Electrolytic capacitor

Most common styles of aluminum and tantalum electrolytic capacitors
An assortment of electrolytic capacitors

Electrolytic capacitor is the generic term for three different capacitor family members:

  1. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors,
  2. Tantalum electrolytic capacitors and
  3. Niobium electrolytic capacitors

All electrolytic capacitors (e-caps) are polarized capacitors whose anode (+) is made of a particular metal on which an insulating oxide layer forms by anodization, acting as the dielectric of the electrolytic capacitor. A non-solid or solid electrolyte which covers the surface of the oxide layer in principle serves as the second electrode (cathode) (-) of the capacitor.

Due to their very thin dielectric oxide layer and enlarged anode surface, electrolytic capacitors have—based on the volume—a much higher capacitance-voltage (CV) product compared to ceramic capacitors or film capacitors, but a much smaller CV value than electrochemical supercapacitors.

The large capacitance of electrolytic capacitors makes them particularly suitable for passing or bypassing low-frequency signals up to some mega-hertz and for storing large amounts of energy. They are widely used for decoupling or noise filtering in power supplies and DC link circuits for variable-frequency drives, for coupling signals between amplifier stages, and storing energy as in a flashlamp.

Standard electrolytic capacitors are polarized components due to their asymmetrical construction, and may only be operated with a higher voltage (ie, more positive) on the anode than on the cathode at all times. Voltages with reverse polarity, or voltage or ripple current higher than specified (as little as 1 or 1.5 volts may suffice), can destroy the dielectric and thus the capacitor. The destruction of electrolytic capacitors can have catastrophic consequences (explosion, fire).

Bipolar electrolytic (aka non-polarized) capacitors which may be operated with either polarity are special constructions with two anodes connected in series.

Basic information

Electrolytic capacitors family tree

As to the basic construction principles of electrolytic capacitors, there are three different types: aluminum, tantalum, and niobium capacitors. Each of these three capacitor families uses non-solid and solid manganese dioxide or solid polymer electrolytes, so a great spread of different combinations of anode material and solid or non-solid electrolytes is available.

Depending on the nature of the anode metal used and the electrolyte used, there is a wide variety of electrolytic capacitors

Charge principle

Like other conventional capacitors, electrolytic capacitors store the electric energy statically by charge separation in an electric field in the dielectric oxide layer between two electrodes. The non-solid or solid electrolyte in principle is the cathode, which thus forms the second electrode of the capacitor. This and the storage principle distinguish them from electrochemical capacitors or supercapacitors, in which the electrolyte generally is the ionic conductive connection between two electrodes and the storage occurs with statically double-layer capacitance and electrochemical pseudocapacitance.

Basic materials and forming principle

Basic principle of anodic oxidation (forming), in which, by applying a voltage with a current source, an oxide layer is formed on a metallic anode

Electrolytic capacitors use a chemical feature of some special metals, earlier called “valve metals”, on which by anodic oxidation (forming) an insulating oxide layer originates and serves as dielectric. There are three different anode metals in use for electrolytic capacitors:

  1. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors use a high-purity etched aluminium foil with aluminium oxide as dielectric
  2. Tantalum electrolytic capacitors use a sintered pellet (“slug”) of high-purity tantalum powder with tantalum pentoxide as dielectric
  3. Niobium electrolytic capacitors use a sintered "slug" of high-purity niobium or niobium oxide powder with niobium pentoxide as dielectric.

All anode materials are either etched or sintered and have a rough surface structure with a much higher surface area compared to a smooth surface of the same area or the same volume. By applying a positive voltage to the above-mentioned anode material in an electrolytic bath an oxide barrier layer with a thickness corresponding to the applied voltage will be formed (formation). This oxide layer acts as dielectric in an electrolytic capacitor. The properties of this oxide layers are given in the following table:

Characteristics of the different oxide layers in aluminum, tantalum and niobium electrolytic capacitors[1][2]
Dielectric Relative
AluminiumAluminium oxide Al2O3 9.6 amorphous 710 1.4
crystalline 1000 1.0
Tantalum Tantalum pentoxide Ta2O5 27 amorphous 625 1.6
Niobium or
Niobium oxide
Niobium pentoxide Nb2O5 41 amorphous 400 2.5

After forming a dielectric oxide on the rough anode structure, a counter electrode has to match the rough insulating oxide surface. This is accomplished by the electrolyte, which acts as the cathode electrode of an electrolytic capacitor. There are many different electrolytes in use. Generally they are distinguished into two species, “non-solid” and “solid” electrolytes. As a liquid medium which has ion conductivity caused by moving ions, non-solid electrolytes can easily fit the rough structures. Solid electrolytes which have electron conductivity can fit the rough structures with the help of special chemical processes like pyrolysis for manganese dioxide or polymerization for conducting polymers.

Comparing the permittivities of the different oxide materials it is seen that tantalum pentoxide has a permittivity approximately three times higher than aluminum oxide. Tantalum electrolytic capacitors of a given CV value theoretically are therefore smaller than aluminium electrolytic capacitors. In practice different safety margins to reach reliable components makes a comparison difficult.

The anodically generated insulating oxide layer is destroyed if the polarity of the applied voltage changes.

Basic about C/V product

A dielectric material is placed between two conducting plates (electrodes), each of area A and with separation d.

Every electrolytic capacitor forms on principle a "plate capacitor" whose capacitance is greater, the larger the electrode area A and the permittivity ε, and the thinner the dielectric (d).

The dielectric thickness of electrolytic capacitors is very slight, in the range of nanometers per volt. On the other hand, the voltage strengths of these oxide layers are quite high. With this very thin dielectric oxide layer combined with a sufficient high dielectric strength the electrolytic capacitors can already achieve a high volumetric capacitance. This is one reason for the high capacitance values of electrolytic capacitors compared to conventional capacitors.

All etched or sintered anodes have a much higher surface compared to a smooth surface of the same area or the same volume. That increases the later capacitance value, depending on the rated voltage, by a factor of up to 200 for non-solid aluminium electrolytic capacitors as well as for solid tantalum electrolytic capacitors.[3][4][5] The large surface compared to a smooth one is the second reason for the relatively high capacitance values of electrolytic capacitors compared with other capacitor families.

All electrolytic capacitors have one special advantage. Because the forming voltage defines the oxide layer thickness, the voltage proof of the later electrolytic capacitor can be produced very simply for the desired rated value. Therefore, the volume of a capacitor is defined by the product of capacitance and voltage, the so-called "CV product".

Basic construction of non-solid aluminum electrolytic capacitors

Basic construction of solid tantalum electrolytic capacitors

Types and features of electrolytic capacitors

Comparison of electrolytic capacitor types

Combinations of anode materials for electrolytic capacitors and the electrolytes used have given rise to wide varieties of capacitor types with different properties. An outline of the main characteristics of the different types is shown in the table below.

Overview of the key features of the different types of electrolytic capacitor
capacitor family
Electrolyte Capacitance
rated voltage
electrolytic capacitor
etched foils
Non-solid, organic electrolyte,
e.g. GBL, DMF, DMA,
0.1…1,000,000 550 105/125/150
Non-solid, e.g. borax, glycol 0.1…2,700,000 630 85/105
Non-solid, water based 1…18,000 100 85/105
Solid, polymer 10…1,500 25 105
Hybrid, polymer and non-solid 6.8…1,000 125 105/125
electrolytic capacitor,
sintered anode
Non-solid, sulfuric acid 0.1…18.000 630 125/200
Solid, manganese dioxide 0.1…3,300 125 125/150
Solid, polymer 10…1,500 25 105
Niobium oxide-
electrolytic capacitor
sintered anode
Solid,manganese dioxide 1…1,500 10 105
Solid, polymer 4.7…470 16 105

The non-solid or so-called "wet" aluminum electrolytic capacitors were and are the cheapest among all other conventional capacitors. They not only provide the cheapest solutions for high capacitance or voltage values for decoupling and buffering purposes but are also insensitive to low ohmic charging and discharging as well as to low-energy transients. Non-solid electrolytic capacitors can be found in nearly all areas of electronic devices, with the exception of military applications.

Tantalum electrolytic capacitors with solid electrolyte as surface-mountable chip capacitors are mainly used in electronic devices in which little space is available or a low profile is required. They operate reliably over a wide temperature range without large parameter deviations. In military and space applications only tantalum electrolytic capacitors have the necessary approvals.

Niobium electrolytic capacitors are in direct competition with industrial tantalum electrolytic capacitors because niobium is more readily available. Their properties are comparable.

The electrical properties of aluminum, tantalum and niobium electrolytic capacitors have been greatly improved by the polymer electrolyte.

Comparison of electrical parameters

In order to compare the different characteristics of the different electrolytic capacitor types, capacitors with the same dimensions and of similar capacitance and voltage are compared in the following table. In such a comparison the values for ESR and ripple current load are the most important parameters for the use of electrolytic capacitors in modern electronic equipment. The lower the ESR, the higher the ripple current per volume and better functionality of the capacitor in the circuit. However, better electrical parameters come with higher prices.

Comparison of the most important characteristics of different types of electrolytic capacitors
capacitor family
Type 1) Dimension
DxL, WxHxL
Max. ESR
100 kHz, 20 °C
Max. Ripple current
85/105 °C
Max. Leakage current
after 2 min. 2)
"wet" Al-electrolytic capacitors 1976 3)
Ethylene glycol/borax electrolyte
Valvo, 034,
5x11 15.000 1710 (0.01CV)
"wet" Al-electrolytic capacitors,
Organic electrolyte
Vishay, 036 RSP,
5x11 1000 160 10 (0.01CV)
"wet" Al-electrolytic capacitors,
Ethylene glycol/borax electrolyte
5x11 900 18010 (0.01CV)
"wet" Al-electrolytic capacitors,
Water-based electrolyte
Rubycon, ZL,
5x11 300 25010 (0.01CV)
"wet" Al-electrolytic capacitors, SMD
Ethylene glycol/borax electrolyte
6.3x8 300 30010 (0.01CV)
"wet" Al-electrolytic capacitors, SMD
Water-based electrolyte
6.3x8 160 60010 (0.01CV)
Solid tantalum electrolytic capacitors
MnO2 electrolyte
Kemet, T494,
7,3x4.3x4.0 100 128510 (0.01CV)
Solid tantaum electrolytic capacitors
Multianode, MnO2 electrolyte
Kemet, T510,
7.3x4.3x4.0 35 250010 (0.01CV)
Solid tantalum electrolytic capacitors
Polymer electrolyte
Kemet, T543,
7.3x4.3x4,0 10 4900 100 (0.1CV)
Solid tantalum electrolytic capacitors
Multianode, polymer
Kemet, T530,
7.3x4.3x4.0 5 4970100 (0.1CV)
Solid niobium electrolytic capacitors,
MnO2 electrolyte
7.3x4.3x4.1 80 1461 20 (0.02CV)
Solid niobium electrolytic capacitors,
Multianode, MnO2 electrolyte
7.3x4.3x4.1 40 2561 20 (0.02CV)
Solid Al-electrolytic capacitors,
Polymer electrolyte
Panasonic, SP-UE,
7.3x4.3x4.2 7 3700 100 (0.1CV)
Solid Al-electrolytic capacitors,
Polymer electrolyte
Kemet, A700,
7.3x4.3x4.0 10 470040 (0.04CV)
Solid Al-electrolytic capacitors,
Polymer electrolyte
Panansonic, SVP,
6.3x6 17 2780200 (0.2CV)
Hybrid Al-electrolytic capacitors,
Polymer + non-solid electrolyte
Panasonic, ZA,
6.3x7.7 30 200010 (0.01CV)

1) Manufacturer, series name, capacitance/voltage

2) calculated for a capacitor 100 µF/10 V,

3) from a 1976 data sheet

Styles of aluminum and tantalum electrolytic capacitors

Aluminum electrolytic capacitors form the bulk of the electrolytic capacitors used in electronics because of the large diversity of sizes and the inexpensive production. Tantalum electrolytic capacitors, usually used in the SMD version, have a higher specific capacitance than the aluminum electrolytic capacitors and are used in devices with limited space or flat design such as laptops. They are also used in military technology, mostly in axial style, hermetically sealed. Niobium electrolytic chip capacitors are a new development in the market and are intended as a replacement for tantalum electrolytic chip capacitors.


Early small electrolytic capacitor from 1914. It had a capacitance of around 2 microfarads.
View of the anode of a "wet" aluminum electrolytic capacitor, Bell System Technique 1929


The phenomenon that can form an oxide layer on aluminum and other metals like tantalum, niobium, manganese, titanium, zinc, cadmium etc. in an electrochemical process, which blocks an electric current from flowing in one direction but allow to flow in the other direction, was discovered in 1875 by the French researcher and founder Eugène Ducretet. He coined the term "valve metal" for such metals.

Charles Pollak (born Karol Pollak), a producer of accumulators, found out that the oxide layer on an aluminum anode remained stable in a neutral or alkaline electrolyte, even when the power was switched off. In 1896 he filed a patent for an "Electric liquid capacitor with aluminum electrodes" (de: Elektrischer Flüssigkeitskondensator mit Aluminiumelektroden) based on his idea of using the oxide layer in a polarized capacitor in combination with a neutral or slightly alkaline electrolyte.[6][7]

"Wet" aluminum capacitor

Various forms of historical anode structures for wet capacitors. For all of these anodes the outer metallic container served as the cathode

The first industrially realized electrolytic capacitors consisted of a metallic box used as the cathode. It was filled with a borax electrolyte dissolved in water, in which a folded aluminum anode plate was inserted. Applying a DC voltage from outside, an oxide layer was formed on the surface of the anode. The advantage of these capacitors was that they were significantly smaller and cheaper than all other capacitors at this time relative to the realized capacitance value. This construction with different styles of anode construction but with a case as cathode and container for the electrolyte was used up to the 1930s and was called a "wet" electrolytic capacitor, in the sense of its having a high water content.

The first more common application of wet aluminum electrolytic capacitors was in large telephone exchanges, to reduce relay hash (noise) on the 48 volt DC power supply. The development of AC-operated domestic radio receivers in the late 1920s created a demand for large-capacitance (for the time) and high-voltage capacitors for the valve amplifier technique, typically at least 4 microfarads and rated at around 500 volts DC. Waxed paper and oiled silk film capacitors were available, but devices with that order of capacitance and voltage rating were bulky and prohibitively expensive.

"Dry" aluminum capacitor

A "dry" electrolytic capacitor with 100 µF and 150 V

The ancestor of the modern electrolytic capacitor was patented by Samuel Ruben in 1925,[8][9] who teamed with Philip Mallory, the founder of the battery company that is now known as Duracell International. Rubens idea adopted the stacked construction of a silver mica capacitor. He introduced a separated second foil to contact the electrolyte adjacent to the anode foil instead of using the electrolyte-filled container as the capacitor's cathode. The stacked second foil got its own terminal additional to the anode terminal and the container no longer had an electrical function. This type of electrolytic capacitor combined with an liquid or gel-like electrolyte of a non-aqueous nature, which is therefore dry in the sense of having a very low water content, became known as the "dry" type of electrolytic capacitor.[10]

With Ruben's invention, together with the invention of wound foils separated with a paper spacer 1927 by A. Eckel of Hydra-Werke (Germany),[11] the actual development of e-caps began.[10]

William Dubilier, whose first patent for electrolytic capacitors was filed in 1928,[12] industrialized the new ideas for electrolytic capacitors and started the first large commercial production in 1931 in the Cornell-Dubilier (CD) factory in Plainfield, New Jersey.[10] At the same time in Berlin, Germany, the "Hydra-Werke", an AEG company, started the production of e-caps in large quantities.

Miniaturisation of aluminum electrolytic capacitors driven by progress in the anode foil etching process

Already in his patent from 1896 Pollak wrote that the capacitance of the capacitor increase by roughening the surface of the anode foil. Today (2014), electrochemically etched low voltage foils can achieve an up to 200-fold increase in surface area compared to a smooth surface.[3][4] Advances in the etching process are the reason for the dimension reductions in aluminum electrolytic capacitors over recent decades.

For aluminum electrolytic capacitors the decades from 1970 to 1990 were marked by the development of various new professional series specifically suited to certain industrial applications, for example with very low leakage currents or with long life characteristics, or for higher temperatures up to 125 °C.[13][14]

Tantalum capacitors

One of the first tantalum electrolytic capacitors were developed in 1930 by Tansitor Electronic Inc. USA, for military purposes.[15] The basic construction of a wound cell was adopted and a tantalum anode foil was used together with a tantalum cathode foil, separated with a paper spacer impregnated with a liquid electrolyte, mostly sulfuric acid, and encapsulated in a silver case.

The relevant development of solid electrolyte tantalum capacitors began some years after William Shockley, John Bardeen and Walter Houser Brattain invented the transistor in 1947. It was invented by Bell Laboratories in the early 1950s as a miniaturized, more reliable low-voltage support capacitor to complement their newly invented transistor. The solution found by R. L. Taylor and H. E. Haring of the Bell labs in early 1950 was based on experiences with ceramics. They ground tantalum to a powder, which they pressed into a cylindrical form and then sintered at high a temperature between 1500 and 2000 °C under vacuum conditions to produce a pellet ("slug").[16][17]

These first sintered tantalum capacitors used a non-solid electrolyte, which does not fit the concept of solid electronics. In 1952 a targeted search at Bell Labs by D. A. McLean and F. S. Power for a solid electrolyte led to the invention of manganese dioxide as a solid electrolyte for a sintered tantalum capacitor.[18]

Although fundamental inventions came from Bell Labs, the inventions for manufacturing commercially viable tantalum electrolytic capacitors came from researchers at the Sprague Electric Company. Preston Robinson, Sprague's Director of Research, is considered to be the actual inventor of tantalum capacitors in 1954.[19][20] His invention was supported by R. J. Millard, who introduced the "reform" step in 1955,[21][22] a significant improvement in which the dielectric of the capacitor was repaired after each dip-and-convert cycle of MnO2 deposition, which dramatically reduced the leakage current of the finished capacitors.

Although solid tantalum capacitors offered capacitors with lower ESR and leakage current values than the aluminum e-caps, 1980 a price shock for tantalum in the industry reduces the applications of Ta-e-caps especially in the entertainment industry dramatically.[23][24] The industry switched back to use aluminum electrolytic capacitors.

Solid electrolytes

Conductivity of non-solid and solid electrolytes

The first solid electrolyte of manganese dioxide developed 1952 for tantalum capacitors had a conductivity 10 times better than all other types of non-solid electrolytes. It also influenced the development of aluminum electrolytic capacitors. In 1964 the first aluminum electrolytic capacitors with solid electrolyte SAL electrolytic capacitor came on the market, developed by Philips.[25]

With the beginning of digitalization, Intel launched in 1971 its first microcomputer, MCS 4, and in 1972 Hewlett Packard launched one of the first pocket calculators, HP 35.[26][27] The requirements for capacitors increased in terms of lowering the equivalent series resistance (ESR) for bypass and decoupling capacitors.[28] The manganese dioxide type of electrolyte should be better.

It was not until 1983 when a new step toward ESR reduction was taken by Sanyo with its "OS-CON" aluminum electrolytic capacitors. These capacitors used a solid organic conductor, the charge transfer salt TTF-TCNQ (tetracyanoquinodimethane), which provided an improvement in conductivity by a factor of 10 compared with the manganese dioxide electrolyte.[29] [30][31]

The next step in ESR reduction was the development of conducting polymers by Alan J. Heeger, Alan MacDiarmid and Hideki Shirakawa in 1975.[32] The conductivity of conductive polymers such as polypyrrole (PPy) [33] or PEDOT[34] is better than that of TCNQ by a factor of 100 to 500, and close to the conductivity of metals.

In 1991 Panasonic came on the market with its "SP-Cap",[35] called polymer aluminum electrolytic capacitors. These aluminum electrolytic capacitors with polymer electrolytes reached very low ESR values directly comparable to ceramic multilayer capacitors (MLCCs). They were still less expensive than tantalum capacitors and with their flat design for laptops and cell phones competed with tantalum chip capacitors as well.

Tantalum electrolytic capacitors with PPy polymer electrolyte cathode followed three years later. In 1993 NEC introduced its SMD polymer tantalum electrolytic capacitors, called "NeoCap". In 1997 Sanyo followed with the "POSCAP" polymer tantalum chips.

A new conductive polymer for tantalum polymer capacitors was presented by Kemet at the "1999 Carts" conference.[36] This capacitor used the newly developed organic conductive polymer PEDT Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), also known as PEDOT (trade name Baytron®) [37]

Niobium capacitors

Another price explosion for tantalum in 2000/2001 forced the development of niobium electrolytic capacitors with manganese dioxide electrolyte, which have been available since 2002.[38][39] Niobium is a sister metal to tantalum and serves as valve metal generating an oxide layer during anodic oxidation. Niobium as raw material is much more abundant in nature than tantalum and is less expensive. It was a question of the availability of the base metal in the late 1960s which led to development and implementation of niobium electrolytic capacitors in the former Soviet Union instead of tantalum capacitors as in the West. The materials and processes used to produce niobium-dielectric capacitors are essentially the same as for existing tantalum-dielectric capacitors. The characteristics of niobium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors are roughly comparable.[40]

Water based electrolytes

With the goal of reducing ESR for inexpensive non-solid e-caps from the mid-1980s in Japan, new water-based electrolytes for aluminum electrolytic capacitors were developed. Water is inexpensive, an effective solvent for electrolytes, and significantly improves the conductivity of the electrolyte. The Japanese manufacturer Rubycon was a leader in the development of new water-based electrolyte systems with enhanced conductivity in the late 1990s.[41] The new series of non-solid e-caps with water-based electrolyte was described in the data sheets as having "Low-ESR", "Low-Impedance", "Ultra-Low-Impedance" or "High-Ripple Current".

A stolen recipe for such a water-based electrolyte, in which important stabilizing substances[42][43] were absent,[44] led in the years 2000 to 2005 to the problem of mass-bursting capacitors in computers and power supplies, which became known under the term "capacitor plague". In these e-caps the water reacts quite aggressively and even violently with aluminum, accompanied by strong heat and gas development in the capacitor, and often led to the explosion of the capacitor.

Electrical characteristics

Series-equivalent circuit

Series-equivalent circuit model of an electrolytic capacitor

The electrical characteristics of capacitors are harmonized by the international generic specification IEC 60384-1. In this standard, the electrical characteristics of capacitors are described by an idealized series-equivalent circuit with electrical components which model all ohmic losses, capacitive and inductive parameters of an electrolytic capacitor:

Capacitance, standard values and tolerances

Typical capacitance as a function of frequency
Typical capacitance as a function of temperature

The electrical characteristics of electrolytic capacitors depend on the structure of the anode and the electrolyte used. This influences the capacitance value of electrolytic capacitors, which depends on measuring frequency and temperature. Electrolytic capacitors with non-solid electrolytes show a broader aberration over frequency and temperature ranges than do capacitors with solid electrolytes.

The basic unit of an electrolytic capacitor's capacitance is the microfarad (μF, or less correctly, uF). The capacitance value specified in the data sheets of the manufacturers is called the rated capacitance CR or nominal capacitance CN and is the value for which the capacitor has been designed.

The standardized measuring condition for e-caps is an AC measuring method with 0.5 V at a frequency of 100/120 Hz and a temperature of 20 °C. For tantalum capacitors a DC bias voltage of 1.1 to 1.5  V for types with a rated voltage ≤2.5 V, or 2.1 to 2.5 V for types with a rated voltage of >2.5 V, may be applied during the measurement to avoid reverse voltage.

The capacitance value measured at the frequency of 1 kHz is about 10% less than the 100/120 Hz value. Therefore, the capacitance values of electrolytic capacitors are not directly comparable and differ from those of film capacitors or ceramic capacitors, whose capacitance is measured at 1 kHz or higher.

Measured with an AC measuring method with 100/120 Hz the capacitance value is the closest value to the electrical charge stored in the e-caps. The stored charge is measured with a special discharge method and is called the DC capacitance. The DC capacitance is about 10% higher than the 100/120 Hz AC capacitance. The DC capacitance is of interest for discharge applications like photoflash.

The percentage of allowed deviation of the measured capacitance from the rated value is called the capacitance tolerance. Electrolytic capacitors are available in different tolerance series, whose values are specified in the E series specified in IEC 60063. For abbreviated marking in tight spaces, a letter code for each tolerance is specified in IEC 60062.

The required capacitance tolerance is determined by the particular application. Electrolytic capacitors, which are often used for filtering and bypassing, do not have the need for narrow tolerances because they are mostly not used for accurate frequency applications like in oscillators.

Rated and category voltage

Relation between rated and category voltage and rated and category temperature

Referring to the IEC/EN 60384-1 standard, the allowed operating voltage for electrolytic capacitors is called the "rated voltage UR" or "nominal voltage UN". The rated voltage UR is the maximum DC voltage or peak pulse voltage that may be applied continuously at any temperature within the rated temperature range TR.

The voltage proof of electrolytic capacitors decreases with increasing temperature. For some applications it is important to use a higher temperature range. Lowering the voltage applied at a higher temperature maintains safety margins. For some capacitor types therefore the IEC standard specifies a "temperature derated voltage" for a higher temperature, the "category voltage UC". The category voltage is the maximum DC voltage or peak pulse voltage that may be applied continuously to a capacitor at any temperature within the category temperature range TC. The relation between both voltages and temperatures is given in the picture at right.

Applying a higher voltage than specified may destroy electrolytic capacitors.

Applying a lower voltage may have a positive influence on electrolytic capacitors. For aluminum electrolytic capacitors a lower applied voltage can in some cases extend the lifetime.[3] For tantalum electrolytic capacitors lowering the voltage applied increases the reliability and reduces the expected failure rate.[45] I

Surge Voltage

The surge voltage indicates the maximum peak voltage value that may be applied to electrolytic capacitors during their application for a limited number of cycles.[3] The surge voltage is standardized in IEC/EN 60384-1. For aluminum electrolytic capacitors with a rated voltage of up to 315 V, the surge voltage is 1.15 times the rated voltage, and for capacitors with a rated voltage exceeding 315 V, the surge voltage is 1.10 times the rated voltage.

For tantalum electrolytic capacitors the surge voltage can be 1.3 times the rated voltage, rounded off to the nearest volt. The surge voltage applied to tantalum capacitors may influence the capacitor's failure rate.[46][47]

Transient voltage

Aluminum electrolytic capacitors with non-solid electrolyte are relatively insensitive to high and short-term transient voltages higher than surge voltage, if the frequency and the energy content of the transients are low. This ability depends on rated voltage and component size. Low energy transient voltages lead to a voltage limitation similar to a zener diode.[48] An unambiguous and general specification of tolerable transients or peak voltages is not possible. In every case transients arise, the application has to be approved very carefully.

Electrolytic capacitors with solid manganese oxide or polymer electrolyte, and aluminum as well as tantalum electrolytic capacitors can not withstand transients or peak voltages higher than surge voltage. Transients for this type of e-caps may destroy the components.[46][47]

Reverse voltage

An exploded aluminum electrolytic capacitor on a PCB

Standard electrolytic capacitors, and aluminum as well as tantalum and niobium electrolytic capacitors are polarized and generally require the anode electrode voltage to be positive relative to the cathode voltage.

Nevertheless, electrolytic capacitors can withstand for short instants a reverse voltage for a limited number of cycles. In detail, aluminum electrolytic capacitors with non-solid electrolyte can withstand a reverse voltage of about 1 V to 1.5 V. This reverse voltage should never be used to determine the maximum reverse voltage under which a capacitor can be used permanently.[49][50][51]

Solid tantalum capacitors can also withstand reverse voltages for short periods. The most common guidelines for tantalum reverse voltage are:

These guidelines apply for short excursion and should never be used to determine the maximum reverse voltage under which a capacitor can be used permanently.[52][53]

But in no case, for aluminum as well as for tantalum and niobium electrolytic capacitors, may a reverse voltage be used for a permanent AC application.

To minimize the likelihood of a polarized electrolytic being incorrectly inserted into a circuit, polarity has to be very clearly indicated on the case, see the section on "Polarity marking" below.

Special bipolar aluminum electrolytic capacitors designed for bipolar operation are available, and usually referred to as "non-polarized" or "bipolar" types. In these, the capacitors have two anode foils with full-thickness oxide layers connected in reverse polarity. On the alternate halves of the AC cycles, one of the oxides on the foil acts as a blocking dielectric, preventing reverse current from damaging the electrolyte of the other one. But these bipolar electrolytic capacitors are not adaptable for main AC applications instead of power capacitors with metallized polymer film or paper dielectric.


Simplified series-equivalent circuit of a capacitor for higher frequencies (above); vector diagram with electrical reactances XESL and XC and resistance ESR and for illustration the impedance Z and dissipation factor tan δ

In general, a capacitor is seen as a storage component for electric energy. But this is only one capacitor function. A capacitor can also act as an AC resistor. Especially aluminum electrolytic capacitors in many applications are used as decoupling capacitors to filter or bypass undesired biased AC frequencies to the ground or for capacitive coupling of audio AC signals. Then the dielectric is used only for blocking DC. For such applications the AC resistance, the impedance, is as important as the capacitance value.

Typical impedance curves for different capacitance values over frequency. The higher the capacitance the lower the resonance frequency.

The impedance Z is the vector sum of reactance and resistance; it describes the phase difference and the ratio of amplitudes between sinusoidally varying voltage and sinusoidally varying current at a given frequency. In this sense impedance is a measure of the ability of the capacitor to pass alternating currents and can be used like Ohm's law.

In other words, the impedance is a frequency-dependent AC resistance and possesses both magnitude and phase at a particular frequency.

In data sheets of electrolytic capacitors only the impedance magnitude |Z| is specified, and simply written as "Z". Regarding the IEC/EN 60384-1 standard, the impedance values of electrolytic capacitors are measured and specified at 10 kHz or 100 kHz depending on the capacitance and voltage of the capacitor.

Besides measuring, the impedance can be calculated using the idealized components of a capacitor's series-equivalent circuit, including an ideal capacitor C, a resistor ESR, and an inductance ESL. In this case the impedance at the angular frequency ω is given by the geometric (complex) addition of ESR, by a capacitive reactance XC

and by an inductive reactance XL (Inductance)


Then Z is given by


In the special case of resonance, in which the both reactive resistances XC and XL have the same value (XC=XL), then the impedance will only be determined by ESR. With frequencies above the resonance the impedance increases again due to the ESL of the capacitor. The capacitor becomes an inductance.

ESR and dissipation factor tan δ

The equivalent series resistance (ESR) summarizes all resistive losses of the capacitor. These are the terminal resistances, the contact resistance of the electrode contact, the line resistance of the electrodes, the electrolyte resistance, and the dielectric losses in the dielectric oxide layer.[54]

For electrolytic capacitors generally the ESR decreases with increasing frequency and temperature.[55]

ESR influences the remaining superimposed AC ripple behind smoothing and may influence the circuit functionality. Related to the capacitorm ESR accounts for internal heat generation if a ripple current flows over the capacitor. This internal heat reduces the lifetime of non-solid aluminum electrolytic capacitors or influences the reliability of solid tantalum electrolytic capacitors.

For electrolytic capacitors, for historical reasons the dissipation factor tan δ will sometimes be specified in the relevant data sheets, instead of the ESR. The dissipation factor is determined by the tangent of the phase angle between the capacitive reactance XC minus the inductive reactance XL and the ESR. If the inductance ESL is small, the dissipation factor can be approximated as:

The dissipation factor is used for capacitors with very low losses in frequency-determining circuits where the reciprocal value of the dissipation factor is called the quality factor (Q), which represents a resonator's bandwidth.

Ripple current

The superimposed (DC biased) AC ripple current flow across the smoothing capacitor C1 of a power supply causes internal heat generation corresponding to the capacitor's ESR

A "ripple current" is the RMS value of a superimposed AC current of any frequency and any waveform of the current curve for continuous operation within the specified temperature range. It arises mainly in power supplies (including switched-mode power supplies) after rectifying an AC voltage and flows as charge and discharge current through the decoupling or smoothing capacitor.

Ripple currents generates heat inside the capacitor body. This dissipation power loss PL is caused by ESR and is the squared value of the effective (RMS) ripple current IR.

This internally generated heat, additional to the ambient temperature and possibly other external heat sources, leads to a capacitor body temperature having a temperature difference of Δ T against the ambient. This heat has to be distributed as thermal losses Pth over the capacitor's surface A and the thermal resistance β to the ambient.

The internally generated heat has to be distributed to the ambient by thermal radiation, convection, and thermal conduction. The temperature of the capacitor, which is the net balance between heat produced and distributed, must not exceed the capacitor's maximum specified temperature.

The ripple current is specified as an effective (RMS) value at 100 or 120 Hz or at 10 kHz at upper category temperature. Non-sinusoidal ripple currents have to be analyzed and separated into their single sinusoidal frequencies by means of Fourier analysis and summarized by squared addition the single currents.[56]

In non-solid electrolytic capacitors the heat generated by the ripple current forces the evaporation of electrolytes, shortening the lifetime of the capacitors.[57][58][59][60][61] Exceeding the limit tends to result in explosive failure.

In solid tantalum electrolytic capacitors with manganese dioxide electrolyte the heat generated by the ripple current influences the reliability of the capacitors.[62][63][64][65] Exceeding the limit tends to result in catastrophic failures with short circuits and burning components.

The heat generated by the ripple current also influences the lifetime of aluminum and tantalum electrolytic capacitors with solid polymer electrolytes.[66] Exceeding the limit tends to result in catastrophic failures with short components.

Current surge, peak or pulse current

Aluminum electrolytic capacitors with non-solid electrolytes normally can be charged up to the rated voltage without any current surge, peak or pulse limitation. This property is a result of the limited ion movability in the liquid electrolyte, which slows down the voltage ramp across the dielectric, and of the capacitor's ESR. Only the frequency of peaks integrated over time must not exceed the maximal specified ripple current.

Solid tantalum electrolytic capacitors with manganese dioxide electrolyte or polymer electrolyte are damaged by peak or pulse currents.[46][47] Solid Tantalum capacitors which are exposed to surge, peak or pulse currents, for example, in highly inductive circuits, should be used with a voltage derating. If possible the voltage profile should be a ramp turn-on, as this reduces the peak current experienced by the capacitor.

Leakage current

The general leakage current behavior of electrolytic capacitors depends on the kind of electrolyte

For electrolytic capacitors, DC leakage current (DCL) is a special characteristic that other conventional capacitors do not have. This current is represented by the resistor Rleak in parallel with the capacitor in the series-equivalent circuit of electrolytic capacitors.

The reasons for leakage current are different between electrolytic capacitors with non-solid and with solid electrolyte or more common for "wet" aluminum and for "solid" tantalum electrolytic capacitors with manganese dioxide electrolyte as well as for electrolytic capacitors with polymer electrolytes. For non-solid aluminum electrolytic capacitors the leakage current includes all weakened imperfections of the dielectric caused by unwanted chemical processes taking place during the time without applied voltage (storage time) between operating cycles. These unwanted chemical processes depend on the kind of electrolyte. Electrolytes with water content or water based electrolytes are more aggressive to the aluminum oxide layer than are electrolytes based on organic liquids. This is why different electrolytic capacitor series specify different storage time without reforming instructions.[67]

Applying a positive voltage to a "wet" capacitor causes a reforming (self-healing) process which repairs all weakened dielectric layers, and the leakage current remain at a low level.[68]

Although the leakage current of non-solid e-caps is higher than current flow over insulation resistance in ceramic or film capacitors, the self-discharge of modern non-solid electrolytic capacitors with organic electrolytes takes several weeks.

The main causes of DCL for solid tantalum capacitors include electrical breakdown of the dielectric, conductive paths due to impurities or poor anodization, bypassing of dielectric due to excess manganese dioxide, to moisture paths, or to cathode conductors (carbon, silver).[69] This "normal" leakage current in solid electrolyte capacitors cannot be reduced by "healing", because under normal conditions solid electrolytes cannot provide oxygen for forming processes. This statement should not be confused with the self-healing process during field crystallization, see below, Reliability (Failure rate).

The specification of the leakage current in data sheets is often given by multiplication of the rated capacitance value CR with the value of the rated voltage UR together with an addendum figure, measured after a measuring time of 2 or 5 minutes, for example:

The leakage current value depends on the voltage applied, on the temperature of the capacitor, and on measuring time. Leakage current in solid MnO2 tantalum electrolytic capacitors generally drops very much faster than for non-solid electrolytic capacitors but remain at the level reached.

Dielectric absorption (soakage)

Main article: Dielectric absorption

Dielectric absorption occurs when a capacitor that has remained charged for a long time discharges only incompletely when briefly discharged. Although an ideal capacitor would reach zero volts after discharge, real capacitors develop a small voltage from time-delayed dipole discharging, a phenomenon that is also called dielectric relaxation, "soakage" or "battery action".

Values of dielectric absorption for some often used capacitors
Type of capacitor Dielectric Absorption
Tantalum electrolytic capacitors with solid electrolyte 2 to 3%,[70] 10%[71]
Aluminium electrolytic capacitor with non solid electrolyte 10 to 15%

Dielectric absorption may be a problem in circuits where very small currents are used in the function of an electronic circuit, such as long-time-constant integrators or sample-and-hold circuits.[72] In most electrolytic capacitor applications supporting power supply lines, dielectric absorption is not a problem.

But especially for electrolytic capacitors with high rated voltage the voltage at the terminals generated by the dielectric absorption can be a safety risk to personnel or circuits. In order to prevent shocks most very large capacitors are shipped with shorting wires that need to be removed before the capacitors are used.[73]

Operational characteristics

Reliability (failure rate)

Bathtub curve with times of “early failures”, “random failures”, and wear-out failures”. The time of random failures is the time of constant failure rate and corresponds with the lifetime of non-solid e-caps.

The reliability of a component is a property that indicates how reliably this component performs its function in a time interval. It is subject to a stochastic process and can be described qualitatively and quantitatively; it is not directly measurable. The reliability of electrolytic capacitors is empirically determined by identifying the failure rate in production accompanying endurance tests, see Reliability engineering.

Reliability normally is shown as a bathtub curve and is divided into three areas: early failures or infant mortality failures, constant random failures and wear out failures. Failures totalized in a failure rate are short circuit, open circuit, and degradation failures (exceeding electrical parameters).

The reliability prediction is generally expressed in a failure rate λ, abbreviated FIT (Failures In Time]. This is the number of failures that can be expected in one billion (109) component-hours of operation (e.g., 1000 components for 1 million hours, or 1  million components for 1000 hours which is 1 ppm/1000 hours) at fixed working conditions during the period of constant random failures. This failure rate model implicitly assumes the idea of "random failure". Individual components fail at random times but at a predictable rate.

Billions of tested capacitor unit-hours would be needed to establish failure rates in the very low level range which are required today to ensure the production of large quantities of components without failures. This requires about a million units over a long time period, which means a large staff and considerable financing.[74] The tested failure rates are often complemented with figures resulting from feedback from the field from big users concerning failed components (field failure rate), which mostly results in a lower failure rate than tested.

The reciprocal value of FIT is MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures).

The standard operating conditions for the failure rate FIT are 40 °C and 0.5 UR. For other conditions of applied voltage, current load, temperature, capacitance value, circuit resistance (for tantalum capacitors), mechanical influences and humidity, the FIT figure can be recalculated with acceleration factors standardized for industrial[75] or military[76] contexts. The higher the temperature and applied voltage the higher the failure rate, for example.

The most often cited source for recalculation of failure rate is the MIL-HDBK-217F, the “bible” of failure rate calculations for electronic components. SQC Online, the online statistical calculator for acceptance sampling and quality control, provides an online tool for short examination to calculate given failure rate values for given application conditions.[77]

Some manufacturers may have their own FIT calculation tables for tantalum capacitors.[78][79][80] or for aluminum capacitors[81]

It is good to know that for tantalum capacitors the failure rate is often specified in essence at 85 °C and rated voltage UR as reference conditions and expressed as percent failed components per thousand hours (n %/1000 h). That is, “n” number of failed components per 105 hours, or in FIT the ten-thousand-fold value per 109 hours.

It should be noted that industrially produced tantalum capacitors nowadays are very reliable components. Continuous improvement in tantalum powder and capacitor technologies have resulted in a significant reduction in the amount of impurities which formerly caused most field crystallization failures. Commercially available industrially produced tantalum capacitors now have reached as standard products the high MIL standard "C" level, which is 0.01%/1000 h at 85 °C and UR or 1 failure per 107 hours at 85 °C and UR.[82] Recalculated in FIT with the acceleration factors coming from MIL HDKB 217F at 40 °C and 0.5 , UR is the failure rate. For a 100 µF/25 V tantalum chip capacitor used with a series resistance of 0.1 Ω the failure rate is 0.02 FIT.

Aluminum electrolytic capacitors do not use a specification in "% per 1000 h at 85 °C and UR". They use the FIT specification with 40 °C and 0.5 UR as reference conditions. Also for aluminum electrolytic capacitors it should be noted that they are very reliable components. Published figures show for low voltage types (6.3…160 V) FIT rates in the range of 1 to 20 FIT[83] and for high voltage types (>160 …550 V) FIT rates in the range of 20 to 200 FIT.[81] Field failure rates for aluminum e-caps are in the range of 0.5 to 20 FIT.[81][83][84]

The published figures show that both capacitor types, tantalum and aluminum, are reliable components, comparable with other electronic components and achieving safe operation for decades under normal conditions. But a great difference exists in the case of wear-out failures. Tantalum capacitors with solid electrolyte have no wear-out mechanism so that the constant failure rate is least, up to the point when all capacitors fail. Electrolytic capacitors with non-solid electrolyte, however, have a limited time of constant random failures up to that point when the wear-out failures start. This time of the constant random failure rate corresponds with the lifetime or service life of “wet” aluminum electrolytic capacitors.


The electrical values of aluminum electrolytic capacitors with non-solid electrolyte change over time due to evaporation of electrolyte. Reaching the specified limits of the electrical parameters, the time of the constant failure rate ends and it is the end of the capacitor's lifetime. The graph show this behavior in a 2000 h endurance test at 105 °C.

The lifetime, service life, load life or useful life of electrolytic capacitors is a special characteristic of non-solid aluminum electrolytic capacitors, whose liquid electrolyte can evaporate over time. Lowering the electrolyte level influences the electrical parameters of the capacitors. The capacitance decreases and the impedance and ESR increase with decreasing amounts of electrolyte. This very slow electrolyte drying-out depends on the temperature, the applied ripple current load, and the applied voltage. The lower these parameters compared with their maximum values the longer the capacitor's “life”. The “end of life” point is defined by the appearance of wear-out failures or degradation failures when either capacitance, impedance, ESR or leakage current exceed their specified change limits.

The lifetime is a specification of a collection of tested capacitors and delivers an expectation of the behavior of similar types. This lifetime definition corresponds with the time of the constant random failure rate in the bathtub curve.

But even after exceeding the specified limits and the capacitors having reached their “end of life” the electronic circuit is not in immediate danger; only the functionality of the capacitors is reduced. With today's high levels of purity in the manufacture of electrolytic capacitors it is not to be expected that short circuits occur after the end-of-life-point with progressive evaporation combined with parameter degradation.

The lifetime of non-solid aluminum electrolytic capacitors is specified in terms of “hours per temperature", like "2,000h/105 °C". With this specification the lifetime at operational conditions can be estimated by special formulas or graphs specified in the data sheets of serious manufacturers. They use different ways for specification, some give special formulas,[85][86] others specify their e-caps lifetime calculation with graphs that consider the influence of applied voltage.[83][87][88][89] Basic principle for calculating the time under operational conditions is the so-called “10-degree-rule”.[90][91][92]

This rule is also known as Arrhenius rule. It characterizes the change of thermic reaction speed. For every 10 °C lower temperature the evaporation is reduced by half. That means for every 10 °C lower temperature the lifetime of capacitors doubles. If a lifetime specification of an electrolytic capacitor is, for example, 2000  h/105 °C, the capacitor's lifetime at 45 °C can be ”calculated” as 128,000 hours—that is roughly 15 years—by using the 10-degrees-rule.

However, solid polymer electrolytic capacitors, aluminum as well as tantalum and niobium electrolytic capacitors also have a lifetime specification. The polymer electrolyte has a small deterioration of conductivity caused by a thermal degradation mechanism in the conductive polymer. The electrical conductivity decreases as a function of time, in agreement with a granular metal type structure, in which aging is due to the shrinking of the conductive polymer grains.[93] The lifetime of polymer electrolytic capacitors is specified in terms similar to non-solid e-caps but its lifetime calculation follows other rules, leading to much longer operational lifetimes.[94][95][96]

Tantalum electrolytic capacitors with solid manganese dioxide electrolyte do not have wear-out failures so they do not have a lifetime specification in the sense of non-solid aluminum electrolytic capacitors. Also, tantalum capacitors with non-solid electrolyte, the "wet tantalums", do not have a lifetime specification because they are hermetically sealed and evaporation of electrolyte is minimized.

Electrolytic capacitors with solid electrolyte do not have wear-out failures so they do not have a lifetime specification in the sense of non-solid aluminum electrolytic capacitors.

Failure modes, self-healing mechanism and application rules

The many different types of electrolytic capacitors show differences in electrical long-term behavior, their inherent failure modes, and their self-healing mechanism. Application rules for types with an inherent failure mode are specified to ensure capacitors with high reliability and long life.

Long-term electrical behavior, failure modes, self-healing mechanism, and application rules of the different types of electrolytic capacitors
Type of
electrolytic capacitors
electrical behavior
Failure modes Self-healing
Aluminum electrolytic capacitors,
non-solid electrolyte
Drying out over time,
capacitance decreases,
ESR increases
no unique
New generated oxide (forming)
by applying a voltage
Aluminum electrolytic capacitors,
solid polymer electrolyte
Deterioration of conductivity,
ESR increases
no unique
Insulating of faults
in the dielectric
by oxidation or evaporation
of the polymer electrolyte
Tantalum electrolytic capacitors,
solid MnO2 electrolyte
Stable Field crystallization
Thermally induced insulating
of faults in the dielectric
by oxidization of the electrolyte MnO2
into insulating MnO2O3
if current availability is limited
Voltage derating 50%
Series resistance 3 Ω/V
Tantalum electrolytic capacitors,
solid polymer electrolyte
Deterioration of conductivity,
ESR increases
Field crystallization
Insulating of faults
in the dielectric by oxidation or evaporation
of the polymer electrolyte
Voltage derating 20 %
Niobium electrolytic capacitors,
solid MnO2 electrolyte
Stable no unique
Thermally induced insulation of faults
in the dielectric
by oxidation of Nb2O5
into insulating NbO2
Niobium anode:
voltage derating 50%
Niobium oxide anode:
voltage derating 20 %
Niobium electrolytic capacitors,
solid polymer electrolyte
Deterioration of conductivity,
ESR increases
no unique
Insulating of faults
in the dielectric
by oxidation or evaporation
of the polymer electrolyte
Niobium anode:
voltage derating 50%
Niobium oxide anode:
voltage derating 20 %
Hybrid aluminum electrolytic capacitors,
solid polymer + non-solid electrolyte
Deterioration of conductivity,
drying out over time,
capacitance decreases,
ESR increases
no unique
New generated oxide (forming)
by applying a voltage

Performance after storage

All electrolytic capacitors are "aged" during manufacturing by applying rated voltage at high temperature for a sufficient time to repair all cracks and weaknesses that may have occurred during production. However, a particular problem with non-solid aluminum models may occur after storage or unpowered periods. Chemical processes (corrosion) can weaken the oxide layer, which may lead to a higher leakage current. Most modern electrolytic systems are chemically inert and without corrosion problems, even after storage times of two years or longer. Non-solid electrolytic capacitors using organic solvents like GBL as electrolyte do not have problems with high leakage current after longer storage times.[68] They can be stored for up to 10 years without problems[56]

Storage times can be tested using accelerated shelf-life testing, which requires storage without applied voltage at the upper category temperature for a certain period, usually 1000 hours. This shelf life test is a good indicator for chemical stability and of the oxide layer, because all chemical reactions are accelerated by higher temperatures. Nearly all commercial series of non-solid electrolytics fulfill the 1000 hour shelf life test. However, many series are specified only for two years of storage. This also ensures the continuing solderability of the terminals.

For antique radio equipment or for electrolytics built in the 1970s or earlier, "pre-conditioning" may be appropriate. For this purpose, the rated voltage is applied to the capacitor via a series resistance of approximately 1 kΩ for one hour. Applying a voltage via a safety resistor repairs the oxide layer by self-healing. Capacitors that fail leakage current requirements after preconditioning, may have experienced mechanical damage.[89]

Electrolytic capacitors with solid electrolytes don’t have precondition requirements.

Additional information

Capacitor symbols

Electrolytic capacitor symbols


Parallel connection

Smaller or low voltage electrolytic capacitors may be connected in parallel without any safety correction action. Large size capacitors, especially large sizes and high voltage types should be individually guarded against sudden energy charge of the whole capacitor bank due to a failed specimen.

Series connection

Some applications like AC/AC converters with DC-link for frequency controls in three-phase grids need the higher voltages aluminum electrolytic capacitors usually offer. For such applications electrolytic capacitors can be connected in series for increased voltage-withstanding capability. During charging, the voltage across each of the capacitors connected in series is proportional to the inverse of the individual capacitor’s leakage current. Since every capacitor differs a little bit in individual leakage current, the capacitors with a higher leakage current will get less voltage. The voltage balance over the series-connected capacitors is not symmetrical. Passive or active voltage balance has to be provided in order to stabilize the voltage over each individual capacitor.[56][89]

Polarity marking

  1. ^ http://capacitor.web.fc2.com/solidcapacitor.html

Polarity marking for polymer electrolytic capacitors

Rectangular polymer capacitors,
tantalum as well as aluminum,
have a polarity marking
at the anode (plus) side

Cylindrical polymer capacitors
have a polarity marking
at the cathode (minus) side

Imprinted markings

Electrolytic capacitors, like most other electronic components and if enough space is available, have imprinted markings to indicate manufacturer, type, electrical and thermal characteristics, and date of manufacture. If they are large enough the capacitor is marked with

Polarized capacitors have polarity markings, usually a "−" (minus) sign on the side of the negative electrode for electrolytic capacitors or a stripe or a "+" (plus) sign. Also, the negative lead for leaded "wet" e-caps is usually shorter.

Smaller capacitors use a shorthand notation. The most commonly used format is: XYZ J/K/M “V”, where XYZ represents the capacitance (calculated as XY × 10Z pF), the letters K or M indicate the tolerance (±10% and ±20% respectively) and “V” represents the working voltage.


Capacitance, tolerance and date of manufacture can be indicated with a short code specified in IEC/EN 60062. Examples of short-marking of the rated capacitance (microfarads): µ47 = 0,47 µF, 4µ7 = 4,7 µF, 47µ = 47 µF

The date of manufacture is often printed in accordance with international standards.

For very small capacitors no marking is possible. Here only the traceability of the manufacturers can ensure the identification of a type.


The standardization for all electrical, electronic components and related technologies follows the rules given by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC),[100] a non-profit, non-governmental international standards organization.[101][102]

The definition of the characteristics and the procedure of the test methods for capacitors for use in electronic equipment are set out in the Generic specification:

The tests and requirements to be met by aluminum and tantalum electrolytic capacitors for use in electronic equipment for approval as standardized types are set out in the following sectional specifications:


The market for electrolytic capacitors in 2008 was roughly 30% of the total market in value

In number of pieces, these capacitors cover about 10% of the total capacitor market, or about 100 to 120 billion pieces.[103]

Manufacturers and products

Worldwide operating manufacturers and their electrolytic capacitor product program
Manufacturer Aluminum
electrolytic capacitors
electrolytic capacitors
AVX - - - - X X X X
CapXon X X X - - - - -
Daewoo, (Partsnic) X X - - - - - -
CDE Cornell Dubilier X X X X X X - -
Capacitor Industries - X - - - - - -
Elna X X X - - - -
Exxelia group - X - - X X - -
Frolyt X X - - - - - -
Hitachi X - -
Hitano X X X - X - - -
Itelcond - X - - - - - -
Jackcon X X - - - - - -
Kaimei Electronic Corp, (Jamicon) X X - - - - - -
Jianghai X X X - - - - -
Lelon X X X - - - - -
MAN YUE, (Samxon) X X - - - - - -
NEC Tokin - - - - X - X -
Nippon Chemi-Con X X X X - - - -
NIC X X X X X - X -
Nichicon X X X - - - - -
Panasonic, Matsushita X X X X - - X -
Richey X X - - - - - -
ROHM - - - - X - X -
Rubycon X X X - - - - -
Samwha X X X - - - - -
SUN Electronic Industry X - - X - - - -
TDK EPCOS X X - - - - - -
Teapo (Luxon) X X X - - - - -
Vishay X X X - X X X X
Yageo X X X - - - - -

Date of the table: March 2015

See also


  1. J.L. Stevens, A.C. Geiculescu, T.F. Strange, Dielectric Aluminum Oxides: Nano-Structural Features and Composites PDF
  3. 1 2 3 4 A. Albertsen, Jianghai Europe, Keep your distance – Voltage Proof of Electrolytic Capacitors, PDF
  4. 1 2 KDK, Specifications for Etched Foil for Anode, Low Voltage
  5. I.Horacek, T.Zednicek, S.Zednicek, T.Karnik, J.Petrzilek, P.Jacisko, P.Gregorova, AVX, High CV Tantalum Capacitors - Challenges and Limitations
  6. Charles Pollack: D.R.P. 92564, filed 14. Januar 1896, granted 19. Mai 1897 D.R.P. 92564
  7. J. Both, Electrolytic capacitors, 1890 to 1925: early history and basic principle, Electrical Insulation Magazine, IEEE, Volume:31, Issue: 1, January–February 2015,
  8. US Patent Nr. 1774455, Electric condenser, filed October 19, 1925, granted August 26, 1930
  9. Samuel Ruben: Inventor, Scholar, and Benefactor by Kathryn R. Bullock PDF www.electrochem.org
  10. 1 2 3 P. McK. Deeley, Electrolytic Capacitors, The Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corp. South Plainfield New Jersey, 1938
  11. Elektrolytischer Kondensator mit aufgerollten Metallbändern als Belegungen, Alfred Eckel Hydra-Werke, Berlin-Charlottenburg, DRP 498 794, filed May 12, 1927, granted May 8, 1930
  12. William Dubilier, Electric Condenser, US Patent 468787
  13. Philips Data Handbook PA01, 1986, the first 125 °C series "118 AHT"
  14. J. Both, The modern era of aluminum electrolytic capacitors, Electrical Insulation Magazine, IEEE, Volume:31, Issue: 4, July–August 2015, ieeexplore.ieee.org
  15. D. F. Tailor, Tantalum and Tantalum Compounds, Fansteel Inc., Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 19, 2nd ed. 1969 John Wiley & sons, Inc.
  16. R. L. Taylor and H. E. Haring, "A metal semi-conductor capacitor", J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 103, p. 611, November, 1956.
  17. E. K. Reed, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Characterization of Tantalum Polymer Capacitors, NEPP Task 1.21.5, Phase 1, FY05
  18. D. A. McLean, F. S. Power, Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs. 44 (1956) 872
  19. Preston Robinson, Sprague, US Patent 3066247, 25. Aug. 1954 - 27. Nov. 1962
  20. Sprague, Dr. Preston Robinson Granted 103rd Patent Since Joining Company In 1929
  21. A. Fraioli, Recent Advances in the Solid-State Electrolytic Capacitor, IRE Transactions on Component Parts, June 1958
  22. R. J. Millard, Sprague, US Patent 2936514, October 24, 1955 - May 17, 1960
  23. W. Serjak, H. Seyeda, Ch. Cymorek, Tantalum Availability: 2000 and Beyond, PCI,March/April 2002,
  24. The Tantalum Supply Chain: A Detailed Analysis, PCI, March/April 2002
  25. J.Both, Valvo, SAL contra Tantal, Zuverlässige Technologien im Wettstreit, nachrichten elektronik 35, 1981
  26. Computerposter
  27. K. Lischka, Spiegel 27.09.2007, 40 Jahre Elektro-Addierer: Der erste Taschenrechner wog 1,5 Kilo,
  28. Larry E. Mosley, Intel Corporation, Capacitor Impedance Needs For Future Microprocessors, CARTS USA 2006, ecadigitallibrary.com
  29. Shinichi Niwa, Yutaka Taketani, Development of new series of aluminium solid capacitors with organic Semiconductive electrolyte (OS-CON), Journal of Power Sources, Volume 60, Issue 2, June 1996, Pages 165–171, sciencedirect.com
  30. Kuch, Investigation of charge transfer complexes:TCNQ-TTF
  31. Sanyo, OS-CON, Technical Book Ver. 15, 2007
  32. About the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2000, Advanced Information, October 10, 2000,
  33. Y. K. ZHANG, J. LIN,Y. CHEN, Polymer Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors with Chemically-Polymerized Polypyrrole (PPy) as Cathode Materials Part I. Effect of Monomer Concentration and Oxidant on Electrical Properties of the Capacitors, PDF
  34. U. Merker, K. Wussow, W. Lövenich, H. C. Starck GmbH, New Conducting Polymer Dispersions for Solid Electrolyte Capacitors, ecadigitallibrary.com
  35. Panasonic, SP-Caps
  36. John Prymak, Kemet, Replacing MnO2 with Polymers, 1999 CARTS
  37. F. Jonas, H.C.Starck, Baytron, Basic chemical and physical properties, Präsentation 2003, [www.hcstarck.de]
  38. Ch. Schnitter, A. Michaelis, U. Merker, H.C. Starck, Bayer, New Niobium Based Materials for Solid Electrolyte Capacitors, Carts 2002
  39. T. Zednicek, S. Sita, C. McCracken, W. A. Millman, J. Gill, AVX, Niobium Oxide Technology Roadmap, CARTS 2002
  40. Y. Pozdeev-Freeman, P. Maden, Vishay, Solid-Electrolyte Niobium Capacitors Exhibit Similar Performance to Tantalum, Feb 1, 2002,
  41. Shigeru Uzawa, Akihiko Komat-u, Tetsushi Ogawara, Rubycon Corporation, Ultra Low Impedance Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitor with Water based Electrolyte or
  42. J.L. Stevens, T. R. Marshall, A.C. Geiculescu m, C.R. Feger, T.F. Strange, Carts USA 2006, The Effects of Electrolyte Composition on the Deformation Characteristics of Wet Aluminum ICD Capacitors,
  43. Alfonso Berduque, Zongli Dou, Rong Xu, KEMET, Electrochemical Studies for Aluminium Electrolytic Capacitor Applications: Corrosion Analysis of Aluminium in Ethylene Glycol-Based Electrolytes PDF
  44. Hillman; Helmold (2004), Identification of Missing or Insufficient Electrolyte Constituents in Failed Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors (PDF), DFR solutions
  45. Ch. Reynolds, AVX, Technical Information, Reliability Management of Tantalum Capacitors, PDF
  46. 1 2 3 J. Gill, AVX, Surge in Solid Tantalum Capacitors
  47. 1 2 3 A. Teverovsky, Perot Systems Code 562, NASA GSFCE, Effect of Surge Current Testing on Reliability of Solid Tantalum Capacitors ecadigitallibrary.com
  48. Imam, A.M., Condition Monitoring of Electrolytic Capacitors for Power Electronics Applications, Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology (2007) smartech.gatech.edu
  49. Nichicon. "General Description of Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors" PDF section "2-3-2 Reverse Voltage".
  50. Rubycon. "Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors FAQ"
  51. CDM Cornell Dubilier. "Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitor Application Guide" p. 4 and p. 6 and p. 9
  52. I. Bishop, J. Gill, AVX Ltd., Reverse Voltage Behavior of Solid Tantalum Capacitors PDF
  53. P. Vasina, T. Zednicek, Z. Sita, J. Sikula, J. Pavelka, AVX, Thermal and Electrical Breakdown Versus Reliability of Ta2O5 Under Both – Bipolar Biasing Conditions PDF
  54. A. Berduque, Kemet, Low ESR Aluminium Electrolytic Capacitors for Medium to High Voltage Applications, kemet.com
  55. Joelle Arnold, Uprating of Electrolytic Capacitors, DfR Solutions
  56. 1 2 3 Vishay BCcomponents, Introduction Aluminum Capacitors, Revision: 10-Sep-13 1 Document Number: 28356, PDF
  57. Vishay, Engineering Solutions, Aluminum Capacitors in Power Supplies
  58. Panasonic, Use technique of Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors
  59. CDE, Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitor Application Guide
  60. Nichicon, Application Guidelines for Aluminum Electolytic Capacitors
  61. Evox Rifa,Electrolytic Capacitors Application Guide
  62. I. Salisbury, AVX, Thermal Management of Surface Mounted Tantalum Capacitors
  63. R.W. Franklin, AVX , Ripple Rating of Tantalum Chip Capacitors
  64. Vishay, Application Notes, AC Ripple Current, Calculations Solid Tantalum Capacitors
  65. KEMET, Ripple Current Capabilities, Technical Update 2004
  66. E. Vitoratos, S. Sakkopoulos, E. Dalas, N. Paliatsas, D. Karageorgopoulos, F. Petraki, S. Kennou, S.A. Choulis, Thermal degradation mechanisms of PEDOT:PSS, Organic Electronics Volume 10, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages 61–66, Organic ElectronicsVolume 10, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages 61–66,
  67. Vishay, Aluminium capacitors, Introduction, Revision: 10-Sep-13 1 Document Number: 28356, Chapter Storage, page 7 vishay.com
  68. 1 2 Ch. Baur, N. Will, Epcos, Long-term stability of aluminum electrolytic capacitors Built to last
  70. Kemet, Polymer Tantalum Chip Capacitors
  72. "Understand Capacitor Soakage to Optimize Analog Systems" by Bob Pease 1982
  73. NIC, Failure Rate Estimation
  74. IEC/EN 61709, Electric components. Reliability. Reference conditions for failure rates and stress models for conversion
  75. MIL-HDBK-217F Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment
  76. SQC online table calculator, Capacitor Failure Rate Model, MIL-HDBK-217, Rev. F - Notice 2
  77. Vishay, Fit Calculator
  78. Hitachi, Precautions in using Tantalum Capacitors, 4.2 Failure Rate Calculation Formula
  79. KEMET FIT Calculator Software
  80. 1 2 3 Sam G. Parler, Cornell Dubilier, Reliability of CDE Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors (PDF)
  81. 1 2 3 T.Zednicek, AVX, A Study of Field Crystallization in Tantalum Capacitors and its effect on DCL and Reliability,
  82. 1 2 3 A. Albertsen, Jianghai Europe, Reliability of Electrolytic Capacitors, PDF
  83. Hitachi aic-europe, Explanations to the useful life, PDF
  84. NCC, Technical Note Judicious Use of Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors PDF
  86. A. Albertsen, Jianghai, Electrolytic Capacitor Lifetime Estimation PDF
  87. "Snap-In HU". aic-europe.com.
  88. 1 2 3 Epcos, Aluminum electrolytic capacitors, General technical informations PDF
  89. Panasonic (10-degree-rule; PDF)
  90. NIC Life expectancy of aluminum electrolytic capacitors (rev.1) (PDF)
  91. Gregory Mirsky, Determining end-of-life, ESR, and lifetime calculations for electrolytic capacitors at higher temperatures, EDN, August 20, 2008, edn.com
  92. E. Vitoratos, S. Sakkopoulos, E. Dalas, N. Paliatsas, D. Karageorgopoulos, F. Petraki, S. Kennou, S.A. Choulis, Thermal degradation mechanisms of PEDOT:PSS, Organic Electronics, Volume 10, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages 61–66,
  93. Nichicon, Technical Guide, Calculation Formula of Lifetime PDF
  94. Estimating of Lifetime FUJITSU MEDIA DEVICES LIMITED PDF
  95. NIC Technical Guide, Calculation Formula of Lifetime
  98. 1 2 3 4 R. Faltus, AVX, Advanced capacitors ensure long-term control-circuit stability, 7/2/2012, EDT
  99. IEC Homepage
  100. IEC Webstore
  101. IEC/EN/DIN Standards, Beuth-Verlag
  102. Electronic Capacitors, SIC 3675, NAICS 334414: Electronic Capacitor Manufacturing, Industry report:
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/18/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.