Cultural neuroscience

Cultural neuroscience is a new interdisciplinary field that studies how cultural values such as practices and beliefs shape and are shaped by the mind, brain and genes across multiple timescales.[1][2] The two main questions in cultural neuroscience is how does culture shape behavior and neurobiology and how does neurobiology reflect culture. The study of cultural neuroscience bridges theory and methods from anthropology, psychology, neuroscience and genetics. Cultural neuroscientists study cultural variation in mental, neural and genomic processes as a means of articulating the bidirectional relationship of these processes and their emergent properties using a variety of methods. Researchers in cultural neuroscience [3][4][5] are motivated by two fundamentally intriguing, yet still unanswered, questions on the origins of human nature and human diversity: how do cultural traits (e.g., values, beliefs, practices) shape neurobiology (e.g., genetic and neural processes) and behavior and how do neurobiological mechanisms (e.g., genetic and neural processes) facilitate the emergence and transmission of cultural traits?

The idea that complex behavior results from the dynamic interaction of genes and cultural environment is not new;[6][7][8] however, cultural neuroscience [9] represents a novel empirical approach to demonstrating bidirectional interactions between culture and biology by integrating theory and methods from cultural psychology, neuroscience and neurogenetics.

Similar to other interdisciplinary fields such as social neuroscience,[10] cognitive neuroscience,[11] affective neuroscience,[12] and neuroanthropology,[13][14][15] cultural neuroscience aims to explain a given mental phenomenon in terms of a synergistic product of mental, neural and genetic events. In particular, cultural neuroscience shares common research goals with social neuroscientists examining how neurobiological mechanisms (e.g., mirror neurons),[16] facilitate cultural transmission, (e.g., imitative learning) and neuroanthropologists[17] examining how embedded culture, as captured by cross-species comparison[18] and ethnography, is related to brain function. Cultural neuroscience also shares intellectual goals with critical neuroscience,[19] a field of inquiry that scrutinizes the social, cultural, economic and political contexts and assumptions that underlie behavioral and brain science research as it is practiced today.

Cultural neuroscience is unique in that it primarily adopts the experimental methods of cultural psychology[20][21] and models of dual inheritance theory[22] as the means to uncovering how mental, neural and genetic events vary as a function of specific culture traits (e.g., values, practices and beliefs) in some meaningful way. Research in cultural neuroscience has practical relevance to transcultural psychiatry,[23] business [24] and technology[25] as well as broader implications for global public policy issues such as population health disparities,[26] bioethics,[27] globalization,[28] immigration, interethnic ideology[29] and international relations.

Culture shapes biology

There's been multiple studies focusing on the neurological difference between Asian and Western culture. Studies have repeatedly shown that westerners tend to be better at attention to detail, processing central objects, and organization through rules and categories. In contrast, Asian culture tends to focus more on context, relationship over category to items, and rely on instinct rather than logic. In one study Neurologists Han and Nothoff looked at activity in the medial prefrontal cortex and found that due to western culture being more individualistic they are more likely to self-identify themselves as "I'm honest" vs Asians who tend to be more dependent and family oriented they would say "I'm honest when i'm with my mother". The same study found that when American's would identify themselves the ventral-medial pre-frontal cortex would activate in contrast to Asian's which it would activate when describing themselves both independently (I'm honest) and interdependently (I'm honest when I'm with my mother). Another study conducted by the same team focused on how the brain reacted to different languages. They found that due to the difference in language structure and representation, American's showed activation in the superior temporal gyrus while Chinese people showed activation in the dorsal extent of the inferior parietal lobule. [30]

A different study conducted by psychologist Joan Chiao found that due to cultural differences Americans are more likely to suffer of depression than Asians. She found that East Asians are more likely to carry the short allele of the serotonin transporter gene (STG) which leads to depression while Americans carry the long allele which doesn't lead to depression. Yet due to difference in cultural structure they found that collectivist societies are more likely to find happiness than individual societies. [31]

Another study done by psychologists Nalini Ambady and Jonathan Freeman spoke of the difference in brain activity between Japanese and Americans when shown different body posture. They found that the reward circuitry in the limbic system would light up when Japanese participants would see submissive body posture while the reward circuitry would activate when american's would see dominant body posture. [32]

Culture differences in visual stimuli

Cultural differences exist in the ventral visual cortex and many studies have shown this. In a study conducted in 2005 they found that East Asians were more likely to keep their eyes focused on background scenes than westerners who would instead focus more on the central object such as a giraffe in a savanna. In a similar 2006 study it showed that in congruence to the difference in society structure westerners showed more activation in object processing regions, including the bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left superior parietal gyrus, and right superior temporal gyrus, although no activation differences were observed in context-processing regions such as the hippocampus. However, there has been some research contradicting cultural bias in the oculomotor control such as one conducted in 2007 by Rayner, Li, Williams, Cave, and well who failed to find evidence that East Asians focus more on context although they did find evidence that they are more likely to focus less on central objects. In a different study they focused more on difference in attention towards faces. They proved that Americans focus more broadly on the entire face such as both the eyes and mouth while Asians focus more on a single part, such as the mouth. The authors point out that this happens due to gaze avoidance in east Asian culture as a way of politeness. In 2008, another study focusing on context showed that East Asians were more likely to include greater details and background when taking photographs of a model when they were free to set the zoom function of the camera as they saw fit. In 2003, a group of researchers used the Frame-Line Test and asked the participants to draw a line of either the exact same length as the one showed or one that was proportional in size. Americans were more accurate in the absolute task, suggesting better memory for the exact or absolute size of the focal object, but East Asians were more accurate in the relative (proportional) task, suggesting better memory for contextual relationships. In a later study conducted by the same group they found a pattern within the cultures when processing emotions. East Asians were less likely to know the difference between fear and disgust than Americans when sampling faces.[33]

Many studies conducted proves that constant repetition in a certain skill has an effect on brain activity. For example, in a 2000 study they showed that taxi drivers in London showed larger gray matter in the posterior hippocampi than the average civilian. [34] A different study in 2004 showed that those who know how to juggle have an increase in volume of the cortical tissue in the bilateral midtemporal area and left posterior intraparietal sulcus.[35]

See also


  1. Ames, D. L.; Fiske, S. T. (2010). "Cultural neuroscience". Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 13 (2): 72–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01301.x.
  2. Chiao, J.Y. & Ambady, N. (2007). Cultural neuroscience: Parsing universality and diversity across levels of analysis. In Kitayama, S. and Cohen, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Cultural Psychology, Guilford Press, NY, pp. 237-254.
  3. Chiao, J. Y. (Ed.) (2009). Cultural neuroscience: Cultural influences on brain function. Progress in Brain Research, Elsevier Press.
  4. Park, DC; Gutchess, AH. (2006). "The cognitive neuroscience of aging and culture". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 15 (3): 105–108. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00416.x.
  5. Han, S.; Northoff, G. (2008). "Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach". Nature Review Neuroscience. 9: 646–654. doi:10.1038/nrn2456.
  6. Li, S.-C. (2003). "Biocultural orchestration of developmental plasticity across levels: The interplay of biology and culture in shaping the mind and behavior across the lifespan". Psychological Bulletin. 129: 171–194. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.171.
  7. Caspi, A.; Moffitt, T. E. (2006). "Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 7 (7): 583–590. doi:10.1038/nrn1925.
  8. Mareschal. D., Johnson, M.H., Sirois, S., Spratling, M.W., Thomas, M.C., Westermann, G. (2007). Neuroconstructivism, Volume 1: How the Brain Constructs Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  9. Chiao, J.Y. (in press). Cultural neuroscience: Visualizing culture-gene influences on brain function. In Decety, J. and Cacioppo, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Social Neuroscience, Oxford University Press, UK.
  10. Cacioppo, J. T.; Berntson, G. G. (1992). "Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain: Doctrine of multilevel analysis.". American Psychologist. 47 (8): 1019–1028. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.8.1019. PMID 1510329.
  11. Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry, R., & Mangun, G.R. Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. W.W. Norton, 2002. 2nd Edition
  12. Panksepp J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions (Series in Affective Science). Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
  13. Domínguez D, JF; Turner, R; Lewis, ED; Egan, GF (2010). "Neuroanthropology: A Humanistic Science for the Study of the Culture–Brain Nexus". Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 5: 138–47. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp024.
  14. Domínguez D, JF (2012). "Neuroanthropology and the Dialectical Imperative". Anthropological Theory. 12 (1): 5–27. doi:10.1177/1463499612436459.
  15. Rilling, J. K. (2008). "Neuroscientific approaches and applications within anthropology". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 137 (47): 2–32. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20947.
  16. Iacoboni, M. (2009). "Imitation, empathy and mirror neurons". Annual Review of Psychology. 60: 653–70. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604.
  17. Domínguez D, JF; Turner, R; Lewis, ED; Egan, GF (2010). "Neuroanthropology: A Humanistic Science for the Study of the Culture–Brain Nexus". Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 5: 138–47. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp024.
  18. Rilling, J. K.; Barks, S. K.; Parr, L. A.; Preuss, T. M.; Faber, T. L.; Pagnoni, G.; Bremner, J. D.; Votaw, J. R. (2007). "A comparison of resting-state brain activity in humans and chimpanzees". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (43): 17146–17151. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705132104. PMID 17940032.
  19. Choudhury, S.; Nagel, S.K.; Slaby, J. (2009). "Critical Neuroscience: Linking Neuroscience and Society through Critical Practice". BioSocieties. 4 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1017/s1745855209006437.
  20. Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (2007). Handbook of Cultural Psychology. Guilford Press.
  21. Wyer, R. S. Jr., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (2009). Understanding Culture: Theory, research and application. New York: Psychology Press.
  22. Richerson, P. J. and R. Boyd. 2005. Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  23. Kirmayer, L.J. (2006). "Beyond the 'new cross-cultural psychiatry': cultural biology, discursive psychology and the ironies of globalization". Transcultural Psychiatry. 43 (1): 126–44. doi:10.1177/1363461506061761. PMID 16671396.
  24. McClure, S.M.; Li, J.; Tomlin, D.; Cypert, K.S.; Montague, L.M.; Montague, P.R. (2004). "Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks". Neuron. 44 (2): 379–87. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.019. PMID 15473974.
  25. Hargittai, E. (2007). "The Social, Political, Economic, and Cultural Dimensions of Search Engines: An Introduction". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12 (3): 769–777. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00349.x.
  26. Smedley, BD (2008). "Moving beyond access: Achieving equity in state health care reform.". Health Affairs. 27: 447–455. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.2.447.
  27. Farah, M.J. (2005). "Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9 (1): 34–40. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001.
  28. Chiu, C-y.; Cheng, S. Y-y (2007). "Toward a social psychology of culture and globalization: Some social cognitive consequences of activating two cultures simultaneously". Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 1: 84–100. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00017.x.
  29. Wolsko, C.; Park, B.; Judd, C. M.; Wittenbrink, B. (2000). "Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and colorblind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78: 635–654. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.635.
  30. dlende (2008-08-14). "Cultural Neuroscience". Neuroanthropology. Retrieved 2016-11-08.
  31. "'Culture of We' Buffers Genetic Tendency to Depression: Northwestern University News". Retrieved 2016-11-08.
  32. "Your brain on culture". Retrieved 2016-11-08. External link in |website= (help)
  33. Park, Denise C.; Huang, Chih-Mao (2010-07-01). "Culture Wires the Brain: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective". Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. 5 (4): 391–400. doi:10.1177/1745691610374591. ISSN 1745-6916. PMC 3409833Freely accessible. PMID 22866061.
  34. Maguire, Eleanor A.; Woollett, Katherine; Spiers, Hugo J. (2006-01-01). "London taxi drivers and bus drivers: a structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis". Hippocampus. 16 (12): 1091–1101. doi:10.1002/hipo.20233. ISSN 1050-9631. PMID 17024677.
  35. Driemeyer, Joenna; Boyke, Janina; Gaser, Christian; Büchel, Christian; May, Arne (2008-07-23). "Changes in Gray Matter Induced by Learning—Revisited". PLoS ONE. 3 (7). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002669. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 2447176Freely accessible. PMID 18648501.

Further reading




This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/17/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.