Boeing 747

Boeing 747
A British Airways 747-400 in white, blue and red livery during takeoff with its landing gear retracting.
Boeing 747-400 of British Airways, the type's largest operator.
Role Wide-body jet airliner
National origin United States
Manufacturer Boeing Commercial Airplanes
First flight February 9, 1969[1]
Introduction January 22, 1970 with Pan American World Airways[2][3]
Status In service
Primary users British Airways
Korean Air
China Airlines
Produced 1968–present
Number built 1,527 as of October 31, 2016[4]
Unit cost
747-100: US$24 million (1967)
747-200: US$39 million (1976)
747-300: US$83 million (1982)
747-400: US$228–260 million (2007)
747-8I: US$351.4 million[5]
747-8F: US$352 million
Variants Boeing 747SP
Boeing 747-400
Boeing 747-8
Boeing VC-25
Boeing E-4
Developed into Boeing YAL-1
Boeing Dreamlifter

The Boeing 747 is an American wide-body commercial jet airliner and cargo aircraft, often referred to by its original nickname, Jumbo Jet, or Queen of the Skies. Its distinctive "hump" upper deck along the forward part of the aircraft makes it among the world's most recognizable aircraft,[6] and it was the first wide-body produced. Manufactured by Boeing's Commercial Airplane unit in the United States, the original version of the 747 was envisioned to have 150 percent greater capacity than the Boeing 707,[7] one of the common large commercial aircraft of the 1960s. First flown commercially in 1970, the 747 held the passenger capacity record for 37 years.[8] As of May 2016, the 747 has been involved in 60 hull-loss accidents resulting in 3,718 fatalities.

The four-engine 747 uses a double deck configuration for part of its length. It is available in passenger, freighter and other versions. Boeing designed the 747's hump-like upper deck to serve as a first class lounge or extra seating, and to allow the aircraft to be easily converted to a cargo carrier by removing seats and installing a front cargo door. Boeing did so because the company expected supersonic airliners (development of which was announced in the early 1960s) to render the 747 and other subsonic airliners obsolete, while the demand for subsonic cargo aircraft would be robust well into the future.[9] The 747 was expected to become obsolete after 400 were sold,[10] but it exceeded critics' expectations with production passing the 1,000 mark in 1993.[11] By October 2016, 1,527 aircraft had been built, with 29 of the 747-8 variants remaining on order.[4]

The 747-400, the most common passenger version in service, has a high-subsonic cruise speed of Mach 0.85–0.855 (up to 570 mph or 920 km/h) with an intercontinental range of 7,260 nautical miles (8,350 mi or 13,450 km).[12] The 747-400 passenger version can accommodate 416 passengers in a typical three-class layout, 524 passengers in a typical two-class layout, or 660 passengers in a high density one-class configuration.[13] The newest version of the aircraft, the 747-8, is in production and received certification in 2011.

Deliveries of the 747-8F freighter version to launch customer Cargolux began in October 2011; deliveries of the 747-8I passenger version to Lufthansa began in May 2012.



In 1963, the United States Air Force started a series of study projects on a very large strategic transport aircraft. Although the C-141 Starlifter was being introduced, they believed that a much larger and more capable aircraft was needed, especially the capability to carry outsized cargo that would not fit in any existing aircraft. These studies led to initial requirements for the CX-Heavy Logistics System (CX-HLS) in March 1964 for an aircraft with a load capacity of 180,000 pounds (81,600 kg) and a speed of Mach 0.75 (500 mph or 800 km/h), and an unrefueled range of 5,000 nautical miles (9,300 km) with a payload of 115,000 pounds (52,200 kg). The payload bay had to be 17 feet (5.18 m) wide by 13.5 feet (4.11 m) high and 100 feet (30 m) long with access through doors at the front and rear.[14]

Featuring only four engines, the design also required new engine designs with greatly increased power and better fuel economy. In May 1964, airframe proposals arrived from Boeing, Douglas, General Dynamics, Lockheed, and Martin Marietta; engine proposals were submitted by General Electric, Curtiss-Wright, and Pratt & Whitney. After a downselect, Boeing, Douglas, and Lockheed were given additional study contracts for the airframe, along with General Electric and Pratt & Whitney for the engines.[14]

All three of the airframe proposals shared a number of features. As the CX-HLS needed to be able to be loaded from the front, a door had to be included where the cockpit usually was. All of the companies solved this problem by moving the cockpit above the cargo area; Douglas had a small "pod" just forward and above the wing, Lockheed used a long "spine" running the length of the aircraft with the wing spar passing through it, while Boeing blended the two, with a longer pod that ran from just behind the nose to just behind the wing.[15][16] In 1965 Lockheed's aircraft design and General Electric's engine design were selected for the new C-5 Galaxy transport, which was the largest military aircraft in the world at the time.[14] The nose door and raised cockpit concepts would be carried over to the design of the 747.[17]

Airliner proposal

The 747 was conceived while air travel was increasing in the 1960s.[18] The era of commercial jet transportation, led by the enormous popularity of the Boeing 707 and Douglas DC-8, had revolutionized long-distance travel.[18][19] Even before it lost the CX-HLS contract, Boeing was pressed by Juan Trippe, president of Pan American World Airways (Pan Am), one of their most important airline customers, to build a passenger aircraft more than twice the size of the 707. During this time, airport congestion, worsened by increasing numbers of passengers carried on relatively small aircraft, became a problem that Trippe thought could be addressed by a large new aircraft.[20]

In 1965, Joe Sutter was transferred from Boeing's 737 development team to manage the design studies for a new airliner, already assigned the model number 747.[21] Sutter initiated a design study with Pan Am and other airlines, to better understand their requirements. At the time, it was widely thought that the 747 would eventually be superseded by supersonic transport aircraft.[22] Boeing responded by designing the 747 so that it could be adapted easily to carry freight and remain in production even if sales of the passenger version declined. In the freighter role, the clear need was to support the containerized shipping methodologies that were being widely introduced at about the same time. Standard containers are 8 ft (2.4 m) square at the front (slightly higher due to attachment points) and available in 20 and 40 ft (6.1 and 12 m) lengths. This meant that it would be possible to support a 2-wide 2-high stack of containers two or three ranks deep with a fuselage size similar to the earlier CX-HLS project.

 A view of an early-production 747 cockpit
An Iran Air 747-200, showing the early-production 747 cockpit, located on the upper deck

In April 1966, Pan Am ordered 25 747-100 aircraft for US$525 million. During the ceremonial 747 contract-signing banquet in Seattle on Boeing's 50th Anniversary, Juan Trippe predicted that the 747 would be "... a great weapon for peace, competing with intercontinental missiles for mankind's destiny".[23] As launch customer,[1][24] and because of its early involvement before placing a formal order, Pan Am was able to influence the design and development of the 747 to an extent unmatched by a single airline before or since.[25]

Design effort

Ultimately, the high-winged CX-HLS Boeing design was not used for the 747, although technologies developed for their bid had an influence.[26] The original design included a full-length double-deck fuselage with eight-across seating and two aisles on the lower deck and seven-across seating and two aisles on the upper deck.[27][28] However, concern over evacuation routes and limited cargo-carrying capability caused this idea to be scrapped in early 1966 in favor of a wider single deck design.[1] The cockpit was, therefore, placed on a shortened upper deck so that a freight-loading door could be included in the nose cone; this design feature produced the 747's distinctive "bulge".[29] In early models it was not clear what to do with the small space in the pod behind the cockpit, and this was initially specified as a "lounge" area with no permanent seating.[30] (A different configuration that had been considered in order to keep the flight deck out of the way for freight loading had the pilots below the passengers, and was dubbed the "anteater".)[31]

The Pratt & Whitney JT9D turbofan suspended under the wing pylon of the 747 prototype. It is stripped of its outer casing, revealing the engine's core at The Museum of Flight in Seattle, WA
The Pratt & Whitney JT9D high-bypass turbofan engine was developed for the 747.

One of the principal technologies that enabled an aircraft as large as the 747 to be conceived was the high-bypass turbofan engine.[32] The engine technology was thought to be capable of delivering double the power of the earlier turbojets while consuming a third less fuel. General Electric had pioneered the concept but was committed to developing the engine for the C-5 Galaxy and did not enter the commercial market until later.[33][34] Pratt & Whitney was also working on the same principle and, by late 1966, Boeing, Pan Am and Pratt & Whitney agreed to develop a new engine, designated the JT9D to power the 747.[34]

The project was designed with a new methodology called fault tree analysis, which allowed the effects of a failure of a single part to be studied to determine its impact on other systems.[1] To address concerns about safety and flyability, the 747's design included structural redundancy, redundant hydraulic systems, quadruple main landing gear and dual control surfaces.[35] Additionally, some of the most advanced high-lift devices used in the industry were included in the new design, to allow it to operate from existing airports. These included slats running almost the entire length of the wing, as well as complex three-part slotted flaps along the trailing edge of the wing.[36] The wing's complex three-part flaps increase wing area by 21 percent and lift by 90 percent when fully deployed compared to their non-deployed configuration.[37]

Boeing agreed to deliver the first 747 to Pan Am by the end of 1969. The delivery date left 28 months to design the aircraft, which was two-thirds of the normal time.[38] The schedule was so fast paced that the people who worked on it were given the nickname "The Incredibles".[39] Developing the aircraft was such a technical and financial challenge that management was said to have "bet the company" when it started the project.[1]

Production plant

Airplane assembly hall, featuring heavy machinery. Large cylindrical airplane sections and wings are readied for mating with other major components. Above are the cranes which ferry heavy and outsize parts of the 747.
747 final assembly at the Boeing Everett Factory

As Boeing did not have a plant large enough to assemble the giant airliner, they chose to build a new plant. The company considered locations in about 50 cities,[40] and eventually decided to build the new plant some 30 miles (50 km) north of Seattle on a site adjoining a military base at Paine Field near Everett, Washington.[41] It bought the 780-acre (3.2 km2) site in June 1966.[42]

Developing the 747 had been a major challenge, and building its assembly plant was also a huge undertaking. Boeing president William M. Allen asked Malcolm T. Stamper, then head of the company's turbine division, to oversee construction of the Everett factory and to start production of the 747.[43] To level the site, more than four million cubic yards (three million cubic meters) of earth had to be moved.[44] Time was so short that the 747's full-scale mock-up was built before the factory roof above it was finished.[45] The plant is the largest building by volume ever built, and has been substantially expanded several times to permit construction of other models of Boeing wide-body commercial jets.[41]

Development and testing

The prototype 747 was first displayed to the public on September 30, 1968

Before the first 747 was fully assembled, testing began on many components and systems. One important test involved the evacuation of 560 volunteers from a cabin mock-up via the aircraft's emergency chutes. The first full-scale evacuation took two and a half minutes instead of the maximum of 90 seconds mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and several volunteers were injured. Subsequent test evacuations achieved the 90-second goal but caused more injuries. Most problematic was evacuation from the aircraft's upper deck; instead of using a conventional slide, volunteer passengers escaped by using a harness attached to a reel.[46] Tests also involved taxiing such a large aircraft. Boeing built an unusual training device known as "Waddell's Wagon" (named for a 747 test pilot, Jack Waddell) that consisted of a mock-up cockpit mounted on the roof of a truck. While the first 747s were still being built, the device allowed pilots to practice taxi maneuvers from a high upper-deck position.[47]

On September 30, 1968, the first 747 was rolled out of the Everett assembly building before the world's press and representatives of the 26 airlines that had ordered the airliner.[48] Over the following months, preparations were made for the first flight, which took place on February 9, 1969, with test pilots Jack Waddell and Brien Wygle at the controls[49][50] and Jess Wallick at the flight engineer's station. Despite a minor problem with one of the flaps, the flight confirmed that the 747 handled extremely well. The 747 was found to be largely immune to "Dutch roll", a phenomenon that had been a major hazard to the early swept-wing jets.[51]

 A view of the 747's four main landing gear, each with four wheels
Closeup of the prototype 747's 16-wheel main landing gear

During later stages of the flight test program, flutter testing showed that the wings suffered oscillation under certain conditions. This difficulty was partly solved by reducing the stiffness of some wing components. However, a particularly severe high-speed flutter problem was solved only by inserting depleted uranium counterweights as ballast in the outboard engine nacelles of the early 747s.[52] This measure caused anxiety when these aircraft crashed, for example El Al Flight 1862 at Amsterdam in 1992 with 282 kilograms (622 lb) of uranium in the tailplane.[53][54]

The flight test program was hampered by problems with the 747's JT9D engines. Difficulties included engine stalls caused by rapid throttle movements and distortion of the turbine casings after a short period of service.[55] The problems delayed 747 deliveries for several months, up to 20 aircraft at the Everett plant were stranded while awaiting engine installation.[56] The program was further delayed when one of the five test aircraft suffered serious damage during a landing attempt at Renton Municipal Airport, site of the company's Renton factory. On December 13, 1969 a test aircraft was being taken to have test equipment removed and a cabin installed when pilot Ralph C. Cokely undershot the airport's short runway. The 747's right, outer landing gear was torn off and two engine nacelles were damaged.[57][58] However, these difficulties did not prevent Boeing from taking a test aircraft to the 28th Paris Air Show in mid-1969, where it was displayed to the public for the first time.[59] The 747 received its FAA airworthiness certificate in December 1969, clearing it for introduction into service.[60]

 The First Lady Pat Nixon sitting in the cockpit of the first commercial 747 during the christening ceremony in 1970
First Lady Pat Nixon visits the cockpit of the first commercial 747 during the christening ceremony, January 15, 1970

The huge cost of developing the 747 and building the Everett factory meant that Boeing had to borrow heavily from a banking syndicate. During the final months before delivery of the first aircraft, the company had to repeatedly request additional funding to complete the project. Had this been refused, Boeing's survival would have been threatened.[24][61] The firm's debt exceeded $2 billion, with the $1.2 billion owed to the banks setting a record for all companies. Allen later said, "It was really too large a project for us."[62] Ultimately, the gamble succeeded, and Boeing held a monopoly in very large passenger aircraft production for many years.[63]

Entry into service

On January 15, 1970, First Lady of the United States Pat Nixon christened Pan Am's first 747, at Dulles International Airport (later Washington Dulles International Airport) in the presence of Pan Am chairman Najeeb Halaby. Instead of champagne, red, white, and blue water was sprayed on the aircraft. The 747 entered service on January 22, 1970, on Pan Am's New York–London route;[64] the flight had been planned for the evening of January 21, but engine overheating made the original aircraft unusable. Finding a substitute delayed the flight by more than six hours to the following day when Clipper Victor was used.[2]

 A helical staircase on 747-100s and -200s that leads to the upper deck
On the 747-100 and 747-200, a spiral staircase connected the main and upper decks. Previously, Boeing used a spiral staircase in its Model 377 Stratocruiser back in 1946.

The 747 enjoyed a fairly smooth introduction into service, overcoming concerns that some airports would not be able to accommodate an aircraft that large.[65] Although technical problems occurred, they were relatively minor and quickly solved.[66] After the aircraft's introduction with Pan Am, other airlines that had bought the 747 to stay competitive began to put their own 747s into service.[67] Boeing estimated that half of the early 747 sales were to airlines desiring the aircraft's long range rather than its payload capacity.[68][69] While the 747 had the lowest potential operating cost per seat, this could only be achieved when the aircraft was fully loaded; costs per seat increased rapidly as occupancy declined. A moderately loaded 747, one with only 70 percent of its seats occupied, used more than 95 percent of the fuel needed by a fully occupied 747.[70] Nonetheless, many flag-carriers purchased the 747 due to its iconic status "even if it made no sense economically" to operate. During the 1970s and 1980s, there was often over 30 regularly scheduled 747s at John F. Kennedy International Airport.[71]

The recession of 1969-1970 greatly affected Boeing. For the year and a half after September 1970 it only sold two 747s in the world, and did not sell any to an American carrier for almost three years.[62] When economic problems in the United States and other countries after the 1973 oil crisis led to reduced passenger traffic, several airlines found they did not have enough passengers to fly the 747 economically, and they replaced them with the smaller and recently introduced McDonnell Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed L-1011 TriStar trijet wide bodies[72] (and later the 767 and A300/A310 twinjets). Having tried replacing coach seats on its 747s with piano bars in an attempt to attract more customers, American Airlines eventually relegated its 747s to cargo service and in 1983 exchanged them with Pan Am for smaller aircraft;[73] Delta Air Lines also removed its 747s from service after several years.[74] Later, Delta acquired 747s again in 2008 as part of its merger with Northwest Airlines, although it intends to retire them from service by 2018.[75]

 A forward-looking view in the stretched upper deck cabin of later 747s
Later 747 models featured a stretched upper deck.

International flights that bypassed traditional hub airports and landed at smaller cities became more common throughout the 1980s, and this eroded the 747's original market.[76] However, many international carriers continued to use the 747 on Pacific routes.[77] In Japan, 747s on domestic routes were configured to carry close to the maximum passenger capacity.[78]

Improved 747 versions

After the initial 747-100, Boeing developed the -100B, a higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) variant, and the -100SR (Short Range), with higher passenger capacity.[79] Increased maximum takeoff weight allows aircraft to carry more fuel and have longer range.[80] The -200 model followed in 1971, featuring more powerful engines and a higher MTOW. Passenger, freighter and combination passenger-freighter versions of the -200 were produced.[79] The shortened 747SP (special performance) with a longer range was also developed, and entered service in 1976.[81]

The 747 line was further developed with the launch of the 747-300 in 1980. The 300 series resulted from Boeing studies to increase the seating capacity of the 747, during which modifications such as fuselage plugs and extending the upper deck over the entire length of the fuselage were rejected. The first 747-300, completed in 1983, included a stretched upper deck, increased cruise speed, and increased seating capacity. The -300 variant was previously designated 747SUD for stretched upper deck, then 747-200 SUD,[82] followed by 747EUD, before the 747-300 designation was used.[83] Passenger, short range and combination freighter-passenger versions of the 300 series were produced.[79]

 An Air New Zealand 747-400 with its landing gear down and flaps down.  The aircraft is mostly white and blue aircraft and in-flight against a blue sky. On each of the two wings are two engines.
The 747-400 entered service in 1989, with Air New Zealand among the first operators of the type.

In 1985, development of the longer range 747-400 began.[84] The variant had a new glass cockpit, which allowed for a cockpit crew of two instead of three,[85] new engines, lighter construction materials, and a redesigned interior. Development cost soared, and production delays occurred as new technologies were incorporated at the request of airlines. Insufficient workforce experience and reliance on overtime contributed to early production problems on the 747-400.[1] The -400 entered service in 1989.[86]

In 1991, a record-breaking 1,087 passengers were airlifted aboard a 747 to Israel as part of Operation Solomon.[87] The 747 remained the heaviest commercial aircraft in regular service until the debut of the Antonov An-124 Ruslan in 1982; variants of the 747-400 would surpass the An-124's weight in 2000. The Antonov An-225 Mriya cargo transport, which debuted in 1988, remains the world's largest aircraft by several measures (including the most accepted measures of maximum takeoff weight and length); one aircraft has been completed and is in service as of 2012. The Hughes H-4 Hercules is the largest aircraft by wingspan, but it only completed a single flight.[88]

Further developments

Interior view. Seats are separated by two aisles, in 3-4-3 configuration. A TV is positioned towards the front of aircraft.
747-400 main deck economy class seating in 3-4-3 layout

Since the arrival of the 747-400, several stretching schemes for the 747 have been proposed. Boeing announced the larger 747-500X and -600X preliminary designs in 1996.[89] The new variants would have cost more than US$5 billion to develop,[89] and interest was not sufficient to launch the program.[90] In 2000, Boeing offered the more modest 747X and 747X stretch derivatives as alternatives to the Airbus A3XX. However, the 747X family was unable to attract enough interest to enter production. A year later, Boeing switched from the 747X studies to pursue the Sonic Cruiser,[91] and after the Sonic Cruiser program was put on hold, the 787 Dreamliner.[92] Some of the ideas developed for the 747X were used on the 747-400ER, a longer range variant of the 747-400.[93]

After several variants were proposed but later abandoned, some industry observers became skeptical of new aircraft proposals from Boeing.[94] However, in early 2004, Boeing announced tentative plans for the 747 Advanced that were eventually adopted. Similar in nature to the 747-X, the stretched 747 Advanced used technology from the 787 to modernize the design and its systems. The 747 remained the largest passenger airliner in service until the Airbus A380 began airline service in 2007.[95]

On November 14, 2005, Boeing announced it was launching the 747 Advanced as the Boeing 747-8.[96] The last 747-400s were completed in 2009.[97] As of 2011, most orders of the 747-8 have been for the freighter variant. On February 8, 2010, the 747-8 Freighter made its maiden flight.[98] The first delivery of the 747-8 went to Cargolux in 2011.[99][100] The 1,500th produced Boeing 747 was delivered in June 2014.[101]

In January 2016, Boeing stated it was reducing 747-8 production to six a year beginning in September 2016, incurring a $569 million post-tax charge against its fourth-quarter 2015 profits. At the end of 2015, the company had 20 orders outstanding.[102][103] On January 29, 2016, Boeing announced that it had begun the preliminary work on the modifications to a commercial 747-8 for the next Air Force One Presidential aircraft, expected to be operational by 2020.[104]

On July 12, 2016, Boeing announced that it had finalized terms of acquisition with Volga-Dnepr Group for 20 747-8 freighters, valued at $7.58 billion at list prices. Four aircraft were delivered beginning in 2012. Volga-Dnepr Group is the parent of three major Russian air-freight carriers - Volga-Dnepr Airlines, AirBridgeCargo Airlines and Atran Airlines. The new 747-8 freighters will replace AirBridgeCargo’s current 747-400 aircraft and expand the airline’s fleet and will be acquired through a mix of direct purchases and leasing over the next six years, Boeing said.[105]

On July 27, 2016, in its quarterly report to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Boeing discussed the potential termination of 747 production due to insufficient demand and market for the aircraft.[106] With a firm order backlog of 21 aircraft and a production rate of six per year, program accounting has been reduced to 1,555 aircraft, and the 747 line could be closed in the third quarter of 2019.[107] In October 2016, UPS Airlines ordered 14 -8Fs to add capacity, along with 14 options, which doubles its official backlog of 15 - including some to refractory airlines - and could extend production by two more years.[108]


Cutaway rendering of a 747, showing internal seating and landing gear
Boeing 747-200 cutaway
For design details of a particular generation, see Boeing 747-400, 747-8, and 747SP.

The Boeing 747 is a large, wide-body (two-aisle) airliner with four wing-mounted engines. The wings have a high sweep angle of 37.5 degrees for a fast, efficient cruise[29] of Mach 0.84 to 0.88, depending on the variant. The sweep also reduces the wingspan, allowing the 747 to use existing hangars.[1][109] Seating capacity is more than 366 with a 3–4–3 seat arrangement (a cross section of 3 seats, an aisle, 4 seats, another aisle, and 3 seats) in economy class and a 2–3–2 arrangement in first class on the main deck. The upper deck has a 3–3 seat arrangement in economy class and a 2–2 arrangement in first class.[110]

Cargolux 747-400F with the nose cargo door open
China Airlines 747-400F with the nose cargo door open

Raised above the main deck, the cockpit creates a hump. The raised cockpit allows front loading of cargo on freight variants.[29] The upper deck behind the cockpit provides space for a lounge or extra seating. The "stretched upper deck" became available as an option on the 747-100B variant and later as standard beginning on the 747-300. The upper deck was stretched more on the 747-8. The 747 cockpit roof section also has an escape hatch from which crew can exit in the event of an emergency if they cannot exit through the cabin.

The 747's maximum takeoff weight ranges from 735,000 pounds (333,400 kg) for the -100 to 970,000 lb (439,985 kg) for the -8. Its range has increased from 5,300 nautical miles (6,100 mi, 9,800 km) on the -100 to 8,000 nmi (9,200 mi, 14,815 km) on the -8I.[111][112]

The 747 has redundant structures along with four redundant hydraulic systems and four main landing gears with four wheels each, which provide a good spread of support on the ground and safety in case of tire blow-outs. The main gear are redundant so that landing can be performed on two opposing landing gears if the others do not function properly.[113] In addition, the 747 has split control surfaces and was designed with sophisticated triple-slotted flaps that minimize landing speeds and allow the 747 to use standard-length runways.[114] For transportation of spare engines, 747s can accommodate a non-functioning fifth-pod engine under the port wing of the aircraft between the inner functioning engine and the fuselage.[115][116]


The 747-100 was the original variant launched in 1966. The 747-200 soon followed, with its launch in 1968. The 747-300 was launched in 1980 and was followed by the 747-400 in 1985. Ultimately, the 747-8 was announced in 2005. Several versions of each variant have been produced, and many of the early variants were in production simultaneously. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) classifies variants using a shortened code formed by combining the model number and the variant designator (e.g. "B741" for all -100 models).[117]


Side view of aircraft on taxiway. Grassy surfaces in foreground; hills and sky in background.
Pan Am was the first airline to operate the 747. The 747-100 pictured shows the original size of the upper deck and window layout.

The first 747-100s were built with six upper deck windows (three per side) to accommodate upstairs lounge areas. Later, as airlines began to use the upper deck for premium passenger seating instead of lounge space, Boeing offered a ten-window upper deck as an option. Some early -100s were retrofitted with the new configuration.[118] The -100 was equipped with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-3A engines. No freighter version of this model was developed, but many 747-100s were converted into freighters.[119] A total of 167 747-100s were built.[4]


Responding to requests from Japanese airlines for a high-capacity aircraft to serve domestic routes between major cities, Boeing developed the 747SR as a short-range version of the 747-100 with lower fuel capacity and greater payload capability. With increased economy class seating, up to 498 passengers could be carried in early versions and up to 550 in later models.[79] The 747SR had an economic design life objective of 52,000 flights during 20 years of operation, compared to 24,600 flights in 20 years for the standard 747.[120] The initial 747SR model, the -100SR, had a strengthened body structure and landing gear to accommodate the added stress accumulated from a greater number of takeoffs and landings.[121] Extra structural support was built into the wings, fuselage, and the landing gear along with a 20 percent reduction in fuel capacity.[122]

Qatar Airways 747SR-81 landing at London Gatwick Airport in 1996

The initial order for the -100SR four aircraft for Japan Air Lines (JAL, later Japan Airlines) was announced on October 30, 1972; rollout occurred on August 3, 1973, and the first flight took place on August 31, 1973. The type was certified by the FAA on September 26, 1973, with the first delivery on the same day. The -100SR entered service with JAL, the type's sole customer, on October 7, 1973, and typically operated flights within Japan.[42] Seven -100SRs were built between 1973 and 1975, each with a 520,000-pound (240,000 kg) MTOW and Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7A engines derated to 43,000 pounds-force (190,000 N) of thrust.[123]

Following the -100SR, Boeing produced the -100BSR, a 747SR variant with increased takeoff weight capability. Debuting in 1978, the -100BSR also incorporated structural modifications for a high cycle-to-flying hour ratio; a related standard -100B model debuted in 1979. The -100BSR first flew on November 3, 1978, with first delivery to All Nippon Airways (ANA) on December 21, 1978. A total of twenty -100BSRs were produced for ANA and JAL.[124] The -100BSR had a 600,000 lb MTOW and was powered by the same JT9D-7A or General Electric CF6-45 engines used on the -100SR. ANA operated this variant on domestic Japanese routes with 455 or 456 seats until retiring its last aircraft in March 2006.[125]

In 1986, two -100BSR SUD models, featuring the stretched upper deck (SUD) of the -300, were produced for JAL.[126] The type's maiden flight occurred on February 26, 1986, with FAA certification and first delivery on March 24, 1986.[127] JAL operated the -100BSR SUD with 563 seats on domestic routes until their retirement in the third quarter of 2006. While only two -100BSR SUDs were produced, in theory, standard -100Bs can be modified to the SUD certification.[124] Overall, twenty-nine 747SRs were built,[4] consisting of seven -100SRs, twenty -100BSRs, and two -100BSR SUDs.


Side view of quadjet on final approach.
The sole Iran Air 747-100B in passenger service in 2009

The 747-100B model was developed from the -100SR, using its stronger airframe and landing gear design. The type had an increased fuel capacity of 48,070 US gal (182,000 l; 40,030 imp gal), allowing for a 5,000-nautical-mile (9,300 km; 5,800 mi) range with a typical 452-passenger payload, and an increased MTOW of 750,000 lb (340,000 kg) was offered. The first -100B order, one aircraft for Iran Air, was announced on June 1, 1978. This aircraft first flew on June 20, 1979, received FAA certification on August 1, 1979, and was delivered the next day.[128] Nine -100Bs were built, one for Iran Air and eight for Saudi Arabian Airlines.[129][130] Unlike the original -100, the -100B was offered with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7A, General Electric CF6-50, or Rolls-Royce RB211-524 engines. However, only RB211-524 (Saudia) and JT9D-7A (Iran Air) engines were ordered.[131] The last 747-100B, EP-IAM was retired by Iran Air in 2014, the last commercial operator of the 747-100 and -100B.[132]


Main article: Boeing 747SP
Ventral view of quadjet climbing in the sky.
Bahrain Royal Flight 747SP climbing with landing gear not yet fully retracted

The development of the 747SP stemmed from a joint request between Pan American World Airways and Iran Air, who were looking for a high-capacity airliner with enough range to cover Pan Am's New York–Middle Eastern routes and Iran Air's planned Tehran–New York route. The Tehran–New York route, when launched, was the longest non-stop commercial flight in the world. The 747SP is 48 feet 4 inches (14.73 m) shorter than the 747-100. Fuselage sections were eliminated fore and aft of the wing, and the center section of the fuselage was redesigned to fit mating fuselage sections. The SP's flaps used a simplified single-slotted configuration.[133][134] The 747SP, compared to earlier variants, had a tapering of the aft upper fuselage into the empennage, a double-hinged rudder, and longer vertical and horizontal stabilizers.[135] Power was provided by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7(A/F/J/FW) or Rolls-Royce RB211-524 engines.[136]

The 747SP was granted a supplemental certificate on February 4, 1976 and entered service with launch customers Pan Am and Iran Air that same year.[134] The aircraft was chosen by airlines wishing to serve major airports with short runways.[137] A total of 45 747SPs were built,[4] with the 44th 747SP delivered on August 30, 1982. In 1987, Boeing re-opened the 747SP production line after five years to build one last 747SP for an order by the United Arab Emirates government.[134] In addition to airline use, one 747SP was modified for the NASA/German Aerospace Center SOFIA experiment.[138] Iran Air is the last civil operator of the type; its final 747-SP (EP-IAC) was to be retired in June 2016.[139][140]


Side view of quad-jet aircraft in flight.
Alitalia 747-200B arriving at Rome Fiumicino Airport in 1990

While the 747-100 powered by Pratt & Whitney JT9D-3A engines offered enough payload and range for US domestic operations, it was marginal for long international route sectors. The demand for longer range aircraft with increased payload quickly led to the improved -200, which featured more powerful engines, increased MTOW, and greater range than the -100. A few early -200s retained the three-window configuration of the -100 on the upper deck, but most were built with a ten-window configuration on each side.[141] The 747-200 was produced in passenger (-200B), freighter (-200F), convertible (-200C), and combi (-200M) versions.[142]

The 747-200B was the basic passenger version, with increased fuel capacity and more powerful engines; it entered service in February 1971.[82] In its first three years of production, the -200 was equipped with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7 engines (initially the only engine available). Range with a full passenger load started at over 5,000 nmi (9,300 km) and increased to 6,000 nmi (11,000 km) with later engines. Most -200Bs had an internally stretched upper deck, allowing for up to 16 passenger seats.[143] The freighter model, the 747-200F, could be fitted with or without a side cargo door,[82] and had a capacity of 105 tons (95.3 tonnes) and an MTOW of up to 833,000 lb (378,000 kg). It entered service in 1972 with Lufthansa.[144] The convertible version, the 747-200C, could be converted between a passenger and a freighter or used in mixed configurations,[79] and featured removable seats and a nose cargo door.[82] The -200C could also be fitted with an optional side cargo door on the main deck.[145]

Iran Air Cargo 747-200M (Combi) taking off from Dubai International Airport in 2009

The combi model, the 747-200M, could carry freight in the rear section of the main deck via a side cargo door. A removable partition on the main deck separated the cargo area at the rear from the passengers at the front. The -200M could carry up to 238 passengers in a three-class configuration with cargo carried on the main deck. The model was also known as the 747-200 Combi.[82] As on the -100, a stretched upper deck (SUD) modification was later offered. A total of 10 converted 747-200s were operated by KLM.[82] Union des Transports Aériens (UTA) also had two of these aircraft converted.[146][147]

After launching the -200 with Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7 engines, on August 1, 1972 Boeing announced that it had reached an agreement with General Electric to certify the 747 with CF6-50 series engines to increase the aircraft's market potential. Rolls-Royce followed 747 engine production with a launch order from British Airways for four aircraft. The option of RB211-524B engines was announced on June 17, 1975.[131] The -200 was the first 747 to provide a choice of powerplant from the three major engine manufacturers.[148]

A total of 393 of the 747-200 versions had been built when production ended in 1991.[149] Of these, 225 were -200B, 73 were -200F, 13 were -200C, 78 were -200M, and 4 were military.[150] Many 747-200s remain in operation, although most large carriers have retired them from their fleets and sold them to smaller operators. Large carriers have sped up fleet retirement following the September 11 attacks and the subsequent drop in demand for air travel, scrapping some or turning others into freighters.[151][152]


Pakistan International Airlines Boeing 747-300 on final approach to London Heathrow Airport, England

The 747-300 features a 23-foot-4-inch-longer (7.11 m) upper deck than the -200.[83] The stretched upper deck has two emergency exit doors and is the most visible difference between the -300 and previous models. Before being made standard on the 747-300, the stretched upper deck was previously offered as a retrofit, and appeared on two Japanese 747-100SR aircraft.[153] The 747-300 introduced a new straight stairway to the upper deck, instead of a spiral staircase on earlier variants, which creates room above and below for more seats.[79] Minor aerodynamic changes allowed the -300's cruise speed to reach Mach 0.85 compared with Mach 0.84 on the -200 and -100 models, while retaining the same takeoff weight.[83] The -300 could be equipped with the same Pratt & Whitney and Rolls-Royce powerplants as on the -200, as well as updated General Electric CF6-80C2B1 engines.[79]

Swissair placed the first order for the 747-300 on June 11, 1980.[154] The variant revived the 747-300 designation, which had been previously used on a design study that did not reach production. The 747-300 first flew on October 5, 1982, and the type's first delivery went to Swissair on March 23, 1983.[42] Besides the passenger model, two other versions (-300M, -300SR) were produced. The 747-300M features cargo capacity on the rear portion of the main deck, similar to the -200M, but with the stretched upper deck it can carry more passengers.[136][155] The 747-300SR, a short range, high-capacity domestic model, was produced for Japanese markets with a maximum seating for 584.[156] No production freighter version of the 747-300 was built, but Boeing began modifications of used passenger -300 models into freighters in 2000.[157]

A total of 81 747-300 series aircraft were delivered, 56 for passenger use, 21 -300M and 4 -300SR versions.[158] In 1985, just two years after the -300 entered service, the type was superseded by the announcement of the more advanced 747-400.[159] The last 747-300 was delivered in September 1990 to Sabena.[79][160] While some -300 customers continued operating the type, several large carriers replaced their 747-300s with 747-400s. Air France, Air India, Pakistan International Airlines, and Qantas were some of the last major carriers to operate the 747-300. On December 29, 2008, Qantas flew its last scheduled 747-300 service, operating from Melbourne to Los Angeles via Auckland.[161] In July 2015, Pakistan International Airlines retired their final 747-300 after 30 years of service.[162]


Underside planform view of an in-flight 747. Under each of the two wings are two engines.
A Qantas 747-400 overflying Moscow at 36,000 feet (11,000 m).
Main article: Boeing 747-400

The 747-400 is an improved model with increased range. It has wingtip extensions of 6 ft (1.8 m) and winglets of 6 ft (1.8 m), which improve the type's fuel efficiency by four percent compared to previous 747 versions.[163] The 747-400 introduced a new glass cockpit designed for a flight crew of two instead of three, with a reduction in the number of dials, gauges and knobs from 971 to 365 through the use of electronics. The type also features tail fuel tanks, revised engines, and a new interior. The longer range has been used by some airlines to bypass traditional fuel stops, such as Anchorage.[164] Powerplants include the Pratt & Whitney PW4062, General Electric CF6-80C2, and Rolls-Royce RB211-524.[165]

The -400 was offered in passenger (-400), freighter (-400F), combi (-400M), domestic (-400D), extended range passenger (-400ER), and extended range freighter (-400ERF) versions. Passenger versions retain the same upper deck as the -300, while the freighter version does not have an extended upper deck.[166] The 747-400D was built for short-range operations with maximum seating for 624. Winglets were not included, but they can be retrofitted.[167][168] Cruising speed is up to Mach 0.855 on different versions of the 747-400.[165]

Front view of a British Airways Boeing 747-400 arriving at London Heathrow Airport in 2015. The triple-slotted trailing edge flaps are well seen.

The passenger version first entered service in February 1989 with launch customer Northwest Airlines on the Minneapolis to Phoenix route.[169] The combi version entered service in September 1989 with KLM, while the freighter version entered service in November 1993 with Cargolux. The 747-400ERF entered service with Air France in October 2002, while the 747-400ER entered service with Qantas,[170] its sole customer, in November 2002. In January 2004, Boeing and Cathay Pacific launched the Boeing 747-400 Special Freighter program,[171] later referred to as the Boeing Converted Freighter (BCF), to modify passenger 747-400s for cargo use. The first 747-400BCF was redelivered in December 2005.[172]

In March 2007, Boeing announced that it had no plans to produce further passenger versions of the -400.[173] However, orders for 36 -400F and -400ERF freighters were already in place at the time of the announcement.[173] The last passenger version of the 747-400 was delivered in April 2005 to China Airlines. Some of the last built 747-400s were delivered with Dreamliner livery along with the modern Signature interior from the Boeing 777. A total of 694 of the 747-400 series aircraft were delivered.[4] At various times, the largest 747-400 operator has included Singapore Airlines,[174] Japan Airlines,[174] and British Airways with 57 as of June 2013.[175][176]

747 LCF Dreamlifter

Side view of quadjet lifting above grassy airport against ocean backdrop.
The Boeing 747 Large Cargo Freighter, also named the Dreamlifter, is modified from ex-airline 747-400s

The 747-400 Dreamlifter[177] (originally called the 747 Large Cargo Freighter or LCF[178]) is a Boeing-designed modification of existing 747-400s to a larger configuration to ferry 787 Dreamliner sub-assemblies. Evergreen Aviation Technologies Corporation of Taiwan was contracted to complete modifications of 747-400s into Dreamlifters in Taoyuan. The aircraft flew for the first time on September 9, 2006 in a test flight.[179] Modification of four aircraft was completed by February 2010.[180] The Dreamlifters have been placed into service transporting sub-assemblies for the 787 program to the Boeing plant in Everett, Washington, for final assembly.[177] The aircraft is certified to carry only essential crew and not passengers.[181]


Main article: Boeing 747-8

Boeing announced a new 747 variant, the 747-8, on November 14, 2005. Referred to as the 747 Advanced prior to its launch, the 747-8 uses the same engine and cockpit technology as the 787, hence the use of the "8". The variant is designed to be quieter, more economical, and more environmentally friendly. The 747-8's fuselage is lengthened from 232 to 251 feet (70.8 to 76.4 m),[182] marking the first stretch variant of the aircraft. Power is supplied by General Electric GEnx-2B67 engines.[165]

Quarter view of quadjet on approach over clouds.
The first Boeing 747-8 freighter on its maiden flight

The 747-8 Freighter, or 747-8F, is derived from the 747-400ERF. The variant has 16 percent more payload capacity than its predecessor, allowing it to carry seven more standard air cargo containers, with a maximum payload capacity of 154 tons (140 tonnes) of cargo.[183] As on previous 747 freighters, the 747-8F features an overhead nose-door and a side-door on the main deck plus a side-door on the lower deck ("belly") to aid loading and unloading. The 747-8F made its maiden flight on February 8, 2010.[184][185] The variant received its amended type certificate jointly from the FAA and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on August 19, 2011.[186] The -8F was first delivered to Cargolux on October 12, 2011.[187]

The passenger version, named 747-8 Intercontinental or 747-8I, is designed to carry up to 467 passengers in a 3-class configuration and fly more than 8,000 nmi (15,000 km) at Mach 0.855. As a derivative of the already common 747-400, the 747-8 has the economic benefit of similar training and interchangeable parts.[188] The type's first test flight occurred on March 20, 2011.[189] The 747-8 has surpassed the Airbus A340-600 as the world's longest airliner. The first -8I was delivered in May 2012 to Lufthansa.[190] The 747-8 has received 138 total orders, including 88 for the -8F and 50 for the -8I as of October 2016.[4]

Government, military, and other variants

Presidential aircraft taxiing in front of silhouetted crowd.
VC-25A 29000, one of two customized Boeing 747-200Bs in the U.S. presidential fleet since 1990
Parked VIP aircraft with red carpet and assembled entourage.
20-1101 Japanese Air Force One, one of two customized Boeing 747-400s in the Japan Air Self-Defense Force since 1993
Silhouette diagram of 747 airborne aircraft carrier aircraft
747 "airborne aircraft carrier" concept

Undeveloped variants

Boeing has studied a number of 747 variants that have not gone beyond the concept stage.

747 trijet

During the late 1960s and early 1970s, Boeing studied the development of a shorter 747 with three engines, to compete with the smaller L-1011 TriStar and DC-10. The 747 trijet would have had more payload, range, and passenger capacity than the L-1011 and DC-10. The center engine would have been fitted in the tail with an S-duct intake similar to the L-1011's. However, engineering studies showed that a total redesign of the 747 wing would be necessary. Maintaining the same 747 handling characteristics would be important to minimize pilot retraining. Boeing decided instead to pursue a shortened four-engine 747, resulting in the 747SP.[199]

747 ASB

Boeing announced the 747 ASB (Advanced Short Body) in 1986 as a response to the Airbus A340 and the McDonnell Douglas MD-11. This aircraft design would have combined the advanced technology used on the 747-400 with the foreshortened 747SP fuselage. The aircraft was to carry 295 passengers a range of 8,000 nmi (9,200 mi; 15,000 km).[200] However, airlines were not interested in the project and it was canceled in 1988 in favor of the 777.

747-500X, -600X, and -700X

Aircraft comparison diagram.
The proposed 747-500X and -600X as depicted in an 1998 FAA illustration

Boeing announced the 747-500X and -600X at the 1996 Farnborough Airshow.[89] The proposed models would have combined the 747's fuselage with a new 251 ft (77 m) span wing derived from the 777. Other changes included adding more powerful engines and increasing the number of tires from two to four on the nose landing gear and from 16 to 20 on the main landing gear.[201]

The 747-500X concept featured an increased fuselage length of 18 ft (5.5 m) to 250 ft (76.2 m) long, and the aircraft was to carry 462 passengers over a range up to 8,700 nautical miles (10,000 mi, 16,100 km), with a gross weight of over 1.0 Mlb (450 tonnes).[201] The 747-600X concept featured a greater stretch to 279 ft (85 m) with seating for 548 passengers, a range of up to 7,700 nmi (8,900 mi, 14,300 km), and a gross weight of 1.2 Mlb (540 tonnes).[201] A third study concept, the 747-700X, would have combined the wing of the 747-600X with a widened fuselage, allowing it to carry 650 passengers over the same range as a 747-400.[89] The cost of the changes from previous 747 models, in particular the new wing for the 747-500X and -600X, was estimated to be more than US$5 billion.[89] Boeing was not able to attract enough interest to launch the aircraft.[90]

747X and 747X Stretch

As Airbus progressed with its A3XX study, Boeing offered a 747 derivative as an alternative in 2000; a more modest proposal than the previous -500X and -600X that retained the 747's overall wing design and add a segment at the root, increasing the span to 229 ft (69.8 m).[202] Power would have been supplied by either the Engine Alliance GP7172 or the Rolls-Royce Trent 600, which were also proposed for the 767-400ERX.[203] A new flight deck based on the 777's would be used. The 747X aircraft was to carry 430 passengers over ranges of up to 8,700 nmi (10,000 mi, 16,100 km). The 747X Stretch would be extended to 263 ft (80.2 m) long, allowing it to carry 500 passengers over ranges of up to 7,800 nmi (9,000 mi, 14,500 km).[202] Both would feature an interior based on the 777.[204] Freighter versions of the 747X and 747X Stretch were also studied.[205]

Side view of quadjet in flight.
The 747-400ER was derived from the 747-400X study.

Like its predecessor, the 747X family was unable to garner enough interest to justify production, and it was shelved along with the 767-400ERX in March 2001, when Boeing announced the Sonic Cruiser concept.[91] Though the 747X design was less costly than the 747-500X and -600X, it was criticized for not offering a sufficient advance from the existing 747-400. The 747X did not make it beyond the drawing board, but the 747-400X being developed concurrently moved into production to become the 747-400ER.[206]


After the end of the 747X program, Boeing continued to study improvements that could be made to the 747. The 747-400XQLR (Quiet Long Range) was meant to have an increased range of 7,980 nmi (9,200 mi, 14,800 km), with improvements to boost efficiency and reduce noise.[207][208] Improvements studied included raked wingtips similar to those used on the 767-400ER and a sawtooth engine nacelle for noise reduction.[209] Although the 747-400XQLR did not move to production, many of its features were used for the 747 Advanced, which has now been launched as the 747-8.


Orders and deliveries

Year Total 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Orders 1,556 17 2 0 12 1 -1 -1 2 3 21 72
Deliveries 1,527 8 18 19 24 31 9 0 8 14 16 14
Year 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986
Orders 43 10 4 17 16 26 35 15 36 56 32 16 2 23 31 122 56 49 66 84
Deliveries 13 15 19 27 31 25 47 53 39 26 25 40 56 61 64 70 45 24 23 35
Year 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966
Orders 42 23 24 14 23 49 72 76 42 14 20 29 29 18 7 20 30 22 43 83
Deliveries 24 16 22 26 53 73 67 32 20 27 21 22 30 30 69 92 4

Model summary

A comparison of the different 747 variants
Diagram of Boeing 747 variants.
At the top: 747-100 (dorsal, cross-section, and front views). Side views, in descending order: 747SP, 747-100, 747-400, 747-8I, and 747LCF.
Model seriesOrdersDeliveriesUnfilled
747-100 167167
747-100B 99
747-100SR 2929
747-200B 225225
747-200C 1313
747-200F 7373
747-200M 7878
747-300 5656
747-300M 2121
747-300SR 44
747-400 442442
747-400D 1919
747-400ER 66
747-400ERF 4040
747-400F 126126
747-400M 6161
747-8I 50419
747-8F 886820
747-E4A 33
747-E4B 11
747SP 4545
747 Total 1,5561,52729
  • Boeing data through end of October 2016.[4][211]
ICAO code[117] Model series
B741 747-100
B742 747-200
B743 747-300
B744 747-400
B74D 747-400D
B74S 747SP
B74R 747-100SR
747-100BSR SUD
BLCF 747-400LCF Dreamlifter
BSCA 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft
B748 747-8F

Accidents and incidents

As of May 2016, the 747 has been involved in 132 aviation occurrences,[212] including 60 hull-loss accidents,[213] resulting in 3,718 fatalities. The 747 has been in 32 hijackings, which caused 24 fatalities.[214] This includes Pan Am Flight 73 where a Boeing 747-121 was hijacked by four terrorists and resulted in 20 deaths.[215]

Few crashes have been attributed to design flaws of the 747. The Tenerife airport disaster resulted from pilot error and communications failure, while the Japan Airlines Flight 123 and China Airlines Flight 611 crashes stemmed from improper aircraft repair. United Airlines Flight 811, which suffered an explosive decompression mid-flight on February 24, 1989, led the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to issue a recommendation that 747-200 cargo doors similar to those on the Flight 811 aircraft be modified. Korean Air Lines Flight 007 was shot down by a Soviet fighter aircraft in 1983 after it had strayed into Soviet territory, causing U.S. President Ronald Reagan to authorize the then-strictly military global positioning system (GPS) for civilian use.[216]

Accidents due to design deficiencies included TWA Flight 800, where a 747-100 exploded in mid-air on July 17, 1996, probably due to sparking electricity wires inside the fuel tank;[217] this finding led the FAA to propose a rule requiring installation of an inerting system in the center fuel tank of most large aircraft that was adopted in July 2008, after years of research into solutions. At the time, the new safety system was expected to cost US$100,000 to $450,000 per aircraft and weigh approximately 200 pounds (91 kg).[218] El Al Flight 1862 crashed after the fuse pins for an engine broke off shortly after take-off due to metal fatigue. Instead of dropping away from the wing, the engine knocked off the adjacent engine and damaged the wing.[219]

Aircraft on display

Ventral view of museum aircraft raised on struts.
Boeing 747-230B in Lufthansa livery on display at the Technikmuseum Speyer in Germany
A parked museum aircraft on static display.
Boeing 747-128 on display at the Musée de l'Air et de l'Espace in France
A parked aircraft on a grassy field.
Boeing 747-212B serving as the Jumbohostel at Arlanda Airport in Sweden

As increasing numbers of "classic" 747-100 and 747-200 series aircraft have been retired, some have found their way into museums or other uses. The City of Everett, the first 747 and prototype, is at the Museum of Flight, Seattle, Washington, USA where it is sometimes leased to Boeing for test purposes.[220]

Other 747s in museums include those at the Aviodrome, Lelystad, The Netherlands; the Qantas Founders Outback Museum, Longreach, Queensland, Australia; Rand Airport, Johannesburg, South Africa; Technikmuseum Speyer, Speyer, Germany; Musée de l'Air et de l'Espace, Paris, France; Tehran Aerospace Exhibition, Tehran, Iran; Jeongseok Aviation Center, Jeju, South Korea,[221] Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum, McMinnville, Oregon, and the National Air and Space Museum, Washington, D.C.[222]

In recent years, some older 747-300s and 747-400s have also found their way into museums as well.

Other uses

A retired Boeing 747-100 of Evergreen International Aviation on the roof of the Wings and Waves waterpark in McMinnville, Oregon.

Upon its retirement from service, the 747 number two in the production line was dismantled and shipped to Hopyeong, Namyangju, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea where it was re-assembled, repainted in a livery similar to that of Air Force One and converted into a restaurant. Originally flown commercially by Pan Am as N747PA, Clipper Juan T. Trippe, and repaired for service following a tailstrike, it stayed with the airline until its bankruptcy. The restaurant closed by 2009,[223] and the aircraft was scrapped in 2010.[224]

A former British Airways 747-200B, G-BDXJ,[225] is parked at the Dunsfold Aerodrome in Surrey, England and has been used as a movie set for productions such as the 2006 James Bond film, Casino Royale.[226] The plane also appears frequently in the BBC television series Top Gear, which is filmed at Dunsfold.

The Jumbohostel, using a converted 747-200, opened at Arlanda Airport, Stockholm on January 15, 2009.[227][228]

The wings of a 747 have been recycled as roofs of a house in Malibu, California.[229][230][231][232]


Model 747SP[233] 747-100[233] 747-200B[233] 747-300[233] 747-400/-400ER[234] 747-8[235]
Cockpit crew Three Two
Seating, typical 276 (25F 57J 194Y) 366 (32F 74J 260Y) 400 (34F 76J 290Y) 416 (23F 78J 315Y) 467 (24F 87J 356Y)
Seating for exit limit[236] 400 440/550 550/660 605
Length 184 ft 9 in (56.3 m) 231 ft 10 in (70.66 m) 250 ft 2 in (76.25 m)
Interior width 239.5 in (608 cm)[234]
Wingspan 195 ft 8 in (59.6 m) 211 ft 5 in (64.4 m) 224 ft 7 in (68.5 m)
Wing area 5,500 ft² (511 m²) 5,650 sq ft (525 m2)[237] 554 m2 (5,960 sq ft)[238]
Wing sweep 37.5°[239][240][241]
Aspect ratio 7 7.9 8.5
Tail height 65 ft 5 in (19.9 m) 63 ft 5 in (19.3 m) 63 ft 8 in (19.4 m) 63 ft 6 in (19.4 m)
Cargo capacity 3,900 cubic feet (110 m3) 6,190 cu ft (175 m3), 30×LD1 6,085 ft³ (172.3 m³)
ER: 5,655 ft³ (160.1 m³)
6345 ft³
Operating empty weight 337,100 lb (152,900 kg) 379,500 lb (172,100 kg) 375,100 lb (170,100 kg) 384,000 lb (174,000 kg) 404,600 lb (183,520 kg)
ER: 412,300 lb (187,010 kg)
485,300 lb (220,128 kg)
Maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) 700,000 lb (320,000 kg) 735,000 lb (333,000 kg) 833,000 lb (378,000 kg) 875,000 lb (396,890 kg)
ER: 910,000 lb (412,760 kg)
987,000 lb (447,696 kg)
Cruise speed Mach 0.86 (568 mph; 914 km/h) 907 km/h (490 kt)[242] 898 km/h-939 km/h (485-507kt)[243] Mach 0.855 (580 mph; 933 km/h)
Airspeed limit[236] Mach 0.92 Mach 0.9
Takeoff 9,250 ft (2,820 m) 10,650 ft (3,250 m) 10,900 ft (3,300 m) 10,900 ft (3,300 m) 9,700 ft (2,955 m)
ER: 10,700 ft (3,260 m)
10,200 ft (3,100 m)
Range 5,830 nmi (10,800 km; 6,710 mi)[lower-alpha 1] 4,620 nmi (8,560 km; 5,320 mi)[lower-alpha 2] 6,560 nmi (12,150 km; 7,550 mi)[lower-alpha 2] 6,330 nmi (11,720 km; 7,280 mi)[lower-alpha 3] 7,585 nmi (14,047 km; 8,729 mi)[lower-alpha 4]
ER: 7,670 nmi (14,200 km; 8,830 mi)[lower-alpha 4]
7,730 nmi (14,320 km; 8,900 mi)[lower-alpha 5][244]
Fuel capacity 50,359 US gal (190,630 L) 48,445 US gal (183,380 L) 53,985 US gal (204,360 L) 57,285 US gal (216,850 L)
ER: 63,705 US gal (241,150 L)
63,034 US gal (238,610 L)
Turbofan engines (×4) Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7 or Rolls-Royce RB211-524 or GE CF6 PW4000 or CF6 or RB211 GEnx-2B67
Thrust (per engine) 46,300–56,900 lbf (206–253 kN) 43,500–51,600 lbf (193–230 kN) 46,300–54,750 lbf (206.0–243.5 kN) 46,300–56,900 lbf (206–253 kN) 56,500–63,300 lbf (251–282 kN)
ER: 62,100–63,300 lbf (276–282 kN)
66,500 lbf (296 kN)
  1. JT9D, 276 passengers
  2. 1 2 JT9D, 366 passengers and baggage
  3. 400 passengers and baggage
  4. 1 2 PW4000, 416 passengers and baggage
  5. 410 passengers and baggage
 An illustration comparing the size of four large aircraft: Hughes H-4 Hercules (Spruce Goose), , Airbus A380, and Boeing 747-8
Comparison between four of the largest aircraft:
  Boeing 747-8

Notable appearances in media

Following its debut, the 747 rapidly achieved iconic status, appearing in numerous film productions such as the Airport series of disaster films, Air Force One, and Executive Decision.[245][246] Appearing in over 300 film productions [247] the 747 is one of the most widely depicted civilian aircraft and is considered by many as one of the most iconic in film history.[248] The aircraft entered the cultural lexicon as the original Jumbo Jet, a term coined by the aviation media to describe its size,[249] and was also nicknamed Queen of the Skies.[250]

See also

Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era
Related lists



    1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rumerman, Judy. "The Boeing 747." U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission, 2003. Retrieved: April 30, 2006.
    2. 1 2 "Jumbo and the Gremlins." TIME, February 2, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.
    3. "Boeing: Commercial Airplanes - 747 - About the 747 Family". Archived from the original on October 2, 2012.
    4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "747 Model Orders and Deliveries data." The Boeing Company, October 2016. Retrieved: November 3, 2016.
    5. "Boeing Commercial Airplanes prices". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on 2008-07-01. Retrieved August 8, 2012.
    6. Negroni, Christine (July 2014). "747: The World's Airliner". Air & Space Magazine. Retrieved January 2, 2015.
    7. Branson, Richard. "Pilot of the Jet Age." Time, December 7, 1998. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    8. "A380 superjumbo lands in Sydney." BBC, October 25, 2007. Retrieved: August 3, 2010. Quote: "The superjumbo's advent ends a reign of nearly four decades by the Boeing 747 as the world's biggest airliner."
    9. Orlebar 2002, p. 50.
    10. Haenggi 2003, pp. 14–15.
    11. Sutter 2006, p. 259.
    12. "Technical Characteristics – Boeing 747-400", The Boeing Company. Retrieved: April 29, 2006.
    13. "747." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: January 9, 2012.
    14. 1 2 3 Norton 2003, pp. 5–12.
    15. Boeing CX-HLS Model at Boeing Corporate Archives - 1963/64
      Models of Boeing C-5A proposal and Lockheed's (Korean text - next page)
    16. "Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, Partners in Freedom." NASA, 2000, see images in "Langley Contributions to the C-5". Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    17. Jenkins 2000, pp. 12–13.
    18. 1 2 Norris and Wagner 1997, p. 13.
    19. "Boeing Multimedia Image Gallery 707". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on 2012-01-11. Retrieved December 8, 2007.
    20. "Innovators: Juan Trippe." PBS. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    21. Sutter 2006, pp. 80–84.
    22. "Air travel, a supersonic future?." BBC News, July 17, 2001. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.
    23. Simons, Graham (2014). The Airbus A380: A History. p. 31.
    24. 1 2 Noland, David. "Passenger Planes: Boeing 747." "Info please." (Pearson Education). Retrieved: April 30, 2006.
    25. Irving 1994, p. 359.
    26. "Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, Partners in Freedom." NASA, 2000. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    27. Boeing 747 "Double Decker" Early Proposed Design Model at Boeing Corporate Archives - mid-to-late 1960's Archived May 12, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
      (alternate image) Archived May 12, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
    28. Irving 1994, p. 282.
    29. 1 2 3 Sutter 2006, p. 93.
    30. Jenkins 2000, p. 17.
    31. Boeing 747 "Anteater" Early Proposed Designs Model at Boeing Corporate Archives - mid-to-late 1960s Archived June 16, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
    32. Mecham, M. "In review: 747, Creating the World's First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation." Aviation Week and Space Technology, Vol. 165, No. 9, September 4, 2006, p. 53.
    33. "GE Aviation: CF6." GE Aviation. Retrieved: December 9, 2007.
    34. 1 2 Colson, Michael S. "Mechanical Engineering 100 Years of Flight." Retrieved: December 9, 2007.
    35. Sutter 2006, pp. 121, 128–131.
    36. Guy and Wagner 1997, pp. 25–26.
    37. Jenkins 2000, p. 19.
    38. Sutter 2006, pp. 96–97.
    39. Guy and Wagner 1997, p. 19.
    40. Pascall, Glenn R. "Everett and Renton react differently to Boeing." Puget Sound Business Journal, September 26, 2003. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    41. 1 2 "Major Production Facilities – Everett, Washington". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on 2007-11-15. Retrieved April 28, 2007.
    42. 1 2 3 "747 Milestones." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    43. Boyer, Tom. "Boeing legend Malcolm Stamper dies." Seattle Times, June 17, 2005. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    44. Irving 1994, p. 310.
    45. Irving 1994, p. 365.
    46. Irving 1994, p. 383.
    47. "History – 747 Commercial Transport". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on 2010-03-16. Retrieved April 29, 2006.
    48. "All but off the Ground." TIME, October 4, 1968. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    49. "The Giant Takes Off." TIME. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    50. "Boeing 747, the Queen of the Skies" and "Celebrates 35th Anniversary". The Boeing Company. February 9, 2004. Archived from the original on 2004-12-07. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
    51. Irving 1994, pp. 417–418.
    52. Irving 1994, p. 428.
    53. Uijt de Haag, P.A. et al. "Evaluating the risk from depleted uranium after the Boeing 747-258F crash in Amsterdam, 1992." Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 76, issue 1. (August 28, 2000), pp. 39–58." Retrieved: May 16, 2007.
    54. van der Keur, Henk. "Uranium Pollution from the Amsterdam 1992 Plane Crash." Laka Foundation, May 1999. Retrieved: May 16, 2007.
    55. Irving 1994, pp. 441–446.
    56. "The Trouble with Jumbo." Time, September 26, 1969.
    57. Irving 1994, p. 436.
    58. Aircraft Incident Report 5-0046 Archived September 19, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. National Transportation Safety Board, August 20, 1970. Retrieved September 26, 2011.
    59. "The Paris Air Show in facts and figures." Reuters, June 14, 2007. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.
    60. "Boeing 747-400." Jane's All the World's Aircraft, October 31, 2000. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
    61. Irving 1994, pp. 437–438.
    62. 1 2 Heppenheimer, T. A. (1998). The Space Shuttle Decision. NASA. pp. 302=303.
    63. "Jumbo challenge", November 6, 1997. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
    64. Norris 1997, p. 48.
    65. "Breaking the Ground Barrier." TIME, September 8, 1967. Retrieved: December 19, 2007.
    66. "Jumbo Beats the Gremlins." TIME, July 13, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.
    67. "Ready or Not, Here Comes Jumbo." TIME, January 19, 1970. Retrieved: December 19, 2007.
    68. Smith, Bruce A. "Boeing Shuns Very Large Jets While Aiming for Longer Range." Aviation Week and Space Technology, January 1, 2001, pp. 28–29.
    69. 747X vs A380 "How to Reduce Congestion (PDF)." Archived February 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.
    70. "Airline reporting on fuel consumption." Miljominsteriet (Danish Environmental Protection Agency). Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    71. "Planes for Rough Weather." TIME, August 3, 1970. Retrieved: December 20, 2007.
    72. "American Airlines History." American Airlines. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.
    73. Davies 1990, p. 96.
    74. Hammerand, Jim (4 August 2016). "Delta plans to cut Boeing 747 fleet to seven ahead of full retirement". Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
    75. "Turning Today's Challenges into Opportunities for Tomorrow." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.
    76. Aboulafia, Richard (March 1, 2004). "Commercial Transport Market Still in Rough Shape". Aviation Week and Space Technology. Archived from the original on 2012-01-12. Retrieved December 10, 2007.
    77. Wallace, James. "A380 buyer keeps mum about possible luxuries aboard cruise ship of the skies." Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 24, 2005. Retrieved: June 3, 2011.
    78. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Boeing 747 Classics." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
    79. "Solutions Center." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    80. "Boeing 747SP." Archived October 30, 2006, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved: November 23, 2007.
    81. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Aircraft Owner's and Operator's Guide: 747-200/300 (PDF)."Aircraft Commerce. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
    82. 1 2 3 "Boeing 747-300." Retrieved: June 3, 2011.
    83. Lawrence and Thornton 2005, p. 54.
    84. Salpukas, Agis. "J.A.L. Orders 15 More of Boeing's 747-400's." Time, July 1, 1988. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    85. Norris 1997, p. 88.
    86. "El Al History page." El Al Airlines. Retrieved: October 18, 2007.
    87. "Ask Us – Largest Plane in the World.", November 11, 2005. Retrieved: April 29, 2006.
    88. 1 2 3 4 5 "Boeing Outlines the "Value" of Its 747 Plans". The Boeing Company. September 2, 1996. Archived from the original on 2000-10-17. Retrieved June 7, 2011.
    89. 1 2 "BA warms to A3XX plan." Flight International, March 19, 1997. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    90. 1 2 "Boeing Shelves 747X to Focus on Faster Jet." People's Daily, March 30, 2001. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    91. Taylor, Alex III. "Boeing's Amazing Sonic Cruiser..." Fortune, December 9, 2002. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    92. "Boeing Launches New, Longer-Range 747-400". The Boeing Company. November 28, 2000. Archived from the original on 2001-01-24. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
    93. Holmes, Stanley. "Boeing's Reborn 747." Archived December 8, 2007, at the Wayback Machine. Business Week, November 16, 2005.
    94. "A380 superjumbo lands in Sydney." BBC News. Retrieved: December 10, 2007.
    95. "Boeing Launches New 747-8 Family". The Boeing Company. November 14, 2005. Archived from the original on 2005-11-24. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
    96. "Downhill for the jumbo." The Sydney Morning Herald, January 9, 2009. Retrieved: February 9, 2009. Archived February 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.
    97. Ostrower, Jon. "Boeing's 747-8F lifts off on maiden flight"., February 8, 2010.
    98. "Boeing Sets 747-8 Freighter Delivery Schedule for Mid-Year 2011". The Boeing Company, September 30, 2010.
    99. Trimble, Stephen. "Boeing pushes 747-8F delivery back to mid-2011/" Air Transport Intelligence News via, September 30, 2010. Retrieved: February 22, 2011.
    100. "Boeing Delivers 1,500th 747". Boeing, June 28, 2014.
    101. "Jumbo jet demise draws a step closer". Financial Times. January 22, 2016.
    102. "Boeing to Cut Production of 747s". Wall Street Journal. January 22, 2016.
    103. "Boeing starts work on replacing Air Force One". Air Force Times. February 1, 2016.
    104. "Volga-Dnepr Group acquires 20 Boeing 747-8 freighters". Air Transport World. 12 July 2016.
    105. The Boeing Company (July 27, 2016). "Form 10-Q Quarterly report" (PDF). Securities and Exchange Commission. it is reasonably possible that we could decide to end production of the 747
    106. "Boeing's 747 Struggles Indicate Large-Aircraft Market Decline". Aviation Week. August 1, 2016.
    107. "UPS orders 14 747-8 Freighte". Flight Global. October 27, 2016.
    108. Bowers 1989, p. 508.
    109. "Boeing 747-400 Airport Planning report, section 2.0, Boeing, December 2002 (PDF)." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007."Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 19, 2006. Retrieved 2006-06-19.
    110. "Boeing 747-100/200/300 Technical Specifications." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    111. "Boeing 747-8 Technical Specifications." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    112. Sutter 2006, pp. 128–131.
    113. Sutter 2006, pp. 121–122.
    114. "Special Report:Air India Flight 182." Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    115. "Her Majesty the Queen Against Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri." Supreme Court of British Columbia. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    116. 1 2 "ICAO Document 8643." International Civil Aviation Organization. Retrieved: April 13, 2013.
    117. "Boeing 747." Aircraft Spotting. Retrieved: December 7, 2007.
    118. "FAA Regulatory and Guidance Library (PDF)." FAA. Retrieved: December 12, 2007. See reference to Supplementary Type Certificates for freighter conversion.
    119. Jenkins 2000, p. 40.
    120. Kane 2004, p. 534.
    121. Itabashi et al. 1995, p. 155.
    122. Bowers 1989, pp. 516–517.
    123. 1 2 Airclaims Jet Programs 1995
    124. "ANA to Retire the Boeing 747SR on March 10" Japan Corporate News Network. Retrieved: December 8, 2015.
    125. "Boeing 747-146B/SR/SUD aircraft" Archived December 15, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.,
    126. "JAL Aircraft Collection." Japan Airlines. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
    127. Airclaims Jet program 1995
    128. "Saudia Orders 4 Boeing 747's." The New York Times. Retrieved: December 12, 2007.
    129. Norris and Wagner 1997, pp. 52–53.
    130. 1 2 Airclaims Jet Programs 1995, p. 111.
    131. "The world's last 747-100 makes final flight with Iran Air". Arabian Aerospace. 22 January 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
    132. Norris and Wagner 1997, p. 71.
    133. 1 2 3 "The Story of the B747SP." Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
    134. Kane 2003, p. 546.
    135. 1 2 "747 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
    136. "Red, White And Q Farewell For Qantas Aircraft." Qantas, March 4, 2002. Retrieved: June 4, 2008.
    137. "The SOFIA Boeing 747SP." Archived November 13, 2006, at the Wayback Machine. NASA SOFIA Science Center. Retrieved: December 31, 2009.
    138. Iran Aviation Tour October 2015, 13 October 2015
    139. The last B747-SP is going to retire on 15 June, retrieved 29 May 2016
    140. "747 windows." Plexoft. Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
    141. Norris and Wagner 1997, pp. 60–61.
    142. Jenkins 2000, p. 43.
    143. "Boeing 747 – About the 747 Family." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.
    144. "Boeing 747-200." Retrieved: December 15, 2007.
    145. "Air France F-BTDG Airfleets." Airfleets. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.
    146. "747-2B3BM(SUD) Aircraft Pictures." Archived December 15, 2007, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.
    147. Jenkins 2000, pp. 46, 50–53.
    148. "747 background." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 13, 2007.
    149. "747 Classics Technical Specifications." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 6, 2007.
    150. "British Airways. (will accelerate the retirement of five 747-200s)". Air Transport World, October 10, 2001, p. 14.
    151. "Qantas (will retire its fleet of five Boeing 747-200 aircraft)." Taipei Times, November 16, 2001. Retrieved: June 4, 2008.
    152. "Boeing 747-300." Archived August 11, 2004, at the Wayback Machine.
    153. "Seven Series". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on 2010-03-28. Retrieved December 15, 2007.
    154. Jenkins 2000, p. 97.
    155. "Boeing 747-100/-200/-300/-SP airport report." (pdf) The Boeing Company, May 2011. Retrieved: September 1, 2014.
    156. "Boeing Delivers First 747-300 Special Freighter To Atlas Air". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on 2000-10-27. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
    157. "Technical Specifications – 747 Classics", The Boeing Company. Retrieved: July 11, 2008
    158. Lawrence and Thornton 2005
    159. "Seven series". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on 2010-03-28. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
    160. "Qantas's final Boeing 747-300 heads for graveyard." The Age. Retrieved: January 21, 2009.
    161. Drum, Bruce (2015-06-29). "PIA to retire its last Boeing 747 "within a month"". World Airline News. Retrieved 2016-07-17.
    162. "Assessment of Wingtip Modifications to Increase the Fuel Efficiency of Air Force Aircraft." National Academies Press, 2007, p. 33.
    163. "JAL 2007." Japan Airlines. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.
    164. 1 2 3 "747 specifications", The Boeing Company. Retrieved December 16, 2007.
    165. "Boeing 747-400 Freighter Family." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    166. "Boeing 747-400/-400ER airport report." (pdf) The Boeing Company, May 2011. Retrieved: September 1, 2014.
    167. "Japan Airlines To Receive 100th Boeing 747 Aircraft." Japan Airlines, November 19, 1998. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    168. "Queen of its time". Airliner world. August 20, 2009.
    169. "Boeing 747-400ER Family." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: October 16, 2007.
    170. "Boeing and Cathay Pacific Airways Launch 747-400 Special Freighter." The Boeing Company, January 7, 2004. Retrieved: July 18, 2015.
    171. "First 747-400 Boeing Converted Freighter Redelivered to Cathay Pacific." The Boeing Company, December 19, 2005. Retrieved: July 18, 2015.
    172. 1 2 Wallace, James. "747-400 passenger is no more.", March 17, 2007. Retrieved June 7, 2011.
    173. 1 2 "Singapore Airlines Boeing 747-400 Fleet World's Largest." The Boeing Company, October 13, 1994. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.
    174. "British Airways set for fleet revamp." The Boeing Company, August 2005. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.
    175. "British Airways Boeing 747-400". Retrieved 18 June 2013.
    176. 1 2 "Final Boeing 747 Dreamlifter Enters Service." The Boeing Company. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
    177. "Evergreen Aviation press releases." Evergreen Aviation, July 20, 2007. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    178. "Boeing 747 Large Cargo Freighter Completes First Flight." The Boeing Company, September 9, 2006.
    179. Mecham, Michael. "Boeing Puts Last Dreamlifter In Service". Aviation Week, February 16, 2010.
    180. "Boeing 747 Dreamlifter Achieves FAA Certification." The Boeing Company, June 4, 2007. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    181. Steinke, Sebastian. "Boeing launches 747-8." Flug Revue, January 2006. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
    182. "Boeing 747-8 Freighter." Deagel. Retrieved: December 8, 2007.
    183. "Boeing 747-8 Freighter Successfully Completes First Flight". The Boeing Company. Retrieved: July 15, 2011
    184. "Pictures & Video: Boeing's 747-8F lifts off on maiden flight." Flight International, February 8, 2010. Retrieved: February 9, 2010.
    185. Ostrower, Jon. "747-8F and 787 delivery dates come into focus". Air Transport Intelligence news via, August 24, 2011.
    186. Ostrower, Jon. "Boeing delivers first 747-8F"., October 12, 2011.
    187. Norris, G. "Boeing freezes the 747-8I design." Aviation Week, 2007. Retrieved: December 8, 2007.
    188. "First 747-8I Takes to the Air" AINOnline, March 20, 2011. Retrieved: March 26, 2011.
    189. Norris, Guy. "Boeing 747-8I Set For Pre-Delivery Evaluation Flights In Germany". Aviation Week, December 6, 2011. Retrieved: March 26, 2011.
    190. "Boeing C-19." Global Security. Retrieved: December 16, 2007.
    191. 1 2 "KC-33A: Closing the Aerial Refuelling and Strategic Air Mobility Gaps (PDF)." Air Power Australia Analysis APA-2005-02, April 16, 2005. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    192. Hamilton, S. "Boeing advanced 747 as tanker (PDF)." Leeham Company, September 11, 2007. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    193. "H3 airstrike". MEMIM Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on January 29, 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
    194. Jenkins, Dennis R. B-1 Lancer, The Most Complicated Warplane Ever Developed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999. ISBN 0-07-134694-5.
    195. "Investigation of a Micro-Fighter / Airborne Aircraft Carrier Concept" (PDF). Defense Technical Information Center. September 1973. Retrieved 2015-11-21.
    196. "Supplementary Type Certificate ST01912LA Installation and removal of internal tanks, associated systems and support structure for the aerial dispersant of liquids". US Federal Aviation Administration, October 27, 2006.
    197. "Boeing nets 57 new orders, including big VIP planes." Seattle Times. Retrieved: December 14, 2007.
    198. Jenkins 2000, pp. 69–71.
    199. "Boeing offers 747ASB" (PDF). Flight International. 7 June 1986. Retrieved 6 October 2012.
    200. 1 2 3 Patterson, James W. "Impact of New Large Aircraft on Airport Design (PDF)." Federal Aviation Administration, March 1998. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    201. 1 2 "Boeing 747 Celebrates 30 Years In Service." The Boeing Company, September 2, 1996. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    202. "Boeing Commits To Produce New Longer-Range 767-400ER." The Boeing Company, September 13, 2000. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    203. "Customer Symposium Highlights Future Boeing 747 Models." The Boeing Company, June 29, 2000. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    204. Morris, J. "Boeing In No Hurry to Launch 747X." Aviation Week, July 24, 2000. Retrieved: December 18, 2007.
    205. "Boeing Launches New, Longer-Range 747-400". The Boeing Company. Archived from the original on 2001-01-24. Retrieved December 17, 2007.
    206. "Boeing Offers New 747-400X Quiet Longer Range Jetliner." The Boeing Company, February 26, 2002. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    207. "GE's CF6 Engine Models Tailored For Boeing's 747-400XQLR Wide-Body." GE Aviation, March 25, 2002.
    208. Steinke, Sebastian. "Boeing Proposes 747-400X Quiet Longer Range." Flug Revue Online, May 2002. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
    209. "Recent Orders." The Boeing Company, July 2016. Retrieved: August 7, 2016.
    210. 1 2 "Orders and Deliveries search page." The Boeing Company, July 2016. Retrieved: August 7, 2016.
    211. "Boeing 747 incidents.", May 7, 2016. Retrieved: May 8, 2016.
    212. "Boeing 747 hull-loss occurrences.", May 7, 2016. Retrieved: May 8, 2016.
    213. "Boeing 747 Accident Statistics.", May 7, 2016. Retrieved: May 8, 2016.
    214. "ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-121 N656PA Karachi-Quaid-E-Azam International Airport". Retrieved May 8, 2016.
    215. "United States Updates Global Positioning System Technology.", February 3, 2006. Retrieved: January 9, 2012.
    216. "Aircraft Accident Report: In-flight Breakup Over the Atlantic Ocean Trans World Airlines Flight 800" (PDF). NTSB/AAR-00/03. National Transportation Safety Board. August 23, 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 15, 2013. Retrieved June 24, 2013.
    217. "Airlines Ordered to Cut Fuel-Tank Explosion Risk." Wall Street Journal, July 17, 2008, p. B5. Note: Cargo aircraft and smaller regional jets and commuter aircraft are not subject to this rule.
    218. "ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-258F 4X-AXG Amsterdam". Retrieved 2013-12-09.
    219. "Aircraft and Space Craft, Boeing 747–121." Museum of Flight. Retrieved: July 15, 2011.
    220. "The Blue Sky." Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    221. "Historic Aircraft Lands at Air and Space Museum." WTOP News, January 16, 2007.
    222. "Dark Roasted Blend: Abandoned Boeing 747 Restaurant (and Other Plane Conversions).", April 21, 2009. Retrieved: April 22, 2009.
    223. "Historic 747 reaches grim end in South Korea"., December 13, 2010. Retrieved: December 13, 2010.
    224. Wastnage, Justin. "James Bond Casino Royale modified Boeing 747-XXX on show ahead of movie première." Flight International, August 29, 2006. Retrieved: January 2, 2012.
    225. "747 is ‘Airbourne’". Dunsfold Park, March 2011. Retrieved January 2, 2012.
    226. “Swedish Hotel Fashioned From An Old Jumbo Jet” Tayfun King, Fast Track, BBC World News (November 23, 2008)
    227. Finighan, Adrian. "Jumbo Jet Hostel" CNN Money (February 11, 2009)
    228. Amelar, Sarah. "The 747 Wing House" Architectural Record, April 2012. Retrieved: August 21, 2012.
    229. Tuzee, Michelle. "Malibu 'Wing House' made of 747 plane parts" KABC-TV, May 17, 2011. Retrieved: August 21, 2012.
    230. Istook, Marc. "The wing house – a house made out of an old Boeing 747" Yahoo! News, March 3, 2012. Retrieved: August 21, 2012.
    231. Derringer, Jaime. "The 747 wing house" Design Milk, September 7, 2011. Retrieved: August 21, 2012.
    232. 1 2 3 4 "747-100/-200/-300/-SP" (PDF). Startup. Boeing. 2007.
    233. 1 2 "747-400" (PDF). Startup. Boeing. May 2010.
    234. "747-8 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning" (PDF). Boeing. December 2012.
    235. 1 2 "Type Certificate Data Sheet NO. A20WE" (PDF). FAA. February 27, 2015.
    236. "Premiere of Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental". Lufthansa. February 13, 2011.
    237. "Boeing 747-8 technical description & cutaway". Flight Global. 13 November 2012.
    238. Martin Bowman (2014). Boeing 747: A History. Pen and Sword.
    239. "Statistical Data for the Boeing-747-400 Aircraft in Commercial Operations" (PDF). FAA. January 2005.
    240. "Commercial aircraft of the world" (PDF). Flight International. 4 September 1991.
    241. "Boeing 747-100/200". Aircraft Technical Data & Specifications.
    242. "Boeing 747-300". Aircraft Technical Data & Specifications.
    243. "Boeing revises "obsolete" performance assumptions". FlightGlobal. 3 August 2015.
    244. "Executive Decision." Movie Ramblings. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    245. "Air Force One." Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved: December 17, 2007.
    246. "Category:Boeing 747". Retrieved April 1, 2015.
    247. "The most iconic aircraft in film history". Retrieved April 1, 2015.
    248. Haenggi 2003, p. 9.
    249. Sutter 2006, p. 279.


    • Bowers, Peter M. Boeing Aircraft Since 1916. London: Putnam Aeronautical Books, 1989. ISBN 0-85177-804-6.
    • Davies, R.E.G. Delta - An Airline and Its Aircraft: The Illustrated History of a Major U.S. Airline and the People Who Made It. McLean, VA: Paladwr Press, 1990. ISBN 0-9626483-0-2.
    • Haenggi, Michael. Boeing Widebodies. St. Paul, MN: MBI Publishing Co., 2003. ISBN 0-7603-0842-X.
    • Irving, Clive. Wide Body: The Making of the Boeing 747. Philadelphia: Coronet, 1994. ISBN 0-340-59983-9.
    • Itabashi, M., K. Kawata and S. Kusaka. "Pre-fatigued 2219-T87 and 6061-T6 aluminium alloys." Structural Failure: Technical, Legal and Insurance Aspects. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon.: Taylor & Francis, 1995. ISBN 978-0-419-20710-8.
    • Jenkins, Dennis R. Boeing 747-100/200/300/SP (AirlinerTech Series, Vol. 6). North Branch, MN: Specialty Press, 2000. ISBN 1-58007-026-4.
    • Kane, Robert M. Air Transportation: 1903–2003. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Co., 2004. ISBN 0-7575-3180-6.
    • Lawrence, Philip K. and David Weldon Thornton. Deep Stall: The Turbulent Story of Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2005, ISBN 0-7546-4626-2.
    • Norris, Guy and Mark Wagner. Boeing 747: Design and Development Since 1969. St. Paul, MN: MBI Publishing Co., 1997. ISBN 0-7603-0280-4.
    • Norton, Bill. Lockheed Martin C-5 Galaxy. North Branch, MN: Specialty Press, 2003. ISBN 1-58007-061-2.
    • Orlebar, Christopher. The Concorde Story. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, Fifth edition, 2002. ISBN 1-85532-667-1.
    • Sutter, Joe. 747: Creating the World's First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, 2006. ISBN 978-0-06-088241-9.

    Further reading

    External links

    Wikimedia Commons has media related to Boeing 747.

    This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/3/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.