced as a model. The only advance expressed in the claims was the computer program which enabled the combined structure to be portrayed more quickly. The new tool therefore provided nothing that went beyond the normal advantages that are obtained by the use of a computer program. Thus, there was no technical contribution and the application was rejected as being a computer program as such.

See also

• List of judgments of the UK Courts relating to excluded subject matter
• Software patents under United Kingdom patent law
• Software patents under the European Patent Convention

References

External links

• Software Patents After Fujitsu. New Directions or (another) Missed Opportunity?
• Is the extension of the patent system to include software related inventions desirable?
• A STEP FORWARD: EXCLUDING 'TECHNICAL' FROM THE TEST FOR PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER
• Inherent Patentability as related to computer software written after High Court judgment but before Court of Appeal had issued their judgment

Fujitsu
Divisions and subsidiaries	Current Amdahl Corporation Fujitsu Computer Products of America Fujitsu Consulting Fujitsu Consulting India Fujitsu Laboratories Fujitsu Semiconductor Fujitsu Technology Solutions Fujitsu Ten Glovia Services Nifty Corporation Former and defunct FANUC3 HAL Computer Systems1 International Computers Limited1 Ross Technology1
Joint ventures and shareholdings	Current General Airconditioners TranSys (20%) Former and defunct Fujitsu Siemens Computers2 Spansion3
Products, services and standards	Current ALiS BCeSIS BS2000 Celsius Enon FLEPia FR FR-V Global Cloud Platform HOAP K computer Lifebook Macroscope OpenFT Primergy SESAM SPARC64 X+ SPARC64 XIfx VM2000 Defunct Corporate Headquarters Office Technology System DC/OSx Eagle FM Towns FM Towns Marty FM Towns games FM-7 FM-8 FM-11 iPAD JEF codepage Micro 16s Pocket LOOX SINIX SPARC Enterprise SPARC64 TurboSPARC VP VP2000
People	David Courtley Toshio Ikeda Naoki Yokoyama
Places	Shiodome City Center
Other	Atlas Consortium Fujitsu's Application Fujitsu Cup Fujitsu Ladies Furukawa Group Kawasaki Frontale Fujitsu Frontiers
1Now integrated into other Fujitsu divisions or business groupings 2Now wholly owned 3Sold Category Commons