British invasion of Manila

British Manila
Occupation by the British Empire


Map of the Spanish East Indies (19th century)
Capital Manila,
Bacolor, Pampanga (Spanish Philippine colonial government retains control outside of Manila and Cavite)
Languages Spanish and native languages.
Religion Roman Catholicism
Political structure Occupation by the British Empire
   1760-1820 George III
  1762-1764 Dawsonne Drake
Historical era Spanish colonisation
   Battle of Manila 6 October 1762
   Treaty of Paris 31 May 1764
Currency Spanish dollar
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Spanish East Indies
Spanish East Indies
Warning: Value not specified for "common_name"

The British invasion of Manila between 1762 and 1764 was an episode in Philippine colonial history when the British Empire occupied the Spanish colonial capital of Manila and the nearby principal port of Cavite.

The resistance from the provisional Spanish colonial government established by members of the Royal Audience of Manila and their Filipino allies prevented British forces from taking control of territory beyond the neighbouring towns of Manila and Cavite. The British occupation was ended as part of the peace settlement of the Seven Years' War.

Historical background

At the time, Britain and France were belligerents in what was later called the Seven Years' War. As the war progressed, the neutral Spanish government became concerned that the string of major French losses at the hands of the British were becoming a threat to Spanish interests. Britain first declared war against Spain on 4 January 1762, and on 18 January 1762 Spain issued their own declaration of war against Britain.[1] France successfully negotiated a treaty with Spain known as the Family Compact which was signed on 15 August 1761. By an ancillary secret convention, Spain became hurriedly committed to making preparations for war against Britain.[2]

On 6 January 1762, the British Cabinet led by the Prime Minister, the Earl of Bute, agreed to attack Havana in the West Indies, and approved Colonel William Draper's 'Scheme for taking Manila with some Troops, which are already in the East Indies' in the East.[3] Draper was commanding officer of the 79th Regiment of Foot, which was currently stationed in Madras, British India. On 21 January 1762 King George III signed the instructions to Draper to implement his Scheme, emphasising that by taking advantage of the 'existing war with Spain', Britain might be able to assure her post-war mercantile expansion.[2]:14

There was also the expectation that the commerce of Spain would suffer a 'crippling blow'. Upon arriving in India, Draper's brevet rank became brigadier general.[2]:12–15 A secret committee of the East India Company agreed to provide a civil governor for the administration of the Islands, and in July 1762 appointed Dawsonne Drake for the post.[4] Manila was one of the most important trading cities in Asia during this period and the Company wanted to extend its influence over the Archipelago.[2]:8

Offensive actions

Map of British Conquest of Manila in 1762.[5]

On 24 September 1762,[6] a British fleet of eight ships of the line, three frigates, and four store ships with a force of 6,839 regulars, sailors and marines, sailed into Manila Bay from Madras.[2]:9 The expedition, led by Brigadier-General William Draper and Rear-Admiral Samuel Cornish, captured Manila, "the greatest Spanish fortress in the western Pacific".[2]:1,7,endcover

The Spanish defeat was not really surprising. The former Governor-General of the Philippines, Pedro Manuel de Arandia, had died in 1759 and his replacement, Brigadier Francisco de la Torre had not arrived because of the British attack on Havana in Cuba. The Spanish Crown appointed the Mexican-born Archbishop of Manila Manuel Rojo del Rio y Vieyra as temporary Lieutenant Governor. In part, because the garrison was commanded by the Archbishop, instead of by a military expert, many mistakes were made by the Spanish forces.[2]:33

On 5 October 1762 (4 October local calendar), the night before the fall of the walled city of Manila, the Spanish military persuaded Rojo to summon a council of war. Several times the archbishop wished to capitulate, but was prevented. By very heavy battery fire that day, the British had successfully breached the walls of the bastion San Diego, dried up the ditch, dismounted the cannons of that bastion and the two adjoining bastions, San Andes and San Eugeno, set fire to parts of the town, and drove the Spanish forces from the walls. At dawn of 6 October, British forces attacked the breach and took the fortifications meeting with little resistance.[2]:48–51

During the siege, the Spanish military lost three officers, two sergeants, 50 troops of the line, and 30 civilians of the militia, besides many wounded. Among the natives there were 300 killed and 400 wounded. The besiegers suffered 147 killed and wounded,[7][8] of whom 16 were officers. The fleet fired upon the city more than 5,000 bombs, and more than 20,000 balls.[9]

Occupation of Manila

Once Manila fell to British troops, "the soldiers turned to pillage." "Rojo wrote that the sack actually lasted 30 hours or more, although he laid the blame on the domestics of the Spaniards, the Chinese and Filipinos, as much as upon the British soldiers."[2]:52–53 Writing in his journal, Archbishop-Governor Rojo described the events and said: "The city was given over the pillage, which was cruel and lasted for forty hours, without excepting the churches, the archbishopric, and a part of the palace. Although the captain-general (Simon de Anda y Salazar) objected at the end of the twenty-four hours, the pillage really continued, in spite of the orders of the British general (Draper) for it to cease. He himself killed with his own hands a soldier he found transgressing his orders, and had three hanged."[10] The British had demanded a ransom of four million dollars from the Spanish government to which Archbishop Rojo now agreed to avoid further destruction.[11]

On 2 November 1762, Dawsonne Drake of the British East India Company assumed office as the British Governor of Manila. He was assisted by a council of four, consisting of John L. Smith, Claud Russel, Henry Brooke and Samuel Johnson. When after several attempts, Drake realised that he was not getting as many assets that he expected, he formed a War Council, that he named Chottry Court, with power to imprison anyone. Many Spaniards, Latinos, Mestizos, Chinese, and natives were imprisoned for crimes, that as denounced by Captain Thomas Backhouse, were "only known to himself."[12]


Sign at Fort Santiago, Manila, marking the departure point of Simón de Anda y Salazar.
This map shows the chronological advance of British troops toward parts of Northern Luzon during the British Occupation of Manila.[5]

In the meantime the Royal Audience of Manila had organised a war council and dispatched Oidor Don Simón de Anda y Salazar to the provincial town of Bulacan to organise continued resistance to the British.[2]:48–49 The Real Audencia also appointed Anda as Lieutenant Governor and Visitor-General.[2]:58[13] That night Anda took a substantial portion of the treasury and official records with him, departing Fort Santiago through the postern of Our Lady of Solitude, to a boat on the Pasig River, and then to Bulacan. He moved headquarters from Bulacan to Bacolor, Pampanga, which was more secure, and quickly obtained the powerful support of the Augustinians.

Anda eventually raised an army which amounted to over 10,000 combatants, most of them volunteer natives, and although they lacked enough modern weapons, they were successful in keeping the British forces confined to Manila and Cavite. On 8 October 1762 Anda wrote to Rojo informing him that Anda had assumed the position of Governor and Capitan-General under statutes of the Council of the Indies which allowed for the devolution of authority from the Governor to the Audiencia in cases of riot or invasion by foreign forces, as such was the case. Anda, being the highest member of the Audiencia not captive by the British, assumed all powers and demanded the royal seal. Rojo declined to surrender it and refused to recognise Anda as Governor-General.[2]:58–59

The surrender agreement between Archbishop Rojo and the British military guaranteed the Roman Catholic religion and its episcopal government, secured private property, and granted the citizens of the former Spanish colony the rights of peaceful travel and of trade 'as British subjects'. Under British control, the Philippines would continue to be governed by the Real Audiencia, the expenses of which were to be paid by Spain.[2]:54 However, Anda refused to recognise any of the agreements signed by Rojo as valid, claiming that the Archbishop has been made to sign them by force, and therefore, according to the statutes of the Council of the Indies, they were invalid. He also refused to negotiate with the invaders until he was addressed as the legal Governor-General of the Philippines, returning to the British the letters that were not addressed to that effect. All of these initiatives were later approved by the King of Spain, who rewarded him and other members of the Audiencia, such as José Basco y Vargas, who had fought against the invaders.

On 26 Nov. Capt. Backhouse, 79th Regiment, dispersed Anda's troops from Pasig. The British then established a post, manned by Lascars and sepoys so they could dominate Laguna de Bay. Then on 19 Jan. 1763, the British sent an expedition commanded by Caapt. Sleigh against Bulacan. They were reinforced by 400 Chinese after Anda ordered their massacre. "In Bulacan alone 180 Chinese had been murdered in cold blood or had hanged themselves in fear." The British took Malolos on the 22nd, but failed to advance upon Anda in Pampanga and withdrew on 7 Feb. In the spring of 1763, Backhouse undertook another expedition against Anda, advancing as far as Batangas.[2]:64–65,67–68,85–87

Cornish and the East Indies Squadron departed in early 1763, leaving two frigates behind, the HMS Falmouth (1752) and the Seaford. On 24 July, news arrived of the cessation of fighting and on 26 August a preliminary draft of the Peace of Paris. The treaty stated that "All conquests not known about at the time of the signing of the treaty were to be returned to the original owners." The impasse continued in Manila however, as the British order to withdraw would not arrive for another six months, and Anda reinforced his blockade of the city. "During the final winter of the British occupation all pretence of cooperation amongst the British leaders was abandoned."[2]:72,90–92

End of the occupation

The Seven Years' War was ended by the signing of the Treaty of Paris on 10 February 1763. At the time of signing, the signatories were not aware that Manila had been taken by the British and consequently it fell under the general provision that all other lands not otherwise provided for be returned to the Spanish Crown.[2]:109 After Archbishop Rojo died in January 1764, the British military finally recognised Simón de Anda y Salazar as the legitimate Governor of the Philippines, sending him a letter addressed to the “Real Audiencia Gobernadora y Capitanía General”, after which Anda agreed to an armistice on the condition that the British forces withdraw from Manila by March. However, the British finally received their orders to withdraw in early March, and by mid-March the overdue Spanish governor for the Philippines, Brig. Don Francisco de la Torre, finally arrived. This Spanish governor brought with him orders from London for Brereton and Backhouse to surrender Manila to himself.[2]:98–100

Drake departed Manila on 29 March 1764, and the Manila Council elected Alexander Dalrymple Provisional Deputy Governor. The British ended the occupation by embarking from Manila and Cavite in the first week of April 1764. The 79th Regiment finally arrived Madras on 25 May 1765.[2]:104–106,108


Diego Silang, who was emboldened by Spanish vulnerability, was promised military assistance if he began a revolt against the Spanish government in the Ilocos Region, but such aid never materialised. Silang was later assassinated by his own friends, and the revolt aborted after his wife, who had taken over the leadership, was captured and executed together with the remaining rebel forces.[14]

Sultan Alimuddin I, who had signed a treaty of alliance with the British forces after they had freed him from Fort Santiago in Manila, where he had been imprisoned accused of treason, was also taken with the evacuating forces, in the hope that he could be of help to the aspirations of the East India Company in the Sultanate of Sulu.[15]

A number of sepoys deserted the British forces and settled down in Pasig, Taytay and Cainta, Rizal.[16]

De la Torre claimed the British destroyed the archives, plundered the palace, removed all naval stores at Cavite and dismantled the city of Manila.[2]:118

The conflict over payment by Spain of the outstanding part of the ransom promised by Rojo in the terms of surrender, and compensation by Britain for the excesses committed by Governor Drake against residents of Manila, continued in Europe for years afterward.[2]:110–115


Postern of Our Lady of Solitude through which Anda escaped with most government papers and about half the treasury.

The British failure to extend lasting control beyond Manila and Cavite and the revolt of their soldiers as their situation deteriorated left the weakened British force vulnerable. Captain Thomas Backhouse reported to the Secretary of War in London that "the enemy is in full possession of the country".[12]

The British had accepted the written surrender of the Philippines from Archbishop Rojo on 30 October 1762,[2]:54 but the Royal Audience of Manila had already appointed Simón de Anda y Salazar as the new Governor-General as provided for under the statutes of the Council of the Indies, as was pointed out by Anda and retrospectively confirmed by the King of Spain, in his re-appointment of both Anda and Basco. It was not the first time that the Audiencia had assumed responsibility for the defence of the Philippines in the absence of a higher authority; in 1646, during the Battles of La Naval de Manila, it temporarily assumed the government and maintained the defence of the Philippines against the Dutch.

As Francisco Leandro Viana, who was in Manila during the 20-month occupation, explained to the Spanish King in 1765, "the English conquest of the Philippines was just an imagined one, as the English never owned any land beyond the range of the cannons in Manila".[17]

See also


  1. Fish 2003, p. 2
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Tracy, Nicholas (1995). Manila Ransomed. University of Exeter Press. p. 9. ISBN 0859894266.
  3. Fish 2003, p. 3
  4. Cornish, Samuel (1761). Cornish to Council at Fort St. George. Public Record Office (PRO), Admiralty Papers.
  5. 1 2 Presidential Communications Development and Strategic Planning Office. "THE BRITISH CONQUEST OF MANILA". Presidential Museum and Library. Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved 20 October 2014.
  6. British naval calendar date
  7. Leebrick, Karl Clayton (2007). The English expedition to Manila and the Philippine Islands in the year 1762. University of California, Berkeley. p. 52.
  8. Blair, Emma Helen (2008). The Philippine Islands, 1493-1803. BiblioBazaar. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-559-25329-4.
  9. B. Rodríguez, Eulogio (2003). The contribution of the Basque men to the Philippines. Donostia-San Sebastián: Jean-Claude Larronde ed. lit. pp. 535–538. ISBN 84-8419-931-2.
  10. Renato Perdon article in the Bayanihan News
  11. When Britain Ruled the Philippines. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse. 2003. ISBN 1-4107-1069-6.
  12. 1 2 Backhouse, Thomas (1765). The Secretary at War to Mr. Secretary Conway. London: British Library. pp. v. 40.
  13. Fish 2003, p. 126
  14. Zaide, Gregorio F, Philippine History and Government, National Bookstore, Manila, 1984
  15. Fish 2003, pp. 132–133.
  16. Fish 2003, p. 158
  17. Viana, Francisco Leandro (1765). Manifiesto del Fiscal Viana. Sevilla: Archivo General de Indias. pp. V. 718.


Additional Readings

Borschberg, P. (2004), “Chinese Merchants, Catholic Clerics and Spanish Colonists in British-Occupied Manila, 1762-1764” in "Maritime China in Transition, 1750-1850", ed. by Wang Gungwu and Ng Chin Keong, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 355–372.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/23/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.