Clinical psychology

Clinical psychology is an integration of science, theory and clinical knowledge for the purpose of understanding, preventing, and relieving psychologically based distress or dysfunction and to promote subjective well-being and personal development.[1][2] Central to its practice are psychological assessment and psychotherapy, although clinical psychologists also engage in research, teaching, consultation, forensic testimony, and program development and administration.[3] In many countries, clinical psychology is a regulated mental health profession.

The field is often considered to have begun in 1896 with the opening of the first psychological clinic at the University of Pennsylvania by Lightner Witmer. In the first half of the 20th century, clinical psychology was focused on psychological assessment, with little attention given to treatment. This changed after the 1940s when World War II resulted in the need for a large increase in the number of trained clinicians. Since that time, three main educational models have developed—the Ph.D. Clinical Science model (heavily focused on research),[4] the Ph.D. science-practitioner model (focusing on research), and the Psy.D. practitioner-scholar model (focusing on clinical practice). Clinical psychologists are now considered experts in providing psychotherapy, and generally train within four primary theoretical orientations—psychodynamic, humanistic, behavior therapy/ cognitive behavioral, and systems or family therapy.


Many 18th c. treatments for psychological distress were based on pseudo-scientific ideas, such as Phrenology.

Although modern, scientific psychology is often dated at the 1879 opening of the first psychological laboratory by Wilhelm Wundt, attempts to create methods for assessing and treating mental distress existed long before. The earliest recorded approaches were a combination of religious, magical and/or medical perspectives.[5] Early examples of such physicians included Patañjali, Padmasambhava,[6] Rhazes, Avicenna,[7] and Rumi.[8]

In the early 19th century, one could have his or her head examined, literally, using phrenology, the study of personality by the shape of the skull. Other popular treatments included physiognomy—the study of the shape of the face—and mesmerism, Mesmer's treatment by the use of magnets. Spiritualism and Phineas Quimby's "mental healing" were also popular.[9]

While the scientific community eventually came to reject all of these methods, academic psychologists also were not concerned with serious forms of mental illness. That area was already being addressed by the developing fields of psychiatry and neurology within the asylum movement.[5] It was not until the end of the 19th century, around the time when Sigmund Freud was first developing his "talking cure" in Vienna, that the first scientifically clinical application of psychology began.

Early clinical psychology

By the second half of the 1800s, the scientific study of psychology was becoming well established in university laboratories. Although there were a few scattered voices calling for an applied psychology, the general field looked down upon this idea and insisted on "pure" science as the only respectable practice.[5] This changed when Lightner Witmer (1867–1956), a past student of Wundt and head of the psychology department at the University of Pennsylvania, agreed to treat a young boy who had trouble with spelling. His successful treatment was soon to lead to Witmer's opening of the first psychological clinic at Penn in 1896, dedicated to helping children with learning disabilities.[10] Ten years later in 1907, Witmer was to found the first journal of this new field, The Psychological Clinic, where he coined the term "clinical psychology", defined as "the study of individuals, by observation or experimentation, with the intention of promoting change".[11] The field was slow to follow Witmer's example, but by 1914, there were 26 similar clinics in the U.S.[12]

Even as clinical psychology was growing, working with issues of serious mental distress remained the domain of psychiatrists and neurologists.[13] However, clinical psychologists continued to make inroads into this area due to their increasing skill at psychological assessment. Psychologists' reputation as assessment experts became solidified during World War I with the development of two intelligence tests, Army Alpha and Army Beta (testing verbal and nonverbal skills, respectively), which could be used with large groups of recruits.[9][10] Due in large part to the success of these tests, assessment was to become the core discipline of clinical psychology for the next quarter century, when another war would propel the field into treatment.

Early professional organizations

The field began to organize under the name "clinical psychology" in 1917 with the founding of the American Association of Clinical Psychology. This only lasted until 1919, after which the American Psychological Association (founded by G. Stanley Hall in 1892) developed a section on Clinical Psychology, which offered certification until 1927.[12] Growth in the field was slow for the next few years when various unconnected psychological organizations came together as the American Association of Applied Psychology in 1930, which would act as the primary forum for psychologists until after World War II when the APA reorganized.[14] In 1945, the APA created what is now called Division 12, its division of clinical psychology, which remains a leading organization in the field. Psychological societies and associations in other English-speaking countries developed similar divisions, including in Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

World War II and the integration of treatment

The U.S. army conducts a psychological test developed by clinical psychologists for selection purposes.

When World War II broke out, the military once again called upon clinical psychologists. As soldiers began to return from combat, psychologists started to notice symptoms of psychological trauma labeled "shell shock" (eventually to be termed posttraumatic stress disorder) that were best treated as soon as possible.[10] Because physicians (including psychiatrists) were over-extended in treating bodily injuries, psychologists were called to help treat this condition.[15] At the same time, female psychologists (who were excluded from the war effort) formed the National Council of Women Psychologists with the purpose of helping communities deal with the stresses of war and giving young mothers advice on child rearing.[11] After the war, the Veterans Administration in the U.S. made an enormous investment to set up programs to train doctoral-level clinical psychologists to help treat the thousands of veterans needing care. As a consequence, the U.S. went from having no formal university programs in clinical psychology in 1946 to over half of all Ph.D.s in psychology in 1950 being awarded in clinical psychology.[11]

WWII helped bring dramatic changes to clinical psychology, not just in America but internationally as well. Graduate education in psychology began adding psychotherapy to the science and research focus based on the 1947 scientist-practitioner model, known today as the Boulder Model, for Ph.D. programs in clinical psychology.[16] Clinical psychology in Britain developed much like in the U.S. after WWII, specifically within the context of the National Health Service[17] with qualifications, standards, and salaries managed by the British Psychological Society.[18]

Development of the Doctor of Psychology degree

By the 1960s, psychotherapy had become imbedded within clinical psychology, but for many the Ph.D. educational model did not offer the necessary training for those interested in practice rather than research. There was a growing argument that said the field of psychology in the U.S. had developed to a degree warranting explicit training in clinical practice. The concept of a practice-oriented degree was debated in 1965 and narrowly gained approval for a pilot program at the University of Illinois starting in 1968.[19] Several other similar programs were instituted soon after, and in 1973, at the Vail Conference on Professional Training in Psychology, the practitioner–scholar model of clinical psychology—or Vail Model—resulting in the Doctor of Psychology (Psy.D.) degree was recognized.[20] Although training would continue to include research skills and a scientific understanding of psychology, the intent would be to produce highly trained professionals, similar to programs in medicine, dentistry, and law. The first program explicitly based on the Psy.D. model was instituted at Rutgers University.[19] Today, about half of all American graduate students in clinical psychology are enrolled in Psy.D. programs.[20]

A changing profession

Since the 1970s, clinical psychology has continued growing into a robust profession and academic field of study. Although the exact number of practicing clinical psychologists is unknown, it is estimated that between 1974 and 1990, the number in the U.S. grew from 20,000 to 63,000.[21] Clinical psychologists continue to be experts in assessment and psychotherapy while expanding their focus to address issues of gerontology, sports, and the criminal justice system to name a few. One important field is health psychology, the fastest-growing employment setting for clinical psychologists in the past decade.[9] Other major changes include the impact of managed care on mental health care; an increasing realization of the importance of knowledge relating to multicultural and diverse populations; and emerging privileges to prescribe psychotropic medication.

Professional practice

Clinical psychologists can offer a range of professional services, including:[11]

In practice, clinical psychologists may work with individuals, couples, families, or groups in a variety of settings, including private practices, hospitals, mental health organizations, schools, businesses, and non-profit agencies. Most clinical psychologists who engage in research and teaching do so within a college or university setting. Clinical psychologists may also choose to specialize in a particular field—common areas of specialization, some of which can earn board certification,[22] include:

Training and certification to practice

The University of Pennsylvania was the first to offer formal education in clinical psychology.

Clinical psychologists study a generalist program in psychology plus postgraduate training and/or clinical placement and supervision. The length of training differs across the world, ranging from four years plus post-Bachelors supervised practice[23] to a doctorate of three to six years which combines clinical placement.[24] In the USA, about half of all clinical psychology graduate students are being trained in Ph.D. programs—a model that emphasizes research—with the other half in Psy.D. programs, which has more focus on practice (similar to professional degrees for medicine and law).[20] Both models are accredited by the American Psychological Association[25] and many other English-speaking psychological societies. A smaller number of schools offer accredited programs in clinical psychology resulting in a Masters degree, which usually take two to three years post-Bachelors.

In the U.K., clinical psychologists undertake a Doctor of Clinical Psychology (D.Clin.Psych.), which is a practitioner doctorate with both clinical and research components. This is a three-year full-time salaried program sponsored by the National Health Service (NHS) and based in universities and the NHS. Entry into these programs is highly competitive, and requires at least a three-year undergraduate degree in psychology plus some form of experience, usually in either the NHS as an Assistant Psychologist or in academia as a Research Assistant. It is not unusual for applicants to apply several times before being accepted onto a training course as only about one-fifth of applicants are accepted each year.[26] These clinical psychology doctoral degrees are accredited by the British Psychological Society and the Health Professions Council (HPC). The HPC is the statutory regulator for practitioner psychologists in the UK. Those who successfully complete clinical psychology doctoral degrees are eligible to apply for registration with the HPC as a clinical psychologist.

The practice of clinical psychology requires a license in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and many other countries. Although each of the U.S. states is somewhat different in terms of requirements and licenses, there are three common elements:[27]

  1. Graduation from an accredited school with the appropriate degree
  2. Completion of supervised clinical experience or internship
  3. Passing a written examination and, in some states, an oral examination

All U.S. state and Canadian province licensing boards are members of the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB) which created and maintains the Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology (EPPP). Many states require other examinations in addition to the EPPP, such as a jurisprudence (i.e. mental health law) examination and/or an oral examination.[27] Most states also require a certain number of continuing education credits per year in order to renew a license, which can be obtained though various means, such as taking audited classes and attending approved workshops. Clinical psychologists require the Psychologist license to practice, although licenses can be obtained with a masters-level degree, such as Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), and Licensed Psychological Associate (LPA).[28]

In the U.K. registration as a clinical psychologist with the Health Professions Council (HPC) is necessary. The HPC is the statutory regulator for practitioner psychologists in the U.K. In the U.K. the following titles are restricted by law "registered psychologist" and "practitioner psychologist"; in addition the specialist title "clinical psychologist" is also restricted by law.


Published by the American Psychiatric Association, the DSM-IV-TR provides a common language and standard criteria for the classification of mental disorders.

An important area of expertise for many clinical psychologists is psychological assessment, and there are indications that as many as 91% of psychologists engage in this core clinical practice.[29] Such evaluation is usually done in service to gaining insight into and forming hypotheses about psychological or behavioral problems. As such, the results of such assessments are usually used to create generalized impressions (rather than diagnoses) in service to informing treatment planning. Methods include formal testing measures, interviews, reviewing past records, clinical observation, and physical examination.[2]

There exist literally hundreds of various assessment tools, although only a few have been shown to have both high validity (i.e., test actually measures what it claims to measure) and reliability (i.e., consistency). These measures generally fall within one of several categories, including the following:

Diagnostic impressions

See also: Mental disorder

After assessment, clinical psychologists often provide a diagnostic impression. Many countries use the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) while the U.S. most often uses the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (the DSM version IV-TR). Both assume medical concepts and terms, and state that there are categorical disorders that can be diagnosed by set lists of descriptive criteria.[30]

Several new models are being discussed, including a "dimensional model" based on empirically validated models of human differences (such as the five factor model of personality[30][31]) and a "psychosocial model", which would take changing, intersubjective states into greater account.[32] The proponents of these models claim that they would offer greater diagnostic flexibility and clinical utility without depending on the medical concept of illness. However, they also admit that these models are not yet robust enough to gain widespread use, and should continue to be developed.

Some clinical psychologists do not tend to diagnose, but rather use formulation—an individualized map of the difficulties that the patient or client faces, encompassing predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating (maintaining) factors.[33]

Clinical theories and interventions

Main article: Psychotherapy

Psychotherapy involves a formal relationship between professional and client—usually an individual, couple, family, or small group—that employs a set of procedures intended to form a therapeutic alliance, explore the nature of psychological problems, and encourage new ways of thinking, feeling, or behaving.[2][34]

Clinicians have a wide range of individual interventions to draw from, often guided by their training—for example, a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) clinician might use worksheets to record distressing cognitions, a psychoanalyst might encourage free association, while a psychologist trained in Gestalt techniques might focus on immediate interactions between client and therapist. Clinical psychologists generally seek to base their work on research evidence and outcome studies as well as on trained clinical judgment. Although there are literally dozens of recognized therapeutic orientations, their differences can often be categorized on two dimensions: insight vs. action and in-session vs. out-session.[11]

The methods used are also different in regards to the population being served as well as the context and nature of the problem. Therapy will look very different between, say, a traumatized child, a depressed but high-functioning adult, a group of people recovering from substance dependence, and a ward of the state suffering from terrifying delusions. Other elements that play a critical role in the process of psychotherapy include the environment, culture, age, cognitive functioning, motivation, and duration (i.e. brief or long-term therapy).[34][35]

Four main schools

The field is dominated in terms of training and practice by essentially four major schools of practice: psychodynamic, humanistic, behavioral/cognitive behavioral, and systems or family therapy.[2]


The psychodynamic perspective developed out of the psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud. The core object of psychoanalysis is to make the unconscious conscious—to make the client aware of his or her own primal drives (namely those relating to sex and aggression) and the various defenses used to keep them in check.[34] The essential tools of the psychoanalytic process are the use of free association and an examination of the client's transference towards the therapist, defined as the tendency to take unconscious thoughts or emotions about a significant person (e.g. a parent) and "transfer" them onto another person. Major variations on Freudian psychoanalysis practiced today include self psychology, ego psychology, and object relations theory. These general orientations now fall under the umbrella term psychodynamic psychology, with common themes including examination of transference and defenses, an appreciation of the power of the unconscious, and a focus on how early developments in childhood have shaped the client's current psychological state.[34]


Main article: Humanistic psychology

Humanistic psychology was developed in the 1950s in reaction to both behaviorism and psychoanalysis, largely due to the person-centered therapy of Carl Rogers (often referred to as Rogerian Therapy) and existential psychology developed by Viktor Frankl and Rollo May.[2] Rogers believed that a client needed only three things from a clinician to experience therapeutic improvement—congruence, unconditional positive regard, and empathetic understanding.[36] By using phenomenology, intersubjectivity and first-person categories, the humanistic approach seeks to get a glimpse of the whole person and not just the fragmented parts of the personality.[37] This aspect of holism links up with another common aim of humanistic practice in clinical psychology, which is to seek an integration of the whole person, also called self-actualization. From 1980, Hans-Werner Gessmann integrated the ideas of humanistic psychology into group psychotherapy as humanistic psychodrama. [38] According to humanistic thinking,[39] each individual person already has inbuilt potentials and resources that might help them to build a stronger personality and self-concept. The mission of the humanistic psychologist is to help the individual employ these resources via the therapeutic relationship.

Behavioral and cognitive behavioral

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) developed from the combination of cognitive therapy and rational emotive behavior therapy, both of which grew out of cognitive psychology and behaviorism. CBT is based on the theory that how we think (cognition), how we feel (emotion), and how we act (behavior) are related and interact together in complex ways. In this perspective, certain dysfunctional ways of interpreting and appraising the world (often through schemas or beliefs) can contribute to emotional distress or result in behavioral problems. The object of many cognitive behavioral therapies is to discover and identify the biased, dysfunctional ways of relating or reacting and through different methodologies help clients transcend these in ways that will lead to increased well-being.[40] There are many techniques used, such as systematic desensitization, socratic questioning, and keeping a cognition observation log. Modified approaches that fall into the category of CBT have also developed, including dialectic behavior therapy and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.[41]

Behavior therapy is a rich tradition. It is well researched with a strong evidence base. Its roots are in behaviorism. In behavior therapy, environmental events predict the way we think and feel. Our behavior sets up conditions for the environment to feedback back on it. Sometimes the feedback leads the behavior to increase- reinforcement and sometimes the behavior descreases- punishment. Oftentimes behavior therapists are called applied behavior analysis. They have studied many areas from developmental disabilities to depression and anxiety disorders. In the area of mental health and addictions a recent article looked at APA's list for well established and promising practices and found a considerable number of them based on the principles of operant and respondent conditioning.[42] Multiple assessment techniques have come from this approach including functional analysis (psychology), which has found a strong focus in the school system. In addition, multiple intervention programs have come from this tradition including community reinforcement approach for treating addictions, acceptance and commitment therapy, functional analytic psychotherapy, including dialectic behavior therapy and behavioral activation. In addition, specific techniques such as contingency management and exposure therapy have come from this tradition.

Systems or family therapy

Main article: Family therapy

Systems or family therapy works with couples and families, and emphasizes family relationships as an important factor in psychological health. The central focus tends to be on interpersonal dynamics, especially in terms of how change in one person will affect the entire system.[43] Therapy is therefore conducted with as many significant members of the "system" as possible. Goals can include improving communication, establishing healthy roles, creating alternative narratives, and addressing problematic behaviors. Contributors include John Gottman, Jay Haley, Sue Johnson, and Virginia Satir.

Other major therapeutic orientations

There exist dozens of recognized schools or orientations of psychotherapy—the list below represents a few influential orientations not given above. Although they all have some typical set of techniques practitioners employ, they are generally better known for providing a framework of theory and philosophy that guides a therapist in his or her working with a client.

One influential therapy that came out of Existential therapy is Gestalt therapy, primarily founded by Fritz Perls in the 1950s. It is well known for techniques designed to increase various kinds of self-awareness—the best-known perhaps being the "empty chair technique"—which are generally intended to explore resistance to "authentic contact", resolve internal conflicts, and help the client complete "unfinished business".[45]

Other perspectives


In the last couple of decades, there has been a growing movement to integrate the various therapeutic approaches, especially with an increased understanding of cultural, gender, spiritual, and sexual-orientation issues. Clinical psychologists are beginning to look at the various strengths and weaknesses of each orientation while also working with related fields, such as neuroscience, genetics, evolutionary biology, and psychopharmacology. The result is a growing practice of eclecticism, with psychologists learning various systems and the most efficacious methods of therapy with the intent to provide the best solution for any given problem.[56]

Professional ethics

The field of clinical psychology in most countries is strongly regulated by a code of ethics. In the U.S., professional ethics are largely defined by the APA Code of Conduct, which is often used by states to define licensing requirements. The APA Code generally sets a higher standard than that which is required by law as it is designed to guide responsible behavior, the protection of clients, and the improvement of individuals, organizations, and society.[57] The Code is applicable to all psychologists in both research and applied fields.

The APA Code is based on five principles: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence, Fidelity and Responsibility, Integrity, Justice, and Respect for People's Rights and Dignity.[57] Detailed elements address how to resolve ethical issues, competence, human relations, privacy and confidentiality, advertising, record keeping, fees, training, research, publication, assessment, and therapy.

Comparison with other mental health professions


Fluoxetine hydrochloride, branded by Lilly as Prozac, is a common antidepressant drug prescribed by psychiatrists. There is a small but growing movement to give prescription privileges to qualified psychologists.

Although clinical psychologists and psychiatrists can be said to share a same fundamental aim—the alleviation of mental distress—their training, outlook, and methodologies are often quite different. Perhaps the most significant difference is that psychiatrists are licensed physicians. As such, psychiatrists often use the medical model to assess psychological problems (i.e., those they treat are seen as patients with an illness) and rely on psychotropic medications as the chief method of addressing the illness[58]—although many also employ psychotherapy as well. Psychiatrists and medical psychologists (who are clinical psychologists that are also licensed to prescribe) are able to conduct physical examinations, order and interpret laboratory tests and EEGs, and may order brain imaging studies such as CT or CAT, MRI, and PET scanning.

Clinical psychologists generally do not prescribe medication, although there is a growing movement for psychologists to have prescribing privileges.[59] These medical privileges require additional training and education. To date, medical psychologists may prescribe psychotropic medications in Guam, New Mexico, and Louisiana and military psychologists.[60]

Counseling psychology

Comparison of mental health professionals in USA
Occupation Degree Common Licenses Prescription Privilege Ave. 2004
Income (USD)
Clinical Psychologist PhD/PsyD Psychologist Mostly no $75,000
Counseling Psychologist (Doctorate) PhD MFT/LPC No $65,000
Counseling Psychologist (Master's) MA/MS/MC MFT/LPC/LPA No $49,000
School Psychologist PhD, EdD Psychologist No $78,000
Psychiatrist MD/DO Psychiatrist Yes $145,600
Clinical Social Worker PhD/MSW LCSW No $36,170
Psychiatric Nurse PhD/MSN/BSN APRN/PMHN No $53,450
Psychiatric and mental health Nurse Practitioner DNP/MSN MHNP Yes (Varies by state) $75,711
Expressive/Art Therapist MA ATR No $45,000
Sources: [61][62][63][64][65][66]

Counseling psychologists study and use many of the same interventions and tools as clinical psychologists, including psychotherapy and assessment. Traditionally, counseling psychologists help people with what might be considered normal or moderate psychological problems—such as the feelings of anxiety or sadness resulting from major life changes or events.[3][11] Many counseling psychologists also receive specialized training in career assessment, group therapy, and relationship counseling, although some counseling psychologists also work with the more serious problems that clinical psychologists are trained for, such as dementia or psychosis.

There are fewer counseling psychology graduate programs than those for clinical psychology and they are more often housed in departments of education rather than psychology. The two professions can be found working in all the same settings but counseling psychologists are more frequently employed in university counseling centers compared to hospitals and private practice for clinical psychologists.[67] There is considerable overlap between the two fields and distinctions between them continue to fade.

School psychology

School psychologists are primarily concerned with the academic, social, and emotional well-being of children and adolescents within a scholastic environment. In the U.K., they are known as "educational psychologists". Like clinical (and counseling) psychologists, school psychologists with doctoral degrees are eligible for licensure as health service psychologists, and many work in private practice. Unlike clinical psychologists, they receive much more training in education, child development and behavior, and the psychology of learning. Common degrees include the Educational Specialist Degree (Ed.S.), Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), and Doctor of Education (Ed.D.).

Traditional job roles for school psychologists employed in school settings have focused mainly on assessment of students to determine their eligibility for special education services in schools, and on consultation with teachers and other school professionals to design and carry out interventions on behalf of students. Other major roles also include offering individual and group therapy with children and their families, designing prevention programs (e.g. for reducing dropout), evaluating school programs, and working with teachers and administrators to help maximize teaching efficacy, both in the classroom and systemically.[68][69]

Clinical social work

Social workers provide a variety of services, generally concerned with social problems, their causes, and their solutions. With specific training, clinical social workers may also provide psychological counseling (in the U.S. and Canada), in addition to more traditional social work. The Masters in Social Work in the U.S. is a two-year, sixty credit program that includes at least a one-year practicum (two years for clinicians).[70]

Occupational therapy

Occupational therapy—often abbreviated OT—is the "use of productive or creative activity in the treatment or rehabilitation of physically, cognitively, or emotionally disabled people."[71] Most commonly, occupational therapists work with people with disabilities to enable them to maximize their skills and abilities. Occupational therapy practitioners are skilled professionals whose education includes the study of human growth and development with specific emphasis on the physical, emotional, psychological, sociocultural, cognitive and environmental components of illness and injury. They commonly work alongside clinical psychologists in settings such as inpatient and outpatient mental health, pain management clinics, eating disorder clinics, and child development services. OT's use support groups, individual counseling sessions, and activity-based approaches to address psychiatric symptoms and maximize functioning in life activities.

Criticisms and controversies

Clinical psychology is a diverse field and there have been recurring tensions over the degree to which clinical practice should be limited to treatments supported by empirical research.[72] Despite some evidence showing that all the major therapeutic orientations are about of equal effectiveness,[73][74] there remains much debate about the efficacy of various forms treatment in use in clinical psychology.[75]

It has been reported that clinical psychology has rarely allied itself with client groups and tends to individualize problems to the neglect of wider economic, political and social inequality issues that may not be the responsibility of the client.[72] It has been argued that therapeutic practices are inevitably bound up with power inequalities, which can be used for good and bad.[76] A critical psychology movement has argued that clinical psychology, and other professions making up a "psy complex", often fail to consider or address inequalities and power differences and can play a part in the social and moral control of disadvantage, deviance and unrest.[77][78]

An October 2009 editorial in the journal Nature suggests that a large number of clinical psychology practitioners in the United States consider scientific evidence to be "less important than their personal – that is, subjective – clinical experience."[79]

Clinical psychology journals

Cover of The Psychological Clinic, the first journal of clinical psychology, published in 1907 by Lightner Witmer

The following represents an (incomplete) listing of significant journals in or related to the field of clinical psychology.

See also: a list of empirical journals published by the APA

Major influences

See also


  1. American Psychological Association, Division 12, About Clinical Psychology
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Plante, Thomas. (2005). Contemporary Clinical Psychology. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-47276-X
  3. 1 2 Brain, Christine. (2002). Advanced psychology: applications, issues and perspectives. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes. ISBN 0-17-490058-9
  4. McFall, Richard M. (2006). "Doctoral Training in Clinical Psychology". Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2 (1): 21–49. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095245. ISSN 1548-5943.
  5. 1 2 3 Benjamin, Ludy (2007). A Brief History of Modern Psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-3206-0.
  6. T. Clifford and Samuel Wiser (1984), Tibetan buddhist medicine and psychiatry
  7. Afzal Iqbal and A. J. Arberry, The Life and Work of Jalaluddin Rumi, p. 94.
  8. Rumi (1995) cited in Zokav (2001), p. 47.
  9. 1 2 3 Benjamin, Ludy (2005). "A history of clinical psychology as a profession in America (and a glimpse at its future)". Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 1: 1–30. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143758. PMID 17716080.
  10. 1 2 3 Alessandri, M., Heiden, L., & Dunbar-Welter, M. (1995). "History and Overview" in Heiden, Lynda & Hersen, Michel (eds.), Introduction to Clinical Psychology. New York: Plenum Press. ISBN 0-306-44877-7
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Compas, Bruce & Gotlib, Ian. (2002). Introduction to Clinical Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN 0-07-012491-4
  12. 1 2 Evans, Rand. (1999). Clinical psychology born and raised in controversy. APA Monitor, 30(11).
  13. Routh, Donald (1994). Clinical psychology since 1917: Science, practice, and organization. New York: Plenum Press. ISBN 0-306-44452-6.
  14. American Psychological Association (1999). "APA: Uniting psychologists for more than 100 years". APA Monitor Online. Vol. 30 no. 11. Archived from the original on October 21, 2000.
  15. Reisman, John (1991). A History of Clinical Psychology. UK: Taylor Francis. ISBN 1-56032-188-1.
  16. Routh, Donald (2000). "Clinical Psychology Training: A History of Ideas and Practices Prior to 1946". American Psychologist. 55 (2): 236. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.236. PMID 10717971.
  17. Hall, John & Llewelyn, Susan (2006). What is Clinical Psychology? (4th ed.). UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-856689-1.
  18. Henry, David (1959). "Clinical psychology abroad". American Psychologist. 14 (9): 601–604. doi:10.1037/h0038711.
  19. 1 2 Murray, Bridget (2000). "The degree that almost wasn't: The PsyD comes of age". Monitor on Psychology. Vol. 31 no. 1. Archived from the original on October 8, 2010.
  20. 1 2 3 Norcross, J. & Castle, P. (2002). "Appreciating the Psy.D: The Facts". Eye on Psi Chi. Vol. 7 no. 1. pp. 22–26.
  21. Menninger, Roy & Nemiah, John (2000). American psychiatry after World War II: 1944-1994. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press. ISBN 0-88048-866-2.
  22. American Board of Professional Psychology, Specialty Certification in Professional Psychology
  23. Pathways to register as a psychologist including clinical psychologist in Australia Archived August 19, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
  24. APA: About clinical psychology
  25. APA. (2005). Guidelines and Principles for Accreditation of Programs in Professional Psychology: Quick Reference Guide to Doctoral Programs.
  26. Cheshire, K. & Pilgrim, D. (2004). A short introduction to clinical psychology. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN 0-7619-4768-X
  27. 1 2 "Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards". Retrieved 2007-02-17.
  28. "Professional Disciplines". Retrieved 2008-12-01.
  29. 1 2 3 Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of Psychological Assessment, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-41979-6
  30. 1 2 Jablensky, Assen (2005). "Categories, dimensions and prototypes: Critical issues for psychiatric classification". Psychopathology. 38 (4): 201. doi:10.1159/000086092. PMID 16145275.
  31. Widiger, Thomas & Trull, Timothy (2007). "Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model". American Psychologist. 62 (2): 71–83. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71. PMID 17324033.
  32. Mundt, Christoph & Backenstrass, Matthias (2005). "Psychotherapy and classification: Psychological, psychodynamic, and cognitive aspects". Psychopathology. 38 (4): 219. doi:10.1159/000086096. PMID 16145279.
  33. Kinderman, P. & Lobban, F. (2000). "Evolving formulations: Sharing complex information with clients". Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 28 (3): 307–310. doi:10.1017/S1352465800003118.
  34. 1 2 3 4 Gabbard, Glen. (2005). Psychodynamic Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 4th Ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press. ISBN 1-58562-185-4
  35. 1 2 La Roche, Martin (2005). "The cultural context and the psychotherapeutic process: Toward a culturally sensitive psychotherapy". Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. 15 (2): 169–185. doi:10.1037/1053-0479.15.2.169.
  36. McMillan, Michael (2004). The Person-Centred Approach to Therapeutic Change. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. ISBN 0-7619-4868-6.
  37. Rowan, John (2001). Ordinary Ecstasy: The Dialectics of Humanistic Psychology. London, UK: Brunner-Routledge. ISBN 0-415-23633-9.
  38. Gessmann, Hans-Werner (2013;2), Humanistische Psychologie und Humanistisches Psychodrama. In: Humanistisches Psychodama Band 4, Verlag des PIB Duisburg, pp. 27–84.
  39. Schneider, K.; Bugental, J. & Pierson, J. (2001). The handbook of humanistic psychology: leading edges in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN 978-0-7619-2121-9.
  40. Beck, A.; Davis, D.; Freeman, A. (2007). Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-59385-476-8.
  41. Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (2006). "What is CBT?". Retrieved 2007-03-04. Albert Ellis is often referred as the "grandfather" of CBT for his influential work in this field.
  42. O'Donohue W, Ferguson KE (2006). "Evidence-based practice in psychology and behavior analysis" (PDF). Behav Analyst Today. 7 (3): 335–50.
  43. Bitter, J. & Corey, G. (2001). "Family Systems Therapy". In Gerald Corey. Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Belmost, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  44. Van Deurzen, Emmy. (2002). Existential Counseling & Psychotherapy in Practice. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. ISBN 0-7619-6223-9
  45. Woldt, Ansel and Toman, Sarah. (2005). Gestalt Therapy: History, Theory, and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications. ISBN 0-7619-2791-3
  46. Slife, B., Barlow, S. and Williams, R. (2001). Critical issues in psychotherapy: translating new ideas into practice. London: SAGE. ISBN 0-7619-2080-3
  47. Blatner, Adam. (1997). The Implications of Postmodernism for Psychotherapy. Individual Psychology, 53(4), 476-482.
  48. Boorstein, Seymour. (1996). Transpersonal Psychotherapy. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-2835-4
  49. Young, Mark (2005). "Helping Someone Who is Different". Learning the Art of Helping (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. ISBN 0-13-111753-X.
  50. Price, Michael (2008). "Culture matters: Accounting for clients' backgrounds and values makes for better treatment". Monitor on Psychology. Vol. 39 no. 7. pp. 52–53.
  51. Hill, Marcia & Ballou, Mary (2005). The foundation and future of feminist therapy. New York: Haworth Press. ISBN 0-7890-0201-9.
  52. Seligman, Martin & Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2000). "Positive psychology: An introduction". American Psychologist. 55 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5. PMID 11392865.
  53. Snyder, C. & Lopez, S. (2001). Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-513533-4.
  54. Linley, Alex; et al. (2006). "Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future" (PDF). The Journal of Positive Psychology. 1 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1080/17439760500372796.
  55. Seligman, M.; Rashid, T. & Parks, A. (2006). "Positive Psychotherapy.". American Psychologist. 61 (8): 774–788. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.774. PMID 17115810.
  56. Norcross, John & Goldfried, Marvin (2005). "The Future of Psychotherapy Integration: A Roundtable". Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. 15 (4): 392.
  57. 1 2 APA. (2003). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved July 28, 2007.
  58. Graybar, S.; Leonard, L. (2005). "In Defense of Listening". American Journal of Psychotherapy. 59 (1): 1–19. PMID 15895765.
  59. Klusman, Lawrence (2001). "Prescribing Psychologists and Patients' Medical Needs; Lessons From Clinical Psychiatry". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 32 (5): 496. doi:10.1037//0735-7028.32.5.496.
  60. Halloway, Jennifer (2004). "Gaining prescriptive knowledge". Monitor on Psychology. Vol. 35 no. 6. p. 22.
  61. APA (2003). "Salaries in Psychology 2003: Report of the 2003 APA Salary Survey".
  62. NIH: Office of Science Education (2006). "Lifeworks: Psychiatrist".
  63. U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics (2004). "Occupational Outlook Handbook: Social Workers".
  64. U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics (2004). "Occupational Outlook Handbook: Registered Nurses".
  65. NIH: Office of Science Education (2006). "Advance News Magazines. (2005)" (PDF).
  66. "Lifeworks: Art Therapist". Retrieved 2007-02-17.
  67. Norcross, John (2000). "Clinical versus counseling psychology: What's the diff?". Eye on Psi Chi. 5 (1): 20–22.
  68. Silva, Arlene (2003). "Who Are School Psychologists?". National Association of School Psychologists.
  69. American Psychological Association. "Archival Description of School Psychology". American Psychological Association.
  71. "Occupational Therapy". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000. Archived from the original on 2008-12-08.
  72. 1 2 Pilgram, D. & Treacher, A. (1992). Clinical Psychology Observed. London & USA/Canada: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-04632-7.
  73. Leichsenring, Falk & Leibing, Eric (2003). "The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 160 (7): 1223–1233. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.7.1223. PMID 12832233.
  74. Reisner, Andrew (2005). "The common factors, empirically validated treatments, and recovery models of therapeutic change". The Psychological Record. 55 (3): 377–400.
  75. Lilienfeld, Scott; et al. (2014). Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1462517510.
  76. Kyuken, W. (1999). "Power and clinical psychology: a model for resolving power-related ethical dilemmas". Ethics Behav. 9 (1): 21–37. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0901_2. PMID 11657486.
  77. Smail, D. "Power, Responsibility and Freedom" (Internet Publication).
  78. International Society of Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurses (2001). "Response to Clinical Psychologists Prescribing Psychotropic Medications" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-03-03.
  79. "Psychology: a reality check". Nature 461 (Editorial): 847. 15 October 2009. doi:10.1038/461847a. Published online 14 October 2009.

External links

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Psychology
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/28/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.