Chilo partellus

Chilo partellus
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Crambidae
Genus: Chilo (moth)
Species: C. partellus
Binomial name
Chilo partellus
(Swinhoe, 1885)
Synonyms
  • Crambus partellus Swinhoe, 1885
  • Chilo partellus acutus Bhattacherjee, 1971
  • Chilo lutulentalis Tams, 1932
  • Chilo partellus coimbatorensis Bhattacherjee, 1971
  • Chilo partellus kanpurensis Bhattacherjee, 1971
  • Chilo kaanpurense Vári, Kroon & Krüger, 2002
  • Crambus zonellus Swinhoe, 1884

Chilo partellus, the spotted stalk borer, is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Swinhoe in 1885. It is found in India, Pakistan,[1] Ethiopia, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and on Mayotte.[2]

C. partellus is a pest that was introduced to Africa most likely from India in the early 20th century. After arriving in Africa, it has spread to nearly all countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and it is assumed that it is spreading to Western Africa. C. partellus is indigenous to Asia and became established in Eastern Africa in the early 1930s.[3]

C. partellus is one of the economically most damaging pests in Asia and Africa, attacking all parts of the plant except the roots.[4]

Habitat

C. partellus has rapidly spread over a wide geographical range and due to this expansion they have proven to be a very efficient colonizer and devastating pest wherever they may occur. In general, C. partellus occurs in low to mid latitudes (<1500) and warmer areas. However, they can now be found in higher elevations such as Ethiopia at 2088m.[5]

C. partellus is highly invasive and can full or partially displace other indigenous stemborer species such as Busseola fusca and Chilo orichalcociliellus. Factors such as temperature and humidity can have a significant impact on the survival and establishment of adult C. partellus in new ecological niches.[6]

Food

C. partellus is a generalist herbivore that feeds on several species of cultivated and wild plants.[7]

Appearance

Eggs: Are flat and oval and look creamy-white and are about 0.8mm in length.[8]

Larvae: Larvae of C. partellus resemble caterpillars and can be creamy-white to yellowish-brown in colour. These larvae also have four purple-brown longitudinal stripes and are usually found with characteristically dark-brown spots along the back, therefore giving off a spotted appearance. When the larvae of the spotted stalk borer are fully grown, they produce a conspicuous reddish-brown head. It has a plate on the dorsal surface of the thorax which is known as a prothoracic shield and is reddish-brown to dark-brown and shiny.[9]

Pupae: Can be up to 15 mm in length, slender and shiny. The pupae of C. partellus are light yellow-brown to dark red-brown in colour.[10]

Adults: Small moths in size with wing lengths ranging from 7–17 mm and a wingspan of 20–25 mm. The forewings of adults are brown-yellowish in colour with darker scale patterns forming longitudinal stripes. The hind wings of males are a pale straw colour and in females the hind wings are white.[11]

Similar species such as Chilo orichalcociliellus located in East Africa may be confused with Chilo partellus.

Reproduction and Life Cycle

Eggs are laid in batches of 10-80 eggs on the upperside and underside of leaf surfaces, usually close to the midrib. They hatch after 4–10 days.[12]

Younger larvae (caterpillars) will feed on the leaf whorl. Older larvae will tunnel into the stems, and it is within these tunnels that they feed and grow for about 2–3 weeks. When these larvae grow completely, they pupate and remain in the stem of the maize. After 1–2 weeks, the adults evolve from the pupae stage and emerge from the stem. They mate and lay eggs on other maize plants and continue to cause damage to the crop.[13]

In fact, during dry seasons, larvae may enter a state of diapause or a period suspended development for several months and will pupate once it the dry season is over and there is an onset of rain. Adults can emerge from pupae in the late afternoon or early evenings and are active at night. Adults will rest on plants during the day. The whole life cycle takes about 3–4 weeks, however it can vary due to factors such as temperature, humidity, and other factors. Five or more successive generations may develop in favourable conditions and in regions where there is warm temperatures, relative humidity, sufficient water and an abundance of host plants, C. partellus can reproduce and develop all year-round.[14][15]

Host Relationship

This pest causes US $334 million annual loss to sorghum alone in the semiarid tropics.[16]

C. partellus attacks several grass species which can be both cultivated and wild. Cultivated crop hosts include but are not limited to maize, sorghum, pearl millet, rice, and sugarcane. Wild hosts include elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum), reeds (Phragmites) and vossia (Vossia cuspidate).[17]

In nature, an insect locates a host plant through a sequence of behavioural and biological responses such as the following:

  1. Orientation and setting
  2. Feeding
  3. Metabolism of ingested food
  4. Growth
  5. Survival and fecundity
  6. Oviposition [18]

If one or more of these categories of insect responses are not met by the host plant, the plant would therefore be rendered as unsuitable or unfavourable for insect establishment. Therefore the extent of insect establishment depends on the interaction of insect responses such as those listed above to various plant characteristics.[19]

Numerous factors can possibly enhance the insect pest problem, this includes either manipulating the environment that are favorable for growth, reproduction and development of insects. Processes that could decrease the insect pest problem include unrestricted use of chemicals (insecticides) and imbalanced use of fertilizers.[20]

Infestation can start around 2 weeks after seedling emergence. The first symptom of damage is the presence of irregular shaped pinholes or shot holes caused by early instar larval feeding in the whorl. This can later convert to elongated lesions on the leaves. The infested plants exhibit a ragged and deteriorated appearance. The older larvae leave the whorl, break through and bore into the stem and reach the growing point. It is there that the larvae cut and cause the characteristic deadheart symptom.[21][22]

Therefore, the damage due to the pest includes leaf feeding and subsequent destruction, extensive tunnels in stems and maize cobs, disruption in the nutrient flow, and the resultant death of the plant due to the puncture of the growing point.[23]

Host Defences

Studies have shown that some host plants to C. partellus have developed defenses and therefore resistance to this pest. For example, some maize landraces have been shown to respond to early herbivory (e.g. egg deposition) by C. partellus by producing HIPVs which would attract parasitoids of C. partellus. It is assumed that this is an opportunity for the exploitation of this trait and can be used as management of this pest. However, this particular defensive technique requires further study for it have very little to no information available regarding other factors including host plant defenses on larval preference and development, C. partellus’s oviposition behaviour after HIPV production, etc. Also, host plants may have created a defense where leaf feeding by C. partellus may have induced secondary defense metabolites making plants unpalatable. Therefore this could represent another opportunity for the management of C. partellus.[24]

Pest Management and Biocontrol Methods

There are a few methods that could be used in order to reduce the pest population of C. partellus. Methods and processes include but are not limited to the following:

Detection methods Infestations by C. partellus can be detected by walking through crops looking for the characteristic physical appearance of a deteriorated host plant by the presence of deadhearts. Samples of infested stems can be cut open to find caterpillars and pupae, however it is a good idea to rear these until adulthood to be certain that they are C. partellus pests. Cultural practices Intercropping or mixing maize with non-host crops like cassava can reduce the population of C. partellus. Trap plants such as Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) may also be used. These plants draw the adult female away from the crop and more eggs are laid on the trap plant than on the host plant crop, and this leads to poor development of larvae. This method is also known as "push-pull". Also, marking sure to destroy all residue of infested maize to ensure the death of all larvae would decrease the chances of reinfestation.[25]

Biological control The use of two parasitic wasps (Cotesia flavipes) and (Xanthopimpla stemmator) can attack and subsequently kill C. partellus pests. These parasitic wasps can lay eggs into C. partellus (C. flavipes on adult and X. stemmator on the pupae) and upon hatching, these eggs feed internally into the pest. They then exit and spin cocoons. Therefore, management of habitats that conserve these parasitic wasps could also result in the decline of C. partellus populations.[26]


Chemical control Applications of granules or dusts to the leaf whorl early in crop growth could kill early larval instars. However this has limited effectiveness, especially once the larvae has bored into the stem. Also, studies indicate that nitrogen fertilizer can be applied as an integrated pest management tactic in control of C. partellus population development and infestation on maize crop.[27][28]

Human Impact

Climate change could be one of the possible reasons this pest is moving to higher altitudes and therefore increasing its geographic range. This is due to a study showing that temperature, relative humidity, and their interaction significantly affect the developmental time of C. partellus.[29]

A study found that the egg period was longer at lower temperatures in relation to higher temperatures for C. partellus, therefore there is a reduction in larval period with an increase in temperature due to increased metabolic activity and feeding. Also, the pupal period was shorter at higher temperatures and longer at lower temperatures, therefore higher temperatures have a significantly shorter egg to adult developmental period. Egg hatching was faster at higher relative humidity, therefore this study and its results imply that high relative humidity modifies to some extent the effect of temperature and contributes to the variation in the egg period of C. partellus. In addition, higher temperatures also indicated a reduction in the length of their life cycle, a reduced developmental time and an increase in developmental rates. Therefore the duration of adult longevity of this pest is inversely related to temperature.[30]

References

  1. "global Pyraloidea database". Globiz.pyraloidea.org. Archived from the original on 2014-10-06. Retrieved 2014-07-15.
  2. Afro Moths
  3. Mohamed, H. M., Khan, Z. R., Overholt, W. A., & Elizabeth, D. K. (2004). Behaviour and biology of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on maize and wild gramineous plants. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 24(04), 287-297
  4. Kamala, V., Sharma, H. C., Manohar Rao, D., Varaprasad, K. S., Bramel, P. J., & Chandra, S. (2012). Interactions of spotted stem borer Chilo partellus with wild relatives of sorghum. Plant Breeding, 131(4), 511-521.
  5. Tamiru, A., Getu, E., Jembere, B., & Bruce, T. (2012). Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the development and fecundity of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 102(01), 9-15.
  6. Tamiru, A., Getu, E., Jembere, B., & Bruce, T. (2012). Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the development and fecundity of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 102(01), 9-15.
  7. Mutyambai, D. M., Midega, C. A., Bruce, T. J., van den Berg, J., Pickett, J. A., & Khan, Z. R. (2014). Behaviour and biology of Chilo partellus on maize landraces. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 153(2), 170-181
  8. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  9. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  10. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  11. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  12. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  13. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  14. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  15. Tamiru, A., Getu, E., Jembere, B., & Bruce, T. (2012). Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the development and fecundity of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 102(01), 9-15.
  16. Sharma, H. C., Dhillon, M. K., Pampapathy, G., & Reddy, B. V. S. (2007). Inheritance of resistance to spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus, in sorghum, Sorghum bicolor. Euphytica, 156(1-2), 117-128
  17. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved keys.lucidcentral.org
  18. Mohamed, H. M., Khan, Z. R., Overholt, W. A., & Elizabeth, D. K. (2004). Behaviour and biology of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on maize and wild gramineous plants. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 24(04), 287-297
  19. Mohamed, H. M., Khan, Z. R., Overholt, W. A., & Elizabeth, D. K. (2004). Behaviour and biology of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on maize and wild gramineous plants. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 24(04), 287-297
  20. Arshad, M. J., Freed, S., Akbar, S., Akmal, M., & Gul, H. T. (2013). Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Maize and Its Impact on the Development of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pakistan Journal Of Zoology, 45(1), 141-147 (PDF)
  21. Kamala, V., Sharma, H. C., Manohar Rao, D., Varaprasad, K. S., Bramel, P. J., & Chandra, S. (2012). Interactions of spotted stem borer Chilo partellus with wild relatives of sorghum. Plant Breeding, 131(4), 511-521.
  22. Midega, C. A., Khan, Z. R., Pickett, J. A., & Nylin, S. (2011). Host plant selection behaviour of Chilo partellus and its implication for effectiveness of a trap crop. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 138(1), 40-47
  23. Tamiru, A., Getu, E., Jembere, B., & Bruce, T. (2012). Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the development and fecundity of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 102(01), 9-15.
  24. Mutyambai, D. M., Midega, C. A., Bruce, T. J., van den Berg, J., Pickett, J. A., & Khan, Z. R. (2014). Behaviour and biology of Chilo partellus on maize landraces. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 153(2), 170-181
  25. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from http://keys.lucidcentral.org
  26. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  27. Arshad, M. J., Freed, S., Akbar, S., Akmal, M., & Gul, H. T. (2013). Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Maize and Its Impact on the Development of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pakistan Journal Of Zoology, 45(1), 141-147 (PDF)
  28. BioNET-EAFRINET. (2011). Chilo partellus (Swinhoe, 1885) - Spotted Stemborer. Retrieved from keys.lucidcentral.org
  29. Tamiru, A., Getu, E., Jembere, B., & Bruce, T. (2012). Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the development and fecundity of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Bulletin of entomological research, 102(01), 9-15.
  30. Tamiru, A., Getu, E., Jembere, B., & Bruce, T. (2012). Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the development and fecundity of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Bulletin of entomological research, 102(01), 9-15.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/22/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.