Consumption function

Not to be confused with demand function.

In economics, the consumption function describes a relationship between consumption and disposable income.[1] Algebraically, this means where is a function that maps levels of disposable income —income after government intervention, such as taxes or transfer payments—into levels of consumption . The concept is believed to have been introduced into macroeconomics by John Maynard Keynes in 1936, who used it to develop the notion of a government spending multiplier.[2] Its simplest form is the linear consumption function used frequently in simple Keynesian models:[3]

where is the autonomous consumption that is independent of disposable income; in other words, consumption when income is zero. The term is the induced consumption that is influenced by the economy's income level. The parameter is known as the marginal propensity to consume, i.e. the increase in consumption due to an incremental increase in disposable income, since . Geometrically, is the slope of the consumption function. One of the key assumptions of Keynesian economics is that this parameter is positive but smaller than one, i.e. .[4]

Criticism of the simplicity and irreality of this assumption lead to the development of Milton Friedman's permanent income hypothesis, and Richard Brumberg and Franco Modigliani's life-cycle hypothesis. But none of them developed a definitive consumption function. Friedman, although he got the Nobel prize for his book A Theory of the Consumption Function (1957), presented several different definitions of the permanent income in his approach, making it impossible to develop a more sophisticated function. Modigliani and Brumberg tried to develop a better consumption function using the income got in the whole life of consumers, but them and their followers ended in a formulation lacking economic theory and therefore full of proxies that do not account for the complex changes of today's economic systems.

Until recently, the three main existing theories, based on the income dependent Consumption Expenditure Function pointed by Keynes in 1936, were Duesenberry's (1949) relative consumption expenditure,[5] Modigliani and Brumberg's (1954) life-cycle income, and Friedman's (1957) permanent income.[6]

Some new theoretical works are based, following Duesenberry's one, on behavioral economics and suggest that a number of behavioural principles can be taken as microeconomic foundations for a behaviorally-based aggregate consumption function.[7]

See also

Notes

  1. Lindauer, John (1976). Macroeconomics (Third ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 40–43. ISBN 0-471-53572-9.
  2. Hall, Robert E.; Taylor, John B. (1986). "Consumption and Income". Macroeconomics: Theory, Performance, and Policy. New York: W. W. Norton. pp. 63–67. ISBN 0-393-95398-X.
  3. Colander, David (1986). Macroeconomics: Theory and Policy. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Co. pp. 94–97. ISBN 0-673-16648-1.
  4. Keynes, John M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. p. 96. The fundamental psychological law ... is that men [and women] are disposed, as a rule and on average, to increase their consumption as their income increases, but not as much as the increase in their income.
  5. Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior.
  6. Friedman, M. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function.
  7. d’Orlando, F.; Sanfilippo, E. (2010). "Behavioral foundations for the Keynesian consumption function". Journal of Economic Psychology. 31 (6): 1035. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.004.

Further reading

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/9/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.